2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review: Thunder and lightning

2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review: Thunder and lightning
2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review

When introduced originally, the Lamborghini Urus rewrote the playbook of what an SUV could be. Sharp to look at, ferociously fast and with a mighty V8 soundtrack, the Urus has become the benchmark of performance SUVs. Now though, thanks to ever tightening regulations, the Urus has had to pivot to hybridisation. But has that diluted the experience? We got behind the wheel of the Lamborghini Urus SE to answer that question.

Lamborghini Urus SE Exterior Design and Engineering – 9/10

Urus SE has a more rounded-off design than its predecessor, but it’s no less menacing.

In comparison to the older Urus and the mad Urus Performante, the Urus SE does appear a bit softer and more rounded off. But that’s not to say it lacks presence by any means. It’s still full of sharp angles and surfaces, the Arancio Borealis optional paint on our test car looked stunning as did the diamond-cut, multi-spoke 23-inch alloy wheels. Up front, there’s a new bonnet, redesigned bumper and a larger front grille, while the slimmer headlights are now matrix LED units and a different DRL signature.

Rear end features quad-exhaust setup, sporty raked roofline, and a hexagon-patterned grille connecting the tail-lights.

The differences are immediately apparent at the rear too, with a new tailgate, rear bumper and a connecting tail-light grille. As always, Lamborghini’s Ad Personam personalisation programme offers an enormous scope for customisation, so buyers can tailor the Urus SE as per their needs. It remains a substantial machine, measuring 5.12m long and 2.02m wide, with a 3m wheelbase. Kerb weight is a hefty 2,505kg, which makes the fact that it can sprint from 0-100kph in just 3.4sec all the more impressive. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Interior Space and Comfort – 8/10

Dashboard layout is premium and feature-loaded, and gets a lot of Lamborghini theatrics.

Inside, the Urus SE retains the familiar Lamborghini approach of combining the ambience of a supercar with the practicality expected of an SUV. However, the changes here are less apparent than those on the outside. The centre console is ever so slightly redesigned with a new array of toggle switches under the touchscreen. The touchscreen itself is larger than the earlier Urus, with updated graphics and a slicker user interface.

Lamborghini’s signature flip-up engine start/stop button is inspired by those of fighter jets.

There’s plenty of visual theatre, too, and it looks just as extroverted as the outside. Standout elements include the hexagonal AC vents, the Lamborghini badging on the dashboard, the aircraft-style levers for the drive modes and of course, the fighter-jet inspired flap-up engine start/stop button. Lamborghini has also introduced new colour and trim combinations with the SE, with our test car featuring the same predominantly orange theme as on the outside.

Rear space is surprisingly plentiful given the Urus SE’s sporty proclivities.

Despite all the drama, this remains a practical SUV. The long wheelbase means there’s plenty of legroom at the rear and it’s wide enough for three too, though taller passengers may find headroom a bit tight thanks to the tapering roofline. The front seats are large, well padded and the optional Lamborghini crest on the headrests just adds to the ambience. The glovebox is decent sized, there’s cupholders and the boot offers 454 litres of capacity.

Lamborghini Urus SE Features and Safety – 8/10

Info-packed driver’s display interface can get confusing at times.

As standard, the Urus SE gets plenty of features like the three screen setup – for the infotainment, AC system and driver’s display – wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, LED matrix headlamps, four-zone auto climate control, leather upholstery, 360-degree camera, connected car tech and so much more. 

The SE also gets a comprehensive technology upgrade, with the new user interface being one of the more significant updates. It features a carousel-style layout on the touchscreen to access the numerous sub-menus it packs in, while the driver’s display shows all sorts of data pertaining to the hybrid system, navigation, media and other car-related info. Navigating all the sub-menus can get confusing, however.

New Lamborghini Telemetry function comes with over 300 pre-loaded racetracks to record lap times on.

There’s also ‘Lamborghini Telemetry’ that can display lap times and sector information for more than 300 preloaded circuits, as well as record new tracks. Connected services extend to navigation, real-time traffic, remote locking, vehicle-status information, remote charging, remote cooling of the cabin and various safety and security alerts.

Also part of the package is ADAS tech like autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control and more. But there’s a lot that’s optional too, like a large panoramic sunroof, a Bang and Olufsen 3D audio system and a whole lot more, apart from the usual trim, material and stitching options. On the whole, the Urus SE is well-equipped but some of the optional extras really could have been standard fitment given the asking price. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Performance and Refinement – 9/10

Twin-turbo V8 and electric motor develop a combined 800hp and 950Nm.

