BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e specs, features comparison

BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e specs, features comparison
BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e specs, features comparison

The BMW i5 LWB (long wheelbase) and Lexus ES 500e are two of the latest additions to the luxury electric sedan segment. Both pack an extensive list of features, but each has an advantage in some areas. They also get different battery pack sizes, and their peak power and torque outputs vary as well. So, how different are the two on paper? We find out.

BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e: Dimensions

 

BMW i5 LWB

Lexus ES 500e

Length

5,175mm

5,145mm

Width

2,156mm

1,920mm

Height

1,520mm

1,575mm

Wheelbase

3,105mm

2,950mm

Boot space

Not disclosed

377 litres

Wheel size

20 inch

21 inch

The BMW i5 LWB is slightly longer by 30mm than the Lexus ES 500e, but the bigger difference is in width. The i5 LWB is 236mm wider than the Lexus; however, the ES 500e is 55mm taller. The BMW sedan also has a 155mm longer wheelbase. In terms of wheels, the Lexus EV rides on 21-inch units, which are 1 inch larger than the i5’s 20-inch ones. BMW has not disclosed the i5 LWB’s boot capacity at the time of writing. Meanwhile, the Es 500e has a 377 litre boot.

Another point of difference is the suspension. The i5 LWB gets rear-axle air suspension, which should offer better ride comfort in real-world conditions, while the ES 500e uses a multi-link setup.

BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e: Powertrain specs

 

BMW i5 LWB

Lexus ES 500e

Battery size

81.6kWh

74.68kWh

Drive configuration

RWD

AWD

Power

268hp

343hp

Torque

410Nm

438Nm

0-100kph

6.7 seconds

5.5 seconds

Claimed range

669km (MIDC)

580km (WLTP)

AC charging (0-100 percent)

Not revealed (11kW charger)

~4 hours (22kW charger)

DC charging (10-80 percent)

33 minutes (160kW charger)

28 minutes (150kW charger)

Clearly, the dual-motor setup of the ES 500e makes much more peak outputs that the i5 LWB, which gets just a rear-mounted electric motor. Compared to the i5, the ES 500e has a 75hp and 28Nm advantage. It’s also quicker, taking 5.5 seconds to go from 0-100kph, which is 1.2 seconds quicker than the BMW. The BMW, however, gets a larger 81.6kWh battery than the Lexus’ 74.68kWh unit. 

As for the claimed range figures of the two sedans, it should be noted that the i5 LWB’s 669km figure is based on the modified Indian driving cycle (MIDC), which is more relaxed than the worldwide harmonised light vehicles test procedure (WLTP). The ES 500e, meanwhile, claims a range of 580km on the stricter WLTP cycle.

When it comes to fast charging times, the ES 500e has the upper hand. On DC charging, the Lexus takes 28 minutes from 10-80 percent compared to 33 minutes for the BMW. Although the BMW supports a slightly higher maximum charging speed of 160kW compared to the Lexus’ 150kW, its longer charging time could be due to the BMW sedan’s larger battery pack. 

BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e: Exterior features

 

BMW i5 LWB

Lexus ES 500e

LED headlamps

Yes

Yes

LED DRLs

Yes

Yes

LED tail-lights

Yes

Yes

Fog lamps

No

Yes

Powered ORVMs

Yes

Yes

Door handles

Flap type

Flush-fitting

Shark-fin antenna

Yes

Yes

Powered tail-gate

Yes

Yes

In terms of exterior features, both sedans are similarly equipped. Both get LED headlamps, LED DRLs, LED tail-lights, powered ORVMs, shark-fin antennas and powered tail-gates. The Lexus, however, stands out here with fog lamps. The two also differ in their door-handle designs. The i5 LWB uses flap-type handles, while the ES 500e gets flush-fitting units.

BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e: Interior features

 

BMW i5 LWB

Lexus ES 500e

Touchscreen

14.9 inch

14 inch

Digital driver’s display

12.3 inch

12.3 inch

Speakers

17-speaker Bowers & Wilkins

17-speaker Mark Levinson

Sunroof

Fixed, panoramic

Openable, single-pane

Ventilated front seats

Yes

Yes

Rear centre armrest

Yes

Yes

Wireless charger

Front and rear (1 each)

Front (2)

Ambient lighting

Yes

Yes

Apple CarPlay and Android Auto

Wireless

Wireless

Connected car tech

Yes

Yes

Rear sunshades

No

Yes

Soft-close doors

No

Yes

Digital IRVM

No

Yes

The two sedans get a 12.3-inch digital driver’s display, 17 speakers, ventilated front seats, rear centre armrest, ambient lighting, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and connected car tech. While the BMW gets a Bowers & Wilkins sound system, the Lexus opts for a Mark Levinson setup.

The BMW gets a slightly larger 14.9-inch touchscreen compared to the Lexus’ 14-inch unit. The sunroof setup is different too, with the i5 LWB getting a fixed panoramic unit with integrated lights, while the ES 500e has an openable single-pane unit. The BMW also gets one wireless charger each at the front and rear, whereas the Lexus gets two at the front. The Lexus claws back some ground with rear sunshades, soft-close doors and a digital IRVM, all of which are missing on the BMW. 

BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e: Safety features

 

BMW i5 LWB

Lexus ES 500e

Airbags

8

8

360-degree camera

Yes

Yes

Electronic parking brake

Yes

Yes

Digital IRVM

No

Yes

ISOFIX seat anchors

Yes

Yes

Rear defogger

Yes

Yes

ADAS

Yes

Yes

Both the sedans are evenly matched on most safety features. Both get eight airbags, a 360-degree camera, electronic parking brake, ISOFIX child seat anchors, rear defogger and ADAS. The Lexus, however, offers a digital IRVM, which is not offered on the BMW.

BMW i5 LWB vs Lexus ES 500e: Verdict

 

BMW i5 LWB

Lexus ES 500e

Ex-showroom price (Rs lakh)

79.60

89.99

Pricing is one area where the BMW i5 LWB and Lexus ES 500e differ quite significantly, by Rs 10.39 lakh to be precise. The other difference is in outright performance. The ES 500e’s AWD setup gives it an advantage in acceleration from 0-100kph. However, for most buyers, the i5 LWB makes more sense, as it gets a relatively larger battery pack and is much more accessible in terms of price. In addition to that, you also get the BMW badge value.

Hero MotoCorp aims to be number one Indian EV seller

Hero MotoCorp aims to be number one Indian EV seller
A close-up shot of the Vida logo on the Vida VX2.

Hero is targeting the top position in India’s electric two-wheeler market as it scales up its Vida business and continues to back Ather Energy. “We clearly are focusing on being number one. There we are not shy of that,” Hero MotoCorp CEO Harshavardhan Chitale told Autocar Professional at the SIAM Annual Convention in New Delhi. He added that Vida and Ather sales, taken together, have already occupied the top position during some months. Considering individual sales numbers from January till August this year, Vida is currently fourth, behind Ather.

