The Aura is Hyundai’s contender for the compact sedan segment, rivalling the likes of the Maruti Suzuki Dzire, Honda Amaze, and Tata Tigor. If you’re planning to bring home a Hyundai Aura, we’ve listed its most prominent strengths and weaknesses below.
Pros
Well-built interior
Step inside the Aura and you’ll be impressed with its bright colour scheme and excellent fit-and-finish. The central dashboard trim and centre console surround are decked out in a copper colour, which lends the front end of the cabin a unique look, and the leather-wrapped steering wheel and gear knob in higher trims do well to add a premium touch.
Smooth and refined engine
Under the bonnet, the Aura packs a sole 1.2-litre 4-cylinder naturally aspirated engine that can be had in either 83hp petrol or 69hp CNG guise. Gearbox options comprise a 5-speed manual and 5-speed AMT for the petrol, while the CNG gets only the former transmission.
As mentioned in our review of the Aura, the petrol-MT powertrain feels quite smooth and refined. It responds well to part-throttle inputs and effortlessly keeps up with traffic. That said, the Aura is best-suited to easygoing urban commuting, as performance is neither brisk nor exciting.
Easy to drive
In addition to its refined engine, the Aura has a very smooth and light steering feel, an absorbent ride, and a slick-shifting manual gearbox with a light clutch. Not to mention, the Aura’s relatively compact footprint makes it easy to manoeuvre in city traffic and on tight roads.
Cons
Falls short on cabin space
Though the Aura’s rear seat offers ample legroom, the narrow width of the car makes the bench best-suited for two adults only. The front seats aren’t the most comfortable either, as the cushioning is a tad too firm, the head restraints are not adjustable, and taller occupants with broader frames may find them too narrow.
Lacks some creature comforts
The Aura comes packed with much of the safety and convenience kit you need, but misses out on a lot of the nice-to-haves offered by rivals like the Dzire and Amaze. Specifically, the Aura doesn’t get a sunroof, a 360-degree camera, ADAS, built-in wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, paddle shifters (for AMT), and connected car tech.
When introduced originally, the Lamborghini Urus rewrote the playbook of what an SUV could be. Sharp to look at, ferociously fast and with a mighty V8 soundtrack, the Urus has become the benchmark of performance SUVs. Now though, thanks to ever tightening regulations, the Urus has had to pivot to hybridisation. But has that diluted the experience? We got behind the wheel of the Lamborghini Urus SE to answer that question.
Lamborghini Urus SE Exterior Design and Engineering – 9/10
Urus SE has a more rounded-off design than its predecessor, but it’s no less menacing.
In comparison to the older Urus and the mad Urus Performante, the Urus SE does appear a bit softer and more rounded off. But that’s not to say it lacks presence by any means. It’s still full of sharp angles and surfaces, the Arancio Borealis optional paint on our test car looked stunning as did the diamond-cut, multi-spoke 23-inch alloy wheels. Up front, there’s a new bonnet, redesigned bumper and a larger front grille, while the slimmer headlights are now matrix LED units and a different DRL signature.
Rear end features quad-exhaust setup, sporty raked roofline, and a hexagon-patterned grille connecting the tail-lights.
The differences are immediately apparent at the rear too, with a new tailgate, rear bumper and a connecting tail-light grille. As always, Lamborghini’s Ad Personam personalisation programme offers an enormous scope for customisation, so buyers can tailor the Urus SE as per their needs. It remains a substantial machine, measuring 5.12m long and 2.02m wide, with a 3m wheelbase. Kerb weight is a hefty 2,505kg, which makes the fact that it can sprint from 0-100kph in just 3.4sec all the more impressive.
Lamborghini Urus SE Interior Space and Comfort – 8/10
Dashboard layout is premium and feature-loaded, and gets a lot of Lamborghini theatrics.
Inside, the Urus SE retains the familiar Lamborghini approach of combining the ambience of a supercar with the practicality expected of an SUV. However, the changes here are less apparent than those on the outside. The centre console is ever so slightly redesigned with a new array of toggle switches under the touchscreen. The touchscreen itself is larger than the earlier Urus, with updated graphics and a slicker user interface.
Lamborghini’s signature flip-up engine start/stop button is inspired by those of fighter jets.
There’s plenty of visual theatre, too, and it looks just as extroverted as the outside. Standout elements include the hexagonal AC vents, the Lamborghini badging on the dashboard, the aircraft-style levers for the drive modes and of course, the fighter-jet inspired flap-up engine start/stop button. Lamborghini has also introduced new colour and trim combinations with the SE, with our test car featuring the same predominantly orange theme as on the outside.
Rear space is surprisingly plentiful given the Urus SE’s sporty proclivities.
Despite all the drama, this remains a practical SUV. The long wheelbase means there’s plenty of legroom at the rear and it’s wide enough for three too, though taller passengers may find headroom a bit tight thanks to the tapering roofline. The front seats are large, well padded and the optional Lamborghini crest on the headrests just adds to the ambience. The glovebox is decent sized, there’s cupholders and the boot offers 454 litres of capacity.
Lamborghini Urus SE Features and Safety – 8/10
Info-packed driver’s display interface can get confusing at times.
As standard, the Urus SE gets plenty of features like the three screen setup – for the infotainment, AC system and driver’s display – wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, LED matrix headlamps, four-zone auto climate control, leather upholstery, 360-degree camera, connected car tech and so much more.
The SE also gets a comprehensive technology upgrade, with the new user interface being one of the more significant updates. It features a carousel-style layout on the touchscreen to access the numerous sub-menus it packs in, while the driver’s display shows all sorts of data pertaining to the hybrid system, navigation, media and other car-related info. Navigating all the sub-menus can get confusing, however.
New Lamborghini Telemetry function comes with over 300 pre-loaded racetracks to record lap times on.
There’s also ‘Lamborghini Telemetry’ that can display lap times and sector information for more than 300 preloaded circuits, as well as record new tracks. Connected services extend to navigation, real-time traffic, remote locking, vehicle-status information, remote charging, remote cooling of the cabin and various safety and security alerts.
Also part of the package is ADAS tech like autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control and more. But there’s a lot that’s optional too, like a large panoramic sunroof, a Bang and Olufsen 3D audio system and a whole lot more, apart from the usual trim, material and stitching options. On the whole, the Urus SE is well-equipped but some of the optional extras really could have been standard fitment given the asking price.
Lamborghini Urus SE Performance and Refinement – 9/10
Twin-turbo V8 and electric motor develop a combined 800hp and 950Nm.