As for the numbers, they are, predictably, staggering. The Urus SE combines the familiar 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 with a 25.9kWh lithium-ion battery and a permanent-magnet synchronous electric motor for an eye-watering combined output of 800hp and 950Nm. The result is 0-100kph in 3.4sec and 0-200kph in 11.2sec, with a claimed top speed of 312kph. Those figures put the Urus SE firmly in supercar territory, despite its size and weight.

And it does feel like one from behind the wheel too, especially in a straight line. Acceleration is relentless and it feels borderline scary on narrow, two-lane roads. The Urus SE always feels like it has power in reserve, especially when you’ve got the powertrain fully dialled up. There’s Strada mode for everyday driving, Sport for when you want to have a bit more fun and of course, Corsa for when you want a proper scare. Couple that with the hybrid system in its full performance mode, and the SE can really feel overwhelming. But if you don’t drive with a heavy foot, it’s surprisingly cordial and sedate. The SE really has a Jekyll and Hyde character about it.

Unrelenting acceleration can get scary on public roads.

What makes the SE more interesting than simply being a faster Urus is the way the electric motor has been integrated. Of course, it’s to help with emissions and meet regulations, but it’s also to boost performance. In EV mode, it can reach up to 135kph and go as far as 66km. But with a flick of a switch, it can turn from silent to violent. 

The V8 also hasn’t become anonymous with the hybridisation. It still makes its presence felt, especially through the optional Akrapovic exhaust our car came fitted with, but it does feel a bit subdued. It’s also piped through the speakers, which doesn’t feel entirely ethical but it does help its case.

Optional Akrapovic exhaust system helps enhance the V8’s aural character.

Lamborghini has also paid considerable attention to keeping performance consistent, with additional cooling for the powertrain and brakes. Not that we ever managed to push it so hard to test out that claim. And apart from the aforementioned drive modes, there’s even some off-road modes baked in, but how many buyers actually take their prized possession off the grippy stuff remains to be seen. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Mileage and Efficiency – 7/10

This is where the Urus SE’s plug-in hybrid system makes a big difference. Lamborghini quotes a WLTP combined energy consumption of 4.67km/kWh plus 17.54kpl. With a discharged battery, however, combined claimed fuel efficiency falls to 7.75kpl.

Thanks to the 25.9kWh battery, the Urus SE claims a 66km all-electric range.

The headline figure therefore needs some context. The SE’s efficiency advantage is greatest when the battery is regularly topped up. With a claimed 66km of EV range, many shorter daily journeys can theoretically be completed without the V8 needing to fire up at all.

For longer journeys, the hybrid system allows the electric motor and V8 to share the workload. But once the battery is depleted, this remains a 2.5-tonne SUV with a twin-turbo V8, so expectations of conventional-SUV fuel economy would be unrealistic.

Lamborghini Urus SE Ride Comfort and Handling – 8/10

Ride isn’t all that absorbent due to the low-profile Pirelli P Zero tyres.

The Urus SE uses a multilink suspension setup front and rear with semi-active dampers, all of which make this large SUV feel engaging around corners without sacrificing comfort. There is a sense of pliancy at low speeds with the ride firming up as speeds rise. Of course, riding on 23-inch wheels means you can feel potholes and road imperfections, but still it isn’t uncomfortable by any means.

Rear-wheel steering, semi-active dampers, e-diff, and torque vectoring help make the Urus SE a keen handler.

It also gets rear-wheel steering, which helps make it more manageable at lower speeds while contributing to agility at higher speeds. The SE feels eager to change direction and the e-diff and clever torque vectoring system do their best to keep things tidy around bends. You also get a good sensation from the steering which has good heft to it and the Pirelli P Zero tyres it comes with are grippy too. Lamborghini has also worked on the aerodynamics, with a new rear aero lip and diffuser increasing rear downforce by 35 percent over the Urus S. Overall though, the SE feels agile enough but there’s no escaping its heavy kerb weight.

Giant carbon-ceramic brakes peek out from behind the 23-inch alloys.

You’re also backed by massive carbon-ceramic brakes, measuring 440mm at the front and 410mm at the rear, and they do take some time getting used to. They may not have the initial bite like with conventional steel brakes, but the stopping power is immense and they stay consistent despite repeated hard braking, which is essential in something as big and powerful as the Urus SE.

Lamborghini Urus SE Value for Money – 7/10

The Urus SE is arguably the most convincing expression yet of Lamborghini’s super-SUV. More importantly, it hasn’t sacrificed the characteristics that make a Lamborghini feel special in the pursuit of meeting ever tightening restrictions. There’s still a V8, it’s still outlandish inside and out, and it still delivers a driving experience that goes well beyond what you’d expect from something this large. All of that while adding the benefit of the plug-in hybrid system for performance and efficiency, as well as properly usable EV range. 

The Urus SE is the all-in-one Lamborghini.

