The real Lawrence of Arabia’s last ride retraced in a Mini Countryman JCW

The real Lawrence of Arabia's last ride retraced in a Mini Countryman JCW
Mini Countryman JCW travelogue in Dorset

Seventeen years ago, in the Imperial War Museum on Lambeth Road in London, I stood mesmerised in front of a motorcycle with the number plate GW 2275, enclosed in a glass case. It was a beautiful, brooding machine, low and long, finished in deep black with just enough nickel and chrome to catch the museum lights: twin fishtail exhausts sweeping back in a graceful curve, the big JAP V-twin sitting exposed and unapologetic between the frame rails, cylinders splayed wide, cooling fins stacked like the pages of a book. Thin copper oil lines ran externally along the frame, feeding the total-loss lubrication system of the era, a solution that looked almost primitive next to a modern engine yet was efficient enough to survive being wrung out past 100mph on 1930s public roads.

A flamboyant form, every component left exposed, hinting at George Brough’s intention to let you see exactly what you were paying for. This was, in its day, the pinnacle of what was once the finest motorcycle industry in the world, the British motorcycle industry. Standing there, it was easy to understand why a certain kind of Englishman, restless, brilliant, and a little broken, would have fallen entirely in love with a machine like this.

T.E. Lawrence's Brough Superior SS100
The very Brough Superior SS100 Lawrence died on, photographed at the Imperial War Museum in 2008. Its last known owner, reclusive collector John Weekly, kept it in his lounge for over 45 years before his death in 2024. After which the Brough’s whereabouts are unknown.

It took me straight back to being a teenager watching Lawrence of Arabia for the first time. The film famously opens with this motorcycle: the frantic braking, the fatal swerve to avoid two boys on bicycles, before flashing back to how a restless desk officer became a legendary guerrilla leader in the Arab Revolt, and how that legend curdled into cynicism once Britain betrayed the cause he’d fought for. This was the actual Brough Superior SS100 that TE Lawrence was ripping home on from Bovington on May 13, 1935, when he went over the handlebars, struck his head, and died six days later without regaining consciousness.

T.E. Lawrence on a camel
Motorcycle or camel, Lawrence rode with consummate ease.

I have always felt a pull towards places where history happened, where the past has left something tangible behind, and this anniversary issue gave me the excuse I needed to follow Lawrence’s last ride. For this quest, I got behind the wheel of the new Mini Countryman John Cooper Works. A slightly contradictory choice of car for a story about a restless man who spent his last years trying to shrink his own reputation by changing his name twice to get away from the legend he’d unwillingly become. Because the new Countryman is going through much the same thing but in reverse.

By the very virtue of its name, the Mini has a reputation of being a compact and cheeky car that seems to occupy hardly any road at all, but this Mini is large and an SUV, accentuated by beefy curves with all-wheel drive as standard and sporty vivid red disc calipers. Under the bonnet sits a potent 2.0-litre turbo four-cylinder engine with 300 horsepower of shove and 400Nm of tug.

The irony was not lost on me: I was driving a car that had outgrown its own name, setting off to chase a man who’d spent his final years trying to shrink his. I pointed the car west out of London on the M3, then the A303, pulling over near Stonehenge for a quick photograph before pressing on toward another English icon further down the road.

The road to Clouds Hill

Stonehenge
Stonehenge bursts into view without warning as the A303 tops a crest, the ancient stones suddenly filling the windscreen against the Salisbury Plain.

Beyond Stonehenge, the Countryman ate the tarmac in complete comfort, cabin hushed, adaptive cruise doing most of the thinking. The road eventually dropped south onto narrower country lanes for the final approach into Dorset, and it was here, as the hedgerows closed in, that the JCW visibly changed character. All-wheel drive dug in through the bends, the exhaust note sharpened, and for a few minutes on the approach to Clouds Hill, this bulked-up, grown-up Mini showed me that the nimbleness of its ancestors still lived somewhere in its genes.

Lawrence's Daybed and Bookshelves
Inside Clouds Hill: Lawrence’s daybed and bookshelves, preserved almost as he left them.

Clouds Hill itself is almost comically modest for a man who became one of the most famous people in England. It’s a four-room labourer’s cottage with no electricity, which Lawrence first rented in 1923 while stationed at nearby Bovington, then painstakingly rebuilt with his own hands before buying it outright in 1929. Inside, the leather-topped daybed, bookshelves crammed with correspondence and photographs, and framed portraits of Bedouin faces and RAF colleagues remain much as he left them, preserved by the National Trust.

What hints at the pull of Lawrence’s personality is who came all the way here to visit him. George Bernard Shaw, EM Forster, Thomas Hardy and Robert Graves all found their way to this tiny, electricity-less retreat, which was slightly ironic, because Lawrence was doing his best to disappear. The world knew him as Lawrence of Arabia, the flamboyant soldier in Arab robes who’d become one of the most recognisable figures of the First World War, and he wanted none of the celebrity that came with it.

Prince Faisal's Delegation
Prince Faisal’s delegation at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. Lawrence (third from left) stood among men Britain would soon betray.

He’d already tried once: in 1922, he joined the RAF under the name John Hume Ross, but the press uncovered him within months. The following year, he joined the Tank Corps as TE Shaw, a name he kept for the rest of his life. Clouds Hill became his refuge, a place to read, write, listen to music, work on his boats and motorcycles, and retreat from a world determined to keep finding him.

He did make forays out. Winston Churchill was a genuine friend, and Lawrence would occasionally turn up unannounced at Chartwell, Churchill’s home about 130 miles away. He liked to boast that his long-distance visits to friends like Churchill and Lady Astor were made in “record time” thanks to the Brough’s speed, calling the machine “the silkiest thing I have ever ridden.”

Churchill’s daughter Mary remembered him arriving as “a short, nondescript, sandy-haired airman riding a motorcycle,” only to reappear at dinner transformed, “presenting himself in the flowing robes of a Prince of Arabia.” She also recalled the “pin-drop silence” that fell over the room whenever Lawrence spoke, a silence that apparently included her father, who himself considered Seven Pillars of Wisdom “unsurpassable” as a war narrative. It was an odd, quietly moving thing to stand in a room with no electricity and realise the man who once sat there could hold some of the loudest reputations in England spellbound.

The road that killed him

Mini Countryman JCW Rear Static
This road has widened over the decades, much like the Mini brand, which now includes an SUV.

From Clouds Hill, the road towards Bovington Camp is the one Lawrence rode almost daily, and it’s easy to see why he loved it: well cambered, with quick, confident curves that seem made for two wheels rather than four. The road has changed considerably since 1935, widened, realigned and smoothed out, the dips Lawrence knew long gone, but the bends remain, and the JCW flowed through them on silky modern tarmac with barely a shudder.

T.E. Lawrence's grave marking
The plaque marking the tree planted by T.E. Lawrence’s former Vickers gunner, Tom Beaumont, in 1983.

Lawrence was known to push his Brough to 100mph on roads like this despite the rougher surfaces and primitive brakes of the time. It takes a particular sort of nerve to do that. Sadly, this is also the road on which he died. A small, weathered stone marker stands by the roadside near the crash site, its inscription barely legible: Near this spot Lawrence of Arabia crashed on his motorcycle and was fatally injured, 13th May 1935.

Signpost for the Lawrence of Arabia Trail
A signpost for the Lawrence of Arabia Trail.

Below it, a plaque records that the tree beside the marker was planted in 1983 by Tom Beaumont, who had served as Lawrence’s Vickers machine gunner in Arabia, one old comrade returning nearly half a century later to mark where another had died. It’s a small, unshowy memorial for a man who became the subject of an Oscar-winning film. Bovington Camp is also the start and finish point of the circular 10.8km Lawrence of Arabia Trail, which strings together the cottage, the crash site, and the church at Moreton in one walkable loop.

T.E. Lawrence's effigy at St.Martin Church
Lawrence’s effigy at St Martin’s Church, Wareham, carved by his friend Eric Kennington.

A short drive away in Wareham is one more stop worth making: the Saxon church of St Martin’s, home to a life-size effigy of Lawrence carved by his friend Eric Kennington, originally intended for St Paul’s Cathedral before being rejected there and finding its way to this small parish church instead.

