ev Archives - https://shritimesnews.com/

ऑटोमोबाइल

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Price, specifications compared

Posted on October 20, 2026October 20, 2026 by admin

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals price specifications compared

Tesla has launched a three-row long-wheelbase variant of the Model Y electric crossover in India. Christened the Model Y L, this new variant notably offers seating for up to six occupants, captain seats in the middle row and a stronger powertrain with a higher claimed range. Below, we lay out how the new Tesla Model Y L fares against its entry-level luxury EV rivals, namely the BYD Sealion 7, Kia EV6, BMW iX1 LWB, Volvo EC40 and Mini Countryman Electric on paper.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Dimensions

Larger than rivals in every sense

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Dimensions compared
	L / W / H (mm)	Wheelbase (mm)	Ground clearance (mm)	Frunk / Boot (litres)	Wheel size (inches)
Model Y L	4,976 / 1,982 / 1,668	3,040	169	116 / 420 (all seats up)	19
Sealion 7	4,830 / 1,925 / 1,620	2,930	170	58 / 500	19 / 20
iX1 LWB	4,616 / 1,845 / 1,627	2,800	190 (estimated)	– / 490	18
Countryman Electric	4,445 / 1,843 / 1,635	2,692	165	– / 460	19
EC40	4,440 / 1,873 / 1,591	2,702	171	31 / 404	19
EV6	4,695 / 1,890 / 1,570	2,900	–	20 / 490	19

The Model Y L beats its rivals in every dimension, and the Sealion 7 emerges as the second-biggest EV here overall. Tesla has slightly increased the Model Y L’s ground clearance vis-a-vis the standard wheelbase (SWB) version, though the iX1 LWB still rides the highest in this company. While the alloy wheel size remains unchanged for the Model Y L, it is mostly at par with rivals on this front.

Coming to boot space, Tesla claims a cavernous 2,539-litre cargo capacity for the Model Y L with the second and third rows folded. With all three rows of seating up, the Model Y L has an estimated boot space of 420 litres, which grows to around 1,076 litres with the third row folded, and there’s a 116-litre frunk too. All told, the Model Y L offers significantly higher total cargo capacity than the 5-seater EVs it rivals.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Powertrain and performance

Sealion 7 AWD is the strongest and quickest to 100kph

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Battery, power, performance compared
Model	Battery capacity (kWh)	Motor setup	Power (hp)	Drive layout	0-100kph (seconds)
Model Y L	88.2*	Dual	514*	AWD	4.5
Sealion 7	82.56	Single / Dual	313 / 530	RWD / AWD	6.7 / 4.5
iX1 LWB	66.5	Single	204	FWD	8.6
Countryman Electric	66.5	Single	204	FWD	8.6
EC40	78	Dual	408	AWD	4.7
EV6	84	Dual	325	AWD	5.3

*Estimated figures

In addition to the longer body, Tesla has fitted the Model Y L with an 88.2kWh battery pack (85kWh net), which is larger than that of the standard model. It also gets a more powerful dual-motor powertrain, making the Model Y L the first Tesla car to offer AWD in India. While the Model Y L has the biggest battery pack among its rivals, its power output falls a bit short of that of the Sealion 7 AWD.

Regardless, the Model Y L is the second-most powerful EV here by a considerable margin. As for claimed 0-100kph times, the Model Y L matches the Sealion 7 AWD, ranking above the EC40, iX1 LWB, and Countryman Electric.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Range and charging speeds

Model Y L features the highest WLTP-tested range

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Range and charging speeds compared
Model	Battery capacity (kWh)	Claimed range (km)	DC fast charging time^
Model Y L	88.2*	681 (WLTP)	288km in 15 min
Sealion 7	82.56	480 / 460 (WLTP)	45 min
iX1 LWB	66.5	531 (MIDC)	32 min
Countryman Electric	66.5	462 (WLTP)	29 min
EC40	78	530 (WLTP)	27 min
EV6	84	581 (WLTP)	18 min

^10-80 percent state of charge (SOC)

*Estimated

Thanks to its larger battery pack, the Model Y L widens the WLTP range lead that the standard model already holds over its rivals. The Model Y L’s range is 100km ahead of the EV6’s, which ranks second, and a whopping 221km more than that of the Sealion 7 AWD, which has the lowest WLTP range of 460km here.

Charging speeds are difficult to compare head-to-head, as Tesla has only confirmed that the Model Y L’s battery can be charged at up to 250kW DC and that it can add 288km of range in just 15 minutes. Keeping the Model Y L aside, the EV6 has the lowest 10-80 percent DC charging time, followed by the EC40, Countryman Electric, iX1 LWB and Sealion 7.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Price

Model Y L is more affordable than the top-spec SWB version

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Prices compared
	Price range (Rs lakh)
Model Y L	61.99
Sealion 7	49.40-54.90
iX1 LWB	51.40
Countryman Electric	55.65-60.70
EC40	59.00
EV6	65.96

Even though the Model Y L is larger, can accommodate more occupants and offers a stronger powertrain with a higher claimed range, it’s impressively priced at around Rs 6 lakh less than the top-spec Model Y Long Range RWD. That makes the Model Y L more affordable than the EV6, the priciest EV here, but costlier than the Sealion 7, Countryman Electric, iX1 LWB and EC40.

