Aprilia SXR GT 175 vs Rivals: Price and specifications compared

Aprilia SXR GT 175 vs Rivals: Price and specifications compared
Aprilia SXR GT 175, Yamaha Aerox 155 S, Hero Xoom 160 and Honda ADV160 in clockwise direction.

Maxi scooters have technically been around in our market since 2006, thanks to the Kinetic Blaze but the idea was first popularised by the Suzuki Burgman and later the Yamaha Aerox added to it. “Popularised” being the operating word because Aprilia also had a player in there from 2020, which has just been updated. So, what’s the maxi scooter scene like today and which one should you go get a test ride of? Let’s see.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Engine and output

Smaller rivals all make more power

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Engine

174.7cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled

156.9cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

156cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

155cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

Power

13.3hp at 7,200rpm

16.3hp at 8,750rpm

14.8hp at 8,000rpm

15hp at 8,000rpm

Torque

14.14Nm at 6,000rpm

14.9Nm at 6,500rpm

14Nm at 6,250rpm

13.9Nm at 6,500rpm

Transmission

CVT

CVT

CVT

CVT

Power-to-weight ratio

100.76hp/tonne

118.98hp/tonne

104.23hp/tonne

119.05hp/tonne

Don’t let the bigger displacement number mislead you into thinking the Aprilia SXR GT 175 is the most powerful of these scooters, because that’s not the case. The SXR has the only air-cooled mill in this class, possibly contributing to its lower output figures. Combine that with the weight and the Aprilia’s case only becomes weaker. For what it’s worth the Italian scooter delivers its peak torque faster than the others so that should be an advantage while plying within the city.

The Yamaha has the lowest kerb weight on this list, which contributes  to  the highest power-to-weight ratio, very closely followed by the Honda.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Dimensions and weight

Hero is the heaviest, Yamaha is the lightest

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Fuel tank capacity

7 litres

8.1 litres

7 litres

5.5 litres

Ground clearance

170mm

175mm

155mm

145mm

Seat height

800mm

NA

787mm

790mm

Kerb weight

132kg

137kg

142kg

126kg

Wheelbase

1362mm

1333mm

1348mm

1350mm

Aprilia gains some ground, or rather gets away from ground with its second highest ground clearance figures. However, it also has the tallest seat height of this bunch. While Yamaha’s ground clearance numbers seem the lowest, do note that the website specifies it to be minimum, which means that it’s measured under laden conditions. So, it’s actually the Hero that has the lowest ground clearance.

As for seat height, Honda doesn’t specify that for the ADV160, but it shouldn’t be too tall for it to be a concern for most Indians. On the other hand, the Xoom 160 is the heaviest of these four, which could prove to be tricky to some at low speed rides and reversing out of parking lots. Aprilia and Hero have neglected mentioning the under seat storage but none of these is likely to impress you in that specific aspect. For what it’s worth, the Honda ADV160 has the highest number of the lot, 27 litres followed by the Yamaha Aerox at 24.5 litres.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Tyres, brakes and suspension

Honda strikes the best balance in equipment

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Tyres (F, R)

120/70-14, 120/70-14

110/80-14, 130/70-13

120/70R14, 140/60R14

110/80-14, 140/70-14

Brakes (F, R)

220mm disc, 140mm drum; single-channel ABS

Disc, disc; single-channel ABS

240mm disc, drum; single-channel ABS

230mm disc, 130mm drum; single-channel ABS

Suspension (F, R)

Telescopic fork, Monoshock

Telescopic fork, twin-shock

Telescopic fork, twin-shock

Telescopic fork, twin-shock

Aprilia has given the SXR GT 175 the widest front tyre, but the rear tyre too is the exact same size which makes it the narrowest rear tyre in this list. Honda appears to have struck the best balance, with respect to the equipment on offer. Though that could change depending on the odd 14-13 front-rear wheel size’s real world implications on the ADV160’s handling.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Features

Honda has an unbeatable ‘feature’

A keyless system is present on all scooters but the Aprilia although Yamaha requires you to pony up for the Aerox S variant to get it. Of the four, Hero and Yamaha’s cockpit views are going to feel the oldest, simply because of their LCD screens. Both companies have packed it with features (call and SMS alerts, metrics on the app and turn-by-turn navigation, to name a few) but apples to apples, the SXR and ADV160 have more modern-looking TFT displays and they also match the former two in features. This will make a difference only if you clearly prefer one over the other, for otherwise there isn’t anything to fault with the Hero and the Yamaha’s displays.

Elsewhere, all offer some type of USB port for charging your devices, front cubby storage and LED lighting. On the convenience front, Hero, Honda and Yamaha offer an integrated starter-motor-generator which gives their scooters features like auto stop/start and a silent start. Honda and Yamaha offer traction control as standard.

A big advantage that only the Honda ADV160 can boast at the moment though, is its E85 compatibility. While Hero and Yamaha do offer other vehicles in their line-up with flex fuel compatibility, the Xoom and the Aerox respectively, do not have that and in these uncertain times, that’s certainly an unmissable advantage of the Honda.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Price

Honda’s advantages have a price to pay

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Price (ex-showroom)

Rs 1.30 lakh

Rs 1.70 lakh

Rs 1.45 lakh

Rs 1.46-1.50 lakh

The Aprilia’s an unbeatable bargain at this price with its nearest rival being the Xoom 160, closely followed by the Yamaha for its non-S version. Honda appears to offer the best balance of everything along with a currently significant E85 compatibility, but also costs Rs 40,000 over the Aprilia. While it’s easy to get confused over what is the right scooter for you, all of these – thankfully – make it unmistakably clear what they intend to offer. Hence, if you’re confused, figuring out your priorities and taking test rides (hopefully back-to-back) should help you pick the right one for you. If that happens to be the ADV160, you now know what you’re paying for.

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Similarities and differences explained

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Similarities and differences explained
Duster

Renault has expanded the new Duster line-up with a strong-hybrid option, joining the existing 1.0-litre and 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engines. While the hybrid shares much of its design and cabin layout with the petrol versions, there are differences in styling, equipment and, most importantly, how the two powertrains deliver performance and efficiency. Here’s a closer look at what sets them apart.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Exterior

The illuminated grille and badges are the main styling difference

Duster turbo petrol
Duster hybrid
 

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid

The Duster hybrid retains the turbo-petrol model’s overall design, including its eyebrow-shaped LED daytime running lamps, chunky body cladding, roof rails and C-pillar-mounted rear door handles.  It also has the same 212mm ground clearance.

The main styling changes are an illuminated ‘Duster’ grille emblem and ‘E-Tech Hybrid’ badges on the front doors and tailgate. The Hybrid version also gets frequency-dependent dampers. Boot capacity is lower than in the turbo-petrol versions, although the overall exterior design remains largely unchanged.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Interior and features

The cabin layout is similar, but the upholstery and equipment differ

Duster turbo petrol
Duster turbo hybrid
 

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid

The hybrid follows the turbo-petrol Duster’s dashboard layout, with a dual-screen setup and an e-shifter on the centre console. The hybrid gets a different upholstery scheme from the turbo-petrol Duster, with black upholstery and grey stitching on the Evolution, Desert Beige semi-leatherette on the Techno and Dune Brown leatherette on the Emotion. The hybrid also gets a smaller headrest.

