Forget diesel, go hybrid: Renault’s Stephane Deblaise

Forget diesel, go hybrid: Renault’s Stephane Deblaise
Forget diesel, go hybrid: Renault’s Stephane Deblaise

“Forget diesel, go hybrid,” Renault Group India CEO Stephane Deblaise told us in an interview at the launch of the Duster hybrid. Renault claims that hybrid is the perfect replacement for diesel. The 1.5-litre K9K diesel engine was instrumental in the first-generation Duster’s sales success; out of the nearly 200,000 units sold, nearly 90 percent were powered by the diesel engine. However, the K9K was axed in 2020, when the stricter BS6 emission norms went into effect. 

First-generation Renault Duster’s K9K 1.5L diesel engine.

Renault Duster hybrid leads in claimed mileage than rivals

In addition to the Renault Duster, the Toyota Hyryder, Maruti Grand Vitara and Victoris are currently the only other mid-size SUVs to offer a hybrid powertrain option. The Duster hybrid’s ARAI-rated mileage of 29kpl is 1.03kpl higher than what the Grand Vitara and Hyryder claim. Meanwhile, the Victoris comes closest to matching the Renault SUV’s figure, with a margin of just 0.35kpl between the two. 

It even has the upper hand in peak outputs, making a combined 160hp and 172Nm, which is 21hp and 31Nm more than the Maruti and Toyota rivals. Furthermore, its 1.4kWh battery pack is relatively the largest in the segment, and as per Renault, up to 80 percent of city driving can be done in pure electric mode.

Speaking of pricing, Renault has priced the Duster’s hybrid lineup from Rs 16.99 lakh to Rs 19.49 lakh, ex-showroom (introductory price applicable for all Duster hybrid deliveries before the end of 2026). The base trim is Rs 31,000 pricier than the Grand Vitara and Rs 56,000 more expensive than the Victoris hybrid, while it is Rs 19,000 cheaper than the Hyryder. At the top-end, the Duster hybrid is Rs 13,000 cheaper than the Grand Vitara and Rs 50,000 than both the Victoris and Hyryder.

Both the engine and the battery are currently imported from Spain, but despite that, the Duster hybrid is priced competitively against its rivals, especially at the top end. “India is a difficult market as people want everything for a very low price. This is why it’s an interesting market to challenge original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to be the best,” Stephane said. 

Renault is working on localising hybrid powertrain

On the scope of localisation, which may lead to a lower price, Francisco Hidalgo Marques, VP Sales and Marketing, Renault India, told Autocar Professional, “We are working on that…the speed of localisation is a manufacturer’s problem and that is our task to do it as soon as possible.” 

Francisco Hidalgo Marques, VP Sales and Marketing, Renault India
Francisco Hidalgo Marques, VP Sales and Marketing, Renault India.

“When we launched the new Duster in January 2026, we launched it with turbo-petrol engine options and announced that hybrid will be part of the future of India. Now, in the last few months a lot of things have changed. Petrol sales have declined and we have a lot of customers who have been coming for the petrol Duster and they are saying, ‘I’m going to wait until the hybrid’s launch. I really want to know if the price is good, I will jump,'” he added. 

Francisco also assured that the company is working very hard on increasing the production. He also highlighted that hybrid sales in the mid-size SUV segment are relatively less due to limited options for the customers. But that is set to change soon with the Kia Seltos adding a hybrid powertrain, as well as the next-generation Hyundai Creta.

He also highlighted that hybrid sales in the mid-size SUV segment remain relatively low due to the limited number of options available to customers. However, this is set to change, with the Kia Seltos set to add a hybrid powertrain soon. Even the next-generation Hyundai Creta will offer a hybrid option.

With inputs from Mugdha Mishra.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV vs rivals: Specifications compared

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV vs rivals: Specifications compared
Mercedes-AMG GT SUV vs rivals

Mercedes-Benz recently unveiled its latest performance SUV, the all-electric AMG GT SUV. As the second model based on the 800-volt AMG.EA platform, the AMG GT SUV touts some serious numbers, particularly when it comes to power and performance. We take a look at how the AMG GT SUV stacks up on paper against its key rivals: the Porsche Cayenne Electric and Lotus Eletre. For this comparison, we’ve selected the top-spec, most potent versions of each electric performance SUV, specifically the AMG GT 63 SUV, Cayenne Turbo Electric, and Eletre 900 Sport.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV vs rivals: Powertrain and performance