As for the numbers, they are, predictably, staggering. The Urus SE combines the familiar 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 with a 25.9kWh lithium-ion battery and a permanent-magnet synchronous electric motor for an eye-watering combined output of 800hp and 950Nm. The result is 0-100kph in 3.4sec and 0-200kph in 11.2sec, with a claimed top speed of 312kph. Those figures put the Urus SE firmly in supercar territory, despite its size and weight.
And it does feel like one from behind the wheel too, especially in a straight line. Acceleration is relentless and it feels borderline scary on narrow, two-lane roads. The Urus SE always feels like it has power in reserve, especially when you’ve got the powertrain fully dialled up. There’s Strada mode for everyday driving, Sport for when you want to have a bit more fun and of course, Corsa for when you want a proper scare. Couple that with the hybrid system in its full performance mode, and the SE can really feel overwhelming. But if you don’t drive with a heavy foot, it’s surprisingly cordial and sedate. The SE really has a Jekyll and Hyde character about it.
Unrelenting acceleration can get scary on public roads.
What makes the SE more interesting than simply being a faster Urus is the way the electric motor has been integrated. Of course, it’s to help with emissions and meet regulations, but it’s also to boost performance. In EV mode, it can reach up to 135kph and go as far as 66km. But with a flick of a switch, it can turn from silent to violent.
The V8 also hasn’t become anonymous with the hybridisation. It still makes its presence felt, especially through the optional Akrapovic exhaust our car came fitted with, but it does feel a bit subdued. It’s also piped through the speakers, which doesn’t feel entirely ethical but it does help its case.
Optional Akrapovic exhaust system helps enhance the V8’s aural character.
Lamborghini has also paid considerable attention to keeping performance consistent, with additional cooling for the powertrain and brakes. Not that we ever managed to push it so hard to test out that claim. And apart from the aforementioned drive modes, there’s even some off-road modes baked in, but how many buyers actually take their prized possession off the grippy stuff remains to be seen.
Lamborghini Urus SE Mileage and Efficiency – 7/10
This is where the Urus SE’s plug-in hybrid system makes a big difference. Lamborghini quotes a WLTP combined energy consumption of 4.67km/kWh plus 17.54kpl. With a discharged battery, however, combined claimed fuel efficiency falls to 7.75kpl.
Thanks to the 25.9kWh battery, the Urus SE claims a 66km all-electric range.
The headline figure therefore needs some context. The SE’s efficiency advantage is greatest when the battery is regularly topped up. With a claimed 66km of EV range, many shorter daily journeys can theoretically be completed without the V8 needing to fire up at all.
For longer journeys, the hybrid system allows the electric motor and V8 to share the workload. But once the battery is depleted, this remains a 2.5-tonne SUV with a twin-turbo V8, so expectations of conventional-SUV fuel economy would be unrealistic.
Lamborghini Urus SE Ride Comfort and Handling – 8/10
Ride isn’t all that absorbent due to the low-profile Pirelli P Zero tyres.
The Urus SE uses a multilink suspension setup front and rear with semi-active dampers, all of which make this large SUV feel engaging around corners without sacrificing comfort. There is a sense of pliancy at low speeds with the ride firming up as speeds rise. Of course, riding on 23-inch wheels means you can feel potholes and road imperfections, but still it isn’t uncomfortable by any means.
Rear-wheel steering, semi-active dampers, e-diff, and torque vectoring help make the Urus SE a keen handler.
It also gets rear-wheel steering, which helps make it more manageable at lower speeds while contributing to agility at higher speeds. The SE feels eager to change direction and the e-diff and clever torque vectoring system do their best to keep things tidy around bends. You also get a good sensation from the steering which has good heft to it and the Pirelli P Zero tyres it comes with are grippy too. Lamborghini has also worked on the aerodynamics, with a new rear aero lip and diffuser increasing rear downforce by 35 percent over the Urus S. Overall though, the SE feels agile enough but there’s no escaping its heavy kerb weight.
Giant carbon-ceramic brakes peek out from behind the 23-inch alloys.
You’re also backed by massive carbon-ceramic brakes, measuring 440mm at the front and 410mm at the rear, and they do take some time getting used to. They may not have the initial bite like with conventional steel brakes, but the stopping power is immense and they stay consistent despite repeated hard braking, which is essential in something as big and powerful as the Urus SE.
Lamborghini Urus SE Value for Money – 7/10
The Urus SE is arguably the most convincing expression yet of Lamborghini’s super-SUV. More importantly, it hasn’t sacrificed the characteristics that make a Lamborghini feel special in the pursuit of meeting ever tightening restrictions. There’s still a V8, it’s still outlandish inside and out, and it still delivers a driving experience that goes well beyond what you’d expect from something this large. All of that while adding the benefit of the plug-in hybrid system for performance and efficiency, as well as properly usable EV range.
The Urus SE is the all-in-one Lamborghini.
At Rs 4.47 crore (ex-showroom, before options), of course, the Urus SE is expensive. But that’s almost beside the point. The Urus SE isn’t for those who expect rational value; it is for those who want a vehicle that can combine supercar pace, SUV practicality, luxury, all-electric driving and aspirational brand value all in one package. As a technological statement and a performance SUV then, the Urus SE makes a compelling case for Lamborghini’s hybrid future.
Okay, first, a clarification: that’s not me hooning around in the Audi Q3 Sportback. That’s a certain Mr Saumil Shah, who borrowed the car from me for ‘work’ – in the biggest air quotes imaginable.
The Q3 Sportback was the support car for our Lamborghini Sterrato shoot at Nanoli Speedway. And, naturally, a muddy track with acres of runoff was an opportunity that proved far too tempting for him to resist. Fun cars do have a way of making you do slightly silly things when the right opportunity presents itself. And I’d definitely put the Audi Q3 in that category. It’s got a peppy engine, neat handling and even good ground clearance, all wrapped within a compact footprint. As someone who loves smaller cars, the Q3 is right up my alley.
It might not look cutting-edge, but buttons and knobs make the dash very user-friendly.
I’ll admit, life with a luxury car can be a little stressful on Mumbai’s congested roads, where you’re sharing whatever road space is left after all the construction with cars, bikes, battle-hardened buses and everything in between. But the Q3 takes a lot of that stress away. The small size and elevated seating make it very easy to place, and what makes things more relaxing still is the excellent noise insulation. It’s no EV (the engine does get vocal in a good way when rushed), but the Q3 does cut out a lot of the cacophony outside. Another highlight on the Q3 is ride comfort. It makes light work of bad roads with the chunky tyres taking up a lot of the initial impact. Just wish the Q3 got snazzier wheels. The boring alloys undo much of the glamour of the Sportback’s SUV-coupé shape. Gun to my head, I’d still take the standard Q3 with its more conventional derriere.