All prices are ex-showroom, India.

ऑटोमोबाइल

Kia Sorento sells 1,739 units in its first month since launch

Posted on October 20, 2026October 20, 2026 by admin

The Kia Sorento recorded 1,739 units in domestic wholesales in September 2026, its first month on sale after launching on September 4. It was Kia India’s fifth best-selling model that month. Including 365 units dispatched to dealers in August ahead of the launch, the Sorento’s total wholesales stood at 2,104 units.

Kia India recorded its highest-ever monthly wholesales of 32,017 units in September, up 41 percent year on year. This was the first time the company had crossed 30,000 units in a month, surpassing its previous record of 29,556 units in October 2025, which was the first month after the GST 2.0 rate cuts kicked in.

Kia Sorento: All you need to know

The Sorento is priced between Rs 27.99 lakh and Rs 40.39 lakh (ex-showroom). It is offered with a 1.6-litre turbo-petrol strong-hybrid powertrain or a 2.2-litre turbo-diesel engine. The hybrid setup pairs a 180hp, 265Nm petrol engine with a 65hp, 264Nm electric motor, while the diesel mill produces 193hp and 442Nm.

The SUV is available in six- and seven-seat configurations. Key features include dual 12.3-inch displays, a head-up display, ventilated front seats, a powered tailgate, a panoramic sunroof and second-row captain seats with ventilation. Safety equipment includes 10 airbags, a 360-degree camera, dual dashcams and Level 2+ ADAS.

The Kia Sorento rivals the Jeep Meridian, Skoda Kodiaq and Volkswagen Tayron.

Kia India sales up 29 percent in H1 FY2027

Kia India recorded wholesales of 1,68,683 units between April and September 2026, a 29 percent year-on-year increase. September wholesales stood at 32,017 units, up 41 percent year on year and the company’s highest monthly total since it entered India in 2019. In Q2 FY2027 (July-September 2026), sales grew 39 percent year on year to 89,259 units and were 12 percent higher than in Q1 FY2027.

The Seltos was Kia’s best-selling model in the first half of FY2027, with 67,667 units, up 99 percent year on year. It accounted for 40 percent of the company’s total wholesales during the period. The Sonet ranked second with 56,929 units, up 21 percent, contributing 34 percent of sales. The Carens range, including the Carens, Carens Clavis and Clavis EV, recorded 34,284 units, down 18 percent year on year.

ऑटोमोबाइल

MG Hector Tomahawk EV vs Mahindra XEV 9S real-world range compared

Posted on October 20, 2026October 20, 2026 by admin

MG Hector Tomahawk EV vs Mahindra XEV 9S real-world range compared

MG recently launched the Hector Tomahawk EV with a 69.2kWh battery, promising a claimed range of 517km. The 3-row electric SUV is positioned squarely against the Mahindra XEV 9S, which is one of the most popular EVs in its price range, and has a larger battery capacity and a higher claimed range of 679km. But in real-world conditions, does the Mahindra XEV 9S offer higher range than the MG Hector Tomahawk EV? We find out.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV vs Mahindra XEV 9S: Specifications, price

Tomahawk EV has a smaller battery, but weighs less than XEV 9S and is more affordable

MG Hector Tomahawk EV vs Mahindra XEV 9S: Specifications, price
	MG Hector Tomahawk EV	Mahindra XEV 9S
Battery pack (kWh)	69.2	79
No. of motor(s)	1	1
Drivetrain	FWD	RWD
Power (hp)	204	286
Torque (Nm)	310	380
Kerb weight (kg)	1,908	Over 2,201*
Price (in Rs lakh)	19.50-23.50	22.65-30.15

*The XEV 9e has a kerb weight of 2201kg, so the XEV 9S, being a 3-row offering, will be heavier.

The MG Hector Tomahawk EV gets a smaller 69.2kWh battery compared to the XEV 9S’ 79kWh unit. It also gets a less powerful front motor that produces 82hp and 70Nm less than the XEV 9S’s rear-mounted motor. However, the Hector Tomahawk EV is the lighter electric SUV in this comparison, weighing over 250kg less than the Mahindra XEV 9S.

The MG Hector Tomahawk EV also asks a lower price, its base-spec variant costing Rs 3.15 lakh less and its top-spec variant costing Rs 6.65 lakh less than the XEV 9S’s 79kWh battery trims.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV vs Mahindra XEV 9S: Real-world range comparison

Although offering very different city and highway efficiencies, both eSUVs offer similar average range

MG Hector Tomahawk EV vs Mahindra XEV 9S: Real-world range comparison
	MG Hector Tomahawk EV	Mahindra XEV 9S
Claimed range (ARAI)	517km	679km
Tested city range	495km	478km
Tested highway range	397km	477km
Tested average range	446km	477.5km

While the MG Hector Tomahawk EV has a claimed ARAI range of 517km, the Mahindra XEV 9S promises a higher range of 679km. However, in our real-world tests, the XEV 9S delivered a higher average range, despite the Hector Tomahawk EV performing better in city driving conditions.

In the city, the Tomahawk EV covered 495km on a full charge, which is 17km more than the XEV 9S. However, on the highway, the Mahindra managed 477km, going 80km further than the MG. As a result, the Mahindra achieved an average real-world range of 477.5km, which is 31.5km more than the Tomahawk EV’s 446km.