 AMG GT 63 SUVCayenne Turbo ElectricEletre 900 Sport
Battery capacity (kWh)106 / 128113112
Motor layoutTripleDualDual
Power (hp)721 (up to 1,169)857 (up to 1,156)905
Torque (Nm)2,0001,360 (up to 1,500)985
Gearbox2-speed automatic1-speed automatic2-speed automatic
Drive layoutAWDAWDAWD
Claimed 0-100kph time (sec)2.72.52.95
Claimed top speed (kph)270*260258

Both the AMG GT SUV and Cayenne Electric have boost functions to significantly raise the power output when launch control is engaged, during which the Merc is a touch more powerful. However, when comparing constant, non-launch-control outputs, it’s the Eletre that ranks as the most powerful one here, followed by the Cayenne Electric and then the AMG GT SUV. In terms of torque output, though, the AMG GT SUV’s 2,000Nm figure far outclasses its rivals.

The standard 106kWh battery pack of the AMG GT SUV is the smallest here, but the optional 128kWh unit turns the hierarchy around. The AMG GT SUV also has a triple-motor layout, while the Porsche and the Lotus SUVs have dual-motor setups – all three are all-wheel drive, however. An interesting aspect of the AMG GT SUV’s motors is that they feature an axial-flux design, which makes them more compact and energy-dense than the radial-flux motors used in the Cayenne Electric and Eletre.

Much like the Eletre, the AMG GT SUV comes fitted with a 2-speed gearbox, whereas the Cayenne Electric makes do with a single-speed transmission. Coming to performance, the Cayenne Electric boasts the lowest 0-100kph time in this company, coming in at 0.2sec quicker than the AMG GT SUV and 0.45sec quicker than the Eletre. The AMG GT SUV, however, carries the highest top speed (albeit only with the optional Driver’s Package), followed by the Cayenne Electric and the Eletre.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV vs rivals: Range and charging

 AMG GT 63 SUVCayenne Turbo ElectricEletre 900 Sport
Battery capacity (kWh)106 / 128113112
Max WLTP range (km)585 / 700623500
Max AC charging wattage (kW)112222
Max DC charging wattage (kW)600 / 710400350
10-80 percent DC charging speed (minutes)11 / 121620

The Eletre carries the lowest range figure, outpaced even by the 106kWh spec of the AMG GT SUV. Expectedly, the 128kWh version of the Merc sports the highest range among its rivals, coming in at 77km over the Cayenne Electric and a full 200km over the Eletre. Even DC charging speeds are a sweep for the AMG GT SUV. When it comes to AC charging, though, the AMG GT SUV can only accept a maximum of 11kW, which is half the wattage that the Cayenne Electric and Eletre are capable of charging at.

Mercedes-AMG GT SUV vs rivals: Dimensions

 AMG GT 63 SUVCayenne Turbo ElectricEletre 900 Sport
Length (mm)5,0844,9855,103
Width (mm)2,0011,9802,019
Height (mm)1,6561,6741,636
Wheelbase (mm)3,0403,0233,019
Kerb weight (kg)2,585 / 2,6952,6452,640
Boot space (litres)670747688
Frunk space (litres)1119046

The Eletre is the longest and widest SUV here, but the AMG GT SUV edges ahead of both its rivals on the wheelbase front. Height is a win for the Cayenne Electric, followed closely by the AMG GT SUV and then the Eletre. Interestingly, the AMG GT SUV is the lightest one here in its 106kWh guise, and the heaviest in its 128kWh spec. Boot space, however, is where the AMG GT SUV trails its rivals – the Cayenne Electric offers 77 litres more space. Looking at frunk space, though, the AMG GT SUV sports the largest capacity, while the Eletre has the smallest one.

5 things to know about the Kawasaki Z300

5 things to know about the Kawasaki Z300
Z300 at launch event

The Kawasaki Z300 is the Japanese brand’s new entry-level street naked, which will sit at the bottom of its Z lineup, drawing styling cues from the larger Z900. It is built on the same platform as the Ninja 300 and brings a parallel-twin engine to a segment largely dominated by single-cylinder bikes, going up against the KTM 390 Duke and TVS Apache RTR 310.