  1. Hero currently invests in Ather Energy and Euler Motors; recently increased its Ather investment
  2. Vida currently offers scooters with both fixed and removable batteries
  3. Hero CEO says Ather-Hero joint product may happen in future

Vida is Hero’s EV subsidiary

Company is increasing production and exploring different offerings

Hero initially differentiated the brand through removable batteries, targeting, among others, customers living in apartments without convenient access to charging. The company is now pursuing fixed-battery scooters alongside its removable-battery models. Chitale said the two configurations are attracting different sets of buyers. Fixed batteries allow Hero to offer a more competitively priced product, with the difference between the two configurations at around Rs 10,000.

Vida has gained almost 600 basis points (6 percent) of market share over the past year and is seeing year-on-year growth of around 100 percent, according to Chitale. Demand has prompted Hero to increase production. Chitale said EV capacity would rise by almost 50 percent this month compared with the previous month, followed by a further doubling by December. Demand for removable-battery models has remained strong, despite the introduction of fixed-battery alternatives.

Ather-Hero partnership progress

Charging already integrated, joint product might happen in future

Hero’s EV strategy also includes its investment in Ather, which it has continued to support through successive fundraises, including the most recent one of Rs 1758 crore. For now, the two companies will continue pursuing independent product roadmaps rather than integrating their vehicle platforms. However, that could change as the market matures. Chitale said the companies discuss areas including battery-cell sourcing, software, motors and motor components. Joint sourcing could become an option, although no such arrangement is currently underway.

Charging infrastructure is already an area where both the companies are working together. Hero and Ather are part of an interoperable fast-charging initiative which, according to Chitale, now involves close to 20 companies and nearly 6,000 charging points.

Hero also has an interest in electric commercial vehicle maker Euler Motors. Chitale described Euler as potentially the “next Ather in making” and said Hero would continue supporting the company through its fundraises. The combination of Vida, Ather and Euler gives Hero exposure across electric two-wheelers and commercial vehicles as it seeks a larger share of India’s expanding EV market.

With inputs from Mukul Y. Singh, Hormazd Sorabjee, Ketan Thakkar, and Stephen Raj Antony.

Simple Wave 3.7 review: A promising family EV but…

Simple Wave 3.7 review: A promising family EV but…
Simple Wave 3.7 tracking shot

The Simple Wave is an interesting proposition in the increasingly crowded electric scooter space. Its rounded, smooth looks certainly grab attention and, as we found out, it is comfortable, spacious and offers brisk performance. There’s plenty to like here, so let’s dive right in.

Simple Wave Design and quality – 8/10

Looks unique and features many chassis changes over the One

Design is subjective, of course, but the Wave looks good to my eyes with its smooth, rounded edges and distinctive silhouette. It’s got a good level of finish too, and the brighter colour options – red and blue – help it stand out. Simple has designed the Wave as a more accessible, family-oriented scooter, without making it look or feel built down to a cost.

It has a quirky design and surely stands out, especially in the brighter colour options.

Compared to the sporty Simple One, the Wave’s chassis is quite different. The rear subframe has been reworked to accommodate the bigger boot and twin shocks (which replace the One’s monoshock). The Wave also uses a simpler, more cost-effective tubular swingarm instead of the cast unit on the One.

Lockable and weatherproof 4L“Pill” storage cubbies are a thoughtful touch, RH cubby is an accessory.

Simple Wave Ergonomics and comfort – 9/10

Offers a supple ride and ample space for two people

The differences only get more pronounced once you sit on the Wave. Its seat is long, wide and will easily accommodate two full-size adults, while its relatively low 775mm seat height makes it friendly for shorter riders.

That low seat height is no accident either; Simple took feedback from customers who had the One and incorporated it into the Wave. This is why the Wave also has a lower handlebar to make it more approachable for shorter and female riders. This has a trade-off, however. Taller riders will find the handlebar fouls their knees during tight, lock-to-lock U-turns.

Riding position is spot-on and ride comfort too is excellent.

Other than that, the Wave is rather sorted ergonomically. Ride comfort is excellent for a scooter, and that isn’t a surprise given that the Simple One itself was quite comfortable. The Wave builds on that with a composed and plush ride that suits its intended role.

Depending on the variant, the Wave weighs between 121-128kg with the 3.7kWh TFT variant provided to us sitting roughly in the middle of that range (124.5kg). We found the Wave handled predictably, without any unwelcome surprises, feeling stable and sure-footed without compromising agility expected of a scooter.

Spacious, well-paded seat can comfortably seat 2 full-size adults.

Simple Wave Performance and range – 9/10

Performance is more than sufficient, Eco mode truly usable

Like the One, the Wave offers really brisk performance, but still feels approachable enough for everyday use. The 3.7 version gets three riding modes – Eco, Ride and Sport – and both Ride and Sport offer more than enough performance for everyday use, which isn’t really a surprise. In Ride the top speed is 75kph, whereas Sport takes it up to 90kph (speedo-indicated, not actual).

The real surprise, however, is Eco mode. Yes, it feels duller than the other two modes, but it isn’t crippled in the way Eco modes on other EVs. The Wave can still get up to around 50-55kph quite respectably and overtake traffic, making Eco genuinely usable even on faster roads or in a big city.

It handles predictably and surefootedly in all scenarios.

Given that the Wave uses the same motor as the OneS making 6.4kW and 52Nm, this performance is no surprise. However, on the Wave, the motor drives the rear wheel via a chain drive, not a belt as seen on the One models.. While a chain will be more maintenance-intensive than a belt, replacing it should be more affordable. Simple has worked to reduce powertrain noise with measures such as a rubber-damped sprocket, but there is still some motor noise. However, it’s much quieter than an Ather Rizta or 450, although far from dead silent like an Ather Konarc or TVS iQube.

Another welcome change to the One is the throttle response. Unlike the older One models we tested, where the scooter could continue accelerating briefly after the throttle was closed, the Wave’s accelerator behaves much more intuitively. It also gets traction control, although the throttle calibration is so smooth, you’re unlikely to need it in dry conditions but it will be a useful safety net in the wet.

Fast 750W charger is standard on all variants.

Powering the Wave are four battery packs, depending on the variant you choose: 2.2kWh, 2.7kWh, 3.7kWh and 5kWh. The IDC ranges Simple claims are 110km, 132km, 171km and 243km, respectively. The first two use LFP (Lithium Ferrous Phosphate) chemistry, while the larger batteries use NCA (Nickel Cobalt Aluminium) cells.

The range indicator also appears to be quite trustworthy although we’ll reserve final judgement on real-world range until we can conduct a full test back in Mumbai. What is also nice is that all variants of the Wave come with a fast 750W charger which enables a pretty quick 0-80 percent claimed charging time of 3hr30min on the 3.7kWh version we were riding.

The standard warranty on the Wave is three years/30,000km, with five years/50,000km and 15 years/2 lakh km extended options also available. The price of these optional longer warranties has not been shared with us.

The Wave’s motor feeds power to the rear wheel via a chain, not a belt like on the One.