The Sportback has its fans, but I’d have the conventional Q3.
In cars with ADAS, my SOP is to first check if auto-braking functions are off. The Q3 doesn’t have ADAS, but I do still have a pre-flight check. And that is to ensure Automatic Parking Sensor Activation is turned off. The Q3’s overly sensitive proximity sensors seem to react to absolutely everything around the car and the constant beeping can get alarming in heavy traffic. Of course, connecting my phone via a wire is also a requirement because there’s no wireless connectivity in the Audi.
Constant warnings from over-sensitive proximity sensors an irritant. Best kept off in traffic.
Thing is, I don’t want to overplay these small irritants. Because, in the big picture, the Q3 remains a charming option for buyers looking for an entry luxury car. More so now with some great deals going on the model as it makes way for the next-gen Q3 that comes later this year. Having lived with one, I know I won’t get bored of this Q3 for a long time to come. Heck, maybe I need to scout around for a good deal myself.
While both models here are hybrids and have 7 seats across three rows, they offer different hybrid technologies. With the ADAPT platform-based JSW MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV, India has its first-ever mass-market plug-in hybrid vehicle making its entry in the hugely popular SUV segment. On the other hand, the TNGA-C platform-based Toyota Innova Hycross is an MPV and offers a strong-hybrid powertrain. Here’s how they stack up in their fully loaded trims.
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Dimensions
The Innova Hycross is larger and offers a slightly bigger boot with all seats in place
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) dimensions
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV
Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid
Length (mm)
4,745
4,755
Width (mm)
1,850
1,850
Height (mm)
1,770
1,790
Wheelbase (mm)
2,810
2,850
Boot space (litres)
192
239
Wheel size (inches)
18
18
The Innova Hycross Hybrid is 10mm longer and 20mm taller than the Hector Tomahawk PHEV. The Toyota MPV also has a wheelbase that’s longer by 40mm, while both cars have identical width figures and sport 18-inch alloy wheels in their top-spec trims. The Innova Hycross Hybrid’s luggage capacity with the third row in place is greater by 47 litres. One of the factors limiting the outright cargo volume of the Hector Tomahawk PHEV is its more space-consuming plug-in hybrid tech.
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Powertrain
The plug-in hybrid powertrain of the MG SUV is more fuel-efficient and offers more power
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) powertrain options
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV
Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid
Engine
1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol
2.0-litre naturally aspirated petrol
Battery size
20.5kWh
1.6kWh
Electric motor type
Permanent magnet synchronous motor
Permanent magnet synchronous motor
Drive configuration
FWD
FWD
Total system output
198hp, 230Nm
184hp, 188Nm
Transmission
DHT
eCVT
0-100kph
9.0 seconds
10.69 seconds*
Claimed mileage
50kpl
22.16kpl
Fuel tank
52 litres
52 litres
AC charging
7.5 hrs at 3.3kW (10-100%)
–
DC fast charging
35 mins at 25kW (30-80%)
–
*Autocar India-tested 0-100kph time.
The strong hybrid powertrain of the Toyota Innova Hycross offers a couple of drive modes – including pure-electric and engine + electric. However, its compact nickel metal hydride (NiMH) battery means that the EV mode of the Innova Hycross Hybrid is understandably more limited than the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV’s, requiring the 2.0-litre petrol engine to step in more often.
The claimed mileage figure of the Innova Hycross Hybrid is 27.84kpl worse than the MG plug-in hybrid SUV, and despite the same fuel tank size, the former’s combined range tops out at around 800km, as per our real-world test of the Toyota MPV. Meanwhile, the plug-in hybrid system of the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV offers more flexibility and comes with four main drive modes. The larger 20.5kWh battery pack and 1.5-litre engine allow for a combined claimed range of over 1,100km.
The Hector Tomahawk PHEV not only offers a claimed pure-electric range of over 115km, but it can also have the engine charging the battery pack while the electric motor drives the front wheels. This is a drive mode that isn’t offered with the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid. To extract the highest possible efficiency from its hybrid system, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV needs to be plugged in to an AC or a DC charger in order to fully top up its battery pack.
Depending on the battery’s SoC, both cars can rely entirely on their petrol engine to drive the wheels. Compared to the Innova Hycross Hybrid’s e-CVT (electronically controlled continuously variable transmission), the Hector Tomahawk PHEV gets a DHT (Dedicated Hybrid Transmission) with an e-clutch. The combined output of the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV is 14hp and 42Nm more than what the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid offers.
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Exterior features
Different body styles aside, both cars are similarly equipped on the outside
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) exterior features
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV
Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid
Auto LED headlamps
Yes
Yes
LED DRLs
Yes
Yes
Backlit logo
Yes
No
Sequential turn signals
Yes
Yes
Front fog lamps
No
Yes (LED)
Rear fog lamps
Yes (LED)
No
Welcome lights
No
Yes
Powered ORVMs
Yes (with auto-fold function)
Yes (with auto-fold function)
Body cladding
Yes
No
Roof rails
Yes
No
Rear spoiler
Yes
Yes
Powered tailgate
Yes
Yes
Radio antenna
Windscreen-integrated
Sharkfin
Colours
Mono-tone and dual-tone
Mono-tone
The MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV is offered in two dual-tone colour options and six mono-tone shades, including a couple of bolder choices. The Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid is restricted to six simpler-looking colours. The SUV body style aside, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV also sports a backlit ‘MG’ logo up front plus prominent roof rails and body cladding.
Where the Innova Hycross Hybrid gets the traditional sharkfin radio antenna, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV has its antenna embedded in the windscreen. The Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid gets front LED fog lamps, whilst the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV features rear LED fog lamps. While the top-spec trims of both cars get automatic LED headlamps and sequential turn indicators, it’s only the Toyota that offers ‘welcome’ lights.