Moreton and the memory of him

Moreton itself is a proper Dorset postcard, a signpost outside St Nicholas’ Church pointing the way to “Walled Garden” beside directions to Wool and Weymouth, as if history and horticulture share equal billing. Lawrence’s small and very private funeral and burial were held here on May 21, 1935, and the mourners included Churchill, Lady Astor, General Wavell (who flew in by autogiro), and author Henry Williamson.

T.E. Lawrence's grave
Left: T.E. Lawrence’s grave at St Nicholas’ Church, Moreton. Simple white stone, flowers left fresh by visitors. Right: The weathered marker near Bovington, barely legible, recording the spot of Lawrence’s crash.

His grave sits a short walk from the church, simple white stone, flowers laid fresh by visitors, the inscription noting he was a Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, and making no mention at all of Arabia.

The coast, and letting the car breathe

Durdle Door
Durdle Door, the natural limestone arch that draws crowds to this stretch of coastline.

I couldn’t leave Dorset without giving the JCW a proper stretch, so I pushed south to the Jurassic Coast, Durdle Door and Lulworth Cove, a slight detour from Lawrence’s own story, but too good to leave out of a day like this. Every mile of the drive validated it being classed as an SUV. The properly deep boot held picnic mats, beach gear, including chairs and an umbrella, without the need of the rear seats being dropped.

Lulworth Cove
Lulworth Cove’s chalk cliffs and turquoise water, a world away from Lawrence’s Dorset lanes.

The cabin felt roomy, and the ride height shrugged off potholed coastal car parks without a second thought. There’s real engine grunt for those urgent overtakes on narrow country lanes when stuck behind agonizingly slow motorhomes that make you feel like tearing your hair out.

Mini Countryman JCW in West Lulworth
West Lulworth, all thatched roofs and honey-coloured stone, is about as quintessentially Dorset as a village gets.

The all-wheel-drive system quietly sorts out grip on the tighter, greasier lanes, especially with the left wheels on a shoulder slick with wet grass. Flick it into its sportiest mode, and the exhaust note gets a synthesised boost through the speakers. It may be all theatre, but it certainly made me grin, and that’s a win because sound plays such a large part in defining how a car makes me feel.

Mini Countryman JCW interior
A compass and live pitch-and-roll readout flaunts SUV identity; instrumentation no traditional Mini has ever needed.

By the time I rolled back into London, it was quite clear to me that at the wheel of a Mini Countryman, what you get is a car that is actually larger and roomier than the Jeep Compass. It has the space, the grunt and the ground clearance, and from the smooth roads of Dorset to the Jeep-only trails of Zanskar, this Mini is genuinely man enough for whatever the country throws at it.

The Helmet He Never Wore

Lawrence’s fatal crash had one consequence far beyond Dorset. Among the doctors treating him at Bovington Camp Military Hospital was a young Australian neurosurgeon named Hugh Cairns, who had himself served in the Middle East during the First World War. Watching Lawrence die of head injuries that a helmet might have prevented left a deep impression on him, and he began studying motorcycle head trauma as a direct consequence.

Sir Hugh Cairns
Sir Hugh Cairns

Crash helmets already existed, invented back in 1914 for racing at Brooklands, but nobody wore them on the road. It took the Second World War, and Cairns’s appointment as a head injuries adviser to the Ministry of Health, for that to change. Researching fatalities among military despatch riders, he found that head injuries were the single biggest killer among motorcyclists and that, of the few riders wearing helmets when they crashed, not one had died.

His 1941 paper was damning enough that helmets became compulsory for all military motorcyclists within a month, and a 1946 follow-up showed the death rate had fallen sharply as a result. Cairns argued the same logic should extend to every civilian rider. It took another 27 years, and Cairns didn’t live to see it, for that to become UK law in 1973. But the chain runs in a straight, almost eerie line from one Dorset lane to millions of ordinary commutes: the man who died avoiding two boys on bicycles ended up, through the doctor who treated him, saving countless lives on two wheels after his own.

“The Rolls-Royce of Motorcycles”

Every Brough Superior was hand-built at George Brough’s works on Haydn Road, Nottingham, and Brough himself was as singular as his machines. Rarely seen without his trademark tailored flat cap, he carried himself more like landed gentry than a factory owner, and his standards bordered on obsessive. Born to motorcycle pioneer William Edward Brough, George forged his own path in 1919 after a rift with his father over how grand and expensive motorcycles ought to be.

T.E. Lawrence on his Brough Superior
Left: George Brough, Right: T.E. Lawrence

A friend suggested adding “Superior” to the name, which Brough senior took as a personal insult. That pursuit of excellence defined the marque: each machine was assembled once to fit every component together, then stripped down for painting and plating, then reassembled for delivery. Brough tested every SS100 himself on public roads past 100mph, and each one left the factory with George Brough’s personal approval and a written certificate guaranteeing it had been timed at the ton over a flying quarter mile.

‘SS’ stood for Super Sports, ‘100’ for that guaranteed top speed of a 100mph, and Brough pushed the idea further still in 1928, setting a 130.6mph record at Arpajon in France. The “Rolls-Royce of Motorcycles” nickname was coined by journalist HD Teague of The Motor Cycle, and Brough liked it enough to use it in his own advertising, reportedly with the real Rolls-Royce’s blessing.

War ended civilian production in 1940, when the factory turned to munitions and aircraft parts, and the specialised J.A. Prestwich (JAP) 998cc, air-cooled, 50-degree OHV V-twin engines Brough relied on were never commercially viable again. Around 3,100 machines were made across 19 models in the marque’s 21-year run, and roughly a third survive today, making every survivor a priceless piece of automotive art.

Lawrence’s relationship with the marque ran deeper than most customers’. Writing to Brough in 1926, he said he’d ridden five Broughs and covered 1,00,000 miles in four years, calling them the greatest delight of his life, two of them possessing “a speed and reliability that reminded me of an express train.” Between 1922 and 1935, he owned eight. The first, bought in 1922, was nicknamed “Boa,” short for Boanerges, meaning “son of thunder.”

The seven that followed were named George I through George VII, with a ninth, George VIII, still being built when he died. At around £200 apiece, enough to buy a modest cottage, this was extraordinary indulgence for a man on an RAF aircraftman’s pay, though royalties from Seven Pillars of Wisdom helped fund it. The Brough he crashed on May 13, 1935, registration GW 2275, was George VII, his last completed machine.

George Brough and T.E. Lawrence

The photographs here are of George Brough and Lawrence on the Brough nicknamed George VI. They were taken during one of Lawrence’s frequent, unassuming visits to the Haydn Road factory by Jack Hallsworth, a Nottingham Journal photographer who knew George Brough and had been tipped off to bring his camera one afternoon.

It’s a rare glimpse of a man famously camera-shy and almost never photographed candidly, hinting at the genuine warmth behind the machines: two very different Englishmen, one a self-effacing war hero trying to vanish into rural obscurity, the other a flamboyant engineer-showman happy to let Rolls-Royce’s name do some of his advertising for him, bound by a friendship that outlasted their differences.

 

 

 

Driving the JSW Tomcar and EX4: Dirt Devils

Driving the JSW Tomcar and EX4: Dirt Devils
Driving the JSW Tomcar and EX4: Dirt Devils

Picture the scene: you’re a commando who’s just parachuted behind enemy lines. Along with you and your team are a bunch of military off-roaders. It’s been a tough jump. High winds, terrain, difficult odds. While the men all make it intact, the machines break up and are destroyed. The team has to salvage what it can, reassemble a couple of off-roaders from the parts of the half dozen parachuted out. What’s clear is that special forces and the military need a tougher, more capable off-roader, one engineered with today’s tech and requirements in mind.

From the school of hard knocks

The Tomcar is purpose-engineered and built for special forces.

This then is the Tomcar: a military off-roader explicitly designed for commando operations. Designed to survive a parachute drop without requiring a rebuild or a massive parachute, heavy rigging and cushioning equipment, it sets an all-new benchmark. The Tomcar is built to take hard knocks, and that’s because the structure is fundamentally different.

Compact nose and tiny LED headlights are unique.

This is evident even when you take a quick glance at the Tomcar TX. It looks like nothing you’ve seen before. Stubby nose, tiny headlights, no doors and a heavy-set rear. What’s for certain is that every small bit is purpose-built and functional, and the only decorative bit seems to be the badge at the rear.