1. What engine does the Kawasaki Z300 use?

The Z300 is powered by a 296cc liquid-cooled parallel-twin engine producing 39hp and 26.1Nm of torque, paired with a six-speed gearbox. The engine is shared with the Ninja 300, but the Z300’s upright ergonomics, largely thanks to a wide, single-piece handlebar, should give it a more relaxed character than its faired sibling.

2. What features does the Kawasaki Z300 get?

The Z300 gets a new instrument cluster with smartphone connectivity, which should be an upgrade over the dated yet charming analogue semi-digital console on the Ninja 300. During the launch livestream, we spotted more than one type of display. One appeared to be a negative LCD unit, while another had a white backlight and could be a TFT screen. This suggests the Z300 may be offered in multiple variants with different feature levels, but Kawasaki is yet to confirm the full variant breakdown.

3. What colours will the Kawasaki Z300 be available in?

The Kawasaki Z300 will be available in two colours at launch – Green and Black.

4. Which bikes will the Kawasaki Z300 rival?

The Z300’s closest rivals are the KTM 390 Duke and the TVS Apache RTR 310. Both are single-cylinder motorcycles with more performance-oriented chassis setups, although the Z300’s parallel-twin engine should give it an edge in refinement. The Z300 might not match them in terms of outright performance, but the Kawasaki badge and twin-cylinder engine give it a distinct proposition in this segment.

5. What is the Kawasaki Z300 price?

‘Kawasaki had scheduled a full price and specification reveal for October 20, but pricing is yet to be confirmed on the Kawasaki India website at the time of writing. For context, the faired Ninja 300 is currently listed at Rs 3.34 lakh (ex-showroom, India). The Z300 gets a new instrument cluster, at the very least, but also has less bodywork. A price in the range of Rs 3.20 lakh to Rs 3.50 lakh (ex-showroom) seems likely, but we’ll update this once Kawasaki confirms the official pricing.

Porsche Mission S image gallery

Porsche Mission S image gallery
Porsche Mission S

The Porsche Mission S concept previews a new mid-engined sports car positioned above the 911. It features a low front end with round headlights, raised front fenders, a sloping roofline and an integrated active rear wing. Its design draws on historic Porsche models, including the 959, 911 GT1 and 928. The cabin combines five round instruments, an analogue rev counter, digital displays and physical controls, without a fixed central touchscreen. Porsche is developing a new platform that can accommodate combustion, hybrid and plug-in hybrid powertrains. The Mission S remains a concept, with no production timeline or technical specifications announced.

Royal Enfield Classic 650 Hypershift Edition Image Gallery

Royal Enfield Classic 650 Hypershift Edition Image Gallery
Royal Enfield Classic 650 Hypershift right profile.

Royal Enfield has launched a special edition of the Classic 650, called the Hypershift, to commemorate the Chennai based manufacturer’s 125th anniversary. It is priced at Rs 4.26 lakh, and the company has clarified that it’s limited to 125 units in each of its key markets, including India. Hence, interested customers will need to register to buy one; registrations will be open until October 28, when sales will happen.

The Classic 650 Hypershift is mechanically identical to the production-spec Classic 650. There are no changes to the underlying design either. It has been priced at Rs 4.26 lakh, which is a Rs 58,000 premium over the base Vallam Red colour (Rs 3.68 lakh) and a Rs 43,500 premium over the top Black Chrome colour (Rs 3.82 lakh). For customers who are able to place an order for one of the 125 units on October 28, deliveries will begin in November.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Price, specifications compared

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Price, specifications compared
Tesla Model Y L vs rivals price specifications compared

Tesla has launched a three-row long-wheelbase variant of the Model Y electric crossover in India. Christened the Model Y L, this new variant notably offers seating for up to six occupants, captain seats in the middle row and a stronger powertrain with a higher claimed range. Below, we lay out how the new Tesla Model Y L fares against its entry-level luxury EV rivals, namely the BYD Sealion 7, Kia EV6, BMW iX1 LWB, Volvo EC40 and Mini Countryman Electric on paper.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Dimensions

Larger than rivals in every sense

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Dimensions compared

 L / W / H (mm)Wheelbase (mm)Ground clearance (mm)Frunk / Boot (litres)Wheel size (inches)
Model Y L4,976 / 1,982 / 1,6683,040169116 / 420 (all seats up)19
Sealion 74,830 / 1,925 / 1,6202,93017058 / 50019 / 20
iX1 LWB4,616 / 1,845 / 1,6272,800190 (estimated)– / 49018
Countryman Electric4,445 / 1,843 / 1,6352,692165– / 46019
EC404,440 / 1,873 / 1,5912,70217131 / 40419
EV64,695 / 1,890 / 1,5702,900–20 / 49019

The Model Y L beats its rivals in every dimension, and the Sealion 7 emerges as the second-biggest EV here overall. Tesla has slightly increased the Model Y L’s ground clearance vis-a-vis the standard wheelbase (SWB) version, though the iX1 LWB still rides the highest in this company. While the alloy wheel size remains unchanged for the Model Y L, it is mostly at par with rivals on this front.

