3 reasons to buy the Hyundai Aura, 2 reasons not to

3 reasons to buy the Hyundai Aura, 2 reasons not to
hyundai aura

The Aura is Hyundai’s contender for the compact sedan segment, rivalling the likes of the Maruti Suzuki Dzire, Honda Amaze, and Tata Tigor. If you’re planning to bring home a Hyundai Aura, we’ve listed its most prominent strengths and weaknesses below.

Pros

Well-built interior

Step inside the Aura and you’ll be impressed with its bright colour scheme and excellent fit-and-finish. The central dashboard trim and centre console surround are decked out in a copper colour, which lends the front end of the cabin a unique look, and the leather-wrapped steering wheel and gear knob in higher trims do well to add a premium touch.

Smooth and refined engine

Under the bonnet, the Aura packs a sole 1.2-litre 4-cylinder naturally aspirated engine that can be had in either 83hp petrol or 69hp CNG guise. Gearbox options comprise a 5-speed manual and 5-speed AMT for the petrol, while the CNG gets only the former transmission.

As mentioned in our review of the Aura, the petrol-MT powertrain feels quite smooth and refined. It responds well to part-throttle inputs and effortlessly keeps up with traffic. That said, the Aura is best-suited to easygoing urban commuting, as performance is neither brisk nor exciting.

Easy to drive

In addition to its refined engine, the Aura has a very smooth and light steering feel, an absorbent ride, and a slick-shifting manual gearbox with a light clutch. Not to mention, the Aura’s relatively compact footprint makes it easy to manoeuvre in city traffic and on tight roads.

Cons

Falls short on cabin space

Though the Aura’s rear seat offers ample legroom, the narrow width of the car makes the bench best-suited for two adults only. The front seats aren’t the most comfortable either, as the cushioning is a tad too firm, the head restraints are not adjustable, and taller occupants with broader frames may find them too narrow.

Lacks some creature comforts

The Aura comes packed with much of the safety and convenience kit you need, but misses out on a lot of the nice-to-haves offered by rivals like the Dzire and Amaze. Specifically, the Aura doesn’t get a sunroof, a 360-degree camera, ADAS, built-in wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, paddle shifters (for AMT), and connected car tech.

2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review: Thunder and lightning

2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review: Thunder and lightning
2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review

When introduced originally, the Lamborghini Urus rewrote the playbook of what an SUV could be. Sharp to look at, ferociously fast and with a mighty V8 soundtrack, the Urus has become the benchmark of performance SUVs. Now though, thanks to ever tightening regulations, the Urus has had to pivot to hybridisation. But has that diluted the experience? We got behind the wheel of the Lamborghini Urus SE to answer that question.

Lamborghini Urus SE Exterior Design and Engineering – 9/10

Urus SE has a more rounded-off design than its predecessor, but it’s no less menacing.

In comparison to the older Urus and the mad Urus Performante, the Urus SE does appear a bit softer and more rounded off. But that’s not to say it lacks presence by any means. It’s still full of sharp angles and surfaces, the Arancio Borealis optional paint on our test car looked stunning as did the diamond-cut, multi-spoke 23-inch alloy wheels. Up front, there’s a new bonnet, redesigned bumper and a larger front grille, while the slimmer headlights are now matrix LED units and a different DRL signature.

Rear end features quad-exhaust setup, sporty raked roofline, and a hexagon-patterned grille connecting the tail-lights.

The differences are immediately apparent at the rear too, with a new tailgate, rear bumper and a connecting tail-light grille. As always, Lamborghini’s Ad Personam personalisation programme offers an enormous scope for customisation, so buyers can tailor the Urus SE as per their needs. It remains a substantial machine, measuring 5.12m long and 2.02m wide, with a 3m wheelbase. Kerb weight is a hefty 2,505kg, which makes the fact that it can sprint from 0-100kph in just 3.4sec all the more impressive. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Interior Space and Comfort – 8/10

Dashboard layout is premium and feature-loaded, and gets a lot of Lamborghini theatrics.

Inside, the Urus SE retains the familiar Lamborghini approach of combining the ambience of a supercar with the practicality expected of an SUV. However, the changes here are less apparent than those on the outside. The centre console is ever so slightly redesigned with a new array of toggle switches under the touchscreen. The touchscreen itself is larger than the earlier Urus, with updated graphics and a slicker user interface.

Lamborghini’s signature flip-up engine start/stop button is inspired by those of fighter jets.

There’s plenty of visual theatre, too, and it looks just as extroverted as the outside. Standout elements include the hexagonal AC vents, the Lamborghini badging on the dashboard, the aircraft-style levers for the drive modes and of course, the fighter-jet inspired flap-up engine start/stop button. Lamborghini has also introduced new colour and trim combinations with the SE, with our test car featuring the same predominantly orange theme as on the outside.

Rear space is surprisingly plentiful given the Urus SE’s sporty proclivities.

Despite all the drama, this remains a practical SUV. The long wheelbase means there’s plenty of legroom at the rear and it’s wide enough for three too, though taller passengers may find headroom a bit tight thanks to the tapering roofline. The front seats are large, well padded and the optional Lamborghini crest on the headrests just adds to the ambience. The glovebox is decent sized, there’s cupholders and the boot offers 454 litres of capacity.

Lamborghini Urus SE Features and Safety – 8/10

Info-packed driver’s display interface can get confusing at times.

As standard, the Urus SE gets plenty of features like the three screen setup – for the infotainment, AC system and driver’s display – wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, LED matrix headlamps, four-zone auto climate control, leather upholstery, 360-degree camera, connected car tech and so much more. 

The SE also gets a comprehensive technology upgrade, with the new user interface being one of the more significant updates. It features a carousel-style layout on the touchscreen to access the numerous sub-menus it packs in, while the driver’s display shows all sorts of data pertaining to the hybrid system, navigation, media and other car-related info. Navigating all the sub-menus can get confusing, however.

New Lamborghini Telemetry function comes with over 300 pre-loaded racetracks to record lap times on.

There’s also ‘Lamborghini Telemetry’ that can display lap times and sector information for more than 300 preloaded circuits, as well as record new tracks. Connected services extend to navigation, real-time traffic, remote locking, vehicle-status information, remote charging, remote cooling of the cabin and various safety and security alerts.

Also part of the package is ADAS tech like autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control and more. But there’s a lot that’s optional too, like a large panoramic sunroof, a Bang and Olufsen 3D audio system and a whole lot more, apart from the usual trim, material and stitching options. On the whole, the Urus SE is well-equipped but some of the optional extras really could have been standard fitment given the asking price. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Performance and Refinement – 9/10

Twin-turbo V8 and electric motor develop a combined 800hp and 950Nm.

As for the numbers, they are, predictably, staggering. The Urus SE combines the familiar 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 with a 25.9kWh lithium-ion battery and a permanent-magnet synchronous electric motor for an eye-watering combined output of 800hp and 950Nm. The result is 0-100kph in 3.4sec and 0-200kph in 11.2sec, with a claimed top speed of 312kph. Those figures put the Urus SE firmly in supercar territory, despite its size and weight.