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Interior features
The Hector Tomahawk PHEV offers even more modern on-board tech than the Hycross
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) interior features
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV
Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid
Infotainment screen
15.6-inch (with swipe gestures)
10.1-inch
Digital driver’s display
8.8-inch
7.0-inch MID
Panoramic sunroof
Yes (dual-pane)
Yes (dual-pane)
Steering adjustment
Tilt & telescopic
Tilt & telescopic
Driver’s seat adjustment
6-way powered
8-way powered
Memory powered
Yes (with ‘retreat’ function)
Yes
Co-driver’s seat adjustment
4-way powered
4-way manual
Sliding & reclining second row
Yes
Yes (powered ottoman seats)
Split rear seats
Yes (second & third rows)
Yes (second & third rows)
Ventilated front seats
Yes
Yes
Leatherette upholstery
Yes
Yes
Rear sunblinds
Yes
Yes
Rear armrest
Yes (with cupholders)
Yes (individual armrests)
Wireless charger
Yes (50W)
No
Automatic climate control
Yes (dual-zone)
Yes (single-zone)
Ambient lighting
Yes (256 colours)
Yes (single-colour)
Audio system
10-speaker Infinity
9-speaker JBL
Wireless Apple CarPlay & Android Auto
Yes
Yes (CarPlay only)
USB ports
Yes (5 ports)
Yes (4 ports)
Connected car tech
Yes
Yes
Voice assistant
Yes (AI-powered & multilingual)
Yes
OTA updates
Yes
No
Multi-app support
Yes
No
The infotainment features of the top-spec MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV are more comprehensive. It comes with a larger touchscreen that supports swipe-gesture functionalities, along with an AI-powered voice assistant with six languages supported. MG’s tie-up with Jio means that there are plenty of apps offered – including gaming, streaming and more. The Hector Tomahawk PHEV also offers OTA software updates, wireless connectivity for both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and a built-in 50-watt wireless charger.
The MG SUV’s convenience features further include a more comprehensive 256-colour ambient lighting system, a fully digital instrument panel, dual-zone AC, a powered front passenger seat, a ‘retreat’ function for the driver’s seat when the door is opened, armrest-integrated cupholders for the second row, and an additional USB port over the top-spec Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid.
However, the latter offers individual & powered captain chairs for the second row with a fold-away ottoman function. The 7-seat capability of the Innova Hycross comes by way of a three-seat third bench. The minimalist interior of the Hector Tomahawk PHEV looks modern but the increased reliance on the touchscreen can come in the way of everyday usability, especially while on the move. The Innova Hycross Hybrid’s interior, meanwhile, offers plenty of physical switchgear that are much easier to use.
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Safety features
Both cars are relatively well-equipped on the safety front
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) safety features
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV
Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid
Airbags
6
6
ABS with EBD
Yes
Yes
Electronic stability program
Yes
Yes
Traction control system
Yes
No
Hill-hold assist
Yes
Yes
TPMS
Yes
Yes
Parking sensors
Yes (front & rear)
Yes (front & rear)
360-degree camera
Yes
Yes
Electronic parking brake
Yes (with auto-hold function)
Yes (with auto-hold function)
Auto-dimming IRVM
Yes
Yes
Rain-sensing wipers
Yes
No
ISOFIX
Yes
Yes
Rear wiper and defogger
Yes
Yes
All-wheel disc brakes
Yes
Yes
ADAS
Yes
Yes
The fully loaded trims of both these cars offer all the basic passive and active safety aids that buyers at this price bracket expect. While both come with ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems), it’s the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV that packs in more features within its ADAS suite. Its adaptive cruise control aid integrates Bend Cruise Assistance (BCA), which slows down the vehicle when approaching corners. There’s also Traffic Jam Assist, which works alongside other active lane-keeping measures.
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Other features
The MG SUV adds a few nice-to-have features over the equivalent Innova Hycross
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) other features
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV
Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid
Drive modes
Yes (4)
Yes (3)
Paddle shifters
No
Yes
V2V and V2L
Yes
No
The MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV offers Eco, Normal, Sports and Custom drive modes, whereas the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid gets Eco, Normal and Power – one less than the MG. The latter also lacks Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle to Load (V2L) functionalities that are available with the Hector Tomahawk PHEV.
Conclusion
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) prices
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV
Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid
Prices (In Rs, lakh)
27.79
31.84
While the prices of the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV are currently introductory, the delta between the two cars here is steep. The top-spec Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) is priced Rs 4.05 lakh more than fully loaded Essence trim of the MG plug-in hybrid SUV. Its affordability factor notwithstanding, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence trim gets a more comprehensive & punchier hybrid powertrain that offers better mileage, along with a better-finished and more premium-looking interior. Moreover, if you prefer an SUV body style, the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV would be worth a serious look.
The Maruti Brezza and Tata Nexon are among the bestselling compact SUVs in the Indian market. While the former received a comprehensive update that introduced cosmetic changes, more features and a powerful new turbo-petrol engine, the latter continues to attract consumers with a wide choice of powertrains. If you are looking to buy a compact SUV, we compare the Brezza’s top-spec ZXi+ trim and the Nexon Fearless+ PS to find out which offers better value for money.
Explore full specs, features and a price breakdown in our Brezza vs Nexon comparison.
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Dimensions
Brezza is taller, while Nexon has a bigger boot
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Dimensions
Maruti Brezza
Tata Nexon
Difference
Length (mm)
3,995
3,995
–
Width (mm)
1,790
1,804
-14
Height (mm)
1,685
1,620
+65
Wheelbase (mm)
2,500
2,498
+2
Ground clearance (mm)
198
208
-10
Boot space (litres)
328
382
-54
Only the length of both models is identical. Beyond that, the Brezza is taller and has a slightly longer wheelbase than the Nexon. On the other hand, the Nexon is wider, rides higher off the ground and has a larger boot.
The Brezza ZXi+ is available only with the naturally aspirated petrol automatic and turbo-petrol manual powertrains. On the other hand, the Nexon Fearless+ PS offers a wide range of options: a turbo-petrol manual and automatic, a diesel manual and automatic, and a CNG manual. As for their turbo-petrol engines, the torque is identical, but the Nexon’s larger mill delivers more power.
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Exterior features
Nexon offers some feel-good features like welcome/goodbye animations
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Exterior features
Maruti Brezza
Tata Nexon
Headlights
LED projector
LED projector
Tail-lights
LED
Connected LED
Welcome/goodbye animations
No
Yes
Sequential turn indicators
No
Yes
Daytime running lamps (DRLs)
Yes
Yes
Fog lamps
LED
LED
Wheels
16-inch
16-inch
Outside rearview mirrors (ORVMs)
Electrically adjustable, auto-folding
Electrically adjustable, auto-folding
Roof rails
Yes
Yes
Rear wiper, washer
Yes
Yes
Colour options
Monotone and dual-tone
Dual-tone
Both the Brezza and Nexon are similarly equipped on the exterior, with LED light setups, DRLs, fog lamps, electrically adjustable and auto-folding ORVMs and 16-inch alloy wheels. However, the Nexon gets some fancier features such as welcome/goodbye animations for the light setups, along with sequential turn indicators. As for colour options, the Nexon is limited to dual-tone schemes, whereas the Brezza offers monotone options as well.