The Duster hybrid is offered in Evolution, Techno and Emotion trims, while the turbo-petrol range gets Evolution, Techno, Techno+, Iconic and Iconic Launch Edition variants. 

The hybrid and turbo-petrol Duster share some equipment across their respective trims, but there are differences. The hybrid Evolution gets a 7-inch digital driver’s display, a 10.1-inch touchscreen and dual-zone automatic climate control. The turbo-petrol Evolution has the same touchscreen and driver’s display, but gets single-zone manual air conditioning. Both the hybrid and turbo-petrol Techno trims get a panoramic sunroof.

At the top of the range, the hybrid Emotion gets a 10.25-inch digital driver’s display, ventilated and electrically adjustable front seats, and a powered tailgate. The turbo-petrol Iconic offers these features too, but additionally gets a 360-degree camera and Level 2 ADAS, which are not available on the hybrid.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Engine and Performance

The 1.3-litre turbo-petrol makes more torque

Duster turbo petrol
Duster hybrid
 

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid

The Duster turbo-petrol is available with two engine options. The 1.0-litre, three-cylinder unit produces 100hp and 166Nm and is paired with a 6-speed manual gearbox. The larger 1.3-litre, four-cylinder engine develops 163hp and 280Nm, and is available with a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox.

The hybrid uses a naturally aspirated 1.8-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine paired with two electric motors: a 20hp generator and a 49hp motor that drives the wheels. The system produces a combined 160hp and 172Nm, with a 1.4kWh battery supporting the setup. It uses a ‘multi-mode’ automatic gearbox with two electric gears and four petrol gears.

The hybrid system automatically switches between six operating modes, including all-electric, petrol-only and series and series-parallel hybrid modes. Renault claims the Duster hybrid can cover up to 80 percent of city driving in pure electric mode and accelerate from 0-100kph in a claimed 9.61 seconds.

While the hybrid’s combined output of 160hp is close to the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol’s 163hp, its claimed torque figure of 172Nm is lower than the turbo-petrol’s 280Nm.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: mileage 

Duster hybrid mileage is 10.55kpl higher than turbo-petrol DCT

PowertrainTransmissionARAI-claimed mileage
1.0-litre turbo-petrol6-speed manual19.41kpl
1.3-litre turbo-petrol6-speed manual17.75kpl
1.3-litre turbo-petrol6-speed DCT automatic18.45kpl
1.8-litre strong hybridMulti-mode automatic29kpl

The hybrid’s claimed mileage is significantly higher than that of either turbo-petrol engine. The difference is 9.59kpl over the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol manual, 11.25kpl over the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol manual and 10.55kpl over the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol DCT. At 29kpl, the hybrid’s claimed mileage is around 57 percent higher than that of the DCT version. 

The hybrid has a 50-litre fuel tank, the same capacity as the turbo-petrol versions. Renault claims a driving range of more than 1,400km on a full tank of the Hybrid variant.

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Price

The hybrid costs more, even though it misses some features available on the top-spec turbo-petrol

TrimDuster hybridDuster turbo-petrol
Authentic–10.49 (1.0 MT)
Evolution16.9911.69 (1.0 MT); 12.99 (1.3 MT); 14.49 (1.3 DCT)
Techno18.9913.49 (1.0 MT); 14.49 (1.3 MT); 15.89 (1.3 DCT)
Techno+–15.29 (1.3 MT); 16.69 (1.3 DCT)
Emotion / Iconic19.49 (Emotion)16.99 (Iconic MT); 18.49 (Iconic DCT)

MT = manual; DCT = dual-clutch automatic

The hybrid’s introductory prices apply to deliveries until December 31, 2026. In Evolution trim, the hybrid costs Rs 2.50 lakh more than the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol DCT, while the top-spec Emotion hybrid is Rs 1 lakh more than the Iconic DCT. The hybrid offers higher claimed mileage but misses out on the 360-degree camera and Level 2 ADAS available on the turbo-petrol Iconic.

The hybrid version suits buyers who cover long distances and prioritize fuel efficiency, while the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol is worth considering for its higher torque and additional driver-assistance features.

All prices are ex-showroom, India.

Report Card: Maruti Victoris’ 1-Year Innings

Report Card: Maruti Victoris’ 1-Year Innings
Maruti Victoris one year report card

Maruti Suzuki introduced the Victoris SUV on September 15, 2026, as its second mid-size SUV. With the Victoris, Maruti aimed to capture a larger share of the mid-size SUV segment by retailing it through its widespread Arena dealership network, in contrast to its Nexa-sold stablemate, the Grand Vitara. The Victoris shares its platform and engines with the Grand Vitara but sports a distinct exterior design. Additionally, it introduced features such as an underbody-mounted CNG tank and became the first Maruti model to feature a Level 2 ADAS suite.

  1. Victoris records 1,47,602 units in total sales in its first year.
  2. Prices have increased/decreased for select variants; still range between Rs 10.5 lakh and Rs 19.99 lakh.
  3. No variant rejigs took place in its first year.

Maruti Victoris sales 

In its first year since launch, the Maruti Suzuki Victoris recorded sales of 1,47,602 units, averaging roughly 12,300 units per month. Monthly volumes began at 4,261 units in September 2025 and rose quickly to 13,496 units in October 2025. Following a minor dip to 12,300 units in November 2025, sales dropped by nearly half in December 2025. Peak sales were recorded in January 2026 at 15,240 units, after which the SUV maintained steady monthly volumes ranging between 10,000 and 13,000 units.

Despite launching after the Grand Vitara, the Victoris achieves higher monthly sales figures, largely supported by Maruti Suzuki’s wider Arena dealership network. Notably, the SUV crossed the 1-lakh sales milestone within eight months of launch—outpacing the Grand Vitara to reach this mark. 

Maruti Victoris variant -wise price 

Variant

Price now (Rs lakh)

Price at launch (Rs lakh)

1.5 LXi

10.50

10.50

1.5 LXi CNG

11.55

11.50

1.5 VXi

11.85

11.80

1.5 VXi AT

13.41

13.36

1.5 VXi CNG

12.90

12.80

1.5 VXi strong hybrid eCVT

16.43

16.38

1.5 ZXi  

13.62

13.57

1.5 ZXi AT

15.18

15.13

1.5 ZXi CNG

14.66

14.57

1.5 ZXi strong hybrid eCVT

18.00

17.80

1.5 ZXi(O)  

13.69

14.08

1.5 ZXi(O) AT 

15.25

15.64

1.5 ZXi(O) strong hybrid

18.43

18.39

1.5 ZXi+  

15.39

15.24

1.5 ZXi+ AT

17.34

17.19

1.5 ZXi+ AT AWD

18.69

18.64

1.5 ZXi+ strong hybrid eCVT

19.52

19.47

1.5 ZXi+(O) 

15.48

15.82

1.5 ZXi+(O)  AT

17.43

17.77

1.5 ZXi+(O) AT AWD

19.27

19.22

1.5 ZXi+(O) strong hybrid eCVT

19.99

19.99

The Victoris is priced between Rs 10.50 lakh and Rs 19.99 lakh, and is offered in several variants. Depending on the variant, prices have increased by up to Rs 20,000 because of hikes by the carmaker due to a rise in input costs. However, select variants of the Victoris saw a price cut of up to Rs 39,000 in July 2026.