And it does feel like one from behind the wheel too, especially in a straight line. Acceleration is relentless and it feels borderline scary on narrow, two-lane roads. The Urus SE always feels like it has power in reserve, especially when you’ve got the powertrain fully dialled up. There’s Strada mode for everyday driving, Sport for when you want to have a bit more fun and of course, Corsa for when you want a proper scare. Couple that with the hybrid system in its full performance mode, and the SE can really feel overwhelming. But if you don’t drive with a heavy foot, it’s surprisingly cordial and sedate. The SE really has a Jekyll and Hyde character about it.

Unrelenting acceleration can get scary on public roads.

What makes the SE more interesting than simply being a faster Urus is the way the electric motor has been integrated. Of course, it’s to help with emissions and meet regulations, but it’s also to boost performance. In EV mode, it can reach up to 135kph and go as far as 66km. But with a flick of a switch, it can turn from silent to violent. 

The V8 also hasn’t become anonymous with the hybridisation. It still makes its presence felt, especially through the optional Akrapovic exhaust our car came fitted with, but it does feel a bit subdued. It’s also piped through the speakers, which doesn’t feel entirely ethical but it does help its case.

Optional Akrapovic exhaust system helps enhance the V8’s aural character.

Lamborghini has also paid considerable attention to keeping performance consistent, with additional cooling for the powertrain and brakes. Not that we ever managed to push it so hard to test out that claim. And apart from the aforementioned drive modes, there’s even some off-road modes baked in, but how many buyers actually take their prized possession off the grippy stuff remains to be seen. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Mileage and Efficiency – 7/10

This is where the Urus SE’s plug-in hybrid system makes a big difference. Lamborghini quotes a WLTP combined energy consumption of 4.67km/kWh plus 17.54kpl. With a discharged battery, however, combined claimed fuel efficiency falls to 7.75kpl.

Thanks to the 25.9kWh battery, the Urus SE claims a 66km all-electric range.

The headline figure therefore needs some context. The SE’s efficiency advantage is greatest when the battery is regularly topped up. With a claimed 66km of EV range, many shorter daily journeys can theoretically be completed without the V8 needing to fire up at all.

For longer journeys, the hybrid system allows the electric motor and V8 to share the workload. But once the battery is depleted, this remains a 2.5-tonne SUV with a twin-turbo V8, so expectations of conventional-SUV fuel economy would be unrealistic.

Lamborghini Urus SE Ride Comfort and Handling – 8/10

Ride isn’t all that absorbent due to the low-profile Pirelli P Zero tyres.

The Urus SE uses a multilink suspension setup front and rear with semi-active dampers, all of which make this large SUV feel engaging around corners without sacrificing comfort. There is a sense of pliancy at low speeds with the ride firming up as speeds rise. Of course, riding on 23-inch wheels means you can feel potholes and road imperfections, but still it isn’t uncomfortable by any means.

Rear-wheel steering, semi-active dampers, e-diff, and torque vectoring help make the Urus SE a keen handler.

It also gets rear-wheel steering, which helps make it more manageable at lower speeds while contributing to agility at higher speeds. The SE feels eager to change direction and the e-diff and clever torque vectoring system do their best to keep things tidy around bends. You also get a good sensation from the steering which has good heft to it and the Pirelli P Zero tyres it comes with are grippy too. Lamborghini has also worked on the aerodynamics, with a new rear aero lip and diffuser increasing rear downforce by 35 percent over the Urus S. Overall though, the SE feels agile enough but there’s no escaping its heavy kerb weight.

Giant carbon-ceramic brakes peek out from behind the 23-inch alloys.

You’re also backed by massive carbon-ceramic brakes, measuring 440mm at the front and 410mm at the rear, and they do take some time getting used to. They may not have the initial bite like with conventional steel brakes, but the stopping power is immense and they stay consistent despite repeated hard braking, which is essential in something as big and powerful as the Urus SE.

Lamborghini Urus SE Value for Money – 7/10

The Urus SE is arguably the most convincing expression yet of Lamborghini’s super-SUV. More importantly, it hasn’t sacrificed the characteristics that make a Lamborghini feel special in the pursuit of meeting ever tightening restrictions. There’s still a V8, it’s still outlandish inside and out, and it still delivers a driving experience that goes well beyond what you’d expect from something this large. All of that while adding the benefit of the plug-in hybrid system for performance and efficiency, as well as properly usable EV range. 

The Urus SE is the all-in-one Lamborghini.

At Rs 4.47 crore (ex-showroom, before options), of course, the Urus SE is expensive. But that’s almost beside the point. The Urus SE isn’t for those who expect rational value; it is for those who want a vehicle that can combine supercar pace, SUV practicality, luxury, all-electric driving and aspirational brand value all in one package. As a technological statement and a performance SUV then, the Urus SE makes a compelling case for Lamborghini’s hybrid future.

Audi Q3 Sportback long term review, 11,500km report

Audi Q3 Sportback long term review, 11,500km report
Audi Q3

Okay, first, a clarification: that’s not me hooning around in the Audi Q3 Sportback. That’s a certain Mr Saumil Shah, who borrowed the car from me for ‘work’ – in the biggest air quotes imaginable.

The Q3 Sportback was the support car for our Lamborghini Sterrato shoot at Nanoli Speedway. And, naturally, a muddy track with acres of runoff was an opportunity that proved far too tempting for him to resist. Fun cars do have a way of making you do slightly silly things when the right opportunity presents itself. And I’d definitely put the Audi Q3 in that category. It’s got a peppy engine, neat handling and even good ground clearance, all wrapped within a compact footprint. As someone who loves smaller cars, the Q3 is right up my alley. 

It might not look cutting-edge, but buttons and knobs make the dash very user-friendly.

I’ll admit, life with a luxury car can be a little stressful on Mumbai’s congested roads, where you’re sharing whatever road space is left after all the construction with cars, bikes, battle-hardened buses and everything in between. But the Q3 takes a lot of that stress away. The small size and elevated seating make it very easy to place, and what makes things more relaxing still is the excellent noise insulation. It’s no EV (the engine does get vocal in a good way when rushed), but the Q3 does cut out a lot of the cacophony outside. Another highlight on the Q3 is ride comfort. It makes light work of bad roads with the chunky tyres taking up a lot of the initial impact. Just wish the Q3 got snazzier wheels. The boring alloys undo much of the glamour of the Sportback’s SUV-coupé shape. Gun to my head, I’d still take the standard Q3 with its more conventional derriere.    

The Sportback has its fans, but I’d have the conventional Q3.

In cars with ADAS, my SOP is to first check if auto-braking functions are off. The Q3 doesn’t have ADAS, but I do still have a pre-flight check. And that is to ensure Automatic Parking Sensor Activation is turned off. The Q3’s overly sensitive proximity sensors seem to react to absolutely everything around the car and the constant beeping can get alarming in heavy traffic. Of course, connecting my phone via a wire is also a requirement because there’s no wireless connectivity in the Audi.  

Constant warnings from over-sensitive proximity sensors an irritant. Best kept off in traffic.