In our real-life tests, we found the Tomahawk EV’s relatively mild regenerative braking, even in its strongest setting, limits its potential for better city efficiency. Meanwhile, its bulky, upright design also works against it on the highway. The XEV 9S, on the other hand, weighs over 2.2 tonnes, which definitely affects its efficiency against the Hector Tomahawk EV.

Autocar India’s range testing

For our real-world range test, we begin with each car’s battery fully charged and tyre presures set as per the manufacturer’s recommendations. We drive the cars on a fixed loop covering both city and highway stretches while maintaining set average speeds. We then calculate the range based on the percentage of charge consumed. The AC is set to 22deg C in auto mode, and features such as the music system, lights and ventilated seats are used as needed, just as a regular user would. This approach ensures consistency and gives a clear idea of what to expect in daily use.

Prices are ex-showroom, India.

ऑटोमोबाइल

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Tomahawk EV performance comparison

Posted on October 19, 2026October 19, 2026 by admin

The Mahindra XEV 9S Pack Three Above and MG Hector Tomahawk EV are three-row electric SUVs that differ in their acceleration, driving range and charging capabilities. Here’s how the two compare on performance, specifications and price.

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Hector Tomahawk EV: Specifications

Specifications	Mahindra XEV 9S Pack Three Above	MG Hector Tomahawk EV
Battery capacity	79kWh	69.2kWh
Electric motor setup	Single, rear-mounted	Single, front-mounted
Power	286hp	204hp
Torque	380Nm	310Nm
Gearbox	Single-speed automatic	Single-speed automatic
Drive layout	Rear-wheel drive	Front-wheel drive
Claimed MIDC range	679km	517km
Maximum DC charging rate	180kW	90kW
Claimed DC charging time	20min (20-80 percent)	Around 35min (30-80 percent)
AC charging time	11.7 hours (7.2kW charger) 8 hours (11.2kW charger)	12.5 hours (10-100 percent)

The XEV 9S has a 82hp advantage over the Tomahawk EV and produces 70Nm more torque. The two SUVs also differ in their drive layouts. The XEV 9S sends power to the rear wheels, while the Tomahawk EV is front-wheel drive. Both use a single-speed automatic transmission.

The XEV 9S has a claimed MIDC range of 679km, which is 162km more than the Tomahawk EV’s 517km. It also supports DC fast charging at up to 180kW, compared with 90kW for the MG.

Mahindra claims the XEV 9S can charge from 20-80 percent in 20 minutes, while MG quotes around 35 minutes for a 30-80 percent charge. Since the quoted charging times cover different charging windows, they are not directly comparable. The AC charging figures also use different charging ranges. The XEV 9S supports an optional 11.2kW AC charger, in addition to the 7.2kW unit. The Tomahawk EV supports 7.4kW AC charging.

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Hector Tomahawk EV: Acceleration timings

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Tomahawk EV: Acceleration timings (seconds)
	Mahindra XEV 9S	MG Tomahawk EV
0-20kph	1.39	1.47
0-40kph	2.73	2.84
0-60kph	4.17	4.25
0-80kph	5.62	5.93
0-100kph	7.54	8.23
0-120kph	9.98	11.28

The XEV 9S gets off the line slightly quicker, reaching 20kph 0.08 seconds ahead of the Tomahawk EV. The gap remains narrow at 40kph and 60kph, with the Mahindra holding leads of 0.11 seconds and 0.08 seconds, respectively.

It begins to pull further ahead beyond 60kph, reaching 80kph 0.31 seconds sooner and 100kph 0.69 seconds sooner than the MG. By 120kph, the difference has widened to 1.30 seconds, with the XEV 9S completing the run in 9.98 seconds against the Tomahawk EV’s 11.28 seconds. The results show the Mahindra’s advantage growing at higher speeds, rather than coming solely from its initial launch.

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Hector Tomahawk EV: Rolling acceleration timings

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Hector Tomahawk EV: Rolling acceleration timings (seconds)
Rolling acceleration tests	Mahindra XEV 9S	MG Hector Tomahawk EV
20-80kph (in kickdown)	4.11	4.56
40-100kph (in kickdown)	4.74	5.45

The results show that the XEV 9S retains its lead across both rolling acceleration tests. It completes the 20-80kph run in 4.11 seconds, 0.45 seconds quicker than the Tomahawk EV’s 4.56 seconds. The gap widens in the 40-100kph test, with the Mahindra taking 4.74 seconds against the MG’s 5.45 seconds. This gives the XEV 9S a 0.71-second advantage in the higher-speed run, further underlining its stronger acceleration performance across both speed ranges.

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Hector Tomahawk EV: Braking tests

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Hector Tomahawk EV: Braking tests
	Mahindra XEV 9S	MG Hector Tomahawk EV
80-0kph distance (m)	29.67	27.52
80-0kph time (seconds)	2.55	2.39
80-20kph L1 regen distance (m)	341.03	575.94
80-20kph L2 regen distance (m)	215.8	389.91
80-20kph L3 regen distance (m)	162.46	210.09

The Tomahawk EV has the advantage in the conventional braking test, stopping from 80kph in 27.52m and 2.39 seconds. The XEV 9S takes 29.67m and 2.55 seconds to come to a halt, requiring 2.15m more distance.