No form, all function

Let’s start with what you can’t see: the monocoque frame. Unlike other off-roaders that use bolted frames, the Tomcar has a one-piece, fully welded frame and integrated roll cage. Designed specifically and tested to absorb and dissipate the extreme G-forces of an air drop (without bending or shearing), it forms the centrepiece of the design. Perfectly in sync with the concept of a very durable, over-engineered vehicle that can be air-dropped or dragged out of aerial transport at low speed. What’s even more impressive is that it can easily be repaired in the field with basic hand tools.

Independent rear suspension and chain drive in one single compact unit. 

Next up, the all-independent suspension, which has massive travel and long suspension arms. The heavy-duty suspension offers up to 14 inches of travel and 17 inches (430mm) of ground clearance. This setup uses massive coil springs, not dissimilar to Baja racers, and motorsport-like damper systems with remote reservoirs. This enables it both to take hard knocks and remain stable at speed. This is so that the Tomcar can cruise effortlessly across undulating terrain at speed and provide a stable platform.

Special powers

175hp engine sits low in the back, aids traction and lends stability.

I walk around the rear and take a good look as the next piece of the puzzle falls in place. There are vents at the rear, and that means that’s where the engine sits. Done to maximise traction, like VW-based Baja buggies, the Tomcar has its 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine mounted low in the rear. The Chevy engine makes 175hp and 275Nm torque.

Flat floor prevents it from snagging on rough terrain.

The TX uses a CVT gearbox for easy use and good torque manipulation. This is placed at the rear with the engine and sends power forward to two transfer cases that are sandwiched together. The first transfer case allows you to shift from rear-wheel drive to four-wheel drive instantly with a mere push of a lever. Bang! The second gives you low range, and along with that, regular gearbox directional functionality – Drive, Neutral and Reverse. There is no Park, only an E-parking brake. These differentials have another unique tech – they are both air-locking and are engineered so that the Tomcar has a completely flat belly – nothing hangs down so it can slide over terrain without the belly fouling. Even more interesting is how power gets transferred to the rear wheels; it’s done through a pair of double chain-drive systems, encased in the hardened steel swing arms!

Basic dash and instruments get the job done.

In addition, the Tomcar has been made for easy serviceability in the field. Components often have a backup, and the vehicle can even function with a high degree of redundancy. There are, for example, two end-to-end fuel systems and twin radiators, and then bits like the suspension have load paths designed specifically to break at specific points where parts are easy to replace. What’s also impressive is that this 1.3-tonne vehicle can carry or pull more than a tonne.

Floats like a butterfly

Big buttons are hardy, can deal with dirt and are easy to hit with gloves on.

With this kind of unique specification, it’s little wonder that this vehicle feels unique to drive. For a start, with no doors, you just slide in behind the wheel. Start up is pretty straightforward, and you can sort of tell this vehicle will be comfortable to operate even with heavy gloves.

Initially, the sound of the quad drive chains at the rear dominates. A gnashing, chainsaw-like ripping sound, it combines with the whine of the CVT to give the Tomcar a unique sound signature. And from slow speeds, especially in sand, the CVT does require a buildup of revs before it pulls forward happily.

Once you build a bit of momentum, however, progress over the sand feels effortless. You can just float over big ruts and carry on without too much deflection of the wheel. A lot of this is because it has the weight of the engine pushing down over the rear-driven wheels, and the stiff chassis and soft, long-travel suspension deal beautifully with the soft undulating surface. While most 4x4s feel heavy when driving through sandy river beds like the one we are on, and tend to bog down and struggle when you slow to a crawl, the Tomcar feels right at home. It’s even relatively easy to steer and place it alongside another vehicle on the narrower sections of this riverbed. Sure, the turning radius isn’t great, and it pays to be ham-fisted with the steering, but what surprises me is just how much speed I can carry without it getting uncomfortable.

It feels completely at home even on seriously difficult off-road trails.

 What’s also very impressive is its ability to do some serious off-roading. Running along the steep sides of the ravine, you can feel the low centre of gravity, which feels like it sits somewhere below the level of the driver’s seat. And then we climb an extremely steep hill, the Tomcar ‘walking’ up the step-like undulations of the trail with superb rear traction. Only the engine and CVT system seem to strain with the load of the uphill climb.

Also super impressive is the ride. The stiff chassis, long-travel suspension and motorsport damper system mean you can carry speed over sections you normally only have to crawl over. You look at a broken trail and drive over, fully expecting to be tossed around, but the Tomcar stays flat, so you add more speed. And this goes on for a bit until eventually stopping distances rein you in. Want to carry speed over rough terrain? This thing operates in another dimension.

Making India’s extreme off-roaders

CEO and founder director of JSW Sarbloh Motors started his journey in extreme off-roading.

One of Jaskirat Singh Nagra’s first off-road excursions landed him, and his family car, in a ditch. Things, however, have looked up since then. Not only has his company Sarbloh Motors made several winning contenders for events like the Rain Forest Challenge and Orange Festival in Arunachal, it, along with JSW Defence, also makes the Sherp and Tomcar in India. Up next, the company’s own EX4. And with 140 Sherps already produced and a line already setup for tactical ATVs, you can expect many more extreme off-roaders to be built by this company.

The EX4: Engineered, designed and made in India

EX4’s wheel articulation with independent suspension. 

While the Tomcar is a tactical ATV meant to function as the tip of the sword, the EX4 is a home-grown scout vehicle built to take on difficult terrain and tough off-road conditions. Based on an extreme off-roader, this is a more conventional vehicle that has its engine up front and extremely short front and rear overhangs. Power comes via the same 175hp 1.5-litre turbo-petrol, and then this one even gets the option of a 2.0 diesel that makes 167hp. The latter is sourced from Fiat/Jeep or Stellantis. The chassis is a tubular space frame, and from the dimensions, you can sort of tell that this thing evolved from a Rain Forest Challenge buggy. 

It can be had with a 175hp petrol or 167hp diesel.

A large A-arm suspension up front and an elongated rear trailing arm help it clamber over most obstacles, and like the Tomcar, it uses canister-fed, motorsport-based dampers that can be adjusted over a wide range. Now, despite the engine being in front, the nose is pretty compact, and interestingly, the anti-roll bar can be seen running around the front of the grille! Of course, the tyres form the extremities of the car; it gets rubber or plastic fenders around the side, and check this out, you can raise the windscreen so you can stick a weapon out and defend yourself if you are in the front seat. 

The snorkel is placed with the frame.

Unlike the Tomcar, this one also has mini doors, look behind the A-pillar on the left and you see the snorkel (neatly hidden away), and walk around to the rear and you get a sense of just how compact this car is. It’s so tight, even the spare sticks out the back. Also interesting are the large brackets on the roof, in case you want to air-lift this vehicle or hoist it onto a ship.

This prototype has many basic features that are likely to be upgraded in future versions.

Once behind the wheel, the EX4 feels more ‘direct,’ the manual gearbox making it feel much more sprightly. And then once you find traction in the sand, it takes off and accelerates better too. If anything, this one clearly has more zip, and it feels lighter on its feet too. The ride on this early prototype, however, isn’t anywhere as stable, and the faster you go, the more it bobs and gets tossed around. What’s also clear as you up the speed is that directional stability isn’t as good. That said, it is more willing to turn and take tighter corners. What you also hear while driving the EX4 is the intake, placed not too far from your ear, and that’s especially when you work the throttle and ask for more air. Where it shines is in extreme off-road conditions. Steep climbs with low traction, drops that could give you nose bleed, these are taken in its stride, the low range and superior traction not even needing the intervention of the locking differential for the most part. The EX4 is available from Rs 40 lakh.

Compact rear carries essential water supply for troop.

Bespoke by design

Blessed with the functional focus of a moon buggy, the ability to drive over terrain at speed that would have a regular 4×4-based military off-roader bouncing all over the place, the Tomcar is a purpose-built weapon system engineered by the end user. Designed to push the envelope in specific areas and deliver speed and dependability over rough terrain, it possesses a unique set of characteristics that are sure to give our special forces and advanced tactical units a unique advantage. And the cherry on top is that it is made right here in India by JSW Tomcar (part of JSW Defence).

JSW Tomcar TX specifications

Price

Rs 55 lakh (Plus GST)

L/W/H 

4,050mm / 1,845mm / 1,758mm

Wheelbase

3,055mm

Ground clearance

340mm

Kerb weight

1,350kg

Engine

4 cyl, 1.5-litre turbo-petrol

Power

175hp at 5,600rpm

Torque

275Nm at 2,000-4,000rpm

Gearbox

Heavy-duty CVT, high and low range

Transfer case

2WD,4WD, lockable front/rear differentials

Tyres (f/r)

265/75 R16

Top Speed

100kph

Winch

4,500kg

Jetour T2 review: Is JSW ready for combat?