Simple Wave Features – 9/10

Massive 63L boot and Pill storage cubbies are very useful

While range without sacrificing usable performance is surely valuable on an EV, practicality is an important consideration as well. Storage is one of the Wave’s big strengths. There’s a useful front cubby, while the two “Pill” storage boxes on either side of the body panels are particularly nifty allowing you quick access to essentials you may need to reach for without having to get off the scooter. Each offers 4 litres of lockable weatherproof storage; the left one is standard, while the right is an accessory.

An undoubtedly big USP on the Wave is its cavernous 63L boot, the largest on any Indian scooter to date.

What is also an undoubtedly big USP on the Wave is its cavernous 63 litre boot, which is the largest on any Indian scooter to date. This should prove to be more than enough for everyone in the family! That being said, 63 litres is an enormous number and while this boot is undoubtedly big, I’m do find myself struggling to comprehend how it is nearly 50 percent bigger than the already cavernous 43 litre boot in the River Indie.

There’s plenty of technology too, including hill hold, drop-safe functionality, theft alerts and Bluetooth connectivity to your phone via the app. The TFT-equipped versions bring even more tech, while the brake-lock clasp is a small but useful touch.

TFT display is well laid-out and has a lot of tech but misses touch functionality.

Simple Wave Price and verdict – 8/10

Scooter has a lot of strengths but is pricey; company yet to prove itself

There isn’t a lot to dislike about the Wave as a scooter. It’s comfortable, spacious, well finished and quick enough to serve its intended purpose very well. However, for all its accomplishments, the Wave doesn’t come cheap. Sure, the Rs 1.10 lakh starting price is tempting, but as you climb the variants ladder, the Wave gets seriously expensive, topping out at Rs 1.90 lakh (ex-showroom, Bengaluru). That said, Simple is one of the few brands offering the option of a 5kWh battery in the family e-scooter space, which is commendable.

However, more than pricing, the bigger issue is that the company is yet to properly scale up its dealer network and establish an aftersales network that delivers the premium experience a buyer will expect after shelling out the money Simple is asking for. The Wave is a good product, but customers paying a premium for an electric scooter will expect not just a solid product but also dependable after-sales support.

The Wave has a lot of strengths but Simple is yet to prove itself in the market.

Ultimately, the Wave’s biggest challenge is that it comes from a start-up that has made plenty of big promises and statements over the past five years but still has a lot to prove. Its dealer network remains minuscule compared with the big players, and long-term reliability still remains unknown.

There’s a lot for Simple to do, but the good news is that the Wave is a genuinely likeable product. If the company can iron out the business side of things, the Wave has the potential to catapult Simple from just another niche start up to a much bigger player. Of course, doing so is a huge challenge and not an overnight process. Simple has a long road ahead of it, but the good news is that it finally has a convincing product to aid in that journey. 
 

Real world charging times of all EVs tested in 2026

Real world charging times of all EVs tested in 2026
Real world charging times of all EVs tested in 2026

We’ve tested the charging performance of seven EVs so far in 2026, spanning a range of battery capacities and DC fast-charging capabilities. We recorded their 20-80 percent charging times as well as their peak charging speeds. Here’s how they rank from the slowest to the fastest.

7. Tata Punch EV

Prices: Rs 9.79 lakh to Rs 12.99 lakh

Tata updated the Punch EV earlier this year, bringing with it larger battery packs (30kWh and 40kWh), among other updates. Besides being the most affordable EV here, it’s also the slowest-charging car on this list. That said, its performance remains respectable by segment standards.

Using a 180kW DC fast charger, charging speeds hovered between 65-67kW from 25-50 percent state of charge, before tapering off beyond 50 percent and dropping sharply after 90 percent. Its 40kWh battery pack took 27 minutes to charge from 20-80 percent, and another 31 minutes to reach 100 percent. We also observed a peak charging speed of 67.3kW, slightly exceeding Tata’s claimed 65kW.

6. Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella

Price: Rs 23.60 lakh

The Urban Cruiser Ebella is Toyota’s only EV on sale in India and is offered in a single variant with a 61kWh battery pack.

Using a 90kW DC fast charger, we recorded a peak charging speed of 68.2kW. Charging the 61kWh battery from 20-80 percent took 35 minutes, while the final 20 percent required another 36 minutes. Impressively, charging speeds remained consistently between 67-68kW from 20-50 percent state of charge.

You can expect similar charging performance from the Maruti Suzuki e Vitara, as the two models are essentially the same vehicle.

5. Mahindra BE 6 Sporteq

Prices: Rs 19.45 lakh to Rs 26.95 lakh

We charged the Mahindra BE 6 Sporteq, equipped with the 79kWh battery pack, using a 150kW DC fast charger. During the test, we recorded a peak charging speed of around 90kW, which is roughly half of Mahindra’s claimed figure. That said, charging speeds remained consistent at around 87-89kW from 20-80 percent state of charge, which is commendable.

The BE 6 took 33 minutes to charge from 20-80 percent and another 35 minutes to go from 80-100 percent.

Notably, owners have reported higher charging speeds, closer to the claimed 180kW, when using Mahindra and Zeon charging stations.

4. Vinfast VF7

Prices: Rs 22.99 lakh to Rs 28.09 lakh

We tested the dual-motor Vinfast VF7, equipped with a 70kWh battery, using a 180kW DC fast charger and observed a peak charging speed of 95.4kW.

Vinfast claims that charging from 10-70 percent takes 28 minutes. In our test, the VF7 required 38 minutes to charge from 20-80 percent using the same 180kW charger.

3. Mercedes-Benz CLA 250+

Price: Rs 60.50 lakh

The Mercedes-Benz CLA 250+ is equipped with an 85kWh battery pack and an 800-volt electrical architecture, enabling charging speeds of up to 320kW. Mercedes claims a 10-80 percent charging time of just 22 minutes.

For our test, we used a 150kW DC fast charger, and the CLA’s 85kWh battery charged from 20-80 percent in 35 minutes and reached 100 percent after another 34 minutes. We recorded a peak charging speed of 125kW, with the charging rate averaging 96kW between 20-70 percent state of charge.

2. Tesla Model Y RWD:

Price: Rs 50.89 lakh

Tesla currently offers the 2026 Model Y in India with a single rear-mounted motor and a 60kWh LFP battery (64kWh gross). Using a 250kW Tesla Supercharger, the battery initially charged at an impressive rate. However, charging speeds dropped rapidly from 176kW at 30 percent state of charge to 109kW at 40 percent, before continuing to taper off thereafter.

In terms of charging times, the Model Y took 23 minutes to charge from 20-80 percent, while the final 20 percent required another 30 minutes.

1. Hyundai Ioniq 5:

Price: Rs 55.71 lakh

The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is the fastest-charging EV we’ve tested so far in 2026. The updated model features a larger 84kWh battery pack, up from 72.6kWh in the previous version. Using a 360kW DC fast charger, charging speeds remained between 240-250kW from 30-50 percent state of charge before dropping sharply. We also recorded a peak charging speed of 251kW at around 50 percent state of charge.