The results reverse under regenerative braking. In the 80-20kph tests, the XEV 9S covers a shorter distance at all three regeneration levels. At L1, it takes 341.03m to slow down, compared with 575.94m for the MG. At L2, the respective distances are 215.8m and 389.91m, while at L3, they are 162.46m and 210.09m. The difference is largest at L2, where the Tomahawk EV covers 174.11m more than the Mahindra before slowing from 80kph to 20kph.

Mahindra XEV 9S vs MG Hector Tomahawk EV: Prices

Model	Price (ex-showroom)
Mahindra XEV 9S Pack Three Above	Rs 29.95 lakh
MG Hector Tomahawk EV	Rs 19.49 lakh-23.49 lakh

The MG Hector Tomahawk EV is priced between Rs 19.49 lakh and Rs 23.49 lakh, while the Mahindra XEV 9S Pack Three Above costs Rs 29.95 lakh. The Tomahawk EV’s top variant is Rs 6.46 lakh cheaper than the XEV 9S. The Mahindra, however, gets a larger 79kWh battery and higher power and torque outputs, and was quicker in all three acceleration tests. The MG stopped in a shorter distance in our 80-0kph braking test.

Autocar India’s testing standards

Before conducting our performance tests, we check and maintain tyre pressure based on the manufacturer’s recommendation and ensure that the car is charged to 100 percent. The car is then tested in a controlled environment with two people on board, and the data is collected via highly accurate GPS-based timing equipment.

All prices are ex-showroom, India.

ऑटोमोबाइल

New Tesla Roadster image gallery

Posted on October 19, 2026October 19, 2026 by admin

Tesla has unveiled its new Roadster EV, with production set to begin in 2028. It will be the second generation of the Roadster, whose first generation was discontinued in 2012. The new model will be offered in a standard Performance trim, along with Thrust and Rocket packages. Bookings for the Performance trim and Thrust package are open in India at Rs 5 lakh, while the Rocket package is available only by invitation.

Tesla claims the new Roadster can accelerate from 0-100kph in under a second. However, final powertrain details, including battery capacity, motor output and range, are yet to be revealed. The electric sports car also gets an underbody suction fan for extra grip. The Thrust package adds four rear-mounted thrusters, while the Rocket package adds 10 more, allowing the car to perform airborne manoeuvres.

ऑटोमोबाइल

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Top-spec strong-hybrid SUVs compared

Posted on October 19, 2026October 19, 2026 by admin

With the Duster strong-hybrid E-Tech 160, Renault is the latest brand to jump on the strong-hybrid bandwagon. The Duster strong-hybrid is positioned as an economical alternative powertrain and adds to its existing turbo-petrol options. On the other hand, the Maruti Victoris has been in the market for a year, offering a strong-hybrid powertrain since launch. But which strong-hybrid mid–size SUV in top-spec guise offers more bang for buck? We compare their respective on-paper specifications to find out. For this comparison, we’ve chosen the top-spec Emotion and ZXi+ (O) versions of the strong-hybrid Renault Duster and Maruti Victoris, respectively.

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Dimensions

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Dimensions
	Renault Duster	Maruti Victoris	Difference
Length (mm)	4,346	4,360	-14
Width (mm)	1,815	1,795	+20
Height (mm)	1,694	1,655	+39
Wheelbase (mm)	2,657	2,600	+57
Ground clearance (mm)	212	210	+2
Boot space (litres)	372	Under 300 (est.)	–

Est. – Estimated

Apart from length, the Duster outranks the Victoris in every other dimension. It is 20mm wider, 39mm taller, has a 57mm longer wheelbase, and rides 2mm higher off the ground.

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Powertrain specifications

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Powertrain specifications
	Renault Duster	Maruti Victoris
Engine	Naturally aspirated petrol, Atkinson cycle	Naturally aspirated petrol, Atkinson cycle
Displacement (cc)	1,789	1,490
Power (hp)	110	92
Torque (Nm)	175	122
Transmission	multi-mode automatic gearbox with 2 electric gears & 4 petrol gears	e-CVT
Battery capacity (kWh)	1.4	0.76
E-motor power (hp)	50	80
E-motor torque (Nm)	208	141
Maximum power output (hp)	160	116
Maximum torque output (Nm)	NA	NA
Claimed efficiency (kpl)	29	28.65

In strong-hybrid guise, both SUVs utilise a naturally aspirated petrol engine running on the more efficient Atkinson cycle. However, the Duster’s larger unit delivers more power and torque figures. The Duster also uses a larger battery pack. Both SUVs also use e-motors, wherein the one on the Maruti produces more power, but the Duster’s e-motor outputs more torque. With a combined power output of 160hp, the Duster strong-hybrid is much more powerful than the Victoris strong-hybrid.

Both SUVs also differ in the gearboxes utilised here. The Duster uses a multi-mode automatic gearbox with 2 electric and 4 petrol gears, whereas the Victoris uses an e-CVT. Renault says that the Duster drives 80 percent on EV power in the city, which likely contributes to its higher claimed mileage. But real-world tests are awaited for the Renault.

