RE Himalayan 440 vs Yezdi Adventure: Price and specifications compared

RE Himalayan 440 vs Yezdi Adventure: Price and specifications compared
Image showing the Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 in Mustang Brown colour and the Yezdi Adventure in Yellow Falcon colour.

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 is back, wearing familiar clothes but a new, improved heart. Debuted first on the Scram 440, the upsized 443cc engine now makes 1.4hp more power and 2Nm of torque over the erstwhile Himalayan 411. Throw in an additional sixth gear and the Himalayan should now be a better tourer than before. But wait, how does this revived ADV compare to its direct rival, the Yezdi Adventure? Let’s find out.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 vs Yezdi Adventure: Engine and output

Yezdi makes more power with a liquid-cooled engine

 

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440

Yezdi Adventure

Engine

443cc single-cylinder, air- and oil-cooled

334cc single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

Power

25.4hp at 6,250rpm

29.6hp at 8,000rpm

Torque

34Nm at 4,000rpm

29.8Nm at 5,800rpm

Transmission

6-speed

6-speed

Power-to-weight ratio

127.64hp/tonne

158.29hp/tonne

On paper, the Yezdi Adventure displaces 109cc less than the Himalayan 440, but the Yezdi starts off strong—quite literally—with more power at a higher redline than the Himalayan 440. Its engine is also liquid-cooled compared to the Himalayan’s air- and oil-cooled mill. Both the motorcycles have six gears, so highway travel shouldn’t be a chore on either.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 vs Yezdi Adventure: Dimensions and weight

Himalayan 440 is more accessible

 

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440

Yezdi Adventure

Fuel tank

15 litres

15.5 litres

Ground clearance

220mm

220mm

Seat height

800mm

815mm

Kerb weight

199kg

187kg

Wheelbase

1460mm

1465mm

Things become a bit more even in this section. Both motorcycles share similar ground clearance numbers, but the Himalayan is more accessible with a 15mm lower saddle height. Yezdi reports 187kg for the Adventure but that’s dry weight. So, with 90 percent fuel, it should weigh just as much, if not more than the Himalayan’s 199kg.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 vs Yezdi Adventure: Tyres, brakes and suspension

Both models are (almost) on par

 

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440

Yezdi Adventure

Tyres (F,R)

90/90-21, 120/90-17

90/90-21, 130/80-17

Brakes (F,R)

300mm front disc, 240mm rear disc

320mm front disc, 240mm rear disc

Suspension (F,R)

Telescopic fork, linkage monoshock

Telescopic fork, linkage monoshock

Once again, the numbers look real similar on this front. The Yezdi Adventure has a slightly larger rear tyre and a slightly larger front disc brake. Speaking of tyres, although both models come with wire spoked rims as standard, the Yezdi Adventure offers cross spoke, tubeless rims as an optional Rs 20,000 add-on; available to the middle and top variants. Over on the Royal Enfield side though, such an upgrade isn’t possible at the moment. Royal Enfield doesn’t offer tubeless rims to the Himalayan 440, even as an accessory; they haven’t confirmed if the Himalayan 450’s tubeless rims can be retrofitted to it either. Suspension is another area where both motorcycles are neck-and-neck with them sharing the same kind of setups on paper, down to the travel.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 vs Yezdi Adventure: Features

Yezdi gets more rider aids

The Yezdi offers a more comprehensive feature package compared to the Royal Enfield. The Adventure gives you traction control, adjustable wind shield and instrument cluster, three ride modes (Road, Rain, Off-road); all of which are missing on the Himalayan 440. On the other hand, the Royal Enfield comes with a tripper pod as standard for turn-by-turn navigation, a USB type-C port, and LED headlight and taillight. But if rider aids are what you’re after, the Yezdi has more of them.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 vs Yezdi Adventure: Price

Yezdi offers more value for money

 

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440

Yezdi Adventure

Price (ex-showroom, Tamilnadu)

Rs 2.29 lakh

Rs 2.09 – 2.16 lakh 

Royal Enfield has kept things straightforward with the Himalayan 440 just offering one variant in three colours. All of them share the same price as well. Yezdi offers three variants of the Adventure in four total colours, separated only by the colour choices. Like we had mentioned earlier, you can add cross spoked tubeless wheels to its middle and top variants for Rs 20,000 extra. To conclude, on paper, the Yezdi Adventure puts up quite the fight to the Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 but real-world experiences may vary. It would be prudent to decide between the two after taking test rides.
 

Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars as new identity for PV business

Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars as new identity for PV business
Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars identity for passenger vehicle business

Tata Motors announced Tata.cars as the new retail name for its passenger vehicle (PV) division on Thursday. Both internal combustion engine (ICE) and electric vehicle (EV) models will now come under Tata.cars umbrella brand. Tata.ev will continue as a sub-brand under the wider Tata.cars brand. This new identity will progressively appear across showrooms, digital touch points, after-sales and service operations, and marketing communications.

  1. Tata.ev to continue as a sub-brand under Tata.cars
  2. Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles to remain as the registered legal entity
  3. New principal colour and typeface are a part of the new identity

That said, the company’s legal identity and corporate structure remain unchanged. Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles will continue to be the registered legal entity for statutory filings, manufacturing plants, official contracts and regulatory obligations. 

Tata Motors adopts Tata.cars as new identity for PV business

Tata Motors said the new identity formalises how Indian customers already refer to its passenger vehicles as “Tata cars”. “In many ways, Tata.cars is an identity that India has given us. Today, we formally embrace it,” said Shailesh Chandra, Managing Director, Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles and Tata Passenger Electric Mobility. “The Tata name carries our heritage, our values and the trust earned over generations, while Tata.cars gives our passenger vehicle business a distinct, modern and future-facing expression,” he added.

Vivek Srivatsa, Chief Commercial Officer, Tata Passenger Electric Mobility, said the transition would also introduce a new visual and sensory system built around a design philosophy called Parallel Pathways. It includes Ambition Blue as the principal colour, a bespoke typeface called Parallel Display and a new sonic identity. Tata Motors will also begin updating its dealerships over the next few months with redesigned interiors and a new stainless-steel facade featuring louvred panels.

The new brand system has been designed to work across products, technologies, customer experiences and markets. While customers will increasingly encounter Tata.cars across sales and service channels, corporate and regulatory references will continue under Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles.

With inputs from Ketan Thakkar.

RE Hunter 350 vs 350cc Triumph Speed 400: Price and specification comparison

RE Hunter 350 vs 350cc Triumph Speed 400: Price and specification comparison
RE Hunter 350 and Triumph Speed 400

The last time we compared the Hunter 350 to the Speed 400, things were a lot more straightforward, but things have since changed. Royal Enfield has fixed the Hunter’s biggest deterrent, comfort and has positioned it squarely as a stylish and relaxed street naked; completely different from its retro siblings. Bajaj, on the other hand, had to downsize the Triumph Speed 400’s 398cc engine to a 349cc one, to meet the 18 percent GST slab. So, is picking one from these two, very good motorcycles still difficult? Let’s see.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400: Engine and output

Triumph has more power and torque, but RE delivers both earlier

 

Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Triumph Speed 400

Engine

349cc single-cylinder, air-cooled

349cc single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

Power

20.2hp at 6,100rpm

37hp at 8500rpm

Torque

27Nm at 4,000rpm

32Nm at 7,000rpm

Transmission

6-speed

5-speed

Power-to-weight ratio

111.6hp/tonne

206.7hp/tonne

Bajaj’s downsizing of the 398cc engine has reduced torque more than horsepower, making the Speed 400 a relatively weaker proposition compared to before, at least on paper. Royal Enfield, however, has not had to do anything and continues with its likable J-series engine making the same power and torque as before. It’s hard not to miss that the Hunter delivers both of it much earlier in the rev range than the Speed which reinforces the status quo that these still aren’t meant to be substitutes for each other. The Speed does have one extra gear, making it more capable at highway speeds of the two.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400: Dimensions and weight

Both remain in lockstep with each other

 

Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Triumph Speed 400

Fuel tank capacity

13 litres

13 litres

Ground clearance

160mm

164mm

Kerb weight

181kg

179kg

Seat height

790mm

803mm

Wheelbase

1370mm

1386mm

Had this been the Bullet/Classic 350, this section would’ve been an onslaught on them but perhaps that’s exactly why the Hunter 350 exists. Being the lightest Royal Enfield, the Hunter puts up a tough fight to the Speed 400 on every front. Even though it is 2kg heavier than the Speed, it’s more accessible with a lower seat height. Both are very approachable and friendly machines, for both newer and shorter riders.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400: Tyres, brakes, and suspension