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Interior features
Brezza not as well equipped as Nexon
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Interior features
Maruti Brezza
Tata Nexon
Instrument cluster
Analogue dials with MID
10.25-inch display
Infotainment screen
10.1-inch
10.25-inch
Head-up display
Yes
No
Android Auto, Apple CarPlay
Wireless
Wireless
Sunroof
Single-pane
Panoramic
Audio system
6-speaker Arkamys Surround Sense
9-speaker JBL
Climate control
Automatic
Automatic
Rear AC vents
Yes
Yes
Driver seat adjustment
Manual
Manual
Front seat ventilation
Yes
Yes
Seat upholstery
Leatherette
Leatherette
Wireless phone charger
Yes
Yes
Air purifier
Yes
Yes
Connected car tech
Yes
Yes
Rear centre armrest
Yes
Yes
Rear sunshade
No
Yes
Ambient lighting
64-colour
No
60:40 split folding seat
Yes
Yes
Apart from multi-colour ambient lighting and a head-up display, the Brezza’s overall interior equipment falls short of the Nexon’s. The latter comes packed with features such as a digital driver’s display as opposed to analogue dials on the former, a panoramic sunroof, a slightly larger infotainment screen, more speakers and rear window sunshades.
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Driving tech
Brezza misses out on drive modes
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Driving tech
Maruti Brezza
Tata Nexon
Drive modes
No
Eco, City and Sport
Paddleshifters
Yes
Yes
Cruise control
Yes
Yes
While paddleshifters and cruise control are available on both models, drive modes are offered only with the Nexon.
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Safety features
Brezza comes equipped with more advanced safety tech
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Safety features
Maruti Brezza
Tata Nexon
BNCAP rating
5 stars
5 stars
Blind-spot warning
Yes
No
Safe-exit warning
Yes
No
Rear cross-traffic alert
Yes
No
Airbags
6
6
Camera setup
360-degree
360-degree
Parking sensors
Front and rear
Front and rear
Disc brakes
Front only
Front only
Tyre-pressure monitoring system
Yes
Yes
Interior rearview mirror (IRVM)
Auto-dimming
Auto-dimming
Hill-hold assist
Yes
Yes
ESC
Yes
Yes
Both the Brezza and Nexon have achieved a 5-star BNCAP crash-safety rating and are equally matched in terms of offering a basic safety kit, along with features such as a 360-degree camera and front parking sensor. But only the former comes with advanced safety systems such as rear cross-traffic alert and blind-spot and safe-exit warnings.
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Price and verdict
Brezza’s more affordable, but Nexon’s powertrain range is hard to ignore
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Prices
Maruti Brezza
Tata Nexon
NA petrol AT
13.54
–
Turbo petrol MT
11.16
12.34
Turbo petrol AT
–
12.55
Turbo diesel MT
–
13.45
Turbo diesel AMT
–
14.10
CNG MT
–
13.30
Comparing only the turbo-petrol manual powertrain, which is common to both, the Brezza is Rs 1.18 lakh more affordable than the Nexon. Notably, the Brezza ZXi+ NA petrol automatic costs almost a lakh rupees more than the Nexon Fearless+ PS turbo-petrol automatic. This is due to the higher tax on the 1.5-litre unit powering the Brezza. Moreover, the Nexon has a Fearless+ A PS trim that sits above the Fearless+ PS trim and brings Level 2 ADAS, but it is limited to the turbo-petrol automatic.
When it comes to choosing between the two, we’d recommend the Tata Nexon. Though the Brezza’s ZXi+ trim starts at a more affordable price point and is backed by Maruti’s widespread and hassle-free service experience, the Nexon’s multiple powertrain options are simply hard to ignore. Additionally, the Tata comes with more bells and whistles than the Maruti, and that’s why it’s our pick.
The Honda Rebel 300 is the first model in the Rebel family to be manufactured locally and acts as the brand’s most accessible cruiser motorcycle here. Built around a bobber-style design with a teardrop fuel tank, round LED headlamp and short exhaust, it is sold exclusively through Honda BigWing dealerships. Here are answers to some of the most commonly asked questions about it.
What is the price of the Honda Rebel 300?
The Honda Rebel 300 is available in two variants. The Standard variant is priced at Rs 2.22 lakh and the E-Clutch variant at Rs 2.62 lakh – a Rs 40,000 premium for the automated clutch system. At Rs 2.22 lakh, the Standard variant undercuts the Royal Enfield Goan Classic 350 (Rs 2.25-2.28 lakh, ex-showroom, Chennai), one of the few other bobber-styled motorcycles currently on sale in India.
What engine does the Honda Rebel 300 use?
The Honda Rebel 300 is powered by a 286cc single-cylinder, liquid-cooled engine producing 30hp and 27.5Nm of torque, paired with a 6-speed gearbox. This is the same engine that powered the CB300R previously sold in our market.
What features does the Honda Rebel 300 have?
Both variants of the Rebel 300 get a circular TFT instrument display with Honda RoadSync connectivity and turn-by-turn navigation, full LED lighting and dual-channel ABS. The E-Clutch variant additionally allows the rider to configure the clutch system via the TFT display.
What is the Honda Rebel 300 E-Clutch and how does it work?
Honda’s E-Clutch is an electronically automated clutch system that uses actuators to operate the clutch automatically, allowing the rider to change gears without using the clutch lever. It does not make the Rebel 300 a fully automatic motorcycle, as the rider still selects gears manually using the gear lever. However, the system handles clutch engagement and disengagement on its own.
Importantly, the clutch lever is retained and can be used manually whenever the rider chooses. The system is designed to reduce rider fatigue in stop-and-go traffic while making the bike more accessible for those who find operating a clutch lever demanding.
What is the seat height and weight of the Honda Rebel 300?
The Honda Rebel 300 has a seat height of 690mm, making it one of the lowest motorcycles currently on sale in our market. This uld make it exceptionally accessible for a wide range of riders. The upright handlebar and forward-set footpegs complement the low t to create a relaxed, unhurried riding position. Kerb weight is 172kg and fuel tank capacity is 11 litres.