Thing is, I don’t want to overplay these small irritants. Because, in the big picture, the Q3 remains a charming option for buyers looking for an entry luxury car. More so now with some great deals going on the model as it makes way for the next-gen Q3 that comes later this year. Having lived with one, I know I won’t get bored of this Q3 for a long time to come. Heck, maybe I need to scout around for a good deal myself. 

Audi Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI Technology test data
Odometer 11,306km 
Price Rs 54.2 lakh (ex-showroom, Mumbai)  
Economy 7.9kpl
Maintenance cost Nil
Faults None
Previous reports June 2026

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid specs, features compared

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid specs, features compared
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

While both models here are hybrids and have 7 seats across three rows, they offer different hybrid technologies. With the ADAPT platform-based JSW MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV, India has its first-ever mass-market plug-in hybrid vehicle making its entry in the hugely popular SUV segment. On the other hand, the TNGA-C platform-based Toyota Innova Hycross is an MPV and offers a strong-hybrid powertrain. Here’s how they stack up in their fully loaded trims.

Explore full specs, features and a price breakdown in our Hector Tomahawk PHEV and Innova Hycross Hybrid comparison.

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Dimensions

The Innova Hycross is larger and offers a slightly bigger boot with all seats in place

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) dimensions

 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

Length (mm)

4,745

4,755

Width (mm)

1,850

1,850

Height (mm)

1,770

1,790

Wheelbase (mm)

2,810

2,850

Boot space (litres)

192

239

Wheel size (inches)

18

18

The Innova Hycross Hybrid is 10mm longer and 20mm taller than the Hector Tomahawk PHEV. The Toyota MPV also has a wheelbase that’s longer by 40mm, while both cars have identical width figures and sport 18-inch alloy wheels in their top-spec trims. The Innova Hycross Hybrid’s luggage capacity with the third row in place is greater by 47 litres. One of the factors limiting the outright cargo volume of the Hector Tomahawk PHEV is its more space-consuming plug-in hybrid tech.

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Powertrain

The plug-in hybrid powertrain of the MG SUV is more fuel-efficient and offers more power 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) powertrain options

 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

Engine

1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol

2.0-litre naturally aspirated petrol

Battery size

20.5kWh

1.6kWh

Electric motor type

Permanent magnet synchronous motor

Permanent magnet synchronous motor

Drive configuration

FWD

FWD

Total system output

198hp, 230Nm

184hp, 188Nm

Transmission

DHT

eCVT

0-100kph

9.0 seconds

10.69 seconds*

Claimed mileage

50kpl

22.16kpl

Fuel tank

52 litres

52 litres

AC charging

7.5 hrs at 3.3kW (10-100%)

DC fast charging

35 mins at 25kW (30-80%)

*Autocar India-tested 0-100kph time.

The strong hybrid powertrain of the Toyota Innova Hycross offers a couple of drive modes – including pure-electric and engine + electric. However, its compact nickel metal hydride (NiMH) battery means that the EV mode of the Innova Hycross Hybrid is understandably more limited than the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV’s, requiring the 2.0-litre petrol engine to step in more often.

The claimed mileage figure of the Innova Hycross Hybrid is 27.84kpl worse than the MG plug-in hybrid SUV, and despite the same fuel tank size, the former’s combined range tops out at around 800km, as per our real-world test of the Toyota MPV. Meanwhile, the plug-in hybrid system of the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV offers more flexibility and comes with four main drive modes. The larger 20.5kWh battery pack and 1.5-litre engine allow for a combined claimed range of over 1,100km.

The Hector Tomahawk PHEV not only offers a claimed pure-electric range of over 115km, but it can also have the engine charging the battery pack while the electric motor drives the front wheels. This is a drive mode that isn’t offered with the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid. To extract the highest possible efficiency from its hybrid system, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV needs to be plugged in to an AC or a DC charger in order to fully top up its battery pack.

Depending on the battery’s SoC, both cars can rely entirely on their petrol engine to drive the wheels. Compared to the Innova Hycross Hybrid’s e-CVT (electronically controlled continuously variable transmission), the Hector Tomahawk PHEV gets a DHT (Dedicated Hybrid Transmission) with an e-clutch. The combined output of the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV is 14hp and 42Nm more than what the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid offers. 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Exterior features

Different body styles aside, both cars are similarly equipped on the outside

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) exterior features

 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

Auto LED headlamps

Yes

Yes

LED DRLs

Yes

Yes

Backlit logo

Yes

No

Sequential turn signals

Yes

Yes

Front fog lamps

No

Yes (LED)

Rear fog lamps

Yes (LED)

No

Welcome lights

No

Yes

Powered ORVMs

Yes (with auto-fold function)

Yes (with auto-fold function)

Body cladding

Yes

No

Roof rails

Yes

No

Rear spoiler

Yes

Yes

Powered tailgate

Yes

Yes

Radio antenna

Windscreen-integrated

Sharkfin

Colours

Mono-tone and dual-tone

Mono-tone

The MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV is offered in two dual-tone colour options and six mono-tone shades, including a couple of bolder choices. The Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid is restricted to six simpler-looking colours. The  SUV body style aside, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV also sports a backlit ‘MG’ logo up front plus prominent roof rails and body cladding.

Where the Innova Hycross Hybrid gets the traditional sharkfin radio antenna, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV has its antenna embedded in the windscreen. The Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid gets front LED fog lamps, whilst the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV features rear LED fog lamps. While the top-spec trims of both cars get automatic LED headlamps and sequential turn indicators, it’s only the Toyota that offers ‘welcome’ lights.

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Interior features

The Hector Tomahawk PHEV offers even more modern on-board tech than the Hycross

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) interior features

 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

Infotainment screen

15.6-inch (with swipe gestures)

10.1-inch

Digital driver’s display

8.8-inch

7.0-inch MID

Panoramic sunroof

Yes (dual-pane)

Yes (dual-pane)

Steering adjustment

Tilt & telescopic

Tilt & telescopic

Driver’s seat adjustment

6-way powered

8-way powered

Memory poweredYes (with ‘retreat’ function)Yes

Co-driver’s seat adjustment

4-way powered

4-way manual

Sliding & reclining second row

Yes

Yes (powered ottoman seats)

Split rear seats

Yes (second & third rows)

Yes (second & third rows)

Ventilated front seats

Yes

Yes

Leatherette upholstery

Yes

Yes

Rear sunblinds

Yes

Yes

Rear armrest

Yes (with cupholders)

Yes (individual armrests)

Wireless charger

Yes (50W)

No

Automatic climate control

Yes (dual-zone)

Yes (single-zone)

Ambient lighting

Yes (256 colours)

Yes (single-colour)

Audio system

10-speaker Infinity

9-speaker JBL

Wireless Apple CarPlay & Android Auto

Yes

Yes (CarPlay only)

USB ports

Yes (5 ports)

Yes (4 ports)

Connected car tech

Yes

Yes

Voice assistant

Yes (AI-powered & multilingual)

Yes

OTA updates

Yes

No

Multi-app support

Yes

No

The infotainment features of the top-spec MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV are more comprehensive. It comes with a larger touchscreen that supports swipe-gesture functionalities, along with an AI-powered voice assistant with six languages supported. MG’s tie-up with Jio means that there are plenty of apps offered – including gaming, streaming and more. The Hector Tomahawk PHEV also offers OTA software updates, wireless connectivity for both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and a built-in 50-watt wireless charger.