At Rs 4.47 crore (ex-showroom, before options), of course, the Urus SE is expensive. But that’s almost beside the point. The Urus SE isn’t for those who expect rational value; it is for those who want a vehicle that can combine supercar pace, SUV practicality, luxury, all-electric driving and aspirational brand value all in one package. As a technological statement and a performance SUV then, the Urus SE makes a compelling case for Lamborghini’s hybrid future.

All you need to know about the MG Hector Tomahawk EV and PHEV

All you need to know about the MG Hector Tomahawk EV and PHEV
All you need to know about the MG Hector Tomahawk EV and PHEV

MG launched the Hector Tomahawk in India in both all-electric (EV) and plug-in hybrid (PHEV) versions, with prices starting from Rs 19.50 lakh and Rs 25.70 lakh, respectively. Both models are offered with a lot of new-age technology and have piqued the interest of enthusiasts. Here’s everything you need to know about the MG Hector Tomahawk EV and Hector Tomahawk PHEV. 

1. What are the exterior differences between the EV and PHEV?

Both versions get different grilles, front bumpers, and alloy wheels

EV
PHEV
 

Both the Hector Tomahawk’s EV and PHEV versions have some design differences. While the EV gets a blanked-off gloss-black grille, the PHEV gets a functional grille with chrome inserts and black trims underneath the headlights. The front bumper design is also different, with the PHEV getting a silver bullbar-like element in the centre that the EV misses. The headlights and illuminated MG logo are, however, shared. 

Not much is different in the side profile, except for the 18-inch alloy designs and red callipers on the top-spec Hector Tomahawk PHEV. If you opt for a dual-tone shade, the EV will have a black roof, while the PHEV will have a white roof. The rear design, however, is identical for both versions of the SUV.

2. What are the interior differences between the EV and PHEV?

Save for a luggage cover and different cabin themes, everything else is the same

MG Hector Tomahawk EV gets a beige and black cabin theme.

Save for a rolling luggage shade on the 5-seater variants of the EV, and a different cabin theme – brown and black on the EV and a darker brown and black on the PHEV – there is no visible difference. Everything else is the same, including the feature suite: a 15.6-inch touchscreen infotainment system, an 8.8-inch digital driver’s display, a 10-speaker Infinity sound system, a panoramic sunroof, powered and ventilated front seats with memory function for the driver’s seat, and a 50W fast wireless charger. 

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV gets a brown and black cabin theme.

The safety suite is also identical in both Hector Tomahawk versions, which includes 6 airbags, a 360-degree camera with an under-bonnet view, Level 2 advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and a tyre pressure monitoring system (TPMS). 

3. What is the boot space on the MG Hector Tomahawk EV and PHEV?

EV and PHEV versions offer up to 610 litres and 192 litres of boot space, respectively

5-seater MG Hector Tomahawk EV’s boot space. 

The MG Hector Tomahawk EV is offered in either a 5-seater or a 7-seater version. The 5-seater offers 610-litre boot space, with all rows up, which can be expanded to 1,053 litres by folding down the rear row. The 7-seater version offers a 192-litre boot space with all rows up,  and 528 litres when the third row is folded. 

The PHEV, offered only as a 7-seater, offers 192-litre boot space like the EV’s 7-seater version, expandable to 528 litres by folding the third row. Neither the EV nor the PHEV version of the Hector Tomahawk are offered with a frunk (storage space under the bonnet). 

4. What are the powertrain specifications of the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV and EV?

PHEV gets a 1.5L engine and 20.5kWh battery; EV offers a 69.2kWh battery pack

The MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV gets a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine and a 20.5kWh battery pack, offering a combined output of 198hp and 230Nm. The front-wheel-drive (FWD) SUV has an all-electric range of around 115km and a total range including the petrol engine of around 1,100km. 

The MG Hector Tomahawk EV, on the other hand, gets a 69.2kWh battery pack, mated to a front-axle-mounted electric motor producing 204hp and 310Nm. It has a claimed range of 517km.  

5. Can the Hector Tomahawk PHEV be charged at a public EV charging station?

It supports 25kW DC fast charging

Yes, being a plug-in hybrid (PHEV), the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV supports 25kW DC fast charging. This can replenish the battery from 30 to 80 percent in 35 minutes, like a typical EV. MG is also offering it with a 3.3kW home charger, which can recharge the battery pack from 10 to 100 percent in 7.5 hours.