With the discontinuation of the N125 in India, the Pulsar 125 had gained attention back as the entry-level Pulsar model and Bajaj has just revamped it from the ground-up. Some of the obvious upgrades are to the engine, frame, and suspension. However, with the line-up expanding to four variants from two earlier, what exactly sets the new Pulsar 125 apart from the old? Let’s find out.
Note: At the time of writing, Bajaj hasn’t shared the exact dimensions and kerb weight for the new Pulsar 125 so this comparison skips that. We’ll update the story once we get those details.
Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Engine
More power and torque at the same points in the rev range
New Bajaj Pulsar 125
Old Bajaj Pulsar 125
Engine
124.58cc single-cylinder, air-cooled
124.38cc single-cylinder, air-cooled
Power
12.1hp at 8,500rpm
11.8hp at 8,500rpm
Torque
11.4Nm at 6,500rpm
10.8Nm at 6,500rpm
Transmission
5-speed
5-speed
Similar to the all-new Pulsar 150, the new Pulsar 125’s engine also looks similar to the outgoing one at first glance, but that’s not the case. The cubic capacity on the new engine has increased by two-tenths and Bajaj has extracted marginally more power and torque delivered at similar rpm as before. Bajaj also claims that 80 percent of the torque is available from 3,000rpm onwards. On paper, it’s easy to dismiss this improvement as minuscule, but it bodes well with Bajaj’s placement of the 125 as an easy city commuter.
Unlike the new Pulsar 150’s oil-cooled engine, the 125 sticks to an air-cooled unit. Transmission also remains 5-speed, but Bajaj claims an upgraded gearbox for low end tractability. The power-to-weight ratio has supposedly improved, and Bajaj says acceleration has as well, but we’ll have to wait until we put the bike through our tests to confirm so.
Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Chassis, headlight, and suspension
Chassis and suspension see major changes
Keeping in line with the all-new theme, Bajaj has also changed the chassis and the suspension setup on the new Pulsar 125. The existing dual-cradle frame has been swapped for a single-cradle or diamond frame with the engine now acting as a stressed member. Bajaj says the change enables the Pulsar 125 to have greater stiffness, enabling better handling and stability.
Though the fork is still a right side up (RSU) telescopic unit, the new Pulsar 125 upgrades the diameter by 1mm to 31mm, but with a 10mm shorter 125mm travel. The rear suspension has also seen improvements with the familiar twin-shock setup being swapped for a monoshock unit and the travel has been increased by 8mm to 110mm. Bajaj attributes greater stability in straight lines and corners on the new Pulsar 125 to the brand-new monoshock setup.
The lighting setup has also been changed, although by a tiny amount. While the headlight and taillight continue to be LED across the board, Bajaj has slightly redesigned the fairing on the new Pulsar 125. Out of the four variants, the LED indicators and hazard lights are only available on the top three variants; only the top-most variant gets a belly pan as standard.
While the tyre sizes remain unchanged on the new Pulsar 125, Bajaj has increased the front disc size on the top three variants. ABS in any form continues to be missing, with the motorcycle offering Combined Braking System (CBS) as standard instead.
Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Features
TFT Cluster and ride modes are major upgrades
The biggest feature addition to the new Pulsar 125 starts with what you’ll see on every ride, the instrument cluster. The base variant now gets a 5-inch LCD cluster, the mid and top variants getting a 5-inch TFT cluster. Connected features like music control and call and SMS alerts are common to all four variants—thanks to the standard Bluetooth—though WiFi is limited to the top variant. Thanks to WiFi, the top variant alone gets Google Maps mirroring for navigation, whereas the others have turn-by-turn navigation.
The TFT cluster can also store important documents like licence and RC for quick access. To charge up your devices on the go, the new Pulsar 125 gives you a USB type-C port, an upgrade to the previous version’s USB type-A port. However, it’s a paid extra on the base variant. What’s standard on all variants are the three ride modes, Road, Rain, and Sport. In order to make city riding easier still, the new Pulsar 125 also gets crawl tech and ISG (Integrated Starter Generator). The former makes stop-and-go traffic easier to handle; whereas the latter, available on the top three variants, gives you silent start and a stop-start system to conserve fuel.
Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Price
New 125’s noticeably more expensive
New Bajaj Pulsar 125
Old Bajaj Pulsar 125
Price (ex-showroom, Delhi)
Rs 92,900 – Rs 1.04 lakh
Rs 81,556 – Rs 94,518
With all the new changes and features, the new Pulsar 125 starts at Rs 92,900 for the base variant and goes up to Rs 1.04 lakh for the top variant, cracking the one lakh mark. That’s a steep increase over the outgoing model’s price range. The new Pulsar 125 does make forward strides in almost every area, but we’ll have to wait until we ride the bike to comment on whether the changes justify the unmissable premium.
Appears to have a 19 front-17 rear tubed spoke wheels
Spotted testing with Pirelli MT60 tyres
Most likely to launch in LatAm markets first
Proper dual-sport design
With an up-swept exhaust and a tall stance
This image gives us a detailed look at a few important things on the motorcycle. We can see a TFT instrument cluster that appears similar to the unit that debuted on the Pulsar N160 S and SS, supporting Google Maps mirroring on the latter. The next detail we can see is the multi-functional switch cube on the left side of the handlebar, presumably to access and navigate through the features the motorcycle will offer. For perspective, some of the brand’s more recent launches like the N160 SS come with modern day features like ride-by-wire which enables rider aids like three ride modes, traction control, and a new crawl function to make riding in traffic easier, and we could see those features on this upcoming dual sport as well.
Being an adventure motorcycle, it understandably has long travel suspension, although exact details are unknown at the moment. The other noteworthy thing is that the motorcycle appears to sport Pirelli MT 60 tyres, but it’ll likely wear different tyres in India to keep the prices affordable. Engine details are still unknown, but as we’d reported earlier it’ll likely be sub-300cc.
The Indian off-road motorcycle market has popular choices like the Hero Xpulse 210 and the Kawasaki KLX230, as well as the KTM 390 Enduro R in the 400cc class. We also have the upcoming Honda XR300 L and XR300 Rally. In an interview with Brazilian media, Bajaj’s Executive Director for the country, Waldyr Ferreira hinted at a launch in the local market towards the end of the year. The timeline for an Indian launch hasn’t been confirmed so far.