The MG SUV’s convenience features further include a more comprehensive 256-colour ambient lighting system, a fully digital instrument panel, dual-zone AC, a powered front passenger seat, a ‘retreat’ function for the driver’s seat when the door is opened, armrest-integrated cupholders for the second row, and an additional USB port over the top-spec Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid.

However, the latter offers individual & powered captain chairs for the second row with a fold-away ottoman function. The 7-seat capability of the Innova Hycross comes by way of a three-seat third bench. The minimalist interior of the Hector Tomahawk PHEV looks modern but the increased reliance on the touchscreen can come in the way of everyday usability, especially while on the move. The Innova Hycross Hybrid’s interior, meanwhile, offers plenty of physical switchgear that are much easier to use.

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Safety features

Both cars are relatively well-equipped on the safety front

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) safety features

 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

Airbags

6

6

ABS with EBD

Yes

Yes

Electronic stability program

Yes

Yes

Traction control system

Yes

No

Hill-hold assist

Yes

Yes

TPMS

Yes

Yes

Parking sensors

Yes (front & rear)

Yes (front & rear)

360-degree camera

Yes

Yes

Electronic parking brake

Yes (with auto-hold function)

Yes (with auto-hold function)

Auto-dimming IRVM

Yes

Yes

Rain-sensing wipers

Yes

No

ISOFIX

Yes

Yes

Rear wiper and defogger

Yes

Yes

All-wheel disc brakes

Yes

Yes

ADAS

Yes

Yes

The fully loaded trims of both these cars offer all the basic passive and active safety aids that buyers at this price bracket expect. While both come with ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems), it’s the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV that packs in more features within its ADAS suite. Its adaptive cruise control aid integrates Bend Cruise Assistance (BCA), which slows down the vehicle when approaching corners. There’s also Traffic Jam Assist, which works alongside other active lane-keeping measures.

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O): Other features

The MG SUV adds a few nice-to-have features over the equivalent Innova Hycross

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) other features

 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

Drive modes

Yes (4)

Yes (3)

Paddle shifters

No

Yes

V2V and V2L

Yes

No

The MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV offers Eco, Normal, Sports and Custom drive modes, whereas the Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid gets Eco, Normal and Power – one less than the MG. The latter also lacks Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle to Load (V2L) functionalities that are available with the Hector Tomahawk PHEV.

Conclusion

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence vs Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) prices

 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid

Prices (In Rs, lakh)

27.79

31.84

While the prices of the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV are currently introductory, the delta between the two cars here is steep. The top-spec Toyota Innova Hycross Hybrid ZX (O) is priced Rs 4.05 lakh more than fully loaded Essence trim of the MG plug-in hybrid SUV. Its affordability factor notwithstanding, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV Essence trim gets a more comprehensive & punchier hybrid powertrain that offers better mileage, along with a better-finished and more premium-looking interior. Moreover, if you prefer an SUV body style, the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV would be worth a serious look.

Also read

MG Hector Tomahawk EV vs PHEV: Differences explained

Maruti Brezza ZXi+ vs Tata Nexon Fearless+ PS: Which should you buy?

Maruti Brezza ZXi+ vs Tata Nexon Fearless+ PS: Which should you buy?

Maruti Brezza ZXi+ vs Tata Nexon Fearless+ PS: Which should you buy?
Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon

The Maruti Brezza and Tata Nexon are among the bestselling compact SUVs in the Indian market. While the former received a comprehensive update that introduced cosmetic changes, more features and a powerful new turbo-petrol engine, the latter continues to attract consumers with a wide choice of powertrains. If you are looking to buy a compact SUV, we compare the Brezza’s top-spec ZXi+ trim and the Nexon Fearless+ PS to find out which offers better value for money.

Explore full specs, features and a price breakdown in our Brezza vs Nexon comparison.

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Dimensions

Brezza is taller, while Nexon has a bigger boot

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Dimensions

 

Maruti Brezza

Tata Nexon

Difference

Length (mm)

3,995

3,995

Width (mm)

1,790

1,804

-14

Height (mm)

1,685

1,620

+65

Wheelbase (mm)

2,500

2,498

+2

Ground clearance (mm)

198

208

-10

Boot space (litres)

328

382

-54

Only the length of both models is identical. Beyond that, the Brezza is taller and has a slightly longer wheelbase than the Nexon. On the other hand, the Nexon is wider, rides higher off the ground and has a larger boot.

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Powertrain options

Brezza ZXi+ offers limited powertrain options

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Powertrain options

 

Maruti Brezza

Tata Nexon

Powertrain

Naturally aspirated petrol | Turbo-petrol

Turbo-petrol | CNG | Turbo-diesel 

Engine configuration

1.5-litre, 4-cyl | 1.0-litre, 3-cyl

1.2-litre, 3-cyl | 1.2-litre, 3-cyl | 1.5-litre, 4-cyl 

Power (hp)

103 | 110 

120 | 100 |115

Torque (Nm)

139 | 170

170 | 170 | 260

Transmission

6MT | 6AT

6MT / 7DCT | 6MT / 6AMT | 6MT 

The Brezza ZXi+ is available only with the naturally aspirated petrol automatic and turbo-petrol manual powertrains. On the other hand, the Nexon Fearless+ PS offers a wide range of options: a turbo-petrol manual and automatic, a diesel manual and automatic, and a CNG manual. As for their turbo-petrol engines, the torque is identical, but the Nexon’s larger mill delivers more power.

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Exterior features 

Nexon offers some feel-good features like welcome/goodbye animations

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Exterior features 

 

Maruti Brezza

Tata Nexon

Headlights 

LED projector

LED projector

Tail-lights

LED

Connected LED

Welcome/goodbye animations

No

Yes

Sequential turn indicators

No

Yes

Daytime running lamps (DRLs)

Yes

Yes

Fog lamps

LED

LED

Wheels

16-inch

16-inch

Outside rearview mirrors (ORVMs)

Electrically adjustable, auto-folding

Electrically adjustable, auto-folding

Roof rails

Yes

Yes

Rear wiper, washer

Yes

Yes

Colour options

Monotone and dual-tone

Dual-tone

Both the Brezza and Nexon are similarly equipped on the exterior, with LED light setups, DRLs, fog lamps, electrically adjustable and auto-folding ORVMs and 16-inch alloy wheels. However, the Nexon gets some fancier features such as welcome/goodbye animations for the light setups, along with sequential turn indicators. As for colour options, the Nexon is limited to dual-tone schemes, whereas the Brezza offers monotone options as well.