As for charging times, the Ioniq 5 took just 16 minutes to charge from 20-80 percent – quickest we’ve seen to date; while reaching 100 percent required another 33 minutes.

Prices are ex-showroom, India.

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Tomahawk PHEV: Specifications comparison

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Tomahawk PHEV: Specifications comparison
MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV and Kia Sorento PHEV quick comparison

Kia’s ICE (internal combustion engine) flagship SUV offering in India, the Sorento, is based on the Hyundai Motor Group’s N3 platform. While the Kia SUV is also available with a diesel powertrain, our focus will be on the strong hybrid version for this comparison. As its segment rival, the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV (plug-in hybrid) is also a three-row SUV, and is built around the brand’s new ADAPT platform. Let’s have a quick look on how these SUVs compare in terms of their dimensions, powertrain specifications and prices.

Explore full specs, features and a price breakdown in our Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV comparison.

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV: Dimensions

The Sorento has the overall size advantage over the Hector Tomahawk

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV dimensions

 

Kia Sorento hybrid

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Length (mm)

4,815

4,745

Width (mm)

1,900

1,850

Height (mm)

1,785

1,770

Wheelbase (mm)

2,815

2,810

Boot space (litres)

179

192

Wheel size (inches)

18-19

18

Neither of these are small SUVs. However, the Kia Sorento hybrid is longer, wider and taller (and has a larger wheelbase) than the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV. The Sorento hybrid can be had with 19-inch alloy wheels at the top end, while the Hector Tomahawk PHEV only gets 18-inch wheels. However, the MG SUV’s boot can accommodate an additional 13 litres worth of cargo behind its third row of seats.

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV: Powertrain

The MG comes with a plug-in hybrid system compared to the Kia’s strong-hybrid setup

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV powertrain options

 

Kia Sorento hybrid

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Engine

1.6-litre turbocharged petrol

1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol

Battery size

TBA

20.5kWh

Electric motor type

Permanent magnet synchronous motor

Permanent magnet synchronous motor

Drive configuration

FWD / AWD

FWD

Total system output

TBA

198hp, 230Nm

Transmission

6AT

DHT

0-100kph

TBA

9.0 seconds

Claimed mileage

TBA

50kpl

Fuel tank

67 litres

52 litres

AC charging

–

7.5 hrs at 3.3kW (10-100%)

DC fast charging

–

35 mins at 25kW (30-80%)

Unlike the Sorento’s strong-hybrid setup, where the battery can only be charged by the internal combustion engine, the battery pack of the Hector Tomahawk PHEV can also be topped up by plugging it into either a DC fast charger or a slower AC charger. The Hector Tomahawk’s plug-in hybrid system allows the car to be driven in pure-electric mode over a distance of up to 115km (claimed), with Kia yet to disclose the Sorento hybrid’s EV-only range. Depending on the state of charge (SoC) of its battery pack, the MG SUV can also be driven using different powertrain modes.

In series-hybrid mode, the engine charges the battery while the electric motor drives the wheels. Then there’s the parallel-hybrid mode, where the engine and electric motor both power the driven wheels. Finally, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV can also be driven in engine-only mode with no assistance from the electric motor. The Hector Tomahawk PHEV employs a naturally aspirated petrol engine running the Atkinson cycle, plus a relatively high-capacity battery pack and a single electric motor.

Under the bonnet of the India-spec Kia Sorento hybrid sits a punchier 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with direct injection, developing 180hp and 265Nm. There’s a compact battery pack and an electric motor whose output is rated at 65hp and 264Nm. Kia is yet to specify the combined output of this hybrid powertrain, alongside its mileage and performance figures. The Hector Tomahawk PHEV gets what MG calls a  “Dedicated Hybrid Transmission (DHT)”, while the Sorento hybrid is equipped with a conventional 6-speed automatic gearbox (AT). Furthermore, the Kia’s fuel tank can carry an additional 13 litres of petrol. The Kia Sorento hybrid gets Eco, Sport and Smart drive modes, along with Snow, Mud and Sand terrain modes. While the Sorento hybrid is available in both front-wheel drive (FWD) and all-wheel drive (AWD) configurations, the Hector Tomahawk PHEV is exclusively FWD.

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV: Prices

Where the pricier Sorento is available in four different trims, the MG is limited to just two

Kia Sorento hybrid vs MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV prices

 

Kia Sorento hybrid

MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV

Price range (In Rs, lakh)

29.49-40.19

25.70-27.79

Even the base-spec trim of the Kia Sorento hybrid costs Rs 3.79 lakh more than the entry-level MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV. On the higher end of the line-up, the Sorento hybrid with all-wheel drive costs a staggering Rs 12.40 lakh more than the fully loaded Hector Tomahawk PHEV (which is front-wheel drive only). While the Hector Tomahawk PHEV has a 7-seat configuration, the Sorento hybrid is also available in a 6-seat format with individual captain seats in the second row. The Kia also offers more power and also has a larger physical footprint. However, if you want the flexibility offered by a plug-in hybrid system and a long list of standard equipment at a lower asking price, then the MG Hector Tomahawk PHEV could be the right three-row mass-market hybrid SUV for you.

Ather aims for a larger market presence with the Konarc

Ather aims for a larger market presence with the Konarc
An outside image showing the Ather Konarc after the launch

Ather‘s new scooter Konarc is a broader bet for the electric two-wheeler maker to move beyond the relatively narrow customer base it has built around its technology-led products and compete for a larger share of India’s mainstream electric scooter market. Konarc is the first product on Ather’s new EL platform, which the company says was developed with safety, serviceability and scale in mind.

  1. Six different Konarcs with two available starting September
  2. Konarc doubles the service interval compared to a typical scooter
  3. AtherNode and True Health to help with charging and resale, respectively

Konarc is built to be serviced faster and less frequent

Ather says EV priorities have changed with times

The Konarc will be offered across S and Z lines. The 100km Konarc S is priced at Rs 99,999, while the 125km and 161km versions cost Rs 1.22 lakh and Rs 1.45 lakh respectively. Prices for the 200km S and the two Z variants have not been announced. The rollout will start with the S 125 and S 161 variants from September 21, followed by the 100km version in the first quarter of 2027. The Z line is scheduled for the second quarter of 2027, and the 200km S will follow in the third quarter. Once all Konarc variants are rolled out over the next year, Ather expects to have an option for 80-90 percent of the scooter market.

Ather’s own assessment is that the questions surrounding EVs have changed. Ather co-founder and CEO Tarun Mehta said that when the company started, customers asked whether an electric scooter was powerful enough, reliable enough, or even practical. As adoption has grown, the questions have become more conventional: where to charge, how safe is the battery, how long it will last, how the vehicle will be serviced and what happens when it has to be eventually sold. The company wants to solve for the three main concerns: service, charging, and resale value for its EV scooters.