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Exterior features

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Exterior features
	Renault Duster	Maruti Victoris
Headlamps	LED	LED projector
LED DRLs	Yes	Connected
Puddle lamps	Yes	No
Tail lamps	Connected LED	Connected LED
Fog lamps	Optional	Yes
Welcome/goodbye animation	Yes	No
Wheel sizes	18-inch	17-inch
Rear spoiler	Yes	Yes
Electric adjust/fold ORVMs	Yes	Yes
Sharkfin antenna	Yes	Yes
Roof rails	Yes	Yes
Powered tailgate	Yes	Yes
Colour	Monotone and dual-tone	Monotone and dual-tone

On the outside, LED light setups, DRLs, roof rails, a shark fin antenna, and a powered tailgate are found on both SUVs. However, larger 18-inch alloy wheels, puddle lamps, and welcome/goodbye animations for the light setups are unique to the Duster.

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Interior features

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Interior features
	Renault Duster	Maruti Victoris
Ventilated seats	Yes	Yes
Sunroof	Panoramic	Panoramic
Infotainment screen size	10.1-inch	10.1-inch
Digital driver’s display	10.25-inch	10.25-inch
Head-up display	Optional	Yes
Wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto	Yes	Yes
On-board navigation	No	Yes
Powered driver seat	6-way	8-way
Powered co-driver seat	6-way	No
Reclining rear seats	No	No
Air Purifier	Optional	Yes
Auto AC	Dual-zone	Single zone
Rear AC vents	Yes	Yes
Seat upholstery	Leatherette	Leatherette
Wireless phone charger	Yes	Yes
Audio system	6-speaker Arkamys	8-speaker Infinity
60:40 split rear seat folding	Yes	Yes
USB Type-C ports	2x front, 2x rear	2x front, 2x rear
Rear armrest	No	Yes
Connected car tech	Yes	Yes
Rear window sunshade	No	No
Ambient lighting	Optional	Yes
Leatherette inserts on the dashboard	Yes	Yes
Push-button start	Yes	Yes
Keyless entry	Yes	Yes
Steering adjust	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic

The Renault offers features such as a powered co-driver seat and dual-zone automatic climate control that the Maruti lacks. In contrast, the latter gets further adjustment for the driver seat, two additional speakers, and on-board navigation, while features like a head-up display and ambient lighting are factory-fitted on the former.

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Driving features

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Driving features
	Renault Duster	Maruti Victoris
Drive modes	No	Eco, Normal, Sport
Cruise control	Regular	Regular

As far as driving features are concerned, both models come with regular cruise control, but drive modes are found only on the Victoris.

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Safety features

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Safety features
Safety features	Renault Duster	Maruti Victoris
Airbags	Six	Sx
Parking sensors	Rear	Front and rear
Camera setup	Rear view	360-degree
Dash cam	Optional	Optional
Electronic parking brake with auto hold	Yes	Yes
ADAS	No	No
TPMS	Yes	Yes
Hill start assist	Yes	Yes
Disc brakes (Front/Rear)	Yes	Yes
ESC	Yes	Yes
Auto-dimming IRVM	Yes	Yes

On the safety front, both SUVs are well-equipped with features such as 6 airbags, rear parking sensors, auto-dimming IRVM, electronic parking brake with auto-hold, all-wheel disc brakes, and TPMS. However, the Victoris pips the Duster here by offering a 360-degree camera and front parking sensors. Notably, both miss out on a Level 2 ADAS suite.

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Prices and verdict

Renault Duster vs Maruti Victoris: Prices (Rs lakh)
	Renault Duster	Maruti Victoris
Price	19.49	19.98

Comparing top-spec versions side by side, the Duster strong-hybrid is more affordable by Rs 41,000. Between the two, it’s the Duster we’d recommend. Apart from being the more affordable option, it offers slightly more kit and delivers more power without sacrificing much in terms of efficiency.

ऑटोमोबाइल

Scooter sales hit record high in first half of FY2027

Posted on October 19, 2026October 19, 2026 by admin

Graphic with Activa, Jupiter, and Access on a podium

Two-wheeler manufacturers have dispatched a record 48,65,192 scooters in the domestic market in the first half (H1) of FY2027. That’s an additional 10.8 lakh units over the same period last year, representing a 29 percent increase. The six-month period included two monthly records: April 2026 opened as the best-ever April, with 6,91,993 units, while September registered 9,95,576 units – the highest monthly total ever for the category and just 4,424 units short of the million-unit (10 lakh) milestone.

Zooming out, the scale of the growth becomes clearer. Scooter sales have more than doubled over 12 years. In H1 FY2016, the total was 2.4 million units, whereas FY2027’s first half has already reached about 60 percent of FY2026’s full-year record of 8.11 million units.

Electric scooters double, claim a 20 percent share

Honda leads overall, TVS grows faster

The fastest-growing part of the segment is electric. E-scooter wholesales hit 9,78,017 units in H1 FY2027, up 103 percent year-on-year from 4,81,199 units in H1 FY2026. This surge has pushed EVs’ share of total scooter sales from 13 percent to 20 percent in a single year.

TVS Motor Company leads the e-scooter market, with 3,05,972 iQube and Orbiter units dispatched, up 107 percent year-on-year, giving it a 31 percent share. Bajaj Auto is second, with 2,60,982 Chetak and Yulu units – a 116 percent jump – and a 27 percent share. Together, the two account for 58 percent of all e-scooters sold in the first half. Ather Energy, with 1,71,611 units and 56 percent growth, held third place, though its share dipped from 23 percent to 18 percent as the market expanded. Hero MotoCorp’s Vida dispatched 1,33,964 units, up 118 percent, for a 14 percent share.