Gurugram Rain: देश के सबसे महंगे और आधुनिक शहरों में गिने जाने वाले गुरुग्राम की चमक तेज बारिश के सामने फीकी पड़ गई है। हरियाणा के इस प्रमुख शहर में भारी जलभराव ने आम लोगों से लेकर करोड़ों रुपये की प्रॉपर्टी और लग्जरी कारों तक सबको एक ही कतार में ला खड़ा कर दिया है। हालत यह रही कि महंगे इलाकों में रहने वाले लोगों को भी पानी से भरी सड़कों पर निकलने में भारी परेशानी हुई।
बारिश के कारण गुरुग्राम की कई प्रमुख सड़कें और अंडरपास पानी में डूब गए। ट्रैफिक व्यवस्था बुरी तरह प्रभावित हुई। कई जगह स्कूल बसें तथा एंबुलेंस तक जलभराव में फंस गईं। हालात को देखते हुए प्रशासन ने आज यानी 25 अगस्त को जिले के सभी सरकारी और निजी स्कूलों में क्लासेस ऑनलाइन कराने का निर्देश दिया है। वहीं कॉरपोरेट और निजी कंपनियों को कर्मचारियों को वर्क फ्रॉम होम (WFH) की सुविधा देने की सलाह दी गई है।
75 MM बारिश ने बिगाड़े हालात
जिला प्रशासन ने बताया कि सोमवार को गुरुग्राम में 70 मिलीमीटर बारिश दर्ज की गई। राजीव चौक, इफ्को चौक, रेलवे रोड, सेक्टर-5, पुरानी दिल्ली रोड, महरौली रोड और बसई रोड समेत प्रमुख इलाके बुरी तरह प्रभावित हुए। नाहरपुर अंडरपास में भी पानी भर गया। कई सड़कों पर ट्रैफिक की रफ्तार धीमी रही। लोग पानी से भरी सड़कों से गुजरते दिखाई दिए। पुराने गुरुग्राम के सदर बाजार, गुरुद्वारा रोड और पुरानी दिल्ली रोड समेत कई इलाकों में जलभराव के कारण घंटों तक भारी जाम लगा रहा।
Outside Magnolias, Gurugram. Where flats sell for Rs 50 crore plus. Drainage system in Ggn is abysmal! One can keep posting, keep demanding accountabilty but nothing changes! Nothing ! pic.twitter.com/j2NxQTngNt
ट्रैफिक पुलिस के एक वरिष्ठ अधिकारी ने बताया कि सिरहौल बॉर्डर, राजीव चौक, नरसिंहपुर और कुछ अन्य जगहों पर वाहनों की आवाजाही बाधित रही। उन्होंने कहा कि स्थिति संभालने के लिए ट्रैफिक पुलिसकर्मियों को तैनात किया गया है। ‘साइबर हब’ के पास गेटवे टावर मेट्रो स्टेशन के सामने एक्सप्रेसवे का एक बड़ा हिस्सा पानी में डूब गया, जिससे प्रमुख मार्ग पर ट्रैफिक प्रभावित हुआ।
VIDEO | Gurugram: School buses carrying children stranded on waterlogged roads.
शीतला माता रोड भी सबसे ज्यादा प्रभावित इलाकों में शामिल रहा। इस सड़क पर मानसून में अक्सर बाढ़ जैसी स्थिति उत्पन्न हो जाती है। बारिश के दौरान नगर निगम के अधिकारी मौके पर सक्रिय रहे। नगर निगम कमिश्नर प्रदीप दहिया और अतिरिक्त नगर निगम आयुक्त यश जालुका ने गुरुग्राम महानगर विकास प्राधिकरण, भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग प्राधिकरण और नगर निगम के अधिकारियों के साथ जलभराव वाले इलाकों का निरीक्षण किया।
#gurugram में हुई बारिश और जल भराव के चलते शीतला माता रोड में केंद्रीय विद्यालय की स्कूल वैन खराब होने के चलते कई घंटों तक फंसे रहे स्कूली बच्चे.. स्कूल ने नहीं ली कोई जिम्मेदारी, जिसके बाद वैन चालक ने अभिभावकों को ही फोन करके बुलाया… रोते रहे स्कूली बच्चे…. ये है @gurgaonpic.twitter.com/f2YvgmiBcO
बारिश का सबसे बड़ा असर स्कूली बच्चों पर देखने को मिला। कई स्कूल बसें पानी में फंस गईं और बच्चों को घर पहुंचने में सामान्य से 5 से 6 घंटे ज्यादा समय लगा। जलभराव के कारण कई परिवारों को अपने बच्चों के घर लौटने को लेकर घंटों चिंता में रहना पड़ा। यही वजह है कि प्रशासन ने 25 अगस्त को स्कूलों को ऑनलाइन करने का फैसला लिया।
गुरुग्राम की पहचान देश के सबसे महंगे रियल एस्टेट बाजारों में होती है। गोल्फ कोर्स रोड जैसे इलाकों में करोड़ों रुपये की प्रॉपर्टी मौजूद है। लेकिन सोमवार 24 अगस्त को हुई बारिश ने एक बड़ा सवाल खड़ा कर दिया- क्या करोड़ों रुपये की प्रॉपर्टी भी खराब इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर और जलभराव से बचा सकती है?