Coming to boot space, Tesla claims a cavernous 2,539-litre cargo capacity for the Model Y L with the second and third rows folded. With all three rows of seating up, the Model Y L has an estimated boot space of 420 litres, which grows to around 1,076 litres with the third row folded, and there’s a 116-litre frunk too. All told, the Model Y L offers significantly higher total cargo capacity than the 5-seater EVs it rivals.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Powertrain and performance

Sealion 7 AWD is the strongest and quickest to 100kph

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Battery, power, performance compared

ModelBattery capacity (kWh)Motor setupPower (hp)Drive layout0-100kph (seconds)
Model Y L88.2*Dual514*AWD4.5
Sealion 782.56Single / Dual313 / 530RWD / AWD6.7 / 4.5
iX1 LWB66.5Single204FWD8.6
Countryman Electric66.5Single204FWD8.6
EC4078Dual408AWD4.7
EV684Dual325AWD5.3

*Estimated figures

In addition to the longer body, Tesla has fitted the Model Y L with an 88.2kWh battery pack (85kWh net), which is larger than that of the standard model. It also gets a more powerful dual-motor powertrain, making the Model Y L the first Tesla car to offer AWD in India. While the Model Y L has the biggest battery pack among its rivals, its power output falls a bit short of that of the Sealion 7 AWD.

Regardless, the Model Y L is the second-most powerful EV here by a considerable margin. As for claimed 0-100kph times, the Model Y L matches the Sealion 7 AWD, ranking above the EC40, iX1 LWB, and Countryman Electric.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Range and charging speeds

Model Y L features the highest WLTP-tested range

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Range and charging speeds compared

ModelBattery capacity (kWh)Claimed range (km)DC fast charging time^
Model Y L88.2*681 (WLTP)288km in 15 min
Sealion 782.56480 / 460 (WLTP)45 min
iX1 LWB66.5531 (MIDC)32 min
Countryman Electric66.5462 (WLTP)29 min
EC4078530 (WLTP)27 min
EV684581 (WLTP)18 min

^10-80 percent state of charge (SOC)

*Estimated

Thanks to its larger battery pack, the Model Y L widens the WLTP range lead that the standard model already holds over its rivals. The Model Y L’s range is 100km ahead of the EV6’s, which ranks second, and a whopping 221km more than that of the Sealion 7 AWD, which has the lowest WLTP range of 460km here.

Charging speeds are difficult to compare head-to-head, as Tesla has only confirmed that the Model Y L’s battery can be charged at up to 250kW DC and that it can add 288km of range in just 15 minutes. Keeping the Model Y L aside, the EV6 has the lowest 10-80 percent DC charging time, followed by the EC40, Countryman Electric, iX1 LWB and Sealion 7.

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Price

Model Y L is more affordable than the top-spec SWB version

Tesla Model Y L vs rivals: Prices compared

 Price range (Rs lakh)
Model Y L61.99
Sealion 749.40-54.90
iX1 LWB51.40
Countryman Electric55.65-60.70
EC4059.00
EV665.96

Even though the Model Y L is larger, can accommodate more occupants and offers a stronger powertrain with a higher claimed range, it’s impressively priced at around Rs 6 lakh less than the top-spec Model Y Long Range RWD. That makes the Model Y L more affordable than the EV6, the priciest EV here, but costlier than the Sealion 7, Countryman Electric, iX1 LWB and EC40.

All prices are ex-showroom, India.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 vs Rivals: Price and specifications compared

Aprilia SXR GT 175 vs Rivals: Price and specifications compared
Aprilia SXR GT 175, Yamaha Aerox 155 S, Hero Xoom 160 and Honda ADV160 in clockwise direction.