Maruti Victoris milestones

Within its first year in the market, Maruti hasn’t introduced or discontinued any of its variants. Additionally, the SUV has not been subject to any recalls.

Maruti Victoris specifications

The Victoris is offered with petrol, CNG, and strong-hybrid powertrains. The petrol and CNG versions use a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated engine: the former produces 103hp and 139Nm, while the latter outputs 88hp and 122Nm. Petrol variants feature a 5-speed manual or a 6-speed automatic transmission, with the automatic also available in an all-wheel-drive (AWD) configuration. CNG versions come exclusively with a 5-speed manual.

The strong-hybrid variant is powered by a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated Atkinson-cycle petrol engine producing 92hp and 122Nm, paired with an e-CVT. The system incorporates a 0.76 kWh battery and an electric motor generating 80hp and 141Nm, delivering a combined peak power output of 116 hp.

In terms of fuel efficiency, the claimed figures for the petrol manual, petrol automatic, and petrol AWD variants are 21.18kpl, 21.06kpl, and 19.07kpl, respectively. The strong-hybrid model leads with a claimed efficiency of 28.65kpl, while the CNG version delivers 27.02km/kg.

All prices are ex-showroom, India

Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 vs Triumph Tracker 400 Comparison: Street Brawl

Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 vs Triumph Tracker 400 Comparison: Street Brawl
Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 vs Triumph Tracker 400 Comparison Lead Image

If you are considering either of these motorcycles, chances are you are also considering the other, especially since they both cost about the same. After the Triumph 400cc bikes were downsized, the Tracker 400 now uses a 349cc engine, while the Guerrilla 450 Apex is a sportier variant with more aggressive ergonomics and grippy, road-focused tyres, which I think suit the bike much better than those on the earlier variant.

On paper, the Tracker makes 40hp and 32Nm, while the Guerrilla produces 40.02hp and 40Nm. The Triumph is a lighter, more compact motorcycle, while the Royal Enfield has a larger engine with more torque and offers a stable, planted feel. So, which one makes more sense for someone looking for a sporty, entertaining roadster?

Design and Features

Both motorcycles have very different visual identities, and that is probably the first thing you’ll notice. The Tracker 400 is inspired by flat-track racers, with a flat seat, side number boards and a wide handlebar. But this isn’t really a dirt-track-focussed motorcycle underneath, as its ergonomics, chassis and suspension are properly road-oriented.

The Guerrilla 450 Apex, meanwhile, looks like a sporty and muscular roadster. Compared to the standard variant, it gets a small cowl over the headlight, a new aluminium handlebar, a removable rear-seat cowl and Vredestein Centauro ST+ tyres. The Apex also has a leaned-forward, more committed riding position compared with the standard Guerrilla.

The Tracker is a relatively compact motorcycle, while the Guerrilla’s longer 1,440mm wheelbase and broad 160-section rear tyre give it a more substantial stance. The Triumph gets a larger 13-litre fuel tank compared with the Guerrilla’s 11-litre unit, which can be tedious when long-distance touring.

Both motorcycles are equally impressive when it comes to build quality and fit and finish. The Tracker features the same digi-analogue console we have seen on all the other Triumph 400 models, while the Guerrilla features the same TFT unit from the Himalayan. The Guerrilla gets two riding modes (Sport and Street), both of which feel quite similar. On the other hand, the Tracker gets a switchable traction control system that the Guerrilla misses out on. Neither has a quickshifter. In terms of convenience, the Guerrilla has a more accessible 780mm seat height and also gets a main stand, which aids in easier chain maintenance.

There is also a difference in ergonomics. The Tracker’s seat is flat and the riding position is relatively sporty, with rear-set footpegs that suit the character of the bike. The Guerrilla Apex has a lower and more accessible 780mm seat and roadster-like, neutral-set footpegs, along with a committed upper-body position. Between the two, you sit on top of the Tracker with its flat seat, while on the Guerrilla, you sit inside the curved seat, and it is also the more comfortable of the two.

Performance and Fuel Economy

This is where things get interesting because the Tracker 400’s 349cc engine is 103cc smaller than the Guerrilla’s 452cc unit, yet peak power is almost identical. The Triumph produces 40hp at 8,750rpm and 32Nm at 7,500rpm, while the Royal Enfield makes 40.02hp at 8,000rpm. Of course, the difference comes in torque, where the RE makes a much healthier 40Nm at 5,500rpm.

The difference in torque delivery is immediately noticeable. The Tracker’s engine likes to be revved out, but you still have to work it quite a bit. The Guerrilla’s Sherpa engine has a different personality. It doesn’t need to be worked as hard, and the additional 8Nm gives it much stronger roll-on performance. It feels more raw and powerful as soon as you open the throttle, and the surge in power after 6,000rpm makes it feel really exciting. After 7,000rpm, there are some vibrations, but nothing that really ruins the riding experience.

The Tracker’s shorter-stroke engine is very refined at moderate engine speeds, but once you start revving it harder, some buzz makes its way into the tank and footpegs at the top end of the rev range. It remains an entertaining engine, but considering I have ridden the older 398cc Thruxton 400, I feel like it misses out on that initial torque kick.

In our performance tests, the Guerrilla completed the 0-100kph sprint in 6.34 seconds, while the Tracker took 7.55 seconds for the same, marking a difference of 1.21 seconds. The real difference in performance was more visible in the roll-on acceleration tests where the Guerrilla 450 Apex was notably quicker.

Fuel efficiency was almost on par in our tests, where the Tracker delivered 24.1kpl in the city and 31.71kpl on the highway, while the Guerrilla gave us 25.23kpl in the city and 32.82kpl on the highway. The Triumph’s 13-litre tank will give it a better range despite the marginally lower highway efficiency. 

Ride and Handling

The biggest difference between these two motorcycles becomes apparent once the road starts to twist. The Guerrilla feels longer and heavier and needs a bit of muscling around, but once in a corner, it is extremely stable and planted. The grip offered by the Vredestein tyres is superb and inspires a lot of confidence. The Tracker, on the other hand, feels light, nimble and very easy to flick into corners, thanks to its shorter wheelbase and the leverage offered by the wide handlebars. Its blocky MRF tyres work well, but given how it rides more like a sporty roadster rather than a tracker, stickier tyres would have been a better choice.