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Interior features 

Brezza not as well equipped as Nexon

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Interior features

 

Maruti Brezza

Tata Nexon

Instrument cluster

Analogue dials with MID

10.25-inch display

Infotainment screen

10.1-inch

10.25-inch

Head-up display

Yes

No

Android Auto, Apple CarPlay

Wireless

Wireless

Sunroof

Single-pane

Panoramic

Audio system

6-speaker Arkamys Surround Sense

9-speaker JBL

Climate control

Automatic

Automatic

Rear AC vents

Yes

Yes

Driver seat adjustment

Manual

Manual

Front seat ventilation

Yes

Yes

Seat upholstery

Leatherette

Leatherette

Wireless phone charger

Yes

Yes

Air purifier

Yes

Yes

Connected car tech

Yes

Yes

Rear centre armrest

Yes

Yes

Rear sunshade

No

Yes

Ambient lighting

64-colour

No

60:40 split folding seat

Yes

Yes

Apart from multi-colour ambient lighting and a head-up display, the Brezza’s overall interior equipment falls short of the Nexon’s. The latter comes packed with features such as a digital driver’s display as opposed to analogue dials on the former, a panoramic sunroof, a slightly larger infotainment screen, more speakers and rear window sunshades.  

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Driving tech

Brezza misses out on drive modes

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Driving tech

 

Maruti Brezza

Tata Nexon

Drive modes

No

Eco, City and Sport

Paddleshifters

Yes

Yes

Cruise control

Yes

Yes

While paddleshifters and cruise control are available on both models, drive modes are offered only with the Nexon.

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Safety features

Brezza comes equipped with more advanced safety tech 

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Safety features

 

Maruti Brezza

Tata Nexon

BNCAP rating 

5 stars

5 stars

Blind-spot warning

Yes

No

Safe-exit warning

Yes

No

Rear cross-traffic alert

Yes

No

Airbags

6

6

Camera setup

360-degree

360-degree

Parking sensors

Front and rear

Front and rear

Disc brakes

Front only

Front only

Tyre-pressure monitoring system

Yes

Yes

Interior rearview mirror (IRVM)

Auto-dimming 

Auto-dimming

Hill-hold assist

Yes

Yes

ESC

Yes

Yes

Both the Brezza and Nexon have achieved a 5-star BNCAP crash-safety rating and are equally matched in terms of offering a basic safety kit, along with features such as a 360-degree camera and front parking sensor. But only the former comes with advanced safety systems such as rear cross-traffic alert and blind-spot and safe-exit warnings.

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Price and verdict

Brezza’s more affordable, but Nexon’s powertrain range is hard to ignore

Maruti Brezza vs Tata Nexon: Prices

 

Maruti Brezza

Tata Nexon

NA petrol AT

13.54

Turbo petrol MT

11.16

12.34

Turbo petrol AT

12.55

Turbo diesel MT

13.45

Turbo diesel AMT

14.10

CNG MT

13.30

Comparing only the turbo-petrol manual powertrain, which is common to both, the Brezza is Rs 1.18 lakh more affordable than the Nexon. Notably, the Brezza ZXi+ NA petrol automatic costs almost a lakh rupees more than the Nexon Fearless+ PS turbo-petrol automatic. This is due to the higher tax on the 1.5-litre unit powering the Brezza. Moreover, the Nexon has a Fearless+ A PS trim that sits above the Fearless+ PS trim and brings Level 2 ADAS, but it is limited to the turbo-petrol automatic.

When it comes to choosing between the two, we’d recommend the Tata Nexon. Though the Brezza’s ZXi+ trim starts at a more affordable price point and is backed by Maruti’s widespread and hassle-free service experience, the Nexon’s multiple powertrain options are simply hard to ignore. Additionally, the Tata comes with more bells and whistles than the Maruti, and that’s why it’s our pick.

All prices are ex-showroom, India.

5 things to know before buying the Honda Rebel 300

5 things to know before buying the Honda Rebel 300
Honda Rebel 300

The Honda Rebel 300 is the first model in the Rebel family to be manufactured locally and acts as the brand’s most accessible cruiser motorcycle here. Built around a bobber-style design with a teardrop fuel tank, round LED headlamp and short exhaust, it is sold exclusively through Honda BigWing dealerships. Here are answers to some of the most commonly asked questions about it.

What is the price of the Honda Rebel 300?

The Honda Rebel 300 is available in two variants. The Standard variant is priced at Rs 2.22 lakh and the E-Clutch variant at Rs 2.62 lakh – a Rs 40,000 premium for the automated clutch system. At Rs 2.22 lakh, the Standard variant undercuts the Royal Enfield Goan Classic 350 (Rs 2.25-2.28 lakh, ex-showroom, Chennai), one of the few other bobber-styled motorcycles currently on sale in India.

What engine does the Honda Rebel 300 use?

The Honda Rebel 300 is powered by a 286cc single-cylinder, liquid-cooled engine producing 30hp and 27.5Nm of torque, paired with a 6-speed gearbox. This is the same engine that powered the CB300R previously sold in our market.

What features does the Honda Rebel 300 have?

Both variants of the Rebel 300 get a circular TFT instrument display with Honda RoadSync connectivity and turn-by-turn navigation, full LED lighting and dual-channel ABS. The E-Clutch variant additionally allows the rider to configure the clutch system via the TFT display.

What is the Honda Rebel 300 E-Clutch and how does it work?

Honda’s E-Clutch is an electronically automated clutch system that uses actuators to operate the clutch automatically, allowing the rider to change gears without using the clutch lever. It does not make the Rebel 300 a fully automatic motorcycle, as the rider still selects gears manually using the gear lever. However, the system handles clutch engagement and disengagement on its own.

Importantly, the clutch lever is retained and can be used manually whenever the rider chooses. The system is designed to reduce rider fatigue in stop-and-go traffic while making the bike more accessible for those who find operating a clutch lever demanding.

What is the seat height and weight of the Honda Rebel 300?

The Honda Rebel 300 has a seat height of 690mm, making it one of the lowest motorcycles currently on sale in our market. This uld make it exceptionally accessible for a wide range of riders. The upright handlebar and forward-set footpegs complement the low t to create a relaxed, unhurried riding position. Kerb weight is 172kg and fuel tank capacity is 11 litres.

Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Price and differences explained

Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Price and differences explained
Lead image showing front right quarter shots of the outgoing and the new Pulsar 125

With the discontinuation of the N125 in India, the Pulsar 125 had gained attention back as the entry-level Pulsar model and Bajaj has just revamped it from the ground-up. Some of the obvious upgrades are to the engine, frame, and suspension. However, with the line-up expanding to four variants from two earlier, what exactly sets the new Pulsar 125 apart from the old? Let’s find out.

Note: At the time of writing, Bajaj hasn’t shared the exact dimensions and kerb weight for the new Pulsar 125 so this comparison skips that. We’ll update the story once we get those details.

Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Engine

More power and torque at the same points in the rev range

 

New Bajaj Pulsar 125

Old Bajaj Pulsar 125

Engine

124.58cc single-cylinder, air-cooled

124.38cc single-cylinder, air-cooled

Power

12.1hp at 8,500rpm

11.8hp at 8,500rpm

Torque

11.4Nm at 6,500rpm

10.8Nm at 6,500rpm

Transmission

5-speed

5-speed

Similar to the all-new Pulsar 150, the new Pulsar 125’s engine also looks similar to the outgoing one at first glance, but that’s not the case. The cubic capacity on the new engine has increased by two-tenths and Bajaj has extracted marginally more power and torque delivered at similar rpm as before. Bajaj also claims that 80 percent of the torque is available from 3,000rpm onwards. On paper, it’s easy to dismiss this improvement as minuscule, but it bodes well with Bajaj’s placement of the 125 as an easy city commuter.

Unlike the new Pulsar 150’s oil-cooled engine, the 125 sticks to an air-cooled unit. Transmission also remains 5-speed, but Bajaj claims an upgraded gearbox for low end tractability. The power-to-weight ratio has supposedly improved, and Bajaj says acceleration has as well, but we’ll have to wait until we put the bike through our tests to confirm so.

Right side close up of the outgoing Pulsar 125's engine
Right side close up of the new Pulsar 125's engine
 

 

Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Chassis, headlight, and suspension

Chassis and suspension see major changes

Keeping in line with the all-new theme, Bajaj has also changed the chassis and the suspension setup on the new Pulsar 125. The existing dual-cradle frame has been swapped for a single-cradle or diamond frame with the engine now acting as a stressed member. Bajaj says the change enables the Pulsar 125 to have greater stiffness, enabling better handling and stability.

Right close up of the outgoing Pulsar 125's rear wheel showing the suspension
Right close up of the new Pulsar 125's rear wheel showing the suspension
 

 

Though the fork is still a right side up (RSU) telescopic unit, the new Pulsar 125 upgrades the diameter by 1mm to 31mm, but with a 10mm shorter 125mm travel. The rear suspension has also seen improvements with the familiar twin-shock setup being swapped for a monoshock unit and the travel has been increased by 8mm to 110mm. Bajaj attributes greater stability in straight lines and corners on the new Pulsar 125 to the brand-new monoshock setup.

The lighting setup has also been changed, although by a tiny amount. While the headlight and taillight continue to be LED across the board, Bajaj has slightly redesigned the fairing on the new Pulsar 125. Out of the four variants, the LED indicators and hazard lights are only available on the top three variants; only the top-most variant gets a belly pan as standard.

Front close up of the outgoing Pulsar 125's headlight fairing
Front close up of the new Pulsar 125's headlight fairing
 

 

Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Tyres and brakes

Higher variants get a larger front disc

 

New Bajaj Pulsar 125

Old Bajaj Pulsar 125

Tyres (F/R)

80/100-17 / 100/90-17

80/100-17 / 100/90-17

Brakes (F/R)

240mm disc, 130mm drum (base)/260mm disc, 130mm drum (other three)

240mm disc, 130mm drum

While the tyre sizes remain unchanged on the new Pulsar 125, Bajaj has increased the front disc size on the top three variants. ABS in any form continues to be missing, with the motorcycle offering Combined Braking System (CBS) as standard instead.

Front wheel right shot of the outgoing Pulsar 125
Front wheel right shot of the new Pulsar 125
 

 

Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Features

TFT Cluster and ride modes are major upgrades

Close up of the outgoing Pulsar 125 base variant instrument cluster
Close up of the new Pulsar 125 top variant instrument cluster
 

 

The biggest feature addition to the new Pulsar 125 starts with what you’ll see on every ride, the instrument cluster. The base variant now gets a 5-inch LCD cluster, the mid and top variants getting a 5-inch TFT cluster. Connected features like music control and call and SMS alerts are common to all four variants—thanks to the standard Bluetooth—though WiFi is limited to the top variant. Thanks to WiFi, the top variant alone gets Google Maps mirroring for navigation, whereas the others have turn-by-turn navigation.

The TFT cluster can also store important documents like licence and RC for quick access. To charge up your devices on the go, the new Pulsar 125 gives you a USB type-C port, an upgrade to the previous version’s USB type-A port. However, it’s a paid extra on the base variant. What’s standard on all variants are the three ride modes, Road, Rain, and Sport. In order to make city riding easier still, the new Pulsar 125 also gets crawl tech and ISG (Integrated Starter Generator). The former makes stop-and-go traffic easier to handle; whereas the latter, available on the top three variants, gives you silent start and a stop-start system to conserve fuel.

Bajaj Pulsar 125 New vs Old: Price

New 125’s noticeably more expensive

 

New Bajaj Pulsar 125

Old Bajaj Pulsar 125

Price (ex-showroom, Delhi)

Rs 92,900 – Rs 1.04 lakh

Rs 81,556 – Rs 94,518

With all the new changes and features, the new Pulsar 125 starts at Rs 92,900 for the base variant and goes up to Rs 1.04 lakh for the top variant, cracking the one lakh mark. That’s a steep increase over the outgoing model’s price range. The new Pulsar 125 does make forward strides in almost every area, but we’ll have to wait until we ride the bike to comment on whether the changes justify the unmissable premium.

All prices are ex-showroom, Delhi.
 

Upcoming Bajaj dual-sport motorcycle spotted testing again

Upcoming Bajaj dual-sport motorcycle spotted testing again
Upcoming Bajaj dual-sport motorcycle right outside shot, showing the engine, wheels, and tyres.

Bajaj has been working on their own dual-sport motorcycle, adding to a long list of new launches expected from the Pune-based manufacturer. The motorcycle has now been spotted testing again, revealing some key details.

  1. Appears to have a 19 front-17 rear tubed spoke wheels
  2. Spotted testing with Pirelli MT60 tyres
  3. Most likely to launch in LatAm markets first

Proper dual-sport design

With an up-swept exhaust and a tall stance

This image gives us a detailed look at a few important things on the motorcycle. We can see a TFT instrument cluster that appears similar to the unit that debuted on the Pulsar N160 S and SS, supporting Google Maps mirroring on the latter. The next detail we can see is the multi-functional switch cube on the left side of the handlebar, presumably to access and navigate through the features the motorcycle will offer. For perspective, some of the brand’s more recent launches like the N160 SS come with modern day features like ride-by-wire which enables rider aids like three ride modes, traction control, and a new crawl function to make riding in traffic easier, and we could see those features on this upcoming dual sport as well.

Upcoming Bajaj dual-sport motorcycle right showing instrument cluster and left switch cube

Being an adventure motorcycle, it understandably has long travel suspension, although exact details are unknown at the moment. The other noteworthy thing is that the motorcycle appears to sport Pirelli MT 60 tyres, but it’ll likely wear different tyres in India to keep the prices affordable. Engine details are still unknown, but as we’d reported earlier it’ll likely be sub-300cc.

The Indian off-road motorcycle market has popular choices like the Hero Xpulse 210 and the Kawasaki KLX230, as well as the KTM 390 Enduro R in the 400cc class. We also have the upcoming Honda XR300 L and XR300 Rally. In an interview with Brazilian media, Bajaj’s Executive Director for the country, Waldyr Ferreira hinted at a launch in the local market towards the end of the year. The timeline for an Indian launch hasn’t been confirmed so far.