The three Japanese players – Honda, Suzuki and Yamaha – collectively sold 12,523 e-scooters, accounting for a combined 1 percent share. Honda led the group with 7,010 units, up 176 percent.

Across ICE and EV models combined, Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India remains the category leader with 1.65 million units, up 15 percent, although its market share has dipped from 38 percent to 34 percent. TVS Motor Company is in second place with 1.43 million units and 32 percent growth, adding 3,49,404 units year-on-year. Nearly half of that incremental volume came from its electric lineup.

Suzuki, with 6,22,722 units and 11 percent growth, and Hero MotoCorp, with 4,09,319 units and 70 percent growth, hold third and fourth place, respectively. Bajaj Auto has climbed to fifth with 2,60,982 units and 116 percent growth, displacing Yamaha, which recorded 2,02,131 units, up 33 percent. Ather Energy is seventh with 1,71,611 units, while River Mobility has entered the top 10, overtaking Piaggio with 30,232 units of the Indie scooter.

With the festive season now underway, the industry will be looking to convert the strong H1 momentum into retail sales. Whether Q3 and Q4 can sustain the near-30 percent growth rate needed to push scooter sales past 10 million units for the first time remains to be seen, but the trajectory points firmly in that direction.

ऑटोमोबाइल

Jeep may revive Willys nameplate for upcoming electric SUV

Posted on October 19, 2026October 19, 2026 by admin

Jeep may revive Willys nameplate for upcoming electric SUV

Jeep is mulling a revival of its iconic Willys military off-roader for an affordable electric SUV after 2030. The proposed model is part of Jeep’s plans to develop compact EVs and strengthen its position against growing competition from Chinese carmakers, particularly in Europe.

Speaking to Autocar UK, Xavier Peugeot, the head of Jeep Europe, said that the Willys is the brand’s “key attention” for the future, and that its electric revival is one of several “new ideas” that could be realised in the coming years. He described Jeep’s heritage as a key advantage in countering new rivals, especially from China, stating: “One of our main assets to counter this offensive is our DNA.”

Jeep Willys revival: All we know so far

A recent teaser image released by Stellantis shows the original Willys MB military Jeep parked in front of the silhouette of a larger, closed-roof SUV with a bootlid-mounted spare wheel. The boxy design of this SUV looks to draw heavily from the original Willy’s utilitarian trappings, and the “Not Fragile” lettering on the crate implies ruggedness, and perhaps a focus on off-road prowess.

Specifics about the proposed Willys revival are yet to be finalised, but Peugeot noted “BEV affordability” as an important attribute, suggesting the EV could be aimed at the more attainable end of the price spectrum. To that end, the electric Willys may use a new low-cost EV architecture being developed by Stellantis for models that comply with the European Union’s proposed ‘E-car’ regulations – the production version of the recently-revealed Citroen 2CV concept is also expected to use this platform.

Peugeot additionally said that “each model in [Jeep’s] future range will be 4×4-compatible,” which could help set the electric Willys revival apart from the rest of Stellantis’s upcoming EVs. The project is expected to move forward after Jeep completes its current ‘Road to 2030’ strategy.

That said, Peugeot did remark that Jeep is “not confirming any concrete launch for this year or that year,” and that “ideas around Willys [will be] confirmed” by the end of this decade.

ऑटोमोबाइल

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV revealed, makes up to 1,169hp

Posted on October 17, 2026October 17, 2026 by admin

Mercedes has taken the wraps off the AMG GT SUV which, according to the German marque, is the first full-size SUV it has developed completely in-house. The five-seat performance EV shares its underpinnings with the fully electric GT 4-Door Coupe, and will be available in GT 53, GT 55 and GT 63 guises, the last of which makes up to 1,169hp. The GT 53 will be the first to go on sale, with the more powerful variants joining the line-up in spring 2027.

Star-shaped DRLs, illuminated badging, active aero and more.
Personalisation options from the Manufaktur programme.
Three digital displays, built-in AI assistants, AMG-specific apps and more.
Claimed WLTP range of up to 700km, with DC fast charging of up to 710kW.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV exterior

Illuminated badging, sloping roofline, active aerodynamics, Manufaktur paint options and more

The Mercedes-AMG GT SUV comes in at 5,084mm long, 2,001mm wide and 1,656mm tall, and it has a wheelbase of 3,040mm. The front fascia sports AMG’s vertical-slat grille and Mercedes star, both of which can be optionally illuminated, flanking which are LED headlamps with star-shaped DRLs (daytime running lights). The front bumper features active slats, which only open when components need extra cooling.

The profile showcases a low-slung roofline that slopes towards the rear along with pronounced wheel arches. Other details here include frameless side windows and compact wing mirrors. Moving to the rear of the AMG GT SUV reveals six circular tail-lamps as seen on the GT 4-Door Coupe, and customers can also opt for a full-width light strip.

Stepping up to the GT 55 and GT 63 means an active rear spoiler that remains flush with the roof until 150kph, changing its angle depending on the driving scenario. Mercedes-AMG also claims a drag coefficient of 0.28 for the GT 53, while the other two are rated at 0.27. The main boot has a claimed capacity of 607 litres, with the frunk capable of accommodating 78 litres worth of luggage.