Speed 400 gets a fatter fork and better brakes

 

Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Triumph Speed 400

Tyres (F, R)

110/70-17, 140/70-17

110/80R17, 150/70R17

Brakes (F, R)

300mm disc, 270mm disc; dual-channel ABS

300mm disc, 230mm disc; dual-channel ABS

Suspension (F, R)

41mm RSU fork, twin-shock

43mm USD fork, monoshock

On paper, the numbers once again continue to be really close. However, the Speed 400 gains on the Hunter 350 in a few areas. It has a wider rear tyre, gets radial tyres at both ends and a slightly fatter USD fork. The Triumph also gets better brakes with a far more effective four-piston, radial caliper at the front, whereas the Hunter 350 sticks to a more conventional two-piston, floating caliper.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400: Features

Par for the (retro) course for both

Packing in the most features for the money isn’t what this segment is known for, and neither motorcycle attempts to change that. The Hunter 350 offers dual-channel ABS, an assist and slipper clutch, a type-C USB port, and a TFT navigation tripper pod on higher variants. The Speed 400, gets everything except the navigation feature, offering traction control instead.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400: Price

Hunter is far more affordable

 

Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Triumph Speed 400

Price

Rs 1.37 lakh – Rs 1.71 lakh

Rs 2.34 lakh

Last but not least, how much do you pay to buy one of these? And this is an area where the Hunter 350 has a huge advantage. The top-most variant of the Hunter 350 will set you back by Rs 1.71 lakh, with the base variant starting at as low as Rs 1.37 lakh (both prices ex-showroom, Chennai). On the other hand, the Speed 400 costs Rs 2.34 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi). On paper, this can look like a difficult choice considering how close these are, but that confusion will go away as soon as you take test rides considering the vastly different riding experiences of both.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Price and spec comparison

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Price and spec comparison

Bajaj has revealed the updated Pulsar N160, celebrating 25 years of the Pulsar brand’s legacy, and a simplified variant nomenclature. The motorcycle now gets a brand-new four valve engine that has more power than before. The higher variant gets a host of new features including a TFT instrument cluster with Google Maps mirroring, traction control, and four ride modes. This is perhaps the biggest challenger yet to the current segment leader, the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V, upgraded last year. Let’s see how the popular street-nakeds compare, on paper.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Engine and output

Similar peak power and torque figures

 

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V)

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Engine

164.5cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled

159.9cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled

Power

18.5hp at 9,500rpm

17.55hp at 9,250rpm

Torque

14.4Nm at 8,000rpm

14.73Nm at 7,500rpm

Gearbox

5-speed

5-speed

Power-to-weight ratio

122.52hp/tonne

120.21hp/tonne

Bajaj has given the N160 an all new 4V engine that’s more powerful than the existing 2V engine. You get more power and 0.25Nmslightly loweress torque although both are delivered later in the rev range than on the Pulsar N160 (2V). The 4V engine is also oil-cooled now, an upgrade from the 2V’s air-cooled engine. On the Apache both peak power and torque come in earlier in the rev range.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Dimensions and weight

Point to Bajaj, mostly

 

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V)

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Fuel tank capacity

14 litres

12 litres

Ground clearance

165mm

180mm

Kerb weight

151kg

146kg

Seat height

795mm

790mm

Wheelbase

1,348mm

1,357mm

The new Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) weighs 151kg which at first glance looks heavier compared to the Apache’s 146kg. However, the TVS gets a smaller 12-litre fuel tank and for motorcycles of this segment that translates to roughly 100km lesser range which isn’t a small number. As for seat height, the Apache has the upper hand with a 5mm lower seat height. The Apache also touts 15mm more ground clearance over the Pulsar, and a 9mm longer wheelbase.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Tyres, brakes, and suspension

Level ground

 

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V)

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Tyres (F,R)

100/80-17, 130/70R17

90/90-17, 130/70R17

Brakes (F,R)

300mm disc, 230mm disc, dual-channel ABS

270mm disc, 240mm disc, dual-channel ABS

Suspension (F,R)