Serviceability is one of the areas where Ather says the EL platform is intended to deliver an advantage. The Konarc’s service interval is 10,000 km (vs 5,000 km for most other scooters), while the number of service checkpoints has also been reduced. In a demonstration during the launch, the motor and transmission assembly was removed in 38 seconds and put back in 1 minute 33 seconds. Mehta acknowledged that service centres would not necessarily replicate these times, but said the architecture was designed to make servicing simpler.

Charging network has also been improved

Ather is solving for public and residential charging

Konarc owners will of course have access to Ather’s existing network of about 6,000 public fast chargers known as Ather Grid. The company, however, sees apartment complexes as the next charging bottleneck. To solve that, it has built AtherNode, a new residential charging system, which uses a building’s common electricity supply to serve individual parking spaces. It manages the available load, queues vehicles, and generates separate bills for residents. This could allow housing societies to add more charging points without immediately upgrading their transformers. Ather plans to introduce the system in six cities from December, beginning with Bengaluru. The Konarc itself gets a 450W onboard charger and supports combined charging; which means that it can be paired with an external 450W charger to refill the battery at 900W.

Ather True Health to help with resale value

The company remains committed to its software first approach

With the Konarc, Ather has attempted to put more conventional attributes of a mass-market scooter alongside the technology it has developed over several years. The company is wanting to solve not only the product problem, but also some of the ownership concerns that could prevent customers from switching from petrol scooters. As the third prong on that front, Ather has introduced True Health on its app, a digital report covering the battery, motor, charger, dashboard, service history and wear components for eligible scooters more than three years old. Owners can view the condition of major components, the battery’s state of health and an estimated resale value. Such a company-verified report could give buyers and sellers a better basis for arriving at a price.

Finally, the company expects software adoption to remain strong even as it moves into a more mainstream segment. For example, in Madhya Pradesh, the adoption rate for AtherStack Pro initially stood at about 40 percent, but eventually crossed 88 percent with the number of stores increasing. The Konarc is Ather’s aim at a much broader part of the market, but that means competing not only with other electric scooter makers, but also with established petrol scooter brands. It remains to be seen whether the company’s push to improve serviceability, charging, and resale value will ease that challenge.

With inputs from Nayan Jain and Stephen Raj Antony.
 

2026 Volvo EX90 review: Better than the XC90

2026 Volvo EX90 review: Better than the XC90
Volvo EX90 front quarter tracking

The EX90 is Volvo’s latest offering in India and also its most premium one. The EX30 and EC40 compete in the entry-level luxury EV segment, but the EX90 is the brand’s flagship electric SUV. It comes in a single, fully loaded variant with all the bells and whistles, along with a dual-motor setup and a claimed range of over 600km. Can it bring in a new audience or convert some XC90 customers? It certainly has the traits to do both.

EX90 Exterior Design and Engineering – 9/10

Built on Volvo’s SPA2 dedicated EV platform that has hints of the XC90.

Based on the new SPA2 architecture, which has its roots in the previous SPA platform but is built specifically for EVs, the EX90 does share some resemblance to the XC90 in its shape and form factor. However, the details are different. As expected, the overall design is simple and far from outlandish or attention-seeking. This is in keeping with the brand’s image, and the restraint actually works. The flat, closed-off front end dismisses any chances of a blingy chrome grille, and what adds drama instead are the LED lights that split open to reveal the main headlamps behind. These, too, have an impressive party trick; with over a million pixels, they can individually light up or switch off and constantly shape a light beam to avoid dazzling oncoming traffic. Further down, you get some more DRL strips, one on each side, and a rather simple, fuss-free bumper. 

DRLs that spilt open to reveal headlamps add drama.

Over to the side, the EX90 is slightly longer than the XC90, while the rest of its dimensions see a marginal bump. 21-inch wheels are standard, and the 210mm of ground clearance at its lowest setting is plenty. The air suspension also allows you to raise the car up to 250mm for off-road use. The door handles are pop-up, flip-up-style units, and you no longer get a key. Instead, you get a card that you need to tap at the right spot, with the Volvo logo facing the right way, for the handle to pop up. Alternatively, you can simply link your phone to the car and use it as a key. It seems convenient on paper, but the card system needs to be a lot more seamless to be hassle-free.

At the rear, it gets a split setup for the LED tail-lamps, with C-shaped LEDs on the lower half and vertically stacked LEDs in the D-pillar. There isn’t a single strip of chrome, and even the cladding is minimal. Subtlety is what Volvo aims for with its design, and the EX90 offers just that.

EX90 Interior Space and Comfort – 8/10

Two-tone upholstery looks rich and materials feel plush.

Inside, the minimalist approach continues and even takes precedence. The dashboard is devoid of any buttons whatsoever, and the majority of the real estate is taken up by the 14.5-inch touchscreen. However, the bright seats and upholstery, along with the bright open-pore wood, lift the cabin ambience significantly. There is generous use of brushed aluminium as well, and the Nappa leather is fantastic to the touch. The centre console also features wireless charging and a rotary knob for media control.

There is plenty in the front seats to pamper you. They offer excellent support, and feature heating, ventilation and a whole host of massage options. Plenty of electric adjustment also means finding an accurate driving position is easy, and all-round visibility is very good.

Exclusively a six-seater with good space and comfort. 

The EX90 is only available as a six-seater, so in the middle row you get captain’s chairs, but these would feel snug for some, and for a luxury car that would be chauffeur-driven, you don’t get the same level of pampering as in the front seats. There is no electric adjustment, heating, ventilation or massage either. There aren’t any sunblinds for the windows too, and even though the huge panoramic sunroof is electrochromic, at the tap of a button you get a bit of tint in the glass, on a hot day with the sun overhead, you will need more.

Massive panoramic glassroof gets electrochromic shade. Physical sunshade is an accessory.

The accessories list has a proper roof shade to protect you from that, and it is an extra we recommend you select. On the plus side, space is good, and the seats can be adjusted 
for legroom and recline too. You get four-zone climate control, with AC vents in the pillars that are a lot more effective, and cupholders stowed within the armrests. Also, being a modified platform, the floor is raised, and you notice this while getting in and out of the car.

Access to the third row is easy from between the captain’s chairs, thanks to the flat floor, but there is no tumble feature for the seats. Instead, they only slide forward, opening a cavity to get in. Room in the last row is at a premium for tall adults, but kids or shorter adults will do just fine with a little adjustment to the middle row.

Third row best suited for kids or short adults over quick drives.

With all three rows up, boot space stands at a healthy 324 litres, and with the third row folded away, it is a sufficient 690 litres. There is a 46-litre frunk too for stowing charging cables. Impressively, there is a full-size spare wheel as standard, which will eat up some boot space but is a huge relief given the low-profile tyres and our roads.

EX90 Features and Safety – 8/10

Annoyingly every control is within the 14.5-inch Google-powered screen.