Upcoming Bajaj dual-sport right side showing the exhaust and wheels

Image credit: xpulse_trails_1729 on Instagram

गुरुग्राम में बारिश का ऐसा कहर कि करोड़ों के फ्लैट और लग्जरी कारें भी बेकार! स्कूल चलेंगी ऑनलाइन, ऑफिसों में WFH

Gurugram Rain: देश के सबसे महंगे और आधुनिक शहरों में गिने जाने वाले गुरुग्राम की चमक तेज बारिश के सामने फीकी पड़ गई है। हरियाणा के इस प्रमुख शहर में भारी जलभराव ने आम लोगों से लेकर करोड़ों रुपये की प्रॉपर्टी और लग्जरी कारों तक सबको एक ही कतार में ला खड़ा कर दिया है। हालत यह रही कि महंगे इलाकों में रहने वाले लोगों को भी पानी से भरी सड़कों पर निकलने में भारी परेशानी हुई।

बारिश के कारण गुरुग्राम की कई प्रमुख सड़कें और अंडरपास पानी में डूब गए। ट्रैफिक व्यवस्था बुरी तरह प्रभावित हुई। कई जगह स्कूल बसें तथा एंबुलेंस तक जलभराव में फंस गईं। हालात को देखते हुए प्रशासन ने आज यानी 25 अगस्त को जिले के सभी सरकारी और निजी स्कूलों में क्लासेस ऑनलाइन कराने का निर्देश दिया है। वहीं कॉरपोरेट और निजी कंपनियों को कर्मचारियों को वर्क फ्रॉम होम (WFH) की सुविधा देने की सलाह दी गई है।

75 MM बारिश ने बिगाड़े हालात

जिला प्रशासन ने बताया कि सोमवार को गुरुग्राम में 70 मिलीमीटर बारिश दर्ज की गई। राजीव चौक, इफ्को चौक, रेलवे रोड, सेक्टर-5, पुरानी दिल्ली रोड, महरौली रोड और बसई रोड समेत प्रमुख इलाके बुरी तरह प्रभावित हुए। नाहरपुर अंडरपास में भी पानी भर गया। कई सड़कों पर ट्रैफिक की रफ्तार धीमी रही। लोग पानी से भरी सड़कों से गुजरते दिखाई दिए। पुराने गुरुग्राम के सदर बाजार, गुरुद्वारा रोड और पुरानी दिल्ली रोड समेत कई इलाकों में जलभराव के कारण घंटों तक भारी जाम लगा रहा।

ट्रैफिक जाम से हाहाकार

ट्रैफिक पुलिस के एक वरिष्ठ अधिकारी ने बताया कि सिरहौल बॉर्डर, राजीव चौक, नरसिंहपुर और कुछ अन्य जगहों पर वाहनों की आवाजाही बाधित रही। उन्होंने कहा कि स्थिति संभालने के लिए ट्रैफिक पुलिसकर्मियों को तैनात किया गया है। ‘साइबर हब’ के पास गेटवे टावर मेट्रो स्टेशन के सामने एक्सप्रेसवे का एक बड़ा हिस्सा पानी में डूब गया, जिससे प्रमुख मार्ग पर ट्रैफिक प्रभावित हुआ।

शीतला माता रोड पर बुरा हाल

शीतला माता रोड भी सबसे ज्यादा प्रभावित इलाकों में शामिल रहा। इस सड़क पर मानसून में अक्सर बाढ़ जैसी स्थिति उत्पन्न हो जाती है। बारिश के दौरान नगर निगम के अधिकारी मौके पर सक्रिय रहे। नगर निगम कमिश्नर प्रदीप दहिया और अतिरिक्त नगर निगम आयुक्त यश जालुका ने गुरुग्राम महानगर विकास प्राधिकरण, भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग प्राधिकरण और नगर निगम के अधिकारियों के साथ जलभराव वाले इलाकों का निरीक्षण किया।

स्कूल बसों में फंसे बच्चे, 5-6 घंटे की देरी

बारिश का सबसे बड़ा असर स्कूली बच्चों पर देखने को मिला। कई स्कूल बसें पानी में फंस गईं और बच्चों को घर पहुंचने में सामान्य से 5 से 6 घंटे ज्यादा समय लगा। जलभराव के कारण कई परिवारों को अपने बच्चों के घर लौटने को लेकर घंटों चिंता में रहना पड़ा। यही वजह है कि प्रशासन ने 25 अगस्त को स्कूलों को ऑनलाइन करने का फैसला लिया।

करोड़ों की प्रॉपर्टी भी नहीं बचा पाई

गुरुग्राम की पहचान देश के सबसे महंगे रियल एस्टेट बाजारों में होती है। गोल्फ कोर्स रोड जैसे इलाकों में करोड़ों रुपये की प्रॉपर्टी मौजूद है। लेकिन सोमवार 24 अगस्त को हुई बारिश ने एक बड़ा सवाल खड़ा कर दिया- क्या करोड़ों रुपये की प्रॉपर्टी भी खराब इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर और जलभराव से बचा सकती है?

सोशल मीडिया पर लोगों ने इस स्थिति को लेकर कई पोस्ट किए। कुछ लोगों ने यह तक कहा कि शहर में करोड़ों रुपये के फ्लैट और महंगी कारें होने के बावजूद अगर सड़कें पानी में डूब जाएं तो इन संपत्तियों की असली उपयोगिता कितनी रह जाती है।

एक सोशल मीडिया यूजर ने शेयर किया कि उसने कार खरीदने के बजाय अपना पैसा शेयर बाजार में निवेश किया था। लेकिन बारिश के दौरान उसे एक बाइक सवार ने मदद करके सुरक्षित जगह तक पहुंचाया। इस घटना ने गुरुग्राम के जलभराव और शहर के इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर पर बहस को और तेज कर दिया।

तीसरी बार बारिश ने रोका गुरुग्राम

इस मानसून में यह पहली बार नहीं है जब गुरुग्राम की रफ्तार थमी हो। इससे पहले 9 जुलाई को भी लगातार बारिश के बाद निजी संस्थानों और कॉरपोरेट ऑफिसों के लिए WFH की सलाह दी गई थी। अगस्त के पहले सप्ताह में भी लगातार बारिश के बाद दो दिन के लिए WFH एडवाइजरी जारी की गई थी। उस दौरान 24 घंटे में गुरुग्राम में करीब 97 मिलीमीटर बारिश दर्ज की गई थी। IMD ने ऑरेंज अलर्ट जारी किया था। कई निचले इलाकों में पानी भर गया था।