USD fork, monoshock

USD fork, monoshock

Things start getting a bit more equal in this area, but please note that we are comparing the top variants of both bikes. On paper, the Bajaj gets a larger front tyre but it’s a minor difference. As for brakes, Bajaj has the superior numbers there with a larger front disc rotor. The suspension specifications on both are extremely similar, but real-world experiences may vary. It’s worth mentioning here that until a year or two ago, TVS was the only manufacturer in this segment offering adjustability on both front and rear suspensions, but unfortunately that’s not the case anymore as the brand doesn’t offer that adjustability anymore.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Features

The Pulsar N160 is the first Bajaj model to offer a TFT dash

Offering segment first features has been a TVS specialty for a while now, but Bajaj is now looking to beat them at their own game with the new Pulsar N160. Bajaj offers features like an electronic throttle body and Google Maps mirroring on the top variant of the N160. To get the Google Maps mirroring on a TVS Apache, one currently has to look at the RTX 300. They remain in lockstep with respect to other features like traction control, ride modes, TFT cluster, and a crawl mode to make navigating traffic easier.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V) vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Price

TVS undercuts the Bajaj by Rs 3,000

 

Bajaj Pulsar N160 (4V)

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Price (Top-most variant)

Rs 1.42 lakh

Rs 1.39 lakh

The new Pulsar N160 has two variants, S and SS, and they cost Rs 1.33 lakh and Rs 1.42 lakh respectively (ex-showroom, Delhi). The Apache RTR 160 4V, on the other hand, has four different variants at the time of writing and starts at Rs 1.19 lakh and goes all the way up to Rs 1.39 lakh for the fully loaded top variant. The differences between the two motorcycles are minor, but thankfully clear enough which should make picking one easier.
 

Royal Enfield to Keep ICE at the Core as Flying Flea Starts EV Journey

FF C6 inside a showroom

Royal Enfield has said that internal combustion engine (ICE) motorcycles will remain central to its business even after the launch of its first Flying Flea electric motorcycle. The company detailed its long-term strategy in its latest annual report under a new framework called RE-BALANCE.

  1. Royal Enfield will continue investing in new ICE motorcycles alongside EVs.
  2. Brazil is now the company’s largest and fastest-growing international market.

In the company’s annual report, Eicher Motors Executive Chairman Siddhartha Lal said Royal Enfield is committed to building its electric future but will continue investing in petrol-powered motorcycles for as long as possible. The RE-BALANCE strategy focuses on balancing investments in ICE and EVs, improving customer experiences, driving profitable growth and advancing sustainability. 

While the company acknowledged that changing consumer preferences and dependence on ICE motorcycles pose long-term business risks, it said it will address these through product innovation, stronger brand relevance and deeper engagement with younger customers.

Royal Enfield said the RE-BALANCE strategy will guide its gradual expansion into electric mobility while continuing to invest in its established ICE portfolio. Its EV ambitions will be led by the Flying Flea brand, and Royal Enfield says that Flying Flea is designed to complement, rather than replace, its existing ICE lineup.

The C6, which is the first model under the brand, was showcased across several cities before its launch in India alongside the opening of the first Flying Flea store in Bengaluru. The motorcycle is priced at Rs 2.79 lakh (ex-showroom Bengaluru) and with Battery as a service (BaaS), the price comes down to Rs 1.99 lakh.

The annual report also highlighted Royal Enfield’s continued global expansion. Brazil emerged as its largest and fastest-growing international market, while the company further strengthened its overseas manufacturing footprint with new assembly facilities in Bangladesh and Thailand.

F1 Sim Racing India Open format explained

F1 Sim Racing India Open

India’s first official F1-sanctioned sim racing competition is currently underway. Run by Mumbai Falcons, F1 Sim Racing India Open offers Indian fans and budding racers a different, and far more accessible entry point to motorsport. In fact, Mumbai Falcons already has plans in place to bridge the gap between sim and real-world racing, giving the best performing participants the chance to join its driver development programme.

  1. Two categories: Junior and Senior
  2. Finale to be held in Mumbai in November 2026 

From sim racing to single seaters

Mumbai Falcons

Over the years, Mumbai Falcons has fielded teams in several international karting and Formula Regional championships. The team has played a crucial role in the junior careers of prominent drivers, including Kimi Antonelli, Oliver Bearman, Arvid Lindblad and Kush Maini. 