While many might be disappointed about the Guerrilla 450 Apex not getting a USD fork, the suspension does work much better than the Tracker’s over bad roads and undulations. The setup feels plusher than the Tracker, which has a quicker rebound that can toss you up if you hit potholes at higher speeds. 

Despite the Triumph being the more compact motorcycle, I felt like it was easier to filter through traffic on the Guerrilla, and that is because the Triumph has slightly wider handlebars and mirrors that jut out slightly more. I do remember my time spent with the Guerrilla on a go-kart track, and it was genuinely a lot of fun. The tyres kept up with the performance that the engine offers, and it was a blast to exploit the full capabilities of the bike. The only limitation was the footpegs, which kept scraping when the bike was leaned over. That said, this was never a problem out on the road.

Braking hardware is strong on both. The Tracker gets a 300mm front disc with a four-piston radial ByBre caliper, while the Guerrilla uses a 310mm front disc and 270mm rear disc. The Guerrilla stopped marginally quicker in our braking test from 60-0kph, but I did notice that the ABS intervention can be strong when emergency braking from higher speeds.

Price and Verdict

These two motorcycles are closer than their engine capacities suggest. The Tracker proves that you don’t need a large engine to make for a fun roadster. Its 349cc motor makes almost as much peak power as the Guerrilla, and its compact dimensions, wide handlebar and sporty chassis make it an engaging motorcycle on a twisty road.

The Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 Apex, however, takes a more muscular approach. Its 452cc engine has substantially more torque, the Vredestein tyres give it a level of grip that suits its performance, and the longer wheelbase also gives it a reassuring planted character, particularly when you’re riding quickly.

They offer two distinct interpretations of the sporty modern roadster. The Tracker’s biggest strength is its agility. It feels smaller, lighter and more eager to change direction quickly. The Guerrilla’s strength is the breadth of its performance. There’s more torque, more road presence and a greater sense of stability when you’re pushing it. And that is ultimately what separates them. The Triumph is the more playful motorcycle, thanks to its nimble nature, while the Guerrilla Apex feels like a more serious attempt at turning the standard roadster into a proper performance-oriented, corner-carving machine.

While it is difficult to pick between these two motorcycles, considering that they do things in different ways, you can’t look past the value that the Guerrilla offers. Despite falling into the 40 percent GST bracket, its starting price is just Rs 10,000 more than that of the Tracker. 
To put things into perspective, the KTM 390 Duke R, which used to be the benchmark for affordable and accessible performance when its Gen 1 model was launched in India, is now priced at Rs 3.45 lakh (ex-showroom), taking its on-road price upwards of Rs 4 lakh. So the way I see it, the Guerrilla 450 Apex is now the new benchmark when it comes to affordable performance in India. Who’d have ever thought that the crown would one day be worn by a Royal Enfield.

2027 Kawasaki Z1100 launched at Rs 12.79 lakh

2027 Kawasaki Z1100 launched at Rs 12.79 lakh
2027 Kawsaki Z1100 front right quarter profile.

Kawasaki has launched the 2027 Z1100 at Rs 12.79 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi), with bookings and deliveries starting today across showrooms in India.

  1. Retains the 1099cc inline-four engine making 136hp and 113Nm
  2. Continues with the single Ebony/Metallic Carbon Grey colour

2027 Kawasaki Z1100 details

Mechanically identical to the 2026 version

Kawasaki has not changed the Z1100 in any way for next year with the super-naked motorcycle remaining identical to its predecessor in every single way. Which means, it retains the 1099cc, in-line-four cylinder, liquid-cooled engine making 136hp and 113Nm; the unit is also shared with the recently updated adventure tourer, Versys 1100 at a slightly lower state of tune (135hp and 112Nm).

The tubular diamond chassis is suspended by a 41mm USD fork with 120mm travel and a back-linkage monoshock with 136mm travel. The former is compression and rebound adjustability, while the latter gets preload and rebound adjustability. Brakes are dual 310mm, Kawasaki-branded Brembo at the front, and 260mm single disc at the rear. The Z1100 continues to offer the same rider aids as before some of which are, a 5-inch TFT display, bi-directional quickshifter, corner-sensitive three levels of traction control and dual-channel ABS, cruise control and smartphone connectivity.

A 17-litre fuel tank also makes the Z1100 quite the mile muncher and despite the 220kg weight ,its relatively manageable under most conditions. With its price, it rivals motorcycles like the Honda CB1000 Hornet SP (Rs 13.29 lakh) with the smaller Z900 sitting lower (Rs 9.99 lakh).
 

3 reasons to buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG and 3 reasons not to

3 reasons to buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG and 3 reasons not to
Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG front quarter

The Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG takes on the Tata Nexon iCNG and the Maruti Brezza CNG in the CNG compact SUV space. Priced from Rs 9.99 lakh to Rs 12.27 lakh (ex-showroom), it carries a premium of Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.2 lakh over the corresponding petrol versions. Before signing on the dotted line, here are the key strengths and weaknesses of this Mahindra SUV.

Reasons to buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG

Strong performance on CNG

The XUV 3XO CNG loses none of its power when running on gas

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG engine

The 1.2-litre MPFI (multi-point fuel-injected) turbo-petrol engine of the XUV 3XO CNG is the same unit found in the lower and mid-spec petrol trims. Here it develops 111hp and 200Nm in both petrol and CNG modes. While there’s some turbo lag below 2,000rpm, the engine pulls eagerly once it crosses that mark. This unit is also notable for its refinement and tractability, rarely requiring one to drop down to first gear, for going over speed breakers, for example.

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG mode switch

Switching between petrol and CNG is seamless as well, and few would be able to tell which fuel the XUV 3XO ZNG is running on. While we’re yet to test it, Mahindra claims a mileage of 24.7km/kg for this compact SUV, translating to a theoretical range of 247km on CNG.

Comfy ride and tidy handling

Mahindra has retuned the suspension to accommodate the extra heft of the CNG kit

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG front quarter tracking

The CNG hardware adds around 100kg to the XUV 3XO’s kerb weight, with the majority of it being over the rear axle. Mahindra has reworked the suspension to compensate for this heft. The result is a slightly firm ride but one that deals with bad roads quite well.

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG steering modes

Adding to the overall comfort here are the 16-inch wheels wrapped with high-profile tyres. These manage to cushion the cabin from sharp bumps. The XUV 3XO CNG rides better than most cars in its segment. What’s good is that this ride comfort doesn’t come at the cost of sloppy handling. In fact, this Mahindra SUV feels tight and planted around corners. The steering is direct and doesn’t require much effort, with drivers being offered three steering modes for flexibility.