Jetour T2 review: Is JSW ready for combat?
Jetour T2 front quarter tracking

JSW Group, one of India’s largest conglomerates, is preparing to significantly expand its automotive ambitions. Having already established a presence through JSW-MG Motor India, its joint venture with China’s SAIC, the company is now gearing up to enter the market with an all-new brand of its own, JSW Motor.

Rather than taking the conventional route of developing products from the ground up, JSW is leveraging global partnerships to fast-track its entry into the industry. Its first product for India will be a large plug-in hybrid SUV based on the Chery Jetour T2, which is expected to be assembled at JSW’s upcoming facility in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, and we hear it will be called the Combat.

With its rugged styling, imposing road presence and the promise of combining EV-like efficiency and long-distance touring ability, the SUV is expected to be positioned in the Rs 30-50 lakh segment and take on established players head-on.

Ahead of its India launch later this year, we got an early drive of the SUV to find out whether JSW Motor’s debut offering is ready for combat.

Jetour T2 Exterior Design and Engineering – 8/10

A handsome SUV that oozes character and rugged appeal.

The Jetour T2 delivers on the SUV template to the T – flat bonnet, upright stance, raised ride height, chunky tyres, rugged body cladding, and, as the icing on the cake, a spare wheel mounted on the tailgate. It looks imposing and highly desirable, and while its silhouette bears a resemblance to the Defender, the T2 still manages to carve out a distinctive identity. JSW is likely to make a few changes to the headlamps, grille and bumpers to further differentiate the Combat, but the overall shape, clean surfacing and most of its defining design elements are expected to remain unchanged.

Attractive 20-inch wheels; 201mm of laden clearance.

The massive 20-inch wheels suit the T2’s stance perfectly, and the clean bodywork, free of unnecessary cuts and creases, is particularly appealing. It also gets functional roof rails capable of carrying up to 100kg of luggage, while the side steps feel reassuringly sturdy and genuinely useful.

The T2’s space-saver spare wheel sits within a squircle-shaped cover, although accessing it involves a multi-step process that could prove frustrating if you ever need to change a tyre on a deserted road late at night.

Functional roof rails can take up to 100kg of load.

In terms of dimensions, it is longer (including the spare wheel), wider and taller than the Toyota Fortuner. Ground clearance, too, is an impressive 190mm in laden condition. However, don’t let its rugged appearance fool you – the version destined for India will remain front-wheel drive.

Jetour T2 Interior Space, Comfort, and Features – 8/10

Solidly built, well-designed cabin with some clever detailing and plenty of storage areas.

Climb aboard using the sturdy side step and handy grab handles, and the T2 immediately impresses with its sense of solidity. The cabin feels built to last, with numerous thoughtful design details lending it plenty of character. Nearly upright windows, a steeply raked windscreen and a dashboard pushed far forward create a tremendous sense of space, further amplified by the panoramic sunroof.

The dashboard itself has a distinctive design, with an illuminated pattern across the fascia adding a unique touch. Several layers are wrapped in dimpled leatherette padding, a theme that extends to the steering wheel and centre console.

Dominating the cabin is a massive 15.6-inch touchscreen that houses numerous vehicle functions, including mirror adjustment, climate control and seat ventilation/heating settings. Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are included, while the 12-speaker Sony audio system delivers impressive sound quality. Even the 540-degree camera system offers excellent image clarity. The downside is that the interface isn’t slick or responsive.

Chunky, door-mounted mirrors. Sadly, controls via touchscreen.

Ahead of the driver sits a 10.6-inch digital instrument cluster, a unit we’ve previously seen in some MG and BYD models. While it displays a wealth of information, the fonts and icons are rather small, making them difficult to read at a glance.

Material quality is generally impressive. The stalks and window switches feel robust and premium, while the jewel-like gear selector features an attractive diamond-cut effect. However, under harsh sunlight, it becomes highly reflective and can prove distracting. Reflections from the dashboard on the front windows are also noticeable.

Rugged-looking door pads with nice detailing.

Notably, its dual-zone climate control struggled to cool its large cabin quickly despite the heavily tinted windows. While our test vehicle was a China-specific version, we hope the version we’re going to get in India has an upgraded air-con compressor. Its seat ventilation didn’t seem very effective either, even at its maximum setting.

Diamond-like chunky gear selector is illuminated.

The sculpted front seats, finished in black leatherette with contrasting red stitching, look suitably sporty. They provide excellent support, though the cushioning feels slightly overstuffed, and the absence of lumbar adjustment is disappointing.

Practicality is a strong point. There are large door bins, two phone storage areas (one incorporating a wireless charger), cupholders, a deep-cooled centre console, a large glovebox and even a hidden storage tray beneath the front seat.

Albeit a bit low-set, rear seat is spacious. Flat floor, wide bench make it comfy for three adults.

The rear seat is equally spacious. A wide bench and completely flat floor make it comfortable for three adults, while the boxy cabin ensures generous headroom and overall space. The seat base is positioned slightly low, but comfort levels remain good.

Cupholders, luggage hooks, bottle opener on its tailgate.

The side-hinged tailgate opens to reveal a cavernous 580-litre boot. Despite carrying the spare wheel, the tailgate itself requires surprisingly little effort to open. Thoughtful touches include a locking mechanism that prevents it from swinging shut unexpectedly, and there are cupholders, luggage hooks and even a bottle opener integrated into the inner panel. The boot area also features clever luggage nets and charging provisions, while a soft-close function further enhances convenience.

Humongous 580L boot. 60:40 rear seat split for added flexibility.

Besides the features already mentioned, it gets one-touch-down power windows, powered front seats with memory, LED lights all around, ambient lighting, a frameless inside mirror, autonomous emergency braking, lane-assist, adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, front and rear cross-traffic alert, six airbags, hill-start assist, hill descent control and ESP, to name a few more.

Jetour T2 Performance, Refinement and Efficiency- 8/10

The T2 version we’re driving today is a plug-in hybrid, which combines a 156hp/220Nm 1.5-litre direct-injection turbo-petrol engine, a 43.24kWh LFP battery pack, and three electric motors. Together, the three motors produce 462hp and 700Nm of torque, with power sent to all four wheels. India will also see the plug-in tech, but in front-wheel-drive guise only, with two electric motors instead of three and a smaller 18.4kWh battery.

Powered by a 1.5 turbo along with 3 electric motors.

While the engineering sounds complex, the driving experience is refreshingly straightforward. The four-cylinder engine is refined, although when it operates primarily as a generator to charge the battery, a faint and distant hum does filter into the cabin.

The SUV can be driven either in pure EV mode or in hybrid mode. In EV mode, Jetour claims a range of up to 211km, and performance feels smooth and relaxed rather than outright brisk. Switch to hybrid mode, and the system automatically alternates between EV operation and combined petrol-electric drive, depending on throttle inputs, road conditions and battery charge levels, among other factors.

In this mode, performance feels remarkably effortless, with the T2 gathering speed with surprising urgency as speeds rise. Under full throttle, acceleration is initially measured up to around 40kph, after which there is a noticeable surge in performance as the powertrain delivers a much stronger pull.

Multiple drive modes are available, including Eco, Normal and Sport. In both Normal and Sport, we noticed the vehicle continuing to accelerate momentarily even after lifting off the throttle, which can feel unnerving. Throttle response in these modes is also a touch too aggressive. Eco mode offers a more natural and polished throttle calibration.

In our testing conducted in 40-degree heat, the T2 accelerated from 0-100kph in just 6.35 seconds in its sportiest setting – quick for its size. Flat out, it will reach a claimed top speed of 200kph.

The T2 also offers three levels of regenerative braking. Impressively, all three feel natural in operation, bringing the SUV down to a crawl smoothly and predictably. The brake pedal itself inspires confidence, with the transition between regenerative and friction braking being almost imperceptible.

Jetour T2 Ride Comfort and Handling – 6/10

Soft suspension and tall ride height mean driving dynamics aren’t anything to write home about.

The T2 rides on MacPherson struts at the front and a multi-link independent rear suspension setup. Its suspension tuning leans towards comfort, but this results in a degree of bounce over speed breakers and undulating surfaces.