Speaking to Autocar India, Mumbai Falcons Racing Limited’s Managing Director Ameet Gadhoke explained that the idea for the F1 Sim Racing India Open stemmed from the team’s experience in single-seater racing. “I’ve seen how important sim racing was for [our drivers] before they went onto the track,” he stated. 

The team isn’t treating sim racing as a separate category; instead, it forms a key part of Mumbai Falcons’ driver development pathway. The best performers in the F1 Sim Racing India Open will join the team’s ‘Agla Star’ programme, with the top 1,000 players earning the chance to train with 4-stroke karts. The top 100 from here will then move up to 2-stroke karts, and those who impress the most will then be trained to step up to single-seater racing.

“The idea is to find the Agla Star. We want a guy or girl to come from here and go into single seaters as fast as possible. We’re doing a talent hunt programme, we’re not [just] doing sim racing,” Gadhoke explained. “So for those who actually understand motorsport, but cannot afford it, this is the pathway. The idea is if this person is good, then we take him out of the group, put him in real karts and then go into single seaters.”

Mumbai Falcons Racing Limited Managing Director Ameet Gadhoke
Mumbai Falcons Racing Limited’s Managing Director Ameet Gadhoke

Mumbai Falcons has also teamed up with several schools across India for this. As the team explained, the goal with this is “to introduce students to sim racing, motorsport technology and structured talent development opportunities at an early age”. As part of this initiative, partner schools will receive simulator infrastructure, training support and structured learning modules. Gadhoke says he’s targeting partnering with around 1,000 schools across 20 cities in India.

F1 also runs its own global sim racing championship, which often acts as a launchpad for wider opportunities in both sim racing, as well as motorsport in general. Gadhoke shared that Mumbai Falcons is also exploring representing India in this F1 Sim Racing World Championship.

F1 Sim Racing India entry fees, format

F1 Sim Racing India open format

Open to both newcomers and experiences players, the F1 Sim Racing India open is divided into two categories – Junior (ages 10-14) and Senior (above 14 years old). Registrations are currently underway, with the F1 Standard package costing Rs 3,499, and the F1 Elite package costing Rs 4,999. While the former simply gives access to competition entry, the more expensive F1 Elite package also includes priority slot for the zonal qualifiers, a 30-minute tutorial, telemetry data, 10 percent discount for online coaching and 10 percent discount on merchandise.

The competition is divided into 10 zones across the country. Phase 1 includes online laps as well as Mumbai Falcons’ school programme. For this, all those who have registered can compete on the F1 25 game through rough Steam, PlayStation Network, Xbox Live or via an EA Play membership. 

Participants can set their fastest lap times on one selected circuit within a 60-day window. Ranking is based on lap time, so the faster your lap, the higher your position. Participants can also continue trying to improve their lap times during the 60-day window.
The top 5,000 juniors and 5,000 seniors from each zone will then make it to the Zonal stage. The 50 fastest juniors and 50 fastest seniors from each zone qualify for the national finals.

F1 Sim Racing India Open: Finals

F1 Sim Racing India finals

The national finals is slated to be held in Mumbai’s NSCI Dome in November 2026. Here, participants will compete in the Playseat Formula Intelligence F1 Edition cockpit, along with the Fanatec ClubSport Racing Wheel F1 system. 

The top 30 from each category will progress to the last stage. The junior finalists will then compete across nine races, while the senior finalists will compete across 12 races. The Junior and Senior champion will each win Rs 1 crore. 
 

Financial Rule: दिखावे पर नहीं, जिंदगी पर खर्च! कपल ने बताए पैसे बचाने और बढ़ाने के 5 नियम

आज की भागदौड़ भरी जिंदगी में पैसों को सही तरीके से मैनेज करना हर परिवार के लिए एक बड़ी चुनौती बन गया है। कई लोग अपनी कमाई का बड़ा हिस्सा महंगे सामान, लग्जरी लाइफस्टाइल और दूसरों को प्रभावित करने में खर्च कर देते हैं। वहीं, बेंगलुरु के एक कपल ने पैसों को लेकर एक अलग सोच पेश की है। मेघा और शुभम का मानना है कि पैसा सिर्फ दिखावे के लिए नहीं, बल्कि जिंदगी को बेहतर बनाने के लिए इस्तेमाल होना चाहिए। उन्होंने अपनी आर्थिक आदतों से जुड़े 5 ऐसे नियम साझा किए हैं, जिनमें अनुभवों, स्वास्थ्य, बचत और भविष्य की सुरक्षा को सबसे ज्यादा महत्व दिया गया है।