Most of the EX90’s features are accessed through the massive, vertically oriented touchscreen. Being Google-powered, it runs a smooth OS, but simple tasks like adjusting the ORVMs require multiple inputs and navigation through the menus, which isn’t easy while on the move. There are some hard-coded functions at the bottom of the touchscreen, such as climate control, but you still need to focus on the screen and cannot operate them easily while driving. There is also a 9-inch driver display with nothing but the absolute necessary figures, such as range, speed and battery percentage. You can also load up the maps there, and it displays the traffic around you too. However, don’t expect multiple dials and a loaded, fighter-jet-like cockpit experience, the instrumentation is all minimal but feels sparse too.

Bowers & Wilkins Hi-Fi audio system is epic.

What is excellent, however, is the music system: a 1,610W, 25-speaker Bowers & Wilkins Hi-Fi audio system with custom presets and modes that truly transform the cabin. If you enjoy your music, there are few cars in the world that offer something at this level or better. Safety is where Volvo excels, and the EX90, being the flagship, has all the bells and whistles – active and passive. Nine airbags, five cameras, five radars and 12 ultrasonic sensors, powering a full ADAS suite including door-opening alert and post-impact braking, make it exceptionally well equipped. Essentials like a 360-degree camera and auto-parking further make it easy to live with.

EX90 Performance and Refinement – 9/10

It is just as nice to drive as it is to be chauffeured in.

The EX90 comes in a single variant in India, with a dual-motor setup and a 106kWh battery pack. It develops 456hp and 670Nm, making it quick off the line. 0-100kph takes just 5.5sec, which, given its size and type, is pretty impressive. However, from behind the wheel, the experience aligns with its laid back character. You can alter the dynamics using the four drive modes. ‘Range’ prioritises efficiency, and power and torque are heavily restrained, although in bumper-to-bumper traffic, you will not notice the dip. There is a creep function too for peak-hour jams. ‘Standard’ is a balance that suits the car well for the most part, while ‘Performance’ is for that rare time when you want to add some enthusiasm.

Despite its strong power figures, performance feels more like an airliner than a fighter jet.

Don’t expect fighter-jet levels of reactions, though. Even in ‘Performance’ and with a heavy right foot, the EX90 builds pace gradually. It is almost like taking off in an aeroplane, where the speed rises in a strong and linear manner. This mode zaps power swiftly, so it is best to use the ‘Standard’ mode and get the best of all worlds. If you end up venturing off the tarmac, the ‘Off-road’ mode allows for more ground clearance (250mm), and it alters traction control and ESP settings to allow for more traction on loose surfaces.

Once on the move, what is extremely impressive is cabin refinement. With no engine sound to distract you, EV cabins amplify ambient sounds like wind and road noise, especially with large tyres, but the EX90 is a different story. Cabin insulation is top-notch, and it is near-silent on the inside. It also has a neat trick, microphones all around the car can relay conversations via the speakers clearly no matter where you are seated. You only have to talk in your natural tone for your voice to clearly go through the microphone and speakers. So passengers sitting at the first and third row can have a conversation without having to speak loudly.

EX90 Mileage / Range and Efficiency – 9/10

The 106kWh battery can eke out 625km according to the WLTP cycle. In our short test drive, we saw an efficiency of 5km/kWh in mixed driving conditions, resulting in a range of 530km. That is rather respectable, and considering a majority of our drive was on the highway, this number should only get better in the city.

The EX90 also has regenerative braking, and you can go from having it completely off to low or high, or just leave it in Auto, where it does all the thinking for you. Feel, though, leaves a lot to be desired, the pedal never feels consistent in its bite point. You get an 11kW AC charger for your home or office, which takes 11 hours for 0-100 percent. But being an 800V system, it can charge at up to 350kW on a DC charger, taking just 23 minutes for 10-80 percent. The car will also pre-condition the battery, meaning it gets the battery up to its optimum temperature to charge as quickly as possible.

EX90 Ride Comfort and Handling – 8/10

The EX90 rides on air suspension, which, over broken roads at medium or high speeds, is excellent. The car adjusts within microseconds, and you barely feel bumps inside. You can firm it up for the highway, so there is none of the wallowy feel associated with a softly sprung setup. Three modes to choose from give you flexibility depending on the road surface. ‘Standard’ offers the best balance, as it has the softness without feeling overly soft in the corners, while ‘Firm’ adds a layer of stability at speed and on fast bends. ‘Soft’ is a bit too soft, and the car ends up diving or rolling a tad more than necessary. In the city, there is none of the harshness over low-speed bumps, and the composed nature of the suspension is its highlight.

EX90 Value for Money – 8/10

The EX90 offers just about everything you need in a luxury EV

Prices for the EX90 will be out in October, and it will be the brand’s flagship SUV, sitting above the XC90. If you are looking for a chauffeur-driven luxury EV, it will tick the right boxes. That said, sunblinds would have been nice, and as a driver, it will frustrate you with an over-reliance on the touchscreen and a fiddly key card. On the whole, though, it does a lot to impress and allows you to forgive these shortcomings. You get everything you expect from a luxury EV, the cabin is plush and comfortable, the materials and feel are excellent, the design is subtle but svelte, and the ride comfort is truly impressive. It rivals the Mercedes-Benz EQS and BMW iX, and while it may not be as feature-loaded in the rear seat as the EQS or as powerful and fun to drive as the iX, it does find a very nice middle ground and would be top of the list for those looking for minimalist class and luxury.

All you need to know about Lexus ES

All you need to know about Lexus ES
Lexus ES

The Lexus ES is available in India in two forms: the ES 350h strong hybrid and the ES 500e EV. The 350h was added to the ES range in July, joining the 500e that launched earlier this year. Beyond the new powertrain options, the latest ES gets a larger footprint, a redesigned cabin and a host of new features. Here’s everything you need to know.

1. How much do the Lexus ES 350h and ES 500e cost in India

The Lexus ES 350h is priced at Rs 66.10 lakh for the Exquisite variant and Rs 71.80 lakh for the Luxury trim, whereas the ES 500e costs Rs 89.99 lakh (all prices are ex-showroom). Both versions get an eight-year/2,00,000km warranty, covering the vehicle and its battery.

2. What powertrain does the Lexus ES 350h get?

The ES 350h uses a 2.5-litre four-cylinder naturally aspirated petrol engine paired with an electric motor and lithium-ion battery. The petrol engine produces 186hp and 235Nm, while the electric motor develops 201hp and 270Nm in isolation. The combined system output is 244hp. Power is sent to the front wheels through an e-CVT gearbox. Lexus claims an ARAI-certified fuel efficiency of 25.22kpl.

3. What battery, motor and range does the Lexus ES 500e offer?

The ES 500e gets a 74.68kWh battery and two electric motors, one on each axle. The front motor produces 227hp and 267Nm, while the rear motor makes 120hp and 170Nm. The combined output is 343hp and 438Nm, with a claimed 0-100kph time of 5.5sec. Lexus claims a range of 580km on a full charge. The ES 500e supports 11kW AC charging, while a 150kW DC fast charger can charge the battery from 10 to 80 percent in 28 minutes. A 2.8kW portable charger is also offered.