6. Are the MG Tomahawk EV and PHEV more affordable with BaaS?

BaaS reduces the EV’s and PHEV’s initial prices by up to Rs 6.01 lakh and 3.91 lakh, respectively 

MG Hector Tomahawk EV, PHEV BaaS vs non-BaaS prices (in Rs, lakh)

 

Without BaaS

With BaaS

Initial cost difference

EV

19.50 to 23.50

13.99 to 17.49*

Up to 6.01

PHEV

25.70 to 27.80

21.79 to 23.89^

3.91

*Battery subscription fee is Rs 4.9 per km per month

^Asks for a battery subscription fee of Rs 3.2 per km per month

The BaaS (Battery-as-a-Service) option reduces the upfront price of the MG Hector Tomahawk EV by Rs 6.01 lakh and the PHEV by Rs 3.91 lakh. However, you then pay a battery rental fee for every kilometre you drive: Rs 4.90 per km for the EV and Rs 3.20 per km for the PHEV. At these rates, the upfront savings from BaaS are effectively used up after around 1.22 lakh km. The break-even point is 1,22,653 km for the EV and 1,22,187 km for the PHEV.

In simple terms, if you expect to drive less than 1.22 lakh km over the entire ownership period, BaaS could be the more affordable option because of its lower initial cost. However, if you plan to drive more than 1.22 lakh km, buying the Hector Tomahawk with the battery included is likely to save you more money in the long run.

There is also another factor to consider. Under the BaaS plan, you do not own the battery, so your long-term costs depend on the rental agreement. If MG increases the per-kilometre fee or changes the contract in the future, your running costs could also increase. So, while BaaS would be more affordable for most buyers, purchasing the vehicle with the battery included may offer greater certainty in running cost calculations.

Prices are ex-showroom, India.

Atiqa Mir joins JK Tyre’s racing programme

Atiqa Mir joins JK Tyre’s racing programme
Atiqa Mir JK Tyre

JK Tyre has signed 11-year-old Atiqa Mir as part of its driver development programme. 

Over the past few years, Mir has emerged as one of India’s most promising young talents in the international karting scene. She’s currently competing in the WSK Final Cup karting series, with Round 1 underway at Italy’s Franciacorta Karting Track.

  1. Mir is currently racing in the WSK Final Cup karting series
  2. Top ranked female racer in the FIA International Karting’s OK N Junior class

JK Tyre signs Atiqa Mir

Atiqa Mir

JK Tyre has been a key pillar of the motorsport community in India, especially with its national racing and karting championships. The company’s played a pivotal role in the junior careers of several prominent racers, including Narain Karthikeyan, Karun Chandhok and Kush Maini.

Its latest recruit, Atiqa Mir, has already made headlines through her achievements in various karting championships in Europe and the Middle East. Earlier this year, she became the first Indian to secure a podium in the European leg of the Champions of the Future Academy, before going on to deliver a dominant victory in Greece. She’s currently the top ranked female racer in the FIA International Karting’s OK N Junior class for drivers up to 14 years old.

At just nine years old, Mir was shortlisted for the Iron Dames Young Talents programme. Since then, she’s also become the first Indian and Asian racer selected for the F1 Academy’s Discover Your Drive programme.

“At JK Tyre, nurturing young talent has always been at the heart of our motorsport journey. Atiqa represents the next generation of Indian racing, and we are delighted to support her as she pursues excellence on the global stage. Her association also reflects our continued commitment to encouraging greater participation of women in motorsport and inspiring young girls to take up the sport,” said Anshuman Singhania, Managing Director, JK Tyre & Industries.

Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars as new identity for PV business

Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars as new identity for PV business
Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars identity for passenger vehicle business

Tata Motors announced Tata.cars as the new retail name for its passenger vehicle (PV) division on Thursday. Both internal combustion engine (ICE) and electric vehicle (EV) models will now come under Tata.cars umbrella brand. Tata.ev will continue as a sub-brand under the wider Tata.cars brand. This new identity will progressively appear across showrooms, digital touch points, after-sales and service operations, and marketing communications.

  1. Tata.ev to continue as a sub-brand under Tata.cars
  2. Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles to remain as the registered legal entity
  3. New principal colour and typeface are a part of the new identity

That said, the company’s legal identity and corporate structure remain unchanged. Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles will continue to be the registered legal entity for statutory filings, manufacturing plants, official contracts and regulatory obligations. 

Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars as new identity for PV business

Tata Motors said the new identity formalises how Indian customers already refer to its passenger vehicles as “Tata cars”. “In many ways, Tata.cars is an identity that India has given us. Today, we formally embrace it,” said Shailesh Chandra, Managing Director, Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles and Tata Passenger Electric Mobility. “The Tata name carries our heritage, our values and the trust earned over generations, while Tata.cars gives our passenger vehicle business a distinct, modern and future-facing expression,” he added.