कपल की यह सोच सोशल मीडिया पर लोगों को काफी पसंद आ रही है। उनका कहना है कि सही वित्तीय फैसले महंगी चीजें खरीदने से नहीं, बल्कि समझदारी से खर्च और निवेश करने से बनते हैं।

1. दिखावे पर नहीं, जिंदगी को बेहतर बनाने पर खर्च

मेघा और शुभम का पहला नियम है कि पैसे सिर्फ दूसरों को प्रभावित करने के लिए खर्च नहीं करने चाहिए। उनका कहना है कि वे महंगी कार, डिजाइनर कपड़े या ऐसी चीजों पर खर्च नहीं करते जो सिर्फ स्टेटस दिखाने के काम आएं। इसके बजाय वे अपने घर, आराम और ऐसी चीजों पर खर्च करते हैं, जो उनकी रोजमर्रा की जिंदगी को बेहतर बनाती हैं। उनके लिए अच्छा घर और बेहतर माहौल ज्यादा मायने रखता है।

2. सामान से ज्यादा यादों को देते हैं महत्व

कपल का मानना है कि चीजें कुछ समय बाद पुरानी हो जाती हैं, लेकिन अनुभव हमेशा याद रहते हैं। इसी सोच के चलते वे हर साल एक इंटरनेशनल ट्रिप प्लान करते हैं और सालभर में कई छोटे वेकेशन या स्टेकेशन का आनंद लेते हैं। इसके अलावा वे त्योहारों और खास मौकों पर अपने माता-पिता से मिलने को भी प्राथमिकता देते हैं।

3. फिटनेस और हेल्थ को मानते हैं सबसे बड़ा निवेश

इस कपल के लिए स्वास्थ्य पर खर्च करना कोई अतिरिक्त खर्च नहीं, बल्कि भविष्य की तैयारी है। वे अच्छी डाइट, फिटनेस, जिम और हेल्थ से जुड़ी चीजों पर बिना झिझक खर्च करते हैं। उनका मानना है कि आज शरीर का ध्यान रखने से भविष्य में बड़े मेडिकल खर्चों से बचा जा सकता है।

4. हर साल बढ़ाते हैं निवेश का आंकड़ा

कपल का चौथा नियम है कि हर साल अपने निवेश को पहले से बेहतर बनाना। वे शॉर्ट टर्म और लॉन्ग टर्म फाइनेंशियल गोल्स को ध्यान में रखकर पैसे मैनेज करते हैं। उनके अनुसार, घर के बाहर खड़ी कार से ज्यादा जरूरी वह रकम है, जो उनके निवेश पोर्टफोलियो में बढ़ रही है।

5. पैसों की जिम्मेदारी मिलकर संभालते हैं

मेघा और शुभम का मानना है कि परिवार में आर्थिक जिम्मेदारियां बांटना जरूरी है। मेघा घर के फिक्स खर्च जैसे किराया, बिल और घरेलू स्टाफ की सैलरी संभालती हैं, जबकि शुभम ग्रॉसरी, ट्रैवल खर्च और क्रेडिट कार्ड से जुड़े भुगतान देखते हैं।

सोशल मीडिया पर लोगों ने की तारीफ

कपल ने अपने ये नियम सोशल मीडिया पर शेयर किए, जिसके बाद कई लोगों ने उनकी सोच की सराहना की। उनका कहना है कि ये कोई परफेक्ट फॉर्मूला नहीं है, बल्कि उनकी फैमिली के लिए काम करने वाली आदतें हैं। उनकी कहानी एक बात साफ बताती है कि अच्छी आर्थिक जिंदगी सिर्फ ज्यादा कमाने से नहीं, बल्कि समझदारी से खर्च और निवेश करने से बनती है।

अपनी बेसिक टी-शर्ट को बनाएं सुपर स्टाइलिश, जानें कमाल के यूनिक हैक्स!