Buyers can personalise the GT SUV through the brand’s Manufaktur programme, which presents over 60 paint options. Customers can also opt for AMG’s forged wheels in colour accents, which includes Matt Vanadium Silver and Matt Copper, Matt Black with a rim flange in Angel Blue, Sunny Lime, or Orange Flame.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV interior and features

Stand-out tech includes dual 14-inch screens, AI assistants and AMG-specific apps

Just like the exterior, the interior of the Mercedes-AMG GT SUV can be personalised using the Manufaktur catalogue. Some of the options that will be offered to customers include accent colours and seatbelts trimmed in Fjord Blue, Green Hell or Orange Flame. The automaker claims that the seating position here is akin to that of a sports car rather than an SUV. Providing comfort up front are multi-way power-adjustable seats, while the three-seat rear bench gets power-folding headrests.

The dashboard pairs a 10.2-inch digital instrument cluster with a 14-inch touchscreen that’s angled towards the driver, while a 14-inch screen is optional for the front occupant. The AMG Performance steering wheel is equipped with paddles to adjust brake-regen levels, while adding to the design are door panels with floating armrests and diamond-pattern stitching. There’s also multi-colour ambient lighting whose colours can be matched to the bevy of displays and controls.

The infotainment system features the German brand’s latest MBUX software, which is based on the MB.OS (Mercedes-Benz Operating System). It integrates AI agents such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing and Google Gemini. This luxury SUV also comes with three AMG-specific apps. Firstly, there’s ‘AMG Performance Menu’, which displays real-time data on power, tyre temperatures and active aero status.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV Burmester audio system

Second is ‘AMG Set-up’ – this lets the driver customise the buttons on the steering wheel as well as aero settings. Finally, there’s ‘AMG Track Pace’, which records lap times and telemetry. Drivers can also use it to show optimal braking points and the ideal racing line in the head-up display. Meanwhile, the optional dashcam allows laps to be recorded with data overlays. The AMG GT SUV is also available with an electrically dimming panoramic glass roof, AMG lighting effects, AMG Performance seats and a Burmester 4D audio system, among many optional features.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV powertrain and performance

The EV gets up to three electric motors and a WLTP range of up to 700km

The entry-level GT 53 variant of the Mercedes-AMG GT SUV uses two synchronous motors – one on each axle – with a two-speed gearbox located at the rear. Its output is rated at 544hp and 800Nm, with Mercedes-AMG claiming a 0-100kph time of 4.2 seconds and a top speed of 250kph. Then there are the mid-spec GT 55 and the top-spec GT 63. These come with two axial flux motors at the rear and one at the front, the latter disengaging when not needed to save energy.

The tri-motor setup of the GT 55 outputs 816hp and 1,860Nm, allowing for a claimed 0-100kph time of 3.1 seconds. Sitting at the top of the Mercedes-AMG GT SUV line-up is the GT 63, which is rated at 1,169hp and 2,000Nm and does 0-100kph in 2.7 seconds. Regardless, the all-wheel-drive GT 55 and GT 63 have a claimed top speed of 270kph with the optional Driver’s Package.

The GT 53’s 106kWh battery pack offers a claimed WLTP range of up to 668km, while the 128kWh battery of the GT 55 and GT 63 is rated at up to 700km. These 800V packs offer DC fast charging of 600kW and 710kW, respectively. Mercedes-AMG claims that charging these batteries from 10-80 percent takes 11-12 minutes, though it also says that these figures are preliminary.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV rear quarter tracking

The GT SUV gets rear-wheel steering as standard while also debuting AMG’s new ‘Active Ride Control+’ suspension. The latter, which is standard on the top-spec GT 63, replaces traditional anti-roll bars with hydraulic units that, according to the automaker, curb body roll and pitch. The top-spec variant also gets carbon-ceramic brakes as standard.

In the tri-motor variants, drivers can adjust the throttle response, cornering behaviour and traction control using dials on the centre console. Mercedes-AMG also said that the ‘AMGForce Sport+’ mode recreates the sound of an AMG V8 (or a six-cylinder in the GT 53) along with simulated gearshifts. As for India, the German marque is yet to reveal its plans for the AMG GT SUV.

Share Market

Axis Mutual Fund का नया फंड लॉन्च, EV और ऑटो सेक्टर की कंपनियों पर लगेगा पैसा; ₹100 से कर सकेंगे निवेश

Posted on October 17, 2026October 17, 2026 by admin

Axis Mutual Fund ने इलेक्ट्रिक गाड़ियों और नई ऑटोमोटिव टेक्नोलॉजी से जुड़ी कंपनियों में निवेश का नया विकल्प पेश किया है। कंपनी ने Axis Nifty EV & New Age Automotive Index Fund लॉन्च किया है। यह एक इंडेक्स फंड है, जो इलेक्ट्रिक मोबिलिटी और नए जमाने की ऑटो इंडस्ट्री से जुड़ी कंपनियों में निवेश करेगा।

इस फंड का न्यू फंड ऑफर (NFO) 16 अक्टूबर को खुल गया है। इसमें 30 अक्टूबर 2026 तक निवेश किया जा सकता है। निवेश की शुरुआत सिर्फ ₹100 से होगी। इसके बाद ₹1 के गुणक में रकम बढ़ाई जा सकती है।