₹1,400 करोड़ खर्च के बावजूद उठे सवाल

बारिश के बाद गुरुग्राम के इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर को लेकर राजनीतिक आरोप-प्रत्यारोप भी तेज हो गए हैं। कांग्रेस के वरिष्ठ नेता रणदीप सिंह सुरजेवाला ने हरियाणा सरकार पर निशाना साधते हुए शहर के इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर को ध्वस्त बताया। उन्होंने आरोप लगाया कि गुरुग्राम पर करीब ₹1,400 करोड़ खर्च किए जाने के बावजूद शहर बारिश के दौरान जलभराव से जूझ रहा है। सुरजेवाला ने स्कूल बसों के फंसने, सड़कों पर पानी भरने और प्रशासनिक व्यवस्था पर भी सवाल उठाए। गुरुग्राम समेत दिल्ली-एनसीआर में आज भी भारी बारिश हो रही है।

ये भी पढ़ें- यूपी में लड़कियों को स्कूल में हिजाब पहनकर आने की अनुमति नहीं; इलाहाबाद HC ने खारिज की मुस्लिम छात्रा की याचिका

Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Price and differences explained

Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Price and differences explained
Bajaj Pulsar 150 New vs Old: Price and differences explained

After what seems like a long, drawn-out process, Bajaj has finally launched the all-new classic Pulsar 150 and Pulsar 125. The new Pulsar 150 brings a lot to the line, with a new engine and frame, along with a whole lot of new features. However, it has also lost some of the features from the previous Pulsar 150 it replaces. Let’s see what those are, in detail. At the end, you can decide if the proverbial “old is gold” applies to the Pulsar 150 too.

Note: At the time of writing, Bajaj hasn’t shared the exact dimensions and kerb weight for the new Pulsar 150, so this comparison skips that part. We’ll update this once we get the details from Bajaj.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Engine changes

Same power but more torque than before

 

New Bajaj Pulsar 150

Old Bajaj Pulsar 150

Engine

149.5cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled

149.5cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled

Power

14hp at 8,000rpm

14hp at 8,500rpm

Torque

14.1Nm at 6,500rpm

13.2Nm at 6,500rpm

Transmission

5-speed

5-speed

Both models have a 149.5cc engine, but they are anything but the same. The old one, for example, was an air-cooled unit, but the new engine upgrades to oil cooling. And while the power figure remains the same, it’s delivered 500rpm earlier. Torque, on the other hand, has increased.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 old engine
Bajaj Pulsar 150 New engine
 

 

Considering that the cubic capacity itself remains unchanged, this is a commendable improvement from Bajaj. The company also claims an improved 0-60kph timing owing to an improved power-to-weight ratio. However, we don’t know by how much that has improved.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Chassis, headlight and suspension

The older Pulsar had a bigger fork

Bajaj Pulsar 150 rear shocks
Bajaj Pulsar 150 monoshock
 

 

Keeping in line with the all-new theme, Bajaj has also changed the chassis and the suspension setup on the new Pulsar 150. The dual-cradle frame has been swapped for a simpler single-cradle or diamond frame, with the engine now acting as a stressed member. Bajaj says the change gives the Pulsar 150 greater stiffness, enabling better handling and stability.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 front three quarter headlight
Bajaj Pulsar 150 new front three quarter headlight
 

 

The fork on the new Pulsar 150 remains a right-side-up (RSU) telescopic unit. However, the previous top variant of the Pulsar 150, Split Seat, had a larger 37mm fork with 130mm of travel. The base variant had a 31mm fork with an even longer 135mm of travel. The new Pulsar 150 swaps both for an in-between 33mm-diameter fork and a shorter 125mm travel. While the reduced travel is unlikely to compromise the bike’s functionality by a noticeable amount, it’s worth mentioning nevertheless. The rear suspension, on the other hand, has seen improvements across the board. The familiar twin-shock setup has been chucked for a brand-new monoshock unit, and the travel has been increased by 8mm to 110mm. Bajaj claims the change gives the Pulsar 150 greater straight-line and cornering stability.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 right side profile old
Bajaj Pulsar 150 right side profile new
 

 

The lighting setup on the Pulsar has also changed. While the headlight and tail-light continue to be LED across the board, Bajaj has slightly redesigned the fairing on the new Pulsar 150. The LED indicators that were previously standard, though, are now only available on the top two variants. The new Pulsar 150 also has hazard lights but only on the top two variants. These two variants get the belly pan as standard, too.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 new vs old: Wheels, tyres and brakes

New Pulsar 150 has smaller tyres and brakes

 

New Bajaj Pulsar 150

Old Bajaj Pulsar 150

Tyres (F, R)

80/100-17, 100/90-17

80/100-17, 100/90-17 (base); 90/90-17, 120/80-17 (top)

Brakes (F, R)

260mm disc, 130mm drum (base); 260mm disc, 230mm disc (mid and top)

260mm disc, 130mm drum (base); 280mm disc, 230mm disc (top)

ABS

Single-channel ABS

Single-channel ABS

Moving on to the tyres, the top variant of the outgoing Pulsar 150 had larger tyres at both the front and rear. The new one, however, standardises the base variant’s tyre sizes for all three variants. The same goes for the front brakes. Both old and new Pulsar 150s stick to having single-channel ABS as standard. If you need dual-channel ABS, you would have to upgrade to the Pulsar N160’s top variant.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 New vs Old: Features

Host of new features on the new Pulsar 150

This is the one area where the new Pulsar 150 unabashedly moves things forward. The previous Pulsar 150’s base variant had a semi-digital instrument cluster, and the top variant had the negative LCD instrument cluster. Both are gone now, with a new 5-inch LCD cluster taking their place on the base variant and the mid and top variants getting a 5-inch TFT cluster. All three variants come with Bluetooth as standard, while the top variant even adds WiFi support. All three get connected features such as music control and call and SMS alerts.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 old dash
Bajaj Pulsar 150 New dash
 

 

However, only the TFT cluster can store important documents like the licence and RC for quick access. Additionally, the top variant exclusively gets Google Maps mirroring for navigation, whereas the other two stick to turn-by-turn navigation. If you are worried that the navigation will drain your phone’s battery, the new Pulsar 150 also gives you a USB Type-C port, an upgrade from the previous version’s USB Type-A port, but only on the top two variants.

The Pulsar 150 has three ride modes – Road, Rain and Sport – with crawl tech and an integrated starter generator (ISG) adding to the convenience. ISG is once again exclusive to the top two variants. Crawl tech makes navigating stop-and-go traffic easier, whereas ISG gives you a silent start and a stop-start system to help conserve fuel.

Bajaj Pulsar 150 New vs Old: Price

Costlier by at least Rs 4,000 

Bajaj Pulsar 150 rear profile
Bajaj Pulsar 150 new rear profile
 

 

 

New Bajaj Pulsar 150

Old Bajaj Pulsar 150

Price range (in Rs)

1.15 lakh-1.23 lakh

1.11 lakh-1.18 lakh

With all the new changes and features, the new Pulsar 150 starts at Rs 1.15 lakh for the base variant and goes up to Rs 1.23 lakh for the top variant. For context, the old Pulsar 150’s price ranged between Rs 1.11 lakh and Rs 1.18 lakh. While the new Pulsar 150 gives you more features, it also lacks some things compared to the older model. Deciding whether it’s really an upgrade therefore requires a test ride, as the real-world experience is hard to conclude based on the spec sheet alone.

Prices are ex-showroom, Delhi.