4. What are the key features of the Lexus ES?

The new ES gets a dual-tone cabin with a 14-inch touchscreen and a 12.3-inch digital driver’s display. It also gets a Mark Levinson premium audio system, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, wireless phone charging and three-zone climate control. Other features include powered front seats with heating and ventilation, a head-up display, digital inside rearview mirror, ambient lighting, rear window sunshades and a power-operated boot lid.

One of the ES’s standout features is proximity-sensing controls. Physical controls are integrated into the dashboard and steering wheel and illuminate when they detect a hand approaching, combining touch controls with physical switches.

The exterior gets Lexus’s new design language, with a sealed-off front end, Twin L-signature lighting and a connected rear light bar. The new ES also has a coupe-like roofline and a rising beltline.

5. How spacious is the new Lexus ES?

The new ES measures 5,145mm long, 1,920mm wide and 1,575mm tall. It is 170mm longer, 55mm wider and 130mm taller than the previous-generation model, while the wheelbase has increased by 80mm to 2,950mm. Lexus has increased ground clearance for India by 20mm to 158mm. The larger dimensions are complemented by a lower window line and thinner seats and trim pieces, while the longer wheelbase frees up more space inside the cabin.

6. What safety and ADAS features does the Lexus ES get?

The ES 350h gets Lexus Safety System+, which includes a pre-collision system, adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist, lane departure alert, automatic emergency braking, a blind-spot monitor and automatic high beam. It also gets eight airbags, Isofix and top-tether mounts and an emergency brake signal. The Luxury variant additionally gets a drive monitor.

The ES 500e gets 10 airbags, a 360-degree camera setup, blind-spot monitoring, adaptive high-beam assist, radar-guided cruise control, lane-change assist and a driver drowsiness monitor. Electronic stability control and all-round parking sensors are also standard.

7. Where is the Lexus ES made, and which cars does it compete with?

The ES is locally assembled in India. The Lexus ES competes with luxury sedans such as the Mercedes-Benz E-Class, BMW 5 Series and Audi A6. The ES stands out in the segment by offering buyers a choice of hybrid and fully electric powertrains.

Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella real world range tested, explained

Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella real world range tested, explained
Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella

Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella is the company’s first and only EV sold in the country, and is essentially a badge-engineered Maruti Suzuki eVitara. Toyota has limited the Ebella range to a single variant, priced at Rs. 23.6 lakh. We put the Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella with the 61kWh battery pack through our range test to find out how it performs.

  1. Three driving and regen modes; no single pedal driving
  2.  Weighs 1,815kg
  3.  20-80 percent recharge takes 35 minutes using a 90kW DC fast charger

Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella: Real-world range

The Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella is solely available with a 61kWh lithium-ion LFP battery pack and it is powered by a 174hp/193Nm electric motor driving the front wheels. For our tests, we used the Eco driving mode all throughout, with regen set to ‘High’ in the city and ‘Medium’ on the highway.

In city conditions, the Toyota Ebella returned 6.37km/kWh which translates to a range of 389km. Interestingly, the efficiency increased on the highway to 6.8km/kWh extrapolating to a range of 415km. With an overall efficiency of 6.59km/kWh, the Toyota Ebella can deliver a real-world range of 402km on a full charge.

Toyota Urban Cruiser Ebella: Charging test

Toyota hasn’t shared any details regarding the Ebella’s DC fast charging capability, but we noted peak charging speeds of around 68.2kW when using a 90kW DC fast charger. In terms of duration, it took 35 minutes to charge from 20-80 percent, and another 36 minutes to reach 100 percent.

Autocar India’s range testing

Before our real-world range tests, the battery of our test car was fully charged, and we maintained tyre pressures in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. The car was driven on a weekday in Mumbai city and on the adjoining state highway in a fixed loop, and we maintained the set average speeds. At the end of each cycle, we calculated the range based on the percentage charge consumed.

Throughout our tests, the climate control was set to 22deg C in a full-auto setting, and other electricals, such as the audio system, indicators and ventilated front seats, were used when required, just as a regular user would. We take pride in our testing data, which isn’t merely consistent but also gives users an accurate indication of what they can expect in the real world.

2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review: Thunder and lightning

2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review: Thunder and lightning
2026 Lamborghini Urus SE review

When introduced originally, the Lamborghini Urus rewrote the playbook of what an SUV could be. Sharp to look at, ferociously fast and with a mighty V8 soundtrack, the Urus has become the benchmark of performance SUVs. Now though, thanks to ever tightening regulations, the Urus has had to pivot to hybridisation. But has that diluted the experience? We got behind the wheel of the Lamborghini Urus SE to answer that question.

Lamborghini Urus SE Exterior Design and Engineering – 9/10

Urus SE has a more rounded-off design than its predecessor, but it’s no less menacing.

In comparison to the older Urus and the mad Urus Performante, the Urus SE does appear a bit softer and more rounded off. But that’s not to say it lacks presence by any means. It’s still full of sharp angles and surfaces, the Arancio Borealis optional paint on our test car looked stunning as did the diamond-cut, multi-spoke 23-inch alloy wheels. Up front, there’s a new bonnet, redesigned bumper and a larger front grille, while the slimmer headlights are now matrix LED units and a different DRL signature.

Rear end features quad-exhaust setup, sporty raked roofline, and a hexagon-patterned grille connecting the tail-lights.

The differences are immediately apparent at the rear too, with a new tailgate, rear bumper and a connecting tail-light grille. As always, Lamborghini’s Ad Personam personalisation programme offers an enormous scope for customisation, so buyers can tailor the Urus SE as per their needs. It remains a substantial machine, measuring 5.12m long and 2.02m wide, with a 3m wheelbase. Kerb weight is a hefty 2,505kg, which makes the fact that it can sprint from 0-100kph in just 3.4sec all the more impressive. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Interior Space and Comfort – 8/10

Dashboard layout is premium and feature-loaded, and gets a lot of Lamborghini theatrics.

Inside, the Urus SE retains the familiar Lamborghini approach of combining the ambience of a supercar with the practicality expected of an SUV. However, the changes here are less apparent than those on the outside. The centre console is ever so slightly redesigned with a new array of toggle switches under the touchscreen. The touchscreen itself is larger than the earlier Urus, with updated graphics and a slicker user interface.

Lamborghini’s signature flip-up engine start/stop button is inspired by those of fighter jets.

There’s plenty of visual theatre, too, and it looks just as extroverted as the outside. Standout elements include the hexagonal AC vents, the Lamborghini badging on the dashboard, the aircraft-style levers for the drive modes and of course, the fighter-jet inspired flap-up engine start/stop button. Lamborghini has also introduced new colour and trim combinations with the SE, with our test car featuring the same predominantly orange theme as on the outside.

Rear space is surprisingly plentiful given the Urus SE’s sporty proclivities.