The chunky, high-profile tyres do an excellent job of smothering smaller imperfections, while the 201mm laden ground clearance provides ample confidence over rough roads. At higher speeds, however, the ride never feels quite as settled or composed. One positive is that it remains well controlled under heavy braking, resisting excessive pitch.

Dynamic prowess is clearly not the priority here. The tall body exhibits a fair amount of roll, noticeable during quick lane changes. Push harder through a series of bends, and this two-tonner T2 understeers quite readily. Combined with its light and somewhat disconnected steering, it is clear that this SUV prefers a more relaxed driving style.

A light steering, smooth hybrid and excellent visibility make it surprisingly easy to drive.

Driven at a gentler pace, the T2 proves extremely easy to live with. The steering offers three weight settings, though it feels best in its lightest mode. Combined with excellent visibility and a smooth, responsive hybrid powertrain, it makes piloting this large SUV remarkably effortless.

Jetour T2 Should You Buy Now or Wait – 8/10

The Jetour T2 plug-in hybrid appears to have all the ingredients needed to establish the JSW brand in India and perhaps even challenge the Toyota Fortuner, despite offering only five seats. It is spacious and practical, it is expected to come loaded with technology and features, and its rugged styling gives it immense road presence and desirability.

The plug-in hybrid powertrain adds further unique appeal, offering the flexibility of pure EV driving and an impressive mileage figure with the hybrid tech. Better still, the system is smooth, refined and delivers strong performance.

It’s larger than a Fortuner, looks imposing, and stays true to the SUV formula.

Yes, it is not without flaws. The touchscreen experience and throttle calibration need refinement, the air-conditioning needs to be more effective, and the ride and handling would benefit from further fine-tuning for Indian conditions. These are areas we hope JSW addresses before launch.

On the whole then, the T2 is certainly ready for combat. Will it win, though, will also depend on JSW pulling off an aggressive pricing strategy and, importantly, backing it up with a reliable ownership and service experience too. That latter is why Toyota rules the roost. The battle lines, then, are drawn.

3 reasons to buy the MG Hector Tomahawk EV and 3 reasons not to

3 reasons to buy the MG Hector Tomahawk EV and 3 reasons not to
MG Hector Tomahawk EV Front Quarter Tracking

The Hector Tomahawk EV (alongside the PHEV) is the first MG model based on the brand’s new ADAPT platform, and costs from Rs 19.49 lakh to Rs 22.99 lakh (ex-showroom). The MG Hector Tomahawk EV is priced more competitively than the Hyundai Creta Electric while also seating up to seven occupants. There’s also the Kia Clavis EV, which costs about the same as the Tomahawk, but that’s an MPV. All that said, let’s start with the positives of this MG SUV first.

Reasons to buy the MG Hector Tomahawk EV

Spacious and premium interiors

Three rows of seats and an accommodating boot make this a practical family hauler

MG Hector Tomahawk EV front seats

The cushioning of the wide front seats of the Hector Tomahawk EV feels comfortable even on long journeys. These seats are ventilated for added comfort, while the driver’s seat also gets a memory function for added convenience. In-cabin storage comes in the form of large door pockets and plenty of cubbies in the centre console. The Hector Tomahawk’s long wheelbase means there’s more than enough legroom for second-row passengers – these seats also recline for added comfort.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV second row

The inclusion of a centre armrest with cupholders, sunblinds, AC vents, USB ports and adjustable headrests make this a nice place to be. Accessing the third row from here is easy and fairly straightforward, courtesy of the sliding second row with its ‘one-touch tumble’ function and a large walk-through gap in the middle. While not the roomiest, last-minute jaunts won’t be an issue as there’s plenty of headroom on offer, and this third row is not devoid of AC vents or LED roof lights.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV third row

Even with the third row up, the Hector Tomahawk EV’s boot stands at 192 litres. This is enough to accommodate a couple of carry-on bags without much fuss. If you’re serious about carrying cargo, folding down those last seats will liberate 528 litres worth of space. The two-tone beige-and-black interior’s minimalistic design gets a generous splattering of soft-touch materials, and the good fit-and-finish further extends the premium appeal of this cabin.

Brimming with modern features

This MG SUV offers more than enough equipment to keep everyone on-board entertained

Taking centre stage on the dashboard is a 15.6-inch infotainment touchscreen, the user interface of which looks clean at first glance. The graphics are crisp and performance is snappy, too. MG has also added swipe-based gesture controls to make it easier to manipulate everyday functions such as adjusting the climate control system or the audio settings. The infotainment system comes with 6 mood-based ambient settings, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, AI-powered karaoke and multi-lingual voice commands.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV dashboard

Furthering the on-board experience is the well-integrated 256-colour ambient lighting system, a 10-speaker Infinity audio system (which sounds great), and crisp-looking 360-degree cameras. There’s also a ‘Custom’ mode for those who wish to tweak the power output and regen braking in 10-percent increments. The Level-2 ADAS suite of the MG Hector Tomahawk EV is comprehensive enough, while the regenerative braking system uses one of its sensors to automatically adjust regen levels in real-time based on traffic conditions.

Easy to drive

The large size of the Hector Tomahawk EV doesn’t make it a handful in the city

MG Hector Tomahawk EV front tracking

A commanding seating position, combined with the light steering and excellent all-around visibility, makes driving the MG Hector Tomahawk EV around town a manageable affair. Finding a suitable driving position is fairly easy too, thanks to the adjustable steering (for reach and rake) and the electrically adjustable driver’s seat. The Tomahawk EV also controls its body movements decently, feeling more mature than any MG EV before it. Finally, the brakes are good, too.

Reasons to not buy the MG Hector Tomahawk EV

Noisy suspension

The Tomahawk’s suspension can get audible over bad patches

MG Hector Tomahawk EV side tracking

While noises from the powertrain, tyres and wind are barely noticeable in this cabin, the same cannot be said about the Hector Tomahawk EV’s suspension. Going over bad roads, you will hear it working fairly easily, which takes away some of the premium feel of the cabin.

Non-linear power delivery

The Tomahawk EV’s powertrain lacks the linearity offered by rivals

MG Hector Tomahawk EV rear tracking

The poor calibration of the electric powertrain of the MG Hector Tomahawk EV means that it may not be ideal for new drivers. ‘Standard’ drive mode dulls the response to prods from your right foot ever so slightly, with firmer throttle application resulting in torque steer due to a sudden surge in power reaching the front wheels. Trying to accelerate hard in ‘Sport’ mode will easily overwhelm the tyres up front – linearity in power delivery is missing.

Too much reliance on the touchscreen

Almost everything is routed through the massive infotainment screen

MG Hector Tomahawk EV touchscreen

It might be sharp and responsive, but burying almost every major function and feature in the infotainment head unit gets distracting. The labyrinth of menus and sub-menus means that you will have to take your eyes off the road for using any of this SUV’s comprehensive feature set. Its sheer size also results in the touchscreen catching reflections, causing further distractions while driving.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV digital instrument cluster

As for the 8.8-inch digital driver’s display, its real-estate could have been used better. While sharpness isn’t a problem, but that positive is overshadowed by the small fonts used for information read-outs. This can make reading most details on this display difficult.

Also read

Maruti Baleno vs Tata Altroz: Whose top trim offers more value?

Hyundai Venue N Line vs Mahindra XUV 3XO: Turbo-petrol auto performance compared

MG Hector Tomahawk EV: What’s in a name?

MG Hector Tomahawk EV: What’s in a name?
MG Hector Tomahawk EV front quarter tracking

MG’s newest SUV has been christened the Hector Tomahawk, but despite the name, it shares nothing with the ICE-powered Hector we’ve known since 2019. The Hector Tomahawk EV and PHEV are the first models on MG’s ADAPT architecture, which will eventually spawn strong hybrids and range-extender hybrids. We drove the Tomahawk EV in sunny Kochi to see how it stacks up in the ever-growing segment.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV Exterior Design and Engineering – 6/10

Let’s talk dimensions first. At 4,745mm long, 1,850mm wide, 1,770mm tall and with a 2,810mm wheelbase, the Tomahawk is larger than the Mahindra XEV 9S in all areas except width. Ground clearance, at 230mm (measured to battery), is also class-best. However, these numbers don’t translate to a particularly imposing stance. Instead, it straddles the line between an MPV and SUV.

Size doesn’t translate to an imposing stance; it straddles the line between an MPV and an SUV.