फंड की खास बातें

फंड को नंदिक मलिक और रोहित गौतम मैनेज करेंगे। यह एक ओपन-एंडेड इंडेक्स फंड है। इसका मतलब है कि निवेशक तय नियमों के मुताबिक इसमें निवेश कर सकते हैं और यूनिट बेचकर पैसा निकाल भी सकते हैं। हालांकि, जल्दी पैसा निकालने पर एग्जिट लोड देना पड़ सकता है।

अगर निवेशक यूनिट खरीदने के 15 दिन के भीतर पैसा निकालते हैं, तो 0.25% एग्जिट लोड लगेगा। 15 दिन के बाद पैसा निकालने पर

एग्जिट लोड नहीं लगेगा।

फंड का बेंचमार्क Nifty EV & New Age Automotive TRI होगा। इसका मकसद इस इंडेक्स के प्रदर्शन के मुताबिक रिटर्न देना है। हालांकि, इंडेक्स के रिटर्न और फंड के रिटर्न में थोड़ा अंतर हो सकता है।

किन कंपनियों में लगेगा पैसा?

यह फंड इलेक्ट्रिक गाड़ियों और नई ऑटोमोटिव टेक्नोलॉजी से जुड़ी कंपनियों में निवेश करेगा। इसमें गाड़ी बनाने वाली कंपनियों के साथ बैटरी, ऑटो पार्ट्स, कच्चे माल और आधुनिक ऑटो टेक्नोलॉजी से जुड़ी कंपनियां भी शामिल हो सकती हैं।

इसका आधार Nifty EV & New Age Automotive Index होगा। इस इंडेक्स में Nifty 500 से तय शर्तों को पूरा करने वाली कंपनियों को चुना जाता है। इनमें कारोबार और शेयरों में खरीद-बिक्री से जुड़ी शर्तें भी शामिल हैं।

30 सितंबर 2026 तक इस इंडेक्स में बड़ी कंपनियों की हिस्सेदारी 44% थी। मिडकैप कंपनियों की हिस्सेदारी 29% और स्मॉलकैप कंपनियों की 27% थी। इंडेक्स की समीक्षा और बदलाव साल में दो बार, मार्च और सितंबर में किए जाते हैं।

EV बाजार में बढ़ती हिस्सेदारी पर नजर

Axis Mutual Fund के मुताबिक, भारत में इलेक्ट्रिक गाड़ियों की हिस्सेदारी FY21 में 1% से भी कम थी। FY26 में यह बढ़कर 9.4% हो गई।

कंपनी का मानना है कि बैटरी की लागत, टेक्नोलॉजी और चार्जिंग की सुविधा में सुधार से इस सेक्टर को आगे बढ़ने में मदद मिल सकती है। इलेक्ट्रिक गाड़ियों का असर सिर्फ ऑटो कंपनियों तक सीमित नहीं है। इससे बैटरी, ऑटो पार्ट्स और दूसरे संबंधित कारोबार को भी फायदा मिल सकता है।

Axis AMC के MD और CEO बी. गोपकुमार ने कहा कि इलेक्ट्रिक मोबिलिटी की ओर बढ़ता रुझान ऑटो इंडस्ट्री को बदल रहा है। कंपनी का कहना है कि यह फंड निवेशकों को इस बदलाव से जुड़ी अलग-अलग तरह की कंपनियों में एक साथ निवेश का मौका देगा।

निवेश से पहले इन बातों को समझें

इस फंड के जरिए निवेशकों को अलग-अलग कंपनियों के शेयर खुद चुनने की जरूरत नहीं होगी। फंड इंडेक्स में शामिल कंपनियों के मुताबिक निवेश करेगा। हालांकि, यह थीमैटिक इक्विटी फंड है। इसलिए इसका प्रदर्शन EV और ऑटो सेक्टर की स्थिति से प्रभावित हो सकता है।

अगर इस सेक्टर की कंपनियों के शेयर गिरते हैं, तो फंड की वैल्यू भी घट सकती है। इंडेक्स को ट्रैक करने के बावजूद फंड का रिटर्न बिल्कुल उसके बराबर रहने की गारंटी नहीं है। कंपनी ने भी साफ किया है कि निवेश का उद्देश्य पूरा होने की कोई गारंटी नहीं है।

इसलिए अपनी जोखिम उठाने की क्षमता, निवेश की अवधि और वित्तीय लक्ष्य को ध्यान में रखकर ही फैसला लें। जरूरत पड़ने पर वित्तीय सलाहकार से भी बात कर सकते हैं।

हेल्थ पॉलिसी के बावजूद हॉस्पिटल का 3 लाख बिल जेब से भरना है, FD तोड़े या किसी से उधार लें?

Disclaimer: यहां मुहैया जानकारी सिर्फ सूचना के लिए दी जा रही है। यहां बताना जरूरी है कि मार्केट में निवेश बाजार जोखिमों के अधीन है। निवेशक के तौर पर पैसा लगाने से पहले हमेशा एक्सपर्ट से सलाह लें। मनीकंट्रोल की तरफ से किसी को भी पैसा लगाने की यहां कभी भी सलाह नहीं दी जाती है।