Maxi scooters have technically been around in our market since 2006, thanks to the Kinetic Blaze but the idea was first popularised by the Suzuki Burgman and later the Yamaha Aerox added to it. “Popularised” being the operating word because Aprilia also had a player in there from 2020, which has just been updated. So, what’s the maxi scooter scene like today and which one should you go get a test ride of? Let’s see.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Engine and output

Smaller rivals all make more power

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Engine

174.7cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled

156.9cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

156cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

155cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled

Power

13.3hp at 7,200rpm

16.3hp at 8,750rpm

14.8hp at 8,000rpm

15hp at 8,000rpm

Torque

14.14Nm at 6,000rpm

14.9Nm at 6,500rpm

14Nm at 6,250rpm

13.9Nm at 6,500rpm

Transmission

CVT

CVT

CVT

CVT

Power-to-weight ratio

100.76hp/tonne

118.98hp/tonne

104.23hp/tonne

119.05hp/tonne

Don’t let the bigger displacement number mislead you into thinking the Aprilia SXR GT 175 is the most powerful of these scooters, because that’s not the case. The SXR has the only air-cooled mill in this class, possibly contributing to its lower output figures. Combine that with the weight and the Aprilia’s case only becomes weaker. For what it’s worth the Italian scooter delivers its peak torque faster than the others so that should be an advantage while plying within the city.

The Yamaha has the lowest kerb weight on this list, which contributes  to  the highest power-to-weight ratio, very closely followed by the Honda.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Dimensions and weight

Hero is the heaviest, Yamaha is the lightest

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Fuel tank capacity

7 litres

8.1 litres

7 litres

5.5 litres

Ground clearance

170mm

175mm

155mm

145mm

Seat height

800mm

NA

787mm

790mm

Kerb weight

132kg

137kg

142kg

126kg

Wheelbase

1362mm

1333mm

1348mm

1350mm

Aprilia gains some ground, or rather gets away from ground with its second highest ground clearance figures. However, it also has the tallest seat height of this bunch. While Yamaha’s ground clearance numbers seem the lowest, do note that the website specifies it to be minimum, which means that it’s measured under laden conditions. So, it’s actually the Hero that has the lowest ground clearance.

As for seat height, Honda doesn’t specify that for the ADV160, but it shouldn’t be too tall for it to be a concern for most Indians. On the other hand, the Xoom 160 is the heaviest of these four, which could prove to be tricky to some at low speed rides and reversing out of parking lots. Aprilia and Hero have neglected mentioning the under seat storage but none of these is likely to impress you in that specific aspect. For what it’s worth, the Honda ADV160 has the highest number of the lot, 27 litres followed by the Yamaha Aerox at 24.5 litres.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Tyres, brakes and suspension

Honda strikes the best balance in equipment

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Tyres (F, R)

120/70-14, 120/70-14

110/80-14, 130/70-13

120/70R14, 140/60R14

110/80-14, 140/70-14

Brakes (F, R)

220mm disc, 140mm drum; single-channel ABS

Disc, disc; single-channel ABS

240mm disc, drum; single-channel ABS

230mm disc, 130mm drum; single-channel ABS

Suspension (F, R)

Telescopic fork, Monoshock

Telescopic fork, twin-shock

Telescopic fork, twin-shock

Telescopic fork, twin-shock

Aprilia has given the SXR GT 175 the widest front tyre, but the rear tyre too is the exact same size which makes it the narrowest rear tyre in this list. Honda appears to have struck the best balance, with respect to the equipment on offer. Though that could change depending on the odd 14-13 front-rear wheel size’s real world implications on the ADV160’s handling.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Features

Honda has an unbeatable ‘feature’

A keyless system is present on all scooters but the Aprilia although Yamaha requires you to pony up for the Aerox S variant to get it. Of the four, Hero and Yamaha’s cockpit views are going to feel the oldest, simply because of their LCD screens. Both companies have packed it with features (call and SMS alerts, metrics on the app and turn-by-turn navigation, to name a few) but apples to apples, the SXR and ADV160 have more modern-looking TFT displays and they also match the former two in features. This will make a difference only if you clearly prefer one over the other, for otherwise there isn’t anything to fault with the Hero and the Yamaha’s displays.

Elsewhere, all offer some type of USB port for charging your devices, front cubby storage and LED lighting. On the convenience front, Hero, Honda and Yamaha offer an integrated starter-motor-generator which gives their scooters features like auto stop/start and a silent start. Honda and Yamaha offer traction control as standard.