The design is clean and quite handsome, if a bit uninspiring. The front bumper is squared off with pass-through aero vents on the edges and chunky cladding lower down. Cooling requirements are met by slim slots in the centre section with some chrome detailing, while the conventional grille is blanked off and finished in gloss black. No light bar here, thankfully, but the MG logo does glow and is flanked by rectangular LED headlights with a subtle H-shaped light signature.

Large rectangular LED headlights have a subtle H in them; no light bar, but the MG logo glows.

In profile, it looks quite slab-sided, with sharp creases along the fenders and plastic wheel-arch cladding adding some definition. These, along with the chunky door cladding, attempt to give it a rugged appearance but are let down by 18-inch wheels that look a tad too small. No electric door handles here, just good old-fashioned pull types.

Further back are a set of intricate LED tail-lights that again resist the connected trend. MG’s love for badging is clear though, with four on the powered tailgate. Finishing things off nicely is a sculpted bumper with a grey trim piece and a centre-mounted reverse lamp. Overall, it’s a reasonably pleasing design, but it looks a tad dated and lacks the butch appeal of some rivals.

Overall styling is neatly done but somewhat uninspiring.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV Interior Space and Comfort – 8/10

Inside, the dash features a familiar minimalistic layout with a large touchscreen front and centre. It looks premium and features soft-touch materials on the dash and doors, but lacks a certain wow factor, and the light tan colour palette might not be to all tastes. That said, the light tone and large windows do give it an airy ambience. Look hard, and you will find areas where fit and finish could be improved. The centre console in particular feels poorly textured and finished, which we were told is down to a supplier issue. Speaking of the centre console, the column-mounted drive selector frees up space here for a wireless charger, cupholders, multiple bins as well as a large pass-through cubby lower down, and the door bins are enormous too.

Minimalistic interior looks premium, but the light tan colour palette might not be to all tastes.

It’s easy to get into a comfortable and commanding driving position using the power-operated seats and reach-and-rake adjustment for the steering wheel. The seats themselves are wide, and despite the firm cushioning, they felt comfortable on our full day of driving. They are ventilated too, and the driver’s seat also gets a memory function.

Powered and ventilated front seats are wide and comfortable; driver’s seat gets a memory function.

The Tomahawk has the second-longest wheelbase in class (next only to the Vinfast MPV 7), and it shows in the second row. Legroom is excellent, and while you do sit slightly knees-up, thigh support is adequate too. The seatback reclines pretty far back and features an armrest and three adjustable headrests. Window sunshades, AC vents and Type-C USB ports add to the rear-seat comfort and convenience.

The chauffeur-driven are well taken care of, with a comfy reclining bench, plenty of room all around and sunblinds.

The Tomahawk EV is available in both 5- and 7-seater guises. The latter adds a sliding second row with one-touch tumble to access the third row, as well as more AC vents on the roof and a dedicated fan-speed control. Getting into the last row is surprisingly dignified thanks to a large aperture, but kneeroom depends largely on the middle-row passengers’ generosity, and the low seat means thigh support is non-existent. Headroom is good, though, and for short journeys, adults will be fine back there.

Third row will fit adults but with a slight compromise to the middle-row space.

With the third row up, boot space stands at 192 litres – enough for a couple of carry-on bags – expanding to a generous 528 litres with it stowed. Under the boot floor are a few more storage cubbies, which are handy since there is no frunk – a miss considering there appears to be enough space under the bonnet. A space-saver spare is mounted underneath the car.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV Features and Safety – 8/10

The minimalist interior layout means you reach for the 15.6-inch infotainment screen for most functions. While this can get distracting, physical and swipe-gesture controls together handle most basic HVAC and audio functions with surprising ease. Anything beyond basic, though, will require a deep dive into the screen. While the screen is sharp and snappy and the UI is clean, it can take a while to find your way through the maze of sub-menus. Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are also present, but using either hides the row of shortcuts at the bottom of the screen. Hardcoding these buttons to always stay on top would improve usability. The screen also often catches glare, which takes away from the otherwise sharp 360-degree camera.

Several functions are baked into the 15.6-inch touchscreen, but gesture controls for essential functions are quite intuitive.

Instrumentation is handled by an 8.8-inch display directly in front of the driver. The screen itself is sharp, but some smaller fonts might have you reaching for your reading glasses. Its real estate could also be better utilised by displaying the blind-view camera feed rather than the current pop-up on the centre screen. Other feature highlights include a sweet-sounding 10-speaker Infinity audio system, a panoramic sunroof that stretches over the second row, 256-colour ambient lighting, connected car tech, an AI assistant and more. It’s worth mentioning that the Tomahawk EV also gets a physical start/stop button, which is absent on the brand’s other EVs.

8.8-inch driver’s display is sharp, but some smaller fonts might have you reaching for your reading glasses.

A Level 2 ADAS suite is also available on the top Essence trim, with functions such as adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist and auto emergency braking. While there isn’t an official crash-test rating yet, the robust standard safety kit, including six airbags, ESP, all-wheel disc brakes and Isofix mounts, provides some confidence.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV Performance and Refinement – 7/10

The Tomahawk EV offers just one powertrain configuration – a 69.2kWh LFP battery pack powering a single motor on the front axle, producing 204hp and 310Nm, good for a claimed 0-100kph time of 8.2 seconds. Its front-wheel-drive layout puts it at a disadvantage against rivals from Tata and Mahindra, who offer either rear- or all-wheel drive and higher power outputs. The front-driven Hyundai Creta Electric or Kia Carens Clavis EV are closer matches, and the Tomahawk EV betters them on power and torque.

First EV on MG’s ADAPT architecture pairs a 69.2kWh battery with a front-mounted motor producing 204hp and 310Nm.

Initial throttle response is mild, making it quite easy to amble around town, but push harder, and you get a power spike resulting in torque steer. In Sport mode, you’ll hear the front tyres protest when made to put all that torque down on a less-than-perfect road. Standard mode dulls response slightly, but it can still catch new drivers off guard. With time, it is possible to drive around this, but the latest crop of rival EVs has mastered a more linear delivery. Eco mode feels a bit tepid and is best saved to counter range anxiety, while a Custom mode lets you customise power output and regen braking in increments of 10 percent. There are also three preset regen modes – Standard, Comfort and Strong – but no paddles to control them or one-pedal mode. Instead, you get an Intelligent setting that uses the ADAS sensors to adjust regen in real time based on the traffic in front of you.

Grip levels and body control are good, but FWD layout struggles to put power down.

Refinement is a bit of a mixed bag. While the motor is fairly muted and there is little wind or tyre noise coming through, you hear the suspension at work on rough patches.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV Range and Efficiency – 7/10

 A spirited highway drive from Kochi to Kozhikode covering 192km, resulted in an overall efficiency of 4.85km/kWh.

While the Hector name is often associated with poor fuel efficiency, the new EV and PHEV hope to change that. MG claims an MIDC range of 517km from its 69.2kWh battery pack. On a spirited drive from Kochi to Kozhikode covering 192km, we recorded an overall efficiency of 4.85km/kWh, translating to a real-world range of 336km. This was on a fast highway run, where the Tomahawk’s tall shape won’t do its efficiency any favours. We’ll put it through our standard real-world efficiency test when we have the car for longer.

DC fast charges at 90kW – slower than rivals but enough for a 30 to 80 percent top-up in a claimed 35 minutes.

Topping up the battery from 10 to 100 percent using the 7.4kW charger is said to take around 12.5 hours. It can also DC fast charge at speeds of up to 90kW, which is lower than its immediate rivals but still enough to take the battery from 30 to 80 percent in about 35 minutes.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV Ride Comfort and Handling – 7/10

Rides with more maturity than previous MG EVs, but suspension can be heard working.

The Hector Tomahawk EV makes a big step up in ride and handling compared to the ICE Hector, but there is still some room for improvement. It rides with more maturity than previous MG EVs, comfortably absorbing most of what we threw at it. However, you do hear the suspension working. Sharper bumps reveal an underlying firmness that occasionally comes through to the cabin. Most roads around Kochi were relatively smooth, and we weren’t able to experience it on rippled concrete, so we will reserve full judgement until we have the car for longer.

A big positive is how easy the Tomahawk is to drive for something this large. Visibility all around is excellent, and you can see the bonnet’s edges from the driver’s seat. A light steering also helps, and overall, it feels less intimidating to drive through tight traffic than, say, the XEV 9S.