Vivek Srivatsa, Chief Commercial Officer, Tata Passenger Electric Mobility, said the transition would also introduce a new visual and sensory system built around a design philosophy called Parallel Pathways. It includes Ambition Blue as the principal colour, a bespoke typeface called Parallel Display and a new sonic identity. Tata Motors will also begin updating its dealerships over the next few months with redesigned interiors and a new stainless-steel facade featuring louvred panels.

The new brand system has been designed to work across products, technologies, customer experiences and markets. While customers will increasingly encounter Tata.cars across sales and service channels, corporate and regulatory references will continue under Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles.

With inputs from Ketan Thakkar.

यशस्वी जायसवाल को सस्ते में छोड़ने पर संजय मांजरेकर ने ट्वीट कर दिखाई नाराजगी

भारत के पूर्व बल्लेबाज संजय मांजरेकर ने युवा खिलाड़ियों वैभव सूर्यवंशी और यशस्वी जायसवाल से जुड़े अनुशासनहीनता के मामलों से निपटने के तरीके को लेकर अंतरराष्ट्रीय क्रिकेट परिषद (ICC) और भारतीय क्रिकेट बोर्ड (BCCI) की आलोचना की है।उन्होंने कहा कि यह दोनों संस्थाएं नरम रवैया अपना रही हैं जिससे खिलाड़ियों को अनुशासनहीनता के लिए प्रोत्साहन मिल रहा है।

मांजरेकर ने एक्स पर लिखा, ‘‘आईसीसी और बीसीसीआई, वैभव ने हाल ही में भारत ​​ए के लिए और अब जायसवाल ने (अनुशासनहीनता दिखाई है)। अगर आप उनका इस तरह के व्यवहार में बचाव करते रहेंगे तो आप उन्हें ऐसा व्यवहार दोहराने के लिए प्रशिक्षित कर रहे हैं। यह खेल के लिए अच्छा नहीं है और सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात यह है कि यह उनके भविष्य के लिए भी अच्छा नहीं है।’’

कोलंबो में दूसरे टेस्ट के पहले दिन मैदान पर हुई कहासुनी के लिए जायसवाल और श्रीलंका के तेज गेंदबाज असिथा फर्नांडो पर उनकी मैच फीस का 25 प्रतिशत जुर्माना लगाया गया। दोनों को एक-एक डिमेरिट अंक भी दिया गया।भारत की पहली पारी के 17वें ओवर में फर्नांडो ने जायसवाल को आउट किया जिसके बाद दोनों में कहासुनी हो गई थी।जून में 15 वर्षीय बल्लेबाज सूर्यवंशी भारत ए की तरफ से खेलते हुए श्रीलंका ए के एक खिलाड़ी के साथ तीखी बहस में उलझ गए थे और हाथापाई की नौबत तक आ गई थी।

हालांकि इससे पहले भारत के बल्लेबाजी कोच सितांशु कोटक ने भी कहा था कि यशस्वी जायसवाल को अशिता फर्नाडो के इतने करीब नहीं जाना चाहिए। सितांशु कोटक ने कहा, “मुझे लगता है कि गेंदबाज़ ने कुछ कहा और यह जोश-जोश में हुआ। ज़ाहिर है, यशस्वी को उनके इतना करीब नहीं जाना चाहिए था, लेकिन जोश-जोश में ऐसा हो जाता है।”

श्रीलंका के तेज़ गेंदबाज़ी कोच रयान वैन नीकेर्क की राय भी कुछ ऐसी ही थी। उन्हें लगा कि यह कड़े मुकाबले वाले दिन का हिस्सा था और उन्होंने इसे “भावनाओं के उबाल” का नतीजा बताया। “देखिए, टेस्ट क्रिकेट मुश्किल होता है, है ना? जब आप भारत जैसी टीम के खिलाफ खेल रहे हों, तो आप बस पीछे हटकर गेंदबाजी नहीं कर सकते। मुझे लगता है कि हमारी तरफ से, हमें हर समय चुनौती पेश करनी होगी और कुछ न कुछ करने की कोशिश करनी होगी।”

उन्होंने आगे कहा,”इसलिए, मेरे नजरिए से, मैंने गेंदबाजों से आगे बढ़कर कुछ करने को कहा है। शायद तीखी बातें भावनाओं के उबाल का नतीजा हैं। मैं इसे मैच रेफरी पर छोड़ता हूं कि वे इसे कैसे देखते हैं।”

Porsche 911 GTS vs MG Cyberster: Quarter mile race

Porsche 911 GTS vs MG Cyberster: Quarter mile race
Porsche-911-vs-MG-Cyberster

There’s no simpler way to compare one car’s performance to another than with a head-to-head quarter-mile race. And in this edition of Autocar India’s quarter-mile racing series, we’ve saved the best for last – Porsche 911 GTS T-hybrid vs MG Cyberster. On one side we have the most definitive and quintessential sports car in the form of the 911, while on the other side, the electric Cyberster represents the cutting-edge future. Let’s find out which one is quicker down the drag strip. 