Upmarket cabin

This cabin is just as plush as that of the petrol and diesel versions

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG seats

A CNG switch next to the steering wheel aside, the cabin of the XUV 3XO CNG is identical to that of non-CNG versions. While it can’t be had in equally top-end trim levels, the CNG version is available with a dual-tone dashboard, gloss black accents and leatherette upholstery. Overall, there’s a feeling of good build that’s backed by a sense of premiumness. Meanwhile, the rear seat is quite roomy for the class and can accommodate three adults without much fuss.

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG digital instrument panel

The top-spec RevX A trim gets twin 10.25-inch screens, a panoramic sunroof and a 6-speaker audio system with Dolby Atmos. Mahindra says the CNG version is engineered to match the five-star Bharat NCAP safety rating of other combustion-powered XUV 3XO versions. Standard safety features here include 6 airbags, stability control, ISOFIX anchors and a reversing camera.

Reasons not to buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG

Small boot

The twin-tank setup eats into what was already a small boot

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG tanks

The 295-litre boot of the XUV 3XO was already the most compact in the segment. Despite moving the spare wheel under the car’s body and fitting the twin cylinders beneath the boot floor, the XUV 3XO CNG’s boot is even more compromised – offering just 270 litres of cargo space. It’s only its width that allows up to four cabin-sized bags to be stored.

Cabin niggles

The XUV 3XO CNG’s interior isn’t devoid of ergonomic flaws

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG interior

While the black leatherette seats look sporty, they don’t get a ventilation function. This means that, on a bright sunny day, they will heat up quite quickly. If you’ve a larger build, the front seats of the XUV 3XO CNG will feel lacking in space. Adding to the ergonomic niggles is the steering wheel, which cannot be adjusted for reach, making it harder to find a comfortable driving position. Lastly, not only is the XUV 3XO CNG’s driver footwell cramped, there’s also no dead pedal.

Limited options

Customers get only mid-spec trim levels with the CNG version

Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG headlamps

The CNG version of the Mahindra XUV 3XO is sold in just four trim levels, all of which are mid-spec options within the broader line-up. This limitation becomes obvious given the lack of a 360-degree camera, ventilated front seats, or a wireless charging pad – these are available in the Nexon iCNG. There are no fog lamps, either. Another limitation is that the CNG version only comes with a 6-speed manual, which has long throws and a fair amount of clutch pedal travel.

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon vs Rivals: Price and Specifications Compared

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon vs Rivals: Price and Specifications Compared
Hero Xtreme 160R Carbon, Pulsar N160 SS and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V in clockwise direction.

The 160cc segment was kickstarted and subsequently dominated by the TVS Apache RTR 160 and now, the RTR 160 4V is the manufacturer’s best-selling Apache, with the RTR 160 (2V) following in its footsteps. Bajaj has been attacking this duo with a trident of motorcycles, the N160, classic 150, and the NS160. In this fight, Hero’s offering the Xtreme 160R has taken a backseat all this while, but Hero’s looking to get in the front with the newly updated version of its street-naked motorcycle. Does it, really? Let’s see.

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon vs Rivals: Engine and output

Bajaj has the biggest engine with the most power

 

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Bajaj Pulsar N160 SS

Engine

163.2cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled

159.7cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled

164.9cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled

Power

17.1hp at 8,750rpm

17.6hp at 8,650rpm

18.5hp at 9,500rpm

Torque

14.6Nm at 6,500rpm

14.7Nm at 7,500rpm

14.4Nm at 8,000rpm

Transmission

5-speed

5-speed

5-speed

Power-to-weight ratio

114.77hp/tonne

120.21hp/tonne

122.52hp/tonne

Hero left the 163.2cc engine almost completely untouched, only raising the peak power output by a meagre 0.2hp compared to earlier. Bajaj’s upgrade to the N160 was more comprehensive than Hero and TVS, even though the other two motorcycles are chronologically newer. Said update has thus helped the N160 SS maintain the highest horsepower of the trio, though it comes in third with respect to torque.

However, the torque race is a very close one and thus unlikely to matter in real-world conditions. The noteworthy jump in power also helps Bajaj maintain a higher power-to-weight ratio, despite being the heaviest of the three motorcycles.

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon vs rivals: Dimensions and weight

Pulsar is the heaviest, but makes up for it

 

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Bajaj Pulsar N160 SS

Fuel tank capacity

12 litres

12 litres

14 litres

Ground clearance

165mm

180mm

165mm

Kerb weight

149kg

146kg

151kg

Seat height

805mm

790mm

795mm

Wheelbase

1,329mm

1,357mm

1,348mm

None of these motorcycles received a generational change to the platform so the numbers largely remain the same as earlier. Starting off with the Xtreme 160R 4V, Hero has given it some additional features which has made it 1.5kg heavier than the previous Combat Edition and the seat height is a negligible 5mm taller too.

TVS added exactly two new features to the Apache so it remains exactly where it was before and is the motorcycle with the lowest seat height, while having the most amount of ground clearance. The Pulsar N160 is the heaviest of the lot, but also has two additional litres of fuel tank capacity, which is a factor in the additional weight. In this class, that translates to – at the very least – 80km of real-world range so that’s not a small advantage to the Bajaj.

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon vs Rivals: Tyres, brakes and suspension

Hero has a smaller rear brake and TVS has a narrower front tyre

 

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Bajaj Pulsar N160 SS

Tyres (F, R)

100/80-17, 130/70R17

90/90-17, 130/70R17

100/80-17, 130/70R17

Brakes (F, R)

276mm disc, 220mm disc, dual-channel ABS

270mm disc, 240mm disc, dual-channel ABS

300mm disc, 230mm disc, dual-channel ABS

Suspension (F, R)

37mm USD fork, monoshock

37mm USD fork, monoshock

37mm USD fork, monoshock

Things continue to even out in this section but Bajaj makes a statement with the largest front disc rotor, which is actually from a class above. All three offer dual-channel ABS as standard on the top variants, and all have a lower variant with right-side-up (RSU) telescopic fork and single-channel ABS. Hero is the only manufacturer to offer a KYB, who is a suspension specialist, built fork but also has given the Xtreme 160R the smallest rear disc. TVS technically does have the smallest tyre of the three, but it’s not alarmingly small to imply handling issues.

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon vs Rivals: Features

Hero’s redemption attempt

This is the area Hero has caught up the most to the other two, after design. Though the Combat Edition added quite a bit to make the Xtreme 160R last year, the fight now feels even across the board, which is a great thing for you and me as consumers.

On the top Carbon variant, you get a 4.2-inch TFT display that goes toe-to-toe with the other two on this list. Xtreme 160R is the only motorcycle in this segment to give you cruise control and TVS, despite technically being the oldest platform of the lot, gives a tough fight to the other two. In terms of outright feature-set, the Bajaj still offers a higher number of features, such as an additional ride mode, document storage on the display and the likes, but TVS and Hero fight valiantly. The Hero still misses out on features such as, a slip-and-assist clutch, a dedicated mode to make low speed riding easier (Crawl mode on Bajaj, GTT on TVS) and Google Maps mirroring. So, if you’re looking for the most feature-loaded Hero, take a gander at the Xtreme 250R, which also got updated with quite a bit of features and is sitting in the segment above.