230mm claimed ground clearance is best in class; wheelbase second only to VF MPV 7.

The steering also weighs up as speeds rise and feels reasonably direct, though the sheer amount of torque going to just the front wheels corrupts the feel. At a quick pace through the twisties, you feel the wheel tugging at your hands as you apply power. Body control is good, and it stays composed through quick direction changes, but a sedate pace is more its element. Braking is strong, with four-wheel discs bringing the heavy SUV to a confident halt.

MG Hector Tomahawk EV Value for Money – 7/10

Introductory pricing for the Hector Tomahawk EV starts at Rs 19.49 lakh and tops out at Rs 23.49 lakh. The Battery-as-a-Service (BaaS) scheme lowers the entry barrier to Rs 13.99 lakh, with battery rental set at Rs 4.90 per km. While all these prices are applicable to limited units only, this is quite aggressive pricing from MG.

Practical, comfortable and no-nonsense SUV will appeal to the chauffeur-driven but lacks the dynamic polish of its rivals.

When compared spec-for-spec, it undercuts the competition from Tata and Mahindra while offering a bigger battery and more performance than its Korean rivals. It has a spacious and comfortable cabin, a comprehensive feature set and is surprisingly easy to drive for its size. However, it lacks the dynamic polish of its rivals and therefore doesn’t feel like a latest-generation EV. As such, its Hector name starts to make more sense. It is a practical, comfortable, no-nonsense SUV that will appeal to the chauffeur-driven just like its forebear. Those looking to do the driving, though, are better off looking elsewhere.

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV long-term review, 31,000km report

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV long-term review, 31,000km report
mercedes benz eqs suv

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV is back in the Autocar India long-term fleet, and after spending the last month with it, I can understand why I was happy to see it return. I have used it for everything from Mumbai office commutes and daily errands to highway runs and even as a cargo hauler, and it has quickly slipped back into the role of a comfortable and effortless family companion. In fact, the more I use it, the more I find myself appreciating just how easy this enormous luxury SUV is to live with.

The EQS SUV is a large SUV, and it feels every bit as luxurious as you would expect from a Mercedes. The cabin is beautifully appointed, the materials feel expensive, and the seats are extremely welcoming and comfortable. My family particularly loves the space and comfort it offers. There is plenty of room inside, and the overall ambience is one of calm and refinement. Being an EV, it is also extremely refined, with the near-silence of the electric powertrain adding to the sense of luxury.

When your driving simulator needs an SUV-sized boot.

Despite its size, the EQS SUV doesn’t feel too big to drive. At more than 5.1 metres long, you would expect it to feel cumbersome, particularly in tight spaces, but that hasn’t been my experience. All-round visibility is very good, which makes it relatively easy to place on the road. The real party trick, however, is the rear-wheel steering. It makes turning around in tight spots remarkably easy, and you quickly stop worrying about the car’s size.

For some perspective, the EQS SUV has a turning circle of just 10.1 metres. That’s actually shorter than my wife’s much smaller Kia Sonet. It is a remarkable statistic and, more importantly, something you can genuinely appreciate when manoeuvring the car in the real world.

Rear-wheel steering makes this 5.1-metre-long SUV surprisingly easy to manoeuvre.

The EQS SUV’s 122kWh battery has also thrown range anxiety right out of the picture for me. I experienced this recently when I shifted from Pune to Mumbai. I had to carry a few important and expensive items, but one trip wasn’t enough to move everything, so I had to make the journey twice.

That meant doing roughly two trips of around 500km in the same day, and the EQS SUV managed it with battery to spare. It was an excellent demonstration of the advantage of having such a large battery. Instead of worrying about where I would have to stop and charge, I could simply concentrate on getting the job done. For an EV that is also expected to undertake long journeys, that kind of range is extremely reassuring.

It settles into a relaxed rhythm on the highway, making long-distance journeys feel easy.

On the highway, the EQS SUV just glides. It is an extremely relaxed long-distance tourer, and I found myself feeling surprisingly fresh even after longer drives. The combination of its refinement, comfort and electric powertrain makes covering distance very easy. There is no engine noise or vibration, and the car simply settles into a comfortable rhythm on the highway. The Burmester 3D Surround Sound System also kept me good company on these longer drives.

There are, however, a couple of things that I don’t particularly like. The first thing I do in any Mercedes is switch off the emergency brake assist. It is a system designed for situations where traffic moves in a relatively organised manner, but I find it extremely sensitive in our chaotic traffic conditions.

Active Brake Assist can be overly sensitive in chaotic traffic, with sudden braking that can really startle you.

I was reminded of this when I once forgot to switch it off. I was driving onto a crowded road when the system suddenly slammed on the brakes. It startled everyone inside the car, but I was also worried about the possibility of someone behind me rear-ending the car. In India, where traffic can be unpredictable and vehicles often follow each other very closely, an unexpected intervention like this can be unsettling. Ideally, there should be an option that allows the driver to switch the system off and keep it off even after the car is restarted.

The other issue is with the ride over bad roads. At low speeds, the ride is cushy and plush, but the EQS SUV’s weight does occasionally make itself felt. If one side of the wheels goes into a pothole at really slow speeds, you can feel the side-to-side movement of the car. It isn’t a major issue, but it is a reminder of just how much car you are driving.

There is also a mild thud if you take a pothole a little faster than you should. The air springs don’t seem to have much negative travel, and you can feel the suspension hit the bump stops.

The plush low-speed ride can get unsettled over potholes, with the EQS’ weight making itself felt.

Other than these two niggles, the EQS SUV has been a comfortable and luxurious companion for me and the family. It has handled my office commutes, daily errands, highway runs and even the demanding Pune-Mumbai move without fuss. Its huge battery has made range anxiety almost irrelevant, while its excellent comfort and refinement make long journeys particularly enjoyable.

Despite its size, the rear-wheel steering makes it surprisingly easy to manoeuvre, and the cabin is exactly the sort of place you want to spend time in. After a month, I am still very fond of the EQS SUV, and I am looking forward to seeing how the experience develops as our long-term stint continues.

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic test data

Odometer31,119km
PriceRs 1.33 crore (ex-showroom)
Economy5.3 km/kWh
Maintenance costNone
FaultsNone

Maruti Baleno CNG AMT launched at Rs 8.32 lakh

Maruti Baleno CNG AMT launched at Rs 8.32 lakh
Maruti Baleno CNG AMT launched at Rs 8.32 lakh

Maruti has added an AMT option to the CNG-powered Baleno, priced from Rs 8.32 lakh (ex-showroom). The new powertrain is available in the Delta and Zeta trims, just like the existing CNG-manual configuration. It uses the same 70hp, 1.2-litre engine but offers slightly higher claimed fuel efficiency than the CNG-MT version.

  1. Offers a claimed fuel efficiency of 34.47km per kg
  2. CNG tank is placed inside the boot; continues to offer a spare wheel

Maruti Baleno CNG-AMT powertrain: More details

New CNG-AMT is more fuel-efficient than the CNG-MT powertrain

The Maruti Baleno’s new CNG-AMT powertrain uses the Z12E 1.2-litre, three-cylinder engine paired with a 5-speed automated manual transmission (AMT). It produces 70hp and 102Nm, the same output as the petrol-MT configuration. The CNG-AMT has a claimed fuel efficiency of 34.47km per kg, which is 0.86kpl higher than the CNG-MT version.

No underbody CNG tank; CNG tank and spare wheel placed inside the boot

However, Maruti has not equipped the Baleno with the underbody CNG tank that debuted with the Victoris last year and was recently spotted in a Wagon R facelift test mule. Instead, the CNG tank is housed inside the boot, along with the spare wheel, leaving negligible boot space in the premium hatchback. In its segment, the Tata Altroz is the only other car to offer a CNG-AMT powertrain. It uses twin CNG cylinders housed in the boot, leaving 210 litres of luggage space. 

Everything else on the Baleno CNG-AMT, including a retuned suspension from the petrol version, is the same as the CNG-MT variants. 

Prices are ex-showroom, India.