FACE OF URBAN INFRA: Gurugram reportedly has the highest net worth individuals per sq km (along with Mumbai’s Malabar Hill) but clearly NO proper drainage. Another day of rain, familiar water-logging. Citizens will rant on social media but little seems to change on ground. pic.twitter.com/luIzh4vc94
सोशल मीडिया पर लोगों ने इस स्थिति को लेकर कई पोस्ट किए। कुछ लोगों ने यह तक कहा कि शहर में करोड़ों रुपये के फ्लैट और महंगी कारें होने के बावजूद अगर सड़कें पानी में डूब जाएं तो इन संपत्तियों की असली उपयोगिता कितनी रह जाती है।
एक सोशल मीडिया यूजर ने शेयर किया कि उसने कार खरीदने के बजाय अपना पैसा शेयर बाजार में निवेश किया था। लेकिन बारिश के दौरान उसे एक बाइक सवार ने मदद करके सुरक्षित जगह तक पहुंचाया। इस घटना ने गुरुग्राम के जलभराव और शहर के इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर पर बहस को और तेज कर दिया।
तीसरी बार बारिश ने रोका गुरुग्राम
इस मानसून में यह पहली बार नहीं है जब गुरुग्राम की रफ्तार थमी हो। इससे पहले 9 जुलाई को भी लगातार बारिश के बाद निजी संस्थानों और कॉरपोरेट ऑफिसों के लिए WFH की सलाह दी गई थी। अगस्त के पहले सप्ताह में भी लगातार बारिश के बाद दो दिन के लिए WFH एडवाइजरी जारी की गई थी। उस दौरान 24 घंटे में गुरुग्राम में करीब 97 मिलीमीटर बारिश दर्ज की गई थी। IMD ने ऑरेंज अलर्ट जारी किया था। कई निचले इलाकों में पानी भर गया था।
#WATCH | Haryana: Amid heavy rainfall in Gurugram, a traffic snarl was seen at NH-48 in the Narsinghpur area pic.twitter.com/WG8raIbYGo
बारिश के बाद गुरुग्राम के इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर को लेकर राजनीतिक आरोप-प्रत्यारोप भी तेज हो गए हैं। कांग्रेस के वरिष्ठ नेता रणदीप सिंह सुरजेवाला ने हरियाणा सरकार पर निशाना साधते हुए शहर के इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर को ध्वस्त बताया। उन्होंने आरोप लगाया कि गुरुग्राम पर करीब ₹1,400 करोड़ खर्च किए जाने के बावजूद शहर बारिश के दौरान जलभराव से जूझ रहा है। सुरजेवाला ने स्कूल बसों के फंसने, सड़कों पर पानी भरने और प्रशासनिक व्यवस्था पर भी सवाल उठाए। गुरुग्राम समेत दिल्ली-एनसीआर में आज भी भारी बारिश हो रही है।
After what seems like a long, drawn-out process, Bajaj has finally launched the all-new classic Pulsar 150 and Pulsar 125. The new Pulsar 150 brings a lot to the line, with a new engine and frame, along with a whole lot of new features. However, it has also lost some of the features from the previous Pulsar 150 it replaces. Let’s see what those are, in detail. At the end, you can decide if the proverbial “old is gold” applies to the Pulsar 150 too.
Note: At the time of writing, Bajaj hasn’t shared the exact dimensions and kerb weight for the new Pulsar 150, so this comparison skips that part. We’ll update this once we get the details from Bajaj.
Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Engine changes
Same power but more torque than before
New Bajaj Pulsar 150
Old Bajaj Pulsar 150
Engine
149.5cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled
149.5cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled
Power
14hp at 8,000rpm
14hp at 8,500rpm
Torque
14.1Nm at 6,500rpm
13.2Nm at 6,500rpm
Transmission
5-speed
5-speed
Both models have a 149.5cc engine, but they are anything but the same. The old one, for example, was an air-cooled unit, but the new engine upgrades to oil cooling. And while the power figure remains the same, it’s delivered 500rpm earlier. Torque, on the other hand, has increased.
Considering that the cubic capacity itself remains unchanged, this is a commendable improvement from Bajaj. The company also claims an improved 0-60kph timing owing to an improved power-to-weight ratio. However, we don’t know by how much that has improved.
Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Chassis, headlight and suspension
The older Pulsar had a bigger fork
Keeping in line with the all-new theme, Bajaj has also changed the chassis and the suspension setup on the new Pulsar 150. The dual-cradle frame has been swapped for a simpler single-cradle or diamond frame, with the engine now acting as a stressed member. Bajaj says the change gives the Pulsar 150 greater stiffness, enabling better handling and stability.
The fork on the new Pulsar 150 remains a right-side-up (RSU) telescopic unit. However, the previous top variant of the Pulsar 150, Split Seat, had a larger 37mm fork with 130mm of travel. The base variant had a 31mm fork with an even longer 135mm of travel. The new Pulsar 150 swaps both for an in-between 33mm-diameter fork and a shorter 125mm travel. While the reduced travel is unlikely to compromise the bike’s functionality by a noticeable amount, it’s worth mentioning nevertheless. The rear suspension, on the other hand, has seen improvements across the board. The familiar twin-shock setup has been chucked for a brand-new monoshock unit, and the travel has been increased by 8mm to 110mm. Bajaj claims the change gives the Pulsar 150 greater straight-line and cornering stability.
The lighting setup on the Pulsar has also changed. While the headlight and tail-light continue to be LED across the board, Bajaj has slightly redesigned the fairing on the new Pulsar 150. The LED indicators that were previously standard, though, are now only available on the top two variants. The new Pulsar 150 also has hazard lights but only on the top two variants. These two variants get the belly pan as standard, too.
Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Wheels, tyres and brakes
Moving on to the tyres, the top variant of the outgoing Pulsar 150 had larger tyres at both the front and rear. The new one, however, standardises the base variant’s tyre sizes for all three variants. The same goes for the front brakes. Both old and new Pulsar 150s stick to having single-channel ABS as standard. If you need dual-channel ABS, you would have to upgrade to the Pulsar N160’s top variant.
Bajaj Pulsar 150 New vs Old: Features
Host of new features on the new Pulsar 150
This is the one area where the new Pulsar 150 unabashedly moves things forward. The previous Pulsar 150’s base variant had a semi-digital instrument cluster, and the top variant had the negative LCD instrument cluster. Both are gone now, with a new 5-inch LCD cluster taking their place on the base variant and the mid and top variants getting a 5-inch TFT cluster. All three variants come with Bluetooth as standard, while the top variant even adds WiFi support. All three get connected features such as music control and call and SMS alerts.
However, only the TFT cluster can store important documents like the licence and RC for quick access. Additionally, the top variant exclusively gets Google Maps mirroring for navigation, whereas the other two stick to turn-by-turn navigation. If you are worried that the navigation will drain your phone’s battery, the new Pulsar 150 also gives you a USB Type-C port, an upgrade from the previous version’s USB Type-A port, but only on the top two variants.
The Pulsar 150 has three ride modes – Road, Rain and Sport – with crawl tech and an integrated starter generator (ISG) adding to the convenience. ISG is once again exclusive to the top two variants. Crawl tech makes navigating stop-and-go traffic easier, whereas ISG gives you a silent start and a stop-start system to help conserve fuel.
Bajaj Pulsar 150 New vs Old: Price
Costlier by at least Rs 4,000
New Bajaj Pulsar 150
Old Bajaj Pulsar 150
Price range (in Rs)
1.15 lakh-1.23 lakh
1.11 lakh-1.18 lakh
With all the new changes and features, the new Pulsar 150 starts at Rs 1.15 lakh for the base variant and goes up to Rs 1.23 lakh for the top variant. For context, the old Pulsar 150’s price ranged between Rs 1.11 lakh and Rs 1.18 lakh. While the new Pulsar 150 gives you more features, it also lacks some things compared to the older model. Deciding whether it’s really an upgrade therefore requires a test ride, as the real-world experience is hard to conclude based on the spec sheet alone.