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Carbon vs Rivals: Price

Carefully treading the affordable-line

 

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Bajaj Pulsar N160 SS

Price (ex-showroom)

Rs 1.27-1.41 lakh

Rs 1.20-1.42 lakh

Rs 1.22-1.43 lakh

Hero is currently the most expensive of the three, especially if you’re looking to get the base variant; beyond that, digging further into the price difference will be splitting hairs, so look at the other sections to see if they help you make a choice. That being said, the 160cc segment in India is one of, if not, the most competitive one so whichever one you choose, you’re unlikely to make a truly bad one. See which motorcycle catches your eye the fastest and pulls your heart strings the hardest after the test ride, and you’ll probably know what you’re bringing home.

If you’re determined to live in the xtreme, er, extreme, Hero is currently taking bookings for the all-new Xtreme 160R 4V, whereas the other two motorcycles are already available in their respective showrooms. Unlike its bigger brother, the 160R 4V will be available in all Hero showrooms across the country – which is quite a large network. Deliveries for it are expected to begin in November.

Universo Ferrari exhibition debuts F80, Luce, 12Cilindri Manuale in India

Universo Ferrari exhibition debuts F80, Luce, 12Cilindri Manuale in India
Universo Ferrari exhibition

Ferrari has officially opened the doors to its first-ever Universo Ferrari exhibition in India. Held at Yashobhoomi, Dwarka in New Delhi from 17 October to 1 November, Universo Ferrari offers a comprehensive look at the Italian marque’s heritage, motorsport pedigree, technology, and craftsmanship. More pertinently, several exciting Ferraris are also on display at Universo Ferrari, some of them for the first time in India. Let’s have a look at the Ferrari cars that have debuted in India as part of Universo Ferrari.

Ferrari F80

Revealed in 2024 as a successor to the LaFerrari, and to commemorate Ferrari’s 80th anniversary, the F80 is the brand’s most powerful road-going offering yet. Producing a combined 1,200hp from its 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6 hybrid powertrain, the F80 claims a ridiculous 0-100kph time of 2.15 seconds and a 0-200kph time of 5.75 seconds. All-wheel drive is fitted as standard, along with a slew of motorsport-derived tech like an MGU-K energy recovery system and electric turbos.

On the outside, the F80 matches the wildness of its powertrain with design elements like a slew of air ducts across the body, a black strip between the headlamps, an active rear wing, a central exhaust, and a massive rear diffuser. Inside, things are quite minimalistic and driver-focused – highlights include a motorsport-style ovoid steering wheel, a large digital driver’s display, an angled centre console, and bucket seats. Ferrari has sold through all 799 units of the F80, each retailing for €3 million (Rs 32 crore), before options.

Ferrari Luce

The Luce is Ferrari’s first EV, and perhaps its most controversial offering. Based on an all-new 800-volt architecture, the Luce features a 122kWh battery and four electric motors producing a combined 1,050hp and 990Nm. Ferrari claims a 0-100kph time of 2.5 seconds, a top speed of 310kph, and a range of up to 530km. Unlike other EVs, the Luce doesn’t pump artificial engine noises into the cabin via speakers – instead, the electric motors are tuned to emit a distinct, high-pitched sound.

Styled by LoveFrom, a firm co-founded by former Apple designer Jony Ive, the Luce features a distinctive two-piece body structure, with a gloss-black passenger cell enclosed within a coloured aluminium shell. It gets recessed LED headlamps, quad LED tail-lamps, suicide doors, and staggered 23-inch front and 24-inch rear wheels. At 5,026mm long, the Luce is the largest Ferrari yet, and its 0.254 drag coefficient is the lowest among road-legal Ferraris. The interior sports a retro-inspired design, with a 10-inch touchscreen, a 12.5-inch OLED driver’s display, and seating for five – a first for a Ferrari. Order books are open for the Luce in overseas markets, with prices starting at 550,000 euros (approximately Rs 6.1 crore) before options.

Ferrari 12Cilindri Manuale

Unveiled a few months ago, the 12Cilindri Manuale is a limited-run special and the first Ferrari in 14 years to offer a manual gearbox. Only, this gearbox isn’t a true manual, but a simulated ‘Manuale By-Wire’ system based on the 12Cilindri’s 8-speed dual-clutch automatic. The experience is intact, however, with a clutch pedal, 6 speeds, a gated shifter, and the ability to stall and clutch-dump the car. If needed, you can even switch to automatic mode and let the DCT take over. Elsewhere, the Manuale retains the 12Cilindri’s 830hp 6.5-litre naturally aspirated V12, claiming a 0-100kph time of 2.9 seconds and a top speed of 340kph.

The exterior largely mirrors that of the standard 12Cilindri but gets exclusive Manuale badges, silver-finished Ferrari side logos, pinstripes on the front splitter and rear winglets, and bespoke five-spoke forged alloy wheels available in four finishes. Inside, the centre console has been redesigned to accommodate a rounded aluminium gear lever inspired by classic Ferrari gated shifters, available in silver or black. Buyers can also choose comfort or racing seats with six vertical grooves. Limited to 1,499 units, the 12Cilindri Manuale is priced from €590,000 (approximately Rs 6.42 crore), before options.

Ferrari 499P

The 499P Le Mans Hypercar was revealed in 2022 as Ferrari’s return to the top class of endurance racing after 50 years. It’s powered by a twin-turbo V6 based on the architecture of the engine used in the 296 GT3, itself derived from the road-going 296 GTB. Developed specifically for racing, the 499P’s V6 works with a bespoke 900-volt, 200kW energy recovery system (ERS) connected to the front axle, forming a hybrid all-wheel drive layout. A brake-by-wire system recovers kinetic energy, while power is delivered through a 7-speed sequential gearbox. Balance of Performance regulations limit the 499P’s total output to 680hp.

The 499P’s design pays tribute to Ferrari’s endurance racing heritage, particularly the 312P prototype from 1973 – Ferrari’s last factory entry in the top class. Its name refers to the 499cc displacement of each cylinder, while ‘P’ stands for Prototype. A yellow stripe runs through the livery – another nod to the 312P – while carbonfibre construction allows for a 1,030kg baseline weight. The 499P brought home several accolades for Ferrari, such as three consecutive Le Mans victories (2023, 2024, and 2025), a complete sweep at the 2025 FIA World Endurance Championship, and more.

Ferrari SF-26

Ferrari pulled the wraps off the SF-26 racer back in January 2026. Built for F1’s 2026 technical regulations overhaul, the SF-26 is powering by Ferrari’s 067/6 power unit – a 1.6-litre turbocharged V6 that can run on sustainable fuel blends and is paired with a heavily bolstered 350kW MGU-K system, creating a near 50-50 performance split between combustion and electric power. 
Driven by Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton, the SF-26 has compiled 11 Grand Prix podiums and 2 victories, with dramatic wins at the Spanish Grand Prix with Hamilton and the British Grand Prix with Leclerc.