Porsche 911 GTS vs MG Cyberster: Powertrain and specs 

Model 

Porsche 911 GTS 

MG Cyberster 

Powertrain 3,951cc flat-six petrol + electric motor77kWh battery, dual electric motors
Drive layout All-wheel drive All-wheel drive 
Power 541hp510hp
Torque 610Nm 725Nm 
Gearbox8-speed DCT 1-speed 
Weight 1,645kg 1,985kg 

The 911 and the Cyberster couldn’t be more different on the powertrain front. The Porsche uses a 3.6-litre flat-six turbo-petrol engine that’s coupled to an electric motor for a combined output of 541hp and 610Nm of torque. The MG, meanwhile, is powered by a 77kWh battery pack and two electric motors (one on each axle) for a total output of 510hp and 725Nm of torque. 

The MG is slightly down on power but has considerably higher torque than the Porsche. And while both get all-wheel drive to help with traction, the 911 has a 340kg weight advantage over the Cyberster. 

Porsche 911 GTS vs MG Cyberster: Drag race 

Model 

Porsche 911 GTS 

MG Cyberster 

Round 1

10.93 seconds 

11.63 seconds

Round 2

10.86 seconds 

11.54 seconds 

In race 1, both the 911 and Cyberster get off the line ferociously, but once the Porsche gets into its stride, it’s hard to catch. With the Cyberster seemingly maxing out at 170kph, the 911 keeps widening the gap till the end.

In race 2, the MG gets off the line better and even manages to pull an early lead. However, the Porsche manages to quickly reel it in and then breezes past it. Both cars improve on their race 1 times, and by the time they reach the finish line, the 911 has set the fastest-ever time at our drag races. The Porsche wins both races by around seven tenths, which is hugely impressive.

But just to put things into perspective, the Porsche costs Rs 2.82 crore, while the MG is priced at Rs 82.49 lakh (ex-showroom) – less than a third of the Porsche. While that’s some serious bang for your buck, the good old combustion power still seems to have the edge in performance.  

Autocar India’s testing standards

Before we conduct our performance tests, we check and maintain tyre pressures based on the manufacturer’s recommendations and ensure the car has a full tank of fuel. The car is then tested in a controlled environment, and the data is collected via highly accurate GPS-based timing equipment.

With inputs from Saptarshi Mondal 

2026 F1: Norris defeats Antonelli to win Dutch GP

2026 F1: Norris defeats Antonelli to win Dutch GP
2026 F1 Dutch GP winner Lando Norris

Lando Norris scored back-to-back wins after taking victory at the Dutch GP – the last race held at Zandvoort for the foreseeable future. Despite missing out on the win, Kimi Antonelli did stretch his championship lead after finishing second, ahead of his Mercedes teammate George Russell.

  1. Norris wins, 11.536 sec ahead of Antonelli
  2. Mercedes scores double podium finish
  3. Alonso P9 for Aston Martin

Norris wins Dutch GP

Verstappen crashes out of home race

Starting from pole position, Norris initially held the lead. But the race was red-flagged moments later as Max Verstappen crashed out on the opening lap after losing control on the drying track. 

Fresh off announcing his contract extension with Red Bull, the four-time world champion was keen to win his home race, with Zandvoort dropping off the F1 calendar next year.  However, Verstappen appeared to struggle for pace throughout the weekend. “[It was a] disappointing end to a weekend that already, I think, was quite tough for us – not really having the pace to challenge the cars ahead. But we’ll see if we can do better in Monza and be a little bit closer to the front,” he said.

2026 F1 Dutch GP Zandvoort

At the re-start, Norris lost the lead to Antonelli. The McLaren driver bid his time before finally making a move on Lap 52. Heading into Turn 1, he first passed Antonelli around the outside and then overtook Lewis Hamilton on the same lap to move into the lead.

A late Virtual Safety Car, brought out due to Esteban Ocon stopping on track, saw teams split strategies. A number of drivers, including Antonelli, pitted for fresh tyres, while Norris and Russell stayed out. Russell let Antonelli past on Lap 65, but Norris had already stretched a safe lead by then. He crossed the chequered flag 11.536 sec clear of Antonelli.

“Yesterday I said we needed to put on a bit of a show for everyone for the final race here, so I made it tough for myself today but [it was] a good race, well-fought,” Norris said. “Probably one of my better wins – we had to fight for it well but the pace was strong. We managed things incredibly well today, so over the moon, very happy. Nice to win the final race here in Zandvoort.”