A big advantage that only the Honda ADV160 can boast at the moment though, is its E85 compatibility. While Hero and Yamaha do offer other vehicles in their line-up with flex fuel compatibility, the Xoom and the Aerox respectively, do not have that and in these uncertain times, that’s certainly an unmissable advantage of the Honda.

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e vs Rivals: Price

Honda’s advantages have a price to pay

 

Aprilia SXR GT 175 hp-e

Honda ADV160

Hero Xoom 160

Yamaha Aerox 155

Price (ex-showroom)

Rs 1.30 lakh

Rs 1.70 lakh

Rs 1.45 lakh

Rs 1.46-1.50 lakh

The Aprilia’s an unbeatable bargain at this price with its nearest rival being the Xoom 160, closely followed by the Yamaha for its non-S version. Honda appears to offer the best balance of everything along with a currently significant E85 compatibility, but also costs Rs 40,000 over the Aprilia. While it’s easy to get confused over what is the right scooter for you, all of these – thankfully – make it unmistakably clear what they intend to offer. Hence, if you’re confused, figuring out your priorities and taking test rides (hopefully back-to-back) should help you pick the right one for you. If that happens to be the ADV160, you now know what you’re paying for.

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Similarities and differences explained

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Similarities and differences explained
Duster

Renault has expanded the new Duster line-up with a strong-hybrid option, joining the existing 1.0-litre and 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engines. While the hybrid shares much of its design and cabin layout with the petrol versions, there are differences in styling, equipment and, most importantly, how the two powertrains deliver performance and efficiency. Here’s a closer look at what sets them apart.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Exterior

The illuminated grille and badges are the main styling difference

Duster turbo petrol
Duster hybrid
 

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid

The Duster hybrid retains the turbo-petrol model’s overall design, including its eyebrow-shaped LED daytime running lamps, chunky body cladding, roof rails and C-pillar-mounted rear door handles.  It also has the same 212mm ground clearance.

The main styling changes are an illuminated ‘Duster’ grille emblem and ‘E-Tech Hybrid’ badges on the front doors and tailgate. The Hybrid version also gets frequency-dependent dampers. Boot capacity is lower than in the turbo-petrol versions, although the overall exterior design remains largely unchanged.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Interior and features

The cabin layout is similar, but the upholstery and equipment differ

Duster turbo petrol
Duster turbo hybrid
 

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid

The hybrid follows the turbo-petrol Duster’s dashboard layout, with a dual-screen setup and an e-shifter on the centre console. The hybrid gets a different upholstery scheme from the turbo-petrol Duster, with black upholstery and grey stitching on the Evolution, Desert Beige semi-leatherette on the Techno and Dune Brown leatherette on the Emotion. The hybrid also gets a smaller headrest.

The Duster hybrid is offered in Evolution, Techno and Emotion trims, while the turbo-petrol range gets Evolution, Techno, Techno+, Iconic and Iconic Launch Edition variants. 

The hybrid and turbo-petrol Duster share some equipment across their respective trims, but there are differences. The hybrid Evolution gets a 7-inch digital driver’s display, a 10.1-inch touchscreen and dual-zone automatic climate control. The turbo-petrol Evolution has the same touchscreen and driver’s display, but gets single-zone manual air conditioning. Both the hybrid and turbo-petrol Techno trims get a panoramic sunroof.

At the top of the range, the hybrid Emotion gets a 10.25-inch digital driver’s display, ventilated and electrically adjustable front seats, and a powered tailgate. The turbo-petrol Iconic offers these features too, but additionally gets a 360-degree camera and Level 2 ADAS, which are not available on the hybrid.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Engine and Performance

The 1.3-litre turbo-petrol makes more torque

Duster turbo petrol
Duster hybrid
 

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid

The Duster turbo-petrol is available with two engine options. The 1.0-litre, three-cylinder unit produces 100hp and 166Nm and is paired with a 6-speed manual gearbox. The larger 1.3-litre, four-cylinder engine develops 163hp and 280Nm, and is available with a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox.

The hybrid uses a naturally aspirated 1.8-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine paired with two electric motors: a 20hp generator and a 49hp motor that drives the wheels. The system produces a combined 160hp and 172Nm, with a 1.4kWh battery supporting the setup. It uses a ‘multi-mode’ automatic gearbox with two electric gears and four petrol gears.