Maruti Swift and Dzire CNGs now available with AMT 

Maruti Swift and Dzire CNGs now available with AMT 
Maruti Swift and Dzire CNG

Maruti Suzuki has launched AMT versions of the Swift and Dzire CNGs. Introductory prices of the Swift CNG AMT and Dzire CNG AMT are Rs 7.92 lakh and Rs 8.53 lakh, respectively. This is the first time that the brand is offering the convenience of an automatic with the low running costs of a CNG powertrain. Maruti becomes the second brand to provide AMT gearboxes with CNG-powered models; Tata Motors was the first to introduce the powertrain combo on select models in its lineup.

  1. CNG versions get a 55-litre tank in the boot and retain a spare wheel 
  2. CNG AMT versions get higher claimed mileage than manual variants. 

Maruti Suzuki Swift CNG AMT, Dzire CNG AMT: Additional info 

AMT versions of the Swift and Dzire CNGs are powered by the same Z12E, 1.2-litre, 3-cylinder engine as their manual versions. Both come with a 55-litre (water-equivalent) CNG tank. In CNG mode, both produce 70hp and 102Nm, with the AMT gearbox being a 5-speed unit.  

The Swift CNG AMT has a claimed mileage of 35.34km/kg which is 2.49km/kg more than its manual version. At 36.47km/kg, the Dzire CNG AMT’s claimed efficiency is 2.74km/kg more than the manual variant. Like their manual counterparts, both models come with retuned suspension to handle the extra weight of the CNG tank, a CNG fuel level indicator, and a fuel switch.

The Swift CNG AMT is available on its VXi, VXi(O) and ZXi trims, while the Dzire offers the powertrain combo with its VXi and ZXi trims. The Swift and Dzire CNG AMTs rival the Tata Tiago and Tata Tigor CNG AMTs. Unlike the Tata models that come with a dual-cylinder setup for their CNG-powered models, Maruti has chosen to fit a single large tank instead, thus boot space is very limited in the Swift and Dzire CNGs.

All prices are ex-showroom, India

Mahindra Vision S interior spied in close detail

Mahindra Vision S interior spied in close detail
Mahindra Vision S interior spied in close detail

A close-to-production test mule of the Mahindra Vision S-based SUV has been spied once again, this time offering a clearer look at the interior. The spy shots suggest that the production-spec Vision S could borrow several design elements from Mahindra’s existing SUVs, including the Thar, Thar Roxx and XUV 7XO. The exterior remains heavily camouflaged, but appears to carry the same design elements seen in previous spy shots.

  1. XUV 7XO-like steering wheel and a Thar Roxx-like infotainment can be seen
  2. Thar Roxx-like circular headlights and a tailgate-mounted spare wheel can be spotted

Mahindra Vision S spied: What was spotted?

Some elements seem to be borrowed from the Thar 3-door and Thar Roxx

Image source: Carwale

The new spy shots appear to show the automatic version of the SUV based on the Vision S concept, as indicated by the drive selector on the centre console. The cabin features a two-spoke steering wheel that looks similar to the one seen on the Mahindra XUV 7XO. The infotainment touchscreen appears similar to the 10.25-inch unit used in the Thar 3-door and Thar Roxx, while the climate control panel is the same unit seen in both models. The protruding AC vents are one of the design elements carried over from the Vision S concept. A digital driver’s display housed within a binnacle can also be seen.

The centre console houses the drive selector stalk, an electronic parking brake and some storage spaces. The seats are finished in black fabric upholstery with contrasting white stitching. However, the production-spec SUV could feature a different upholstery theme.

Projector headlights, tailgate-mounted spare wheel can be seen

Image source: Carwale

Although heavily camouflaged, some exterior design elements are visible. These include a grille with vertical struts and a tailgate-mounted spare wheel. The tailgate-mounted spare wheel is expected to help not compromise boot space, which could otherwise be taken up by an underbody-mounted spare, particularly given the vehicle’s sub-4-metre length. The SUV also gets Thar Roxx-like circular headlights with projector elements. Previous test mules have also revealed flush-type door handles and a panoramic sunroof.

Image source: Carwale

The Vision S-based SUV will use Mahindra’s NU_IQ platform, which supports petrol, diesel, hybrid and electric powertrains. As part of its Vision 2027 roadmap announced in 2025, Mahindra said its NU_IQ-based SUVs would enter production from 2027.

McLaren confirms its building an SUV

McLaren confirms its building an SUV
Mclaren

McLaren has confirmed plans to build its first SUV in the UK as part of a GBP 500 million investment in its manufacturing and engineering operations. The unnamed performance SUV is in the early stages of development and is planned to launch before 2030.

The investment will also fund a second vehicle assembly facility in the UK, expand McLaren’s existing facilities and bring engine development and production in-house for the first time. The programme is expected to create at least 1,000 jobs within and around McLaren, with a further 3,000 jobs expected across its supply chain.

Speaking to Autocar UK, McLaren COO Michael Straughan said “there’s a roadmap for about the next 10 years that gives us real confidence. We’ve got a growth plan and a delivery perspective on how we can get to where we want to get to.”

McLaren SUV confirmed

McLaren had previously ruled out an SUV, with former CEO Mike Flewitt saying the company could not afford to develop one and that it “just doesn’t fit the brand”. The company is one the last supercar makers to add an SUV to its range, following rivals including Ferrari, Lamborghini and Aston Martin.

The SUV will use one of the company’s new hybrid powertrains. Straughan said the SUV remains in the early stages of development, although McLaren is targeting a launch before 2030. The company has not yet announced its name, technical details or exact launch date.

The SUV will be the first McLaren road car to move beyond the mid-engined supercar format that has defined the brand since its road-car business was established. “No longer will we be only rear-engined, rear-wheel-drive cars. There’s going to be front-engined, and either four-wheel drive or perhaps rear-wheel drive in the future. It’s very difficult off one assembly line, so we need another assembly line – wherever we decide to put that”, Straughan said. 

The SUV’s body structure is still being decided. McLaren is considering several options, including carbonfibre, drawing on its expertise in lightweight composite construction. “It’s one of the discussions we’re having at the moment, because nobody has ever done this before,” he said. “Every other SUV [of this type] has been aluminium, and we’ve got a number of options at the moment for what the body structure will be in the future. If we went that way, it would be the first. It would be incredibly special.” he added. 

The SUV is the only new model McLaren has confirmed. However, the front-engined layout could support other models in future. Straughan said there are no firm plans for additional models, but that the layout “opens up other opportunities”. McLaren has not confirmed any further derivatives or changes to its existing supercar range.

New engines and gearboxes

McLaren will develop and manufacture future engines and gearboxes in-house for the first time. Its current V6 and V8 engines are supplied by Ricardo, which has powered all of McLaren’s core models since the company’s relaunch with the 12C in 2011. The engines are exclusive to McLaren.

McLaren hasn’t alluded to their technical specifications, but says they will support “the company’s hybrid engine strategy”. The company says they will be developed and tuned to maximise driver engagement. Asked about the technical make-up of these new engines, Straughan said: “Obviously it’s going to start with the current V8 products or the future generation of that, but once you start building engines there are lots of opportunities”. 

Confirmation of plans for two distinct engine programmes suggests McLaren will offer different cylinder counts and capacities across its line-up going forward. McLaren’s partnership with Ricardo will continue for other engineering work, but future engines will be built by McLaren rather than shipped to Woking by Ricardo.

No immediate McLaren EV

McLaren has no immediate plans for a fully electric road car. COO Michael Straughan said the company will wait until customer demand is strong enough, although its integration with Forseven has provided experience in electric-vehicle development. Straughan said it was important that McLaren launched an EV “at the right time”.

“It’s inevitable – it will come, and we’ve got to be ready for when it does come. But the market reception to EVs in this space is not fantastic at the moment, so we can’t afford to make a mistake with the product, and therefore we will hold off until we’re certain that the customer demand is there”, he added.

Second UK factory planned

The new facility will supplement the McLaren Production Centre in Woking, although its location has not yet been confirmed. “We can’t build a front-engined car on the same line as a rear-engined car,” Straughan said. “We’re not going to use somebody else’s production line,” Straughan said. “We’ll build our own”, he added. 

McLaren will also expand its existing production facility in Woking, which built around 2,000 cars in 2025, as well as its carbonfibre manufacturing and research centre in South Yorkshire. The company has recently opened a design and innovation centre in Bicester and a testing and vehicle development facility in the Midlands.

Together, these sites will support McLaren’s UK operations across design, engineering, vehicle development and manufacturing, increasing production capacity for its next generation of models. “We can’t stop making the cars we make today,” Straughan said. “We have to introduce the new products alongside them”, Straughan said.