Russell couldn’t follow up his Sprint win with victory on Sunday, but he fended off Hamilton to hold on to third place. Speaking after the race, the Mercedes driver explained, “I come away from this weekend as a whole satisfied. It’s been my best weekend for quite a while. I’ll take those positives.”

Charles Leclerc ended up fifth in the other Ferrari car, followed by McLaren’s Oscar Piastri. Liam Lawson, who replaced an injured Isack Hadjar at Red Bull Racing for this race, finished seventh despite being handed a 10-second time penalty for a yellow flag infringement.

Nico Hulkenberg crossed the line P8, handing Audi some valuable points. Aston Martin appears to be taking steps in the right direction with its recent updates, with Fernando Alonso finishing P9. Finally, Alpine’s Pierre Gasly rounded out the top 10.

2026 F1 championship standings

Antonelli has extended his championship lead to 59 points from his teammate Russell, who is now tied on points with Hamilton. Norris’ consecutive wins sees him climb up fourth place in the standings, 24 points behind Russell and Hamilton.

F1 will now head to Monza for the Italian GP on September 4-6.

2026 F1 Dutch GP results

Pos

Driver

Team

1

Lando Norris

McLaren

2

Kimi Antonelli

Mercedes

3

George Russell

Mercedes

4

Lewis Hamilton

Ferrari

5

Charles Leclerc

Ferrari

6

Oscar Piastri

McLaren

7

Liam Lawson

Red Bull Racing

8

Nico Hulkenberg

Audi

9

Fernando Alonso

Aston Martin

10

Pierre Gasly

Alpine

11

Yuki Tsunoda

Racing Bulls

12

Arvid Lindblad

Racing Bulls

13

Gabriel Bortoleto

Audi

14

Franco Colapinto

Alpine

15

Sergio Perez

Cadillac

16

Carlos Sainz

Williams

17

Alex Albon

Williams

NC

Valtteri Bottas

Cadillac

NC

Esteban Ocon

Haas

NC

Lance Stroll

Aston Martin

NC

Ollie Bearman

Haas

NC

Max Verstappen

Red Bull Racing

F&O में कई साल बाद घाटा हुआ कम लेकिन, SEBI की रिपोर्ट में रिटेलर्स को परेशान करने वाली बातें आई सामने

F&O, Rupees Printing Machine or Destroyer: इक्विटी डेरिवेटिव्स मार्केट में वित्त वर्ष 2026 के दौरान कई वर्षों बाद पहली बार बड़ी गिरावट देखने को मिली। हालांकि बाजार नियामक सेबी (SEBI) की ताजा ट्रेडर स्कोरकार्ड रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक मूल समस्या अभी भी बनी हुई है कि अधिकतर रिटेल ट्रेडर्स F&O (Futures & Options) को एक व्यवस्थित ट्रेडिंग प्रक्रिया की बजाय किस्मत आजमाने जैसा मानते हैं। एफएंडओ में कुल नुकसान और ट्रेडर्स की संख्या दोनों कम तो हुई, लेकिन 10 में से करीब 9 रिटेल ट्रेडर्स अब भी घाटे में रहे। सेबी के आंकड़ों से सामने आया है कि वित्त वर्ष 2026 में जो सुधार दिखा भी है, वह स्ट्रैटेजी यानी रणनीति के चलते नहीं बल्कि ट्रेडर्स की संख्या घटने से आया।

क्या हैं आंकड़े

वित्त वर्ष 2026 में F&O में एक्टिव इंडिविजुअल ट्रेडर्स की संख्या 18% घटकर 87.5 लाख और कुल नेट नुकसान 18% घटकर ₹91,685 करोड़ रहा तो नुकसान में रहने वाले ट्रेडर्स का अनुपात भी 90.9% से घटकर 87.7% रह गया। हालांकि नुकसान में रहने वाले ट्रेडर का औसत नुकसान बढ़कर लगभग ₹1.17 लाख हो गया। इस प्रकार वित्त वर्ष 2026 में कम लोगों ने ट्रेडिंग की, लेकिन जो ट्रेडिंग में बने रहे, उन्होंने अभी काफी बड़ा रिस्क लिया और भारी नुकसान उठाया।

Options Buying अब भी रिटेलर्स की पहली पसंद

सेबी के बिहैवरियल एनालिसिस के मुताबिक करीब 99.3% इंडिविजुअल ट्रेडर्स ने कम से कम एक बार ऑप्शंस में ट्रेड किया, तो 93% ट्रेडर्स ने सिर्फ ऑप्शंस में ट्रेडिंग की और फ्यूचर्स में उनकी हिस्सेदारी बहुत सीमित रही। इसके अलावा सेबी के के स्ट्रैटेजी-वाइज स्टडी में सामने आया कि ऑप्शंस बायर्स को 90% नुकसान हुआ और रिटेलर्स को सबसे बड़ा झटका इसी ने दिया। इससे फटाफट पैसा बनाने की कोशिश, एक्सपायरी के दिन ट्रेडिंग, बिना ठोस रणनीति के डायरेक्शन बेट्स और जरूरत से ज्यादा बड़ी पोजिशंस लेना।