Despite all the drama, this remains a practical SUV. The long wheelbase means there’s plenty of legroom at the rear and it’s wide enough for three too, though taller passengers may find headroom a bit tight thanks to the tapering roofline. The front seats are large, well padded and the optional Lamborghini crest on the headrests just adds to the ambience. The glovebox is decent sized, there’s cupholders and the boot offers 454 litres of capacity.

Lamborghini Urus SE Features and Safety – 8/10

Info-packed driver’s display interface can get confusing at times.

As standard, the Urus SE gets plenty of features like the three screen setup – for the infotainment, AC system and driver’s display – wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, LED matrix headlamps, four-zone auto climate control, leather upholstery, 360-degree camera, connected car tech and so much more. 

The SE also gets a comprehensive technology upgrade, with the new user interface being one of the more significant updates. It features a carousel-style layout on the touchscreen to access the numerous sub-menus it packs in, while the driver’s display shows all sorts of data pertaining to the hybrid system, navigation, media and other car-related info. Navigating all the sub-menus can get confusing, however.

New Lamborghini Telemetry function comes with over 300 pre-loaded racetracks to record lap times on.

There’s also ‘Lamborghini Telemetry’ that can display lap times and sector information for more than 300 preloaded circuits, as well as record new tracks. Connected services extend to navigation, real-time traffic, remote locking, vehicle-status information, remote charging, remote cooling of the cabin and various safety and security alerts.

Also part of the package is ADAS tech like autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control and more. But there’s a lot that’s optional too, like a large panoramic sunroof, a Bang and Olufsen 3D audio system and a whole lot more, apart from the usual trim, material and stitching options. On the whole, the Urus SE is well-equipped but some of the optional extras really could have been standard fitment given the asking price. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Performance and Refinement – 9/10

Twin-turbo V8 and electric motor develop a combined 800hp and 950Nm.

As for the numbers, they are, predictably, staggering. The Urus SE combines the familiar 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 with a 25.9kWh lithium-ion battery and a permanent-magnet synchronous electric motor for an eye-watering combined output of 800hp and 950Nm. The result is 0-100kph in 3.4sec and 0-200kph in 11.2sec, with a claimed top speed of 312kph. Those figures put the Urus SE firmly in supercar territory, despite its size and weight.

And it does feel like one from behind the wheel too, especially in a straight line. Acceleration is relentless and it feels borderline scary on narrow, two-lane roads. The Urus SE always feels like it has power in reserve, especially when you’ve got the powertrain fully dialled up. There’s Strada mode for everyday driving, Sport for when you want to have a bit more fun and of course, Corsa for when you want a proper scare. Couple that with the hybrid system in its full performance mode, and the SE can really feel overwhelming. But if you don’t drive with a heavy foot, it’s surprisingly cordial and sedate. The SE really has a Jekyll and Hyde character about it.

Unrelenting acceleration can get scary on public roads.

What makes the SE more interesting than simply being a faster Urus is the way the electric motor has been integrated. Of course, it’s to help with emissions and meet regulations, but it’s also to boost performance. In EV mode, it can reach up to 135kph and go as far as 66km. But with a flick of a switch, it can turn from silent to violent. 

The V8 also hasn’t become anonymous with the hybridisation. It still makes its presence felt, especially through the optional Akrapovic exhaust our car came fitted with, but it does feel a bit subdued. It’s also piped through the speakers, which doesn’t feel entirely ethical but it does help its case.

Optional Akrapovic exhaust system helps enhance the V8’s aural character.

Lamborghini has also paid considerable attention to keeping performance consistent, with additional cooling for the powertrain and brakes. Not that we ever managed to push it so hard to test out that claim. And apart from the aforementioned drive modes, there’s even some off-road modes baked in, but how many buyers actually take their prized possession off the grippy stuff remains to be seen. 

Lamborghini Urus SE Mileage and Efficiency – 7/10

This is where the Urus SE’s plug-in hybrid system makes a big difference. Lamborghini quotes a WLTP combined energy consumption of 4.67km/kWh plus 17.54kpl. With a discharged battery, however, combined claimed fuel efficiency falls to 7.75kpl.

Thanks to the 25.9kWh battery, the Urus SE claims a 66km all-electric range.

The headline figure therefore needs some context. The SE’s efficiency advantage is greatest when the battery is regularly topped up. With a claimed 66km of EV range, many shorter daily journeys can theoretically be completed without the V8 needing to fire up at all.

For longer journeys, the hybrid system allows the electric motor and V8 to share the workload. But once the battery is depleted, this remains a 2.5-tonne SUV with a twin-turbo V8, so expectations of conventional-SUV fuel economy would be unrealistic.

Lamborghini Urus SE Ride Comfort and Handling – 8/10

Ride isn’t all that absorbent due to the low-profile Pirelli P Zero tyres.

The Urus SE uses a multilink suspension setup front and rear with semi-active dampers, all of which make this large SUV feel engaging around corners without sacrificing comfort. There is a sense of pliancy at low speeds with the ride firming up as speeds rise. Of course, riding on 23-inch wheels means you can feel potholes and road imperfections, but still it isn’t uncomfortable by any means.

Rear-wheel steering, semi-active dampers, e-diff, and torque vectoring help make the Urus SE a keen handler.

It also gets rear-wheel steering, which helps make it more manageable at lower speeds while contributing to agility at higher speeds. The SE feels eager to change direction and the e-diff and clever torque vectoring system do their best to keep things tidy around bends. You also get a good sensation from the steering which has good heft to it and the Pirelli P Zero tyres it comes with are grippy too. Lamborghini has also worked on the aerodynamics, with a new rear aero lip and diffuser increasing rear downforce by 35 percent over the Urus S. Overall though, the SE feels agile enough but there’s no escaping its heavy kerb weight.

Giant carbon-ceramic brakes peek out from behind the 23-inch alloys.

You’re also backed by massive carbon-ceramic brakes, measuring 440mm at the front and 410mm at the rear, and they do take some time getting used to. They may not have the initial bite like with conventional steel brakes, but the stopping power is immense and they stay consistent despite repeated hard braking, which is essential in something as big and powerful as the Urus SE.

Lamborghini Urus SE Value for Money – 7/10

The Urus SE is arguably the most convincing expression yet of Lamborghini’s super-SUV. More importantly, it hasn’t sacrificed the characteristics that make a Lamborghini feel special in the pursuit of meeting ever tightening restrictions. There’s still a V8, it’s still outlandish inside and out, and it still delivers a driving experience that goes well beyond what you’d expect from something this large. All of that while adding the benefit of the plug-in hybrid system for performance and efficiency, as well as properly usable EV range. 

The Urus SE is the all-in-one Lamborghini.

At Rs 4.47 crore (ex-showroom, before options), of course, the Urus SE is expensive. But that’s almost beside the point. The Urus SE isn’t for those who expect rational value; it is for those who want a vehicle that can combine supercar pace, SUV practicality, luxury, all-electric driving and aspirational brand value all in one package. As a technological statement and a performance SUV then, the Urus SE makes a compelling case for Lamborghini’s hybrid future.