The SF-26’s bodywork shifts away from the previous ground-effect era toward a lighter, more agile 770kg carbon-composite structure. It features advanced active aerodynamics with movable front and rear wings to minimise drag on straights while maximising cornering downforce. Visually, the SF-26 incorporates push-rod suspension on both axles and debuts a gloss Rosso Scuderia livery accented with white.

Renault Duster hybrid launched at Rs 16.99 lakh

Renault Duster hybrid launched at Rs 16.99 lakh
Renault Duster hybrid launched

Renault has launched the Duster hybrid in India at an introductory price of Rs 16.99 lakh for the entry-level Evolution trim, with prices going up to Rs 19.49 lakh for the top-end Emotion trim. Customer bookings are underway at Rs 21,000, with deliveries scheduled to begin in November. The Duster hybrid takes on the strong-hybrid versions of the Maruti Grand Vitara, Maruti Victoris and Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder.

  1. 1.8-litre petrol and two electric motors make a combined 160hp, with 0-100kph in a claimed 9.61sec.
  2. 1.4kWh battery pack, multi-mode automatic gearbox and a claimed 29kpl.
  3. Features include ventilated seats, panoramic sunroof, dual-zone climate control and more.

Renault Duster hybrid prices

The Duster hybrid range is available in three trim levels

Renault Duster hybrid price list (Rs, lakh)

Trims

Prices (ex-showroom)

Evolution

16.99

Techno

18.99

Emotion

19.49

Renault is offering the Duster hybrid in three trims: Evolution, Techno and Emotion. These introductory prices apply to all deliveries until December 31, 2026, and R-Pass owners will get priority deliveries. Buyers can also opt for the Renault Protect 360 ownership package, priced from Rs 89,900, which bundles three years of comprehensive insurance, three years of scheduled maintenance and a three-year assured resale value.

Renault Duster hybrid powertrain and mileage

The E-Tech hybrid features a 1.4kWh battery pack and a multi-mode automatic transmission

Renault Duster hybrid engine

The Duster is based on Renault’s RGMP platform, which the brand says can accommodate petrol, hybrid and CNG powertrains. The hybrid is equipped with the brand’s ‘E-Tech 160’ system, which pairs a 1.8-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with two electric motors. The Atkinson-cycle engine makes 110hp and 175Nm, and Renault claims it is the biggest engine in the segment, with a thermal efficiency of up to 41 percent. A high-voltage starter-generator mounted on the engine handles engine starts, smooths out gearshifts and charges the battery, including through regenerative braking. A separate 50hp traction motor, connected directly to the driveline, drives the front wheels and produces 208Nm. The combined system output stands at 160hp, which Renault says is the highest in the segment.

Renault Duster Hybrid Drive Selector

The hybrid system runs on a 1.4kWh, 247V NMC battery pack with direct refrigerant cooling. Transmission duties are handled by what Renault calls a “multi-mode automatic” gearbox, with two electric gears and four petrol gears. The system switches automatically between six operating modes, including all-electric, petrol-only, and series and series-parallel hybrid. The French automaker claims the hybrid can manage up to 80 percent of city driving in pure electric mode, and a 0-100kph time of 9.61sec, which it says is the quickest in the segment. The Duster hybrid also gets frequency-dependent dampers.

The ARAI-certified mileage of the Renault Duster hybrid is 29kpl, which the brand says makes it the most fuel-efficient hybrid in India, ahead of rivals such as the Maruti Victoris hybrid, Maruti Grand Vitara hybrid and Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder hybrid. Combined with a 50-litre fuel tank, Renault claims a total driving range of over 1,400km.

Renault Duster hybrid exterior design

Overall styling is largely similar to the turbo-petrol Duster

Renault Duster Hybrid Front Quarter

The Duster hybrid looks largely the same as the turbo-petrol versions, with chunky body cladding, C-pillar-mounted rear door handles, roof rails and eyebrow-style DRLs (daytime running lights). Up front, the signature grille gets an illuminated ‘Duster’ emblem, and full-LED headlamps are offered from the Techno trim onwards.

Renault Duster Hybrid Rear Quarter

The base Evolution trim rides on 18-inch flex wheels, while the top-spec Emotion gets 18-inch diamond-cut alloys. At the rear is an LED horizontal light bar, while there are ‘E-Tech’ badges on the front doors and the tailgate. The Duster hybrid’s ground clearance stands at 212mm.

Renault Duster hybrid interior and features

Feature highlights include a pano sunroof, ventilated seats and a 10.25-inch digital cluster

Renault Duster Hybrid Interior

The Duster hybrid’s cabin follows the general design of the turbo-petrol versions, with a dual-screen layout. The mid-spec Techno gets Desert Beige semi-leatherette upholstery, while the top-spec Emotion gets Dune Brown leatherette upholstery.

Standard features on the base Evolution trim include a 10.1-inch touchscreen, a 7-inch digital driver’s display and dual-zone automatic climate control. The Techno adds an electric panoramic sunroof, keyless entry with push-button start and connected car tech via the ‘MyRenault’ (MYR) app. The range-topping Emotion trim gets a larger 10.25-inch digital driver’s display, 6-way electrically adjustable and ventilated front seats, and a powered tailgate.

Renault Duster hybrid safety features

A wide array of safety tech is on offer

Renault claims that the Duster hybrid’s entry-level Evolution trim gets 38 safety features as standard. These come in the form of 6 airbags, hill-start assist, cruise control, rear parking sensors and a rearview camera.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG: CNG efficiency, petrol performance

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG: CNG efficiency, petrol performance
Mahindra XUV 3XO CNG review

CNG is shaping up to be the new diesel. For the second year running, CNG passenger vehicles outsold diesels, accounting for 21.98 percent of the market compared to 18.08 percent for oil burners in FY2026. That is a very big deal. Big enough for Mahindra – traditionally a diesel-first brand – to sit up, take notice and want a piece of the action. Its first attempt – if you don’t count the fleet-only KUV100 CNG – is the Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG. Read as Zee-NG and pronounced Zing. The headline is that it makes the same amount of power as the pure-petrol 3XO TCMPFi. We experienced it in Mumbai to see if it really has zing.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG Exterior Design and Engineering – 7/10

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

Outside, there isn’t much to tell the ZNG apart from the regular XUV 3XO. Our test car is based on the REVX trim and gets a body-coloured grille, while other trims gloss black. LED lighting is present, though fog lamps are missing even on the top REVX A CNG trim. 

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG
ZNG badge on the tailgate is the only exterior telltale of the CNG powertrain.

In profile, you’ll notice the gloss black 16-inch wheels – the largest size available on the ZNG, with 17s reserved for the pure-petrol TGDi. At the rear is the clearest giveaway of its CNG powertrain: a ZNG badge on the tailgate.