रिटेलर्स के लिए बढ़ी लड़ाई

सेबी की रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक रिटेल ट्रेडर्स का मुकाबला अब सिर्फ दूसरे इंडिविजुअल्स से नहीं है। मार्केट पर अब बड़े इंस्टीट्यूशंस, प्रोप्राइटरी ट्रेडिंग फर्म्स और एल्गोरिदम से चलने वाले उन ट्रेडर्स का दबदबा बढ़ रहा है जो एडवांस्ड एग्जीक्यूशन सिस्टम का इस्तेमाल करते हैं। ऐसा इसलिए क्योंकि ये टेक्नोलॉजी, रिस्क मॉडल्स, ऑटोमोटेड एग्जीक्यूशन और डिसिपलिन्ड पोजिशन साइजिंग का इस्तेमाल करते हैं। वित्त वर्ष 2026 प्रोप्रॉयटरी ट्रेडर्स ने लगभग ₹44,000 करोड़ और FPIs ने करीब ₹14,000 करोड़ की कमाई की। इन दोनों की कमाई का करीब 99% हिस्सा एल्गोरिदमिक ट्रेडिंग एंटिटीज से आया। एक तरह कई रिटेलर्स भावनाओं, सोशल मीडिया टिप्स और एक्सपायरी के दिन ट्रे़डिंग पर पर निर्भर हैं तो प्रोफेशनल ट्रेडर्स पहले से तय रणनीतियों, टेक्नोलॉजी और रिस्क मैनेजमेंट के के आधार पर ट्रेड कर रहे।

और भी खास बातें आई सामने

सेबी की रिपोर्ट में एक बात का खंडन हुआ कि अधिक अनुभव का मतलब घाटा कम होना है। जिन ट्रेडर्स ने लगातार चार या उससे अधिक वर्षों तक ट्रेडिंग की, उनमें भी नुकसान की दर बहुत अधिक रही यानी कि बार-बार एक ही गलती करने से ट्रेडिंग स्किल अपने आप नहीं बढ़ती। इसी तरह जिन ट्रेडर्स को लगातार दो साल नुकसान हुआ, उनमें से लगभग 90% ने ट्रेडिंग जारी रखी और फिर से नुकसान उठाया।

सेबी की रिपोर्ट में एक और परेशान करने वाली बात सामने आई कि अधिक ट्रेडिंग से नुकसान भी बड़ा हुआ। सबसे अधिक एक्टिव 42% ट्रेडर्स की कुल घाटे में 87% और टर्नओवर में 94% हिस्सेदारी रही। यह समस्या खासतौर से युवाओं और कम आय वाले ट्रेडर्स में अधिक दिखाई दी।

सेबी की रिपोर्ट में कम कैपिटल और अधिक रिस्क की बात सामने आई। लगभग 35% डेरिवेटिव्स ट्रेडर्स के पास कोई इक्विटी पोर्टफोलियो नहीं था, तो 78% के पास ₹1 लाख से कम की इक्विटी होल्डिंग थी। पोर्टफोलियो का साइज बढ़ने के साथ नुकसान की संभावना लगातार कम होती गई। बहुत कम या बिना इक्विटी होल्डिंग वाले ट्रेडर्स के लिए नुकसान की संभावना 93% रही तो ₹10 करोड़ से अधिक के पोर्टफोलियो वाले ट्रेडर्स के लिए यह लगभग 58% रही। इससे संकेत मिलता है कि बड़ी पूंजी वाले ट्रेडर्स आमतौर पर एक लिमिट में एक्सपोजर लेते हैं, जबकि कई छोटे ट्रेडर्स अपनी पूंजी के मुकाबले बहुत अधिक लेवरेज इस्तेमाल करते हैं।

Bonds में निवेश पर रिटर्न की गांरटी! ऐसे ऐड पर लगेगी रोक, SEBI ने लाया प्रस्ताव

डिस्क्लेमर: यहां मुहैया जानकारी सिर्फ सूचना के लिए दी जा रही है। यहां बताना जरूरी है कि मार्केट में निवेश बाजार जोखिमों के अधीन है। निवेशक के तौर पर पैसा लगाने से पहले हमेशा एक्सपर्ट से सलाह लें। मनीकंट्रोल की तरफ से किसी को भी पैसा लगाने की यहां कभी भी सलाह नहीं दी जाती है।