The hybrid system automatically switches between six operating modes, including all-electric, petrol-only and series and series-parallel hybrid modes. Renault claims the Duster hybrid can cover up to 80 percent of city driving in pure electric mode and accelerate from 0-100kph in a claimed 9.61 seconds.

While the hybrid’s combined output of 160hp is close to the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol’s 163hp, its claimed torque figure of 172Nm is lower than the turbo-petrol’s 280Nm.

Renault Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: mileage 

Duster hybrid mileage is 10.55kpl higher than turbo-petrol DCT

PowertrainTransmissionARAI-claimed mileage
1.0-litre turbo-petrol6-speed manual19.41kpl
1.3-litre turbo-petrol6-speed manual17.75kpl
1.3-litre turbo-petrol6-speed DCT automatic18.45kpl
1.8-litre strong hybridMulti-mode automatic29kpl

The hybrid’s claimed mileage is significantly higher than that of either turbo-petrol engine. The difference is 9.59kpl over the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol manual, 11.25kpl over the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol manual and 10.55kpl over the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol DCT. At 29kpl, the hybrid’s claimed mileage is around 57 percent higher than that of the DCT version. 

The hybrid has a 50-litre fuel tank, the same capacity as the turbo-petrol versions. Renault claims a driving range of more than 1,400km on a full tank of the Hybrid variant.

Duster turbo petrol vs hybrid: Price

The hybrid costs more, even though it misses some features available on the top-spec turbo-petrol

TrimDuster hybridDuster turbo-petrol
Authentic–10.49 (1.0 MT)
Evolution16.9911.69 (1.0 MT); 12.99 (1.3 MT); 14.49 (1.3 DCT)
Techno18.9913.49 (1.0 MT); 14.49 (1.3 MT); 15.89 (1.3 DCT)
Techno+–15.29 (1.3 MT); 16.69 (1.3 DCT)
Emotion / Iconic19.49 (Emotion)16.99 (Iconic MT); 18.49 (Iconic DCT)

MT = manual; DCT = dual-clutch automatic

The hybrid’s introductory prices apply to deliveries until December 31, 2026. In Evolution trim, the hybrid costs Rs 2.50 lakh more than the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol DCT, while the top-spec Emotion hybrid is Rs 1 lakh more than the Iconic DCT. The hybrid offers higher claimed mileage but misses out on the 360-degree camera and Level 2 ADAS available on the turbo-petrol Iconic.

The hybrid version suits buyers who cover long distances and prioritize fuel efficiency, while the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol is worth considering for its higher torque and additional driver-assistance features.

All prices are ex-showroom, India.

EXCLUSIVE: Norton India launch timelines, Atlas to be first to go on sale

EXCLUSIVE: Norton India launch timelines, Atlas to be first to go on sale
Left to right, Norton Atlas, Norton's upcoming single-cylinder motorcycle render and Norton Manx R.

We first rode the Norton Manx R superbike overseas in May and this was followed by the Atlas adventure bike in July. At the time in June, TVS had said that the Atlas would be introduced in India later in the year. It had also scheduled the launch of TVS Paddock, its premium retail channel, for the second quarter of FY27. Paddock will serve as the retail outlet for both Norton products as well as select TVS premium vehicles across the country.

  1. Norton motorcycles will be retailed out of a few exclusive Norton outlets as well as a new TVS Paddock dealer network
  2. Three paddock outlets will be set up by December 2026
  3. Norton line-up will be initiated with the Atlas, followed by Manx R and the new single-cylinder motorcycle

Norton’s reach in Europe, US and India

Indian dealer network still being established

We recently reported on the company’s new 450cc class liquid cooled single cylinder roadster making its debut at ECMA 2026. In its official response to our queries sent, a company spokesperson said, “Norton is set to launch in India soon following the brand’s presence at EICMA this year, when the next key stage of the resurgence will be revealed”.

However, the company did not provide an updated Paddock rollout schedule. Current preparations are understood to point to around three Paddock outlets by December, although a larger network is being sought. The number of outlets that will be operational when motorcycle sales begin has yet to be finalised.
Under the tentative India rollout plan, the Atlas could launch in January 2027, with the Manx following by March if that schedule holds. The sequence could see Norton introduce three to four products during 2027, although the final model mix and launch dates have not been announced. As for the new single cylinder roadster, that bike