XUV 3XO ZNG Interior Space and Comfort – 8/10

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

Inside, too, the ZNG is largely identical to its petrol and diesel counterparts, with a CNG switch to the right of the steering wheel being the only real giveaway. The dual-tone dashboard with lots of gloss black trim is otherwise carried over unchanged. Despite not being the top of the line variant, the cabin has an upmarket and well-trimmed air to it. 

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

Our REVX A test car gets black leatherette seats, which can get quite hot, and they lack ventilation, just like the regular 3XO. The front seats are also a bit tight for larger frames, and the lack of a telescoping steering makes it hard to get comfy. Another ergonomic gripe is the tight driver’s footwell, with no dead pedal – pertinent as a six-speed manual is your only gearbox option.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

The rear seat remains spacious and comfortable for its segment, and accommodating three abreast is not an issue. One area where the 3XO fell short was boot space, measuring just 295 litres – the smallest in the segment. To keep as much of the boot intact as possible, Mahindra has moved the space-saver spare under the body and placed a dual-tank setup under the boot floor. The combined liquid capacity of the tanks is 60 litres, which translates to 10kg of CNG capacity. 

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

Boot capacity has dropped to 270 litres, which is smallest amongst immediate rivals, however it remains fairly wide and can accommodate up to four cabin bags.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG Features and Safety – 8/10

The 3XO ZNG is available in four trims, which offer the same features as their petrol and diesel counterparts. The highlights are a pair of sharp 10.25-inch screens for infotainment and instrumentation, a panoramic sunroof and a six-speaker audio system with Dolby Atmos. 

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

The digital instrument cluster has a few more CNG-related functions. Hit the CNG switch, and an indicator on the digital instrument cluster confirms the fuel you are using, while the fuel gauge changes to display the fuel level. The cluster can also show the ratio of time spent in each fuel mode and the corresponding fuel efficiency.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

As such, the 3XO ZNG is reasonably well equipped compared to equivalent variants of its main rival, the Tata Nexon iCNG. However, the Nexon offers a wider choice of CNG variants, with top-spec versions getting features such as a 360-degree camera, ventilated front seats and a wireless charger, all of which the Mahindra misses out on.

The safety kit is quite comprehensive, featuring six airbags, ESC, ISOFIX mounts, a tyre pressure monitoring system and a reversing camera. The regular XUV 3XO is also a five-star Bharat NCAP safety-rated car, and Mahindra says the ZNG has been engineered to meet the same standards.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG Performance and Refinement – 8/10

Powering the ZNG is the same 1.2-litre multi-point fuel injection (MPFi) turbo-petrol engine that does duty on the lower and mid-level trims of the 3XO. The kicker is that Mahindra quotes the exact same power and torque figures for CNG as for the pure-petrol version – 111hp and 200Nm. That is highly unusual, as a 10 to 15 percent drop in power figures is the norm. For comparison, its direct rival, the Tata Nexon iCNG, loses 20hp when switching from petrol to CNG. Mahindra says it has managed this with the use of a 10-bar CNG injection system. It also says the turbocharger and ECU calibration have been optimised to run on CNG, and initial impressions seem to back this up.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG
1.2-litre TCMPFI engine uses a 10-bar CNG injection system; Mahindra claims identical 111hp and 200Nm figures for petrol and CNG.

In everyday driving, the difference between CNG and petrol modes is barely noticeable. The engine feels smooth and refined in both, only becoming audible when extended. Performance, too, is very similar. Throttle response is good and the motor feels tractable, rarely requiring a shift into first when negotiating a speed breaker. There is a bit of turbo lag below 2,000rpm, but get past this and performance feels brisk.

The switch between modes is also quite seamless, with no apparent jerkiness or change in engine note. However, switch back and forth a few times, and you’ll notice the throttle response is ever so slightly duller in CNG mode, and there are times when it will hesitate on sudden throttle inputs. Overall, though, calibration in CNG mode is very good, and in everyday driving, there is very little to fault.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG
Performance feels brisk once you get past 2000rpm.

While the pure-petrol version of this engine can be had with a six-speed torque-converter automatic, the ZNG is only available with the six-speed manual. While its immediate rivals don’t offer an automatic with CNG either, Mahindra would have done well to offer at least an AMT. As it is, the manual is a smooth and easy-to-use unit, but not quite at the level of its Japanese or Korean competition. Its throws are a bit too long, and the clutch, while light, has a long travel.

In terms of outright performance, Mahindra claims an 11.8sec 0-100kph time for the ZNG. We conducted a quick performance test (not to Autocar India standards), which resulted in a 0-100kph time of 12.98s on petrol and 12.64s on CNG – a difference we put down to the launch. In-gear acceleration figures paint a clearer picture, where the ZNG was quicker in petrol mode by about 0.7 seconds in both 20-80kph and 40-100kph runs. Nevertheless, performance in either CNG or petrol is so close that most drivers would be hard-pressed to tell the difference.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG Mileage and Efficiency – 8/10

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

Mahindra claims an efficiency figure of 24.7km/kg for the XUV 3XO ZNG, which translates to a theoretical range of 247km from its 10kg CNG capacity. 

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG
CNG filler neatly positioned beside the fuel filler; fuel filler door still has a manual release in the cabin.

It also gets an idle-stop/start function, which should help efficiency. We will verify these claims with a real-world test soon.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG Ride Comfort and Handling – 9/10

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG
Light steering works well in town; steering modes dial up resistance but don’t offer better feel.

The switch to CNG adds around 100kg to the 3XO, most of it concentrated at the rear. To ensure this doesn’t affect ride or handling, Mahindra has tweaked the suspension to cope with the extra weight. The ZNG’s ride has a slightly firm edge, but overall it deals with bad roads very well.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG
16-inch wheels and tall tyres are better at absorbing sharper bumps than the 17s on higher petrol trims.

The smaller 16-inch wheels also play an important part here, as their taller-sidewall tyres absorb sharp edges before they make their way to the cabin. Overall, the ride remains amongst the best in the class.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG

Handling, too, remains tight and engaging, with a planted feel around the bends. The steering is light and direct, and while you can dial up the resistance using the three steering modes, this adds little in terms of feel or feedback.

Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG Value for Money – 8/10

Overall, the Mahindra XUV 3XO offers good value for money and makes for a compelling entrant into the CNG compact SUV space. Prices for the Mahindra XUV 3XO ZNG start at Rs 9.99 lakh and go up to Rs 12.27 lakh, which is between Rs 1 lakh and Rs 1.2 lakh more than the equivalent petrol trims. Pricing is on par with comparable variants of the Tata Nexon iCNG. However, the Nexon has a wider range and also offers more features on the higher trims.

Mahindra has packaged the CNG tanks cleverly, minimising the impact on boot space. That said, the 3XO’s boot wasn’t particularly large to begin with, and that remains a drawback. What sets it apart is the driving experience. CNG calibration is very good, and performance in CNG mode is close enough to petrol for most people not to notice a real difference. For a first attempt, the XUV 3XO ZNG certainly ticks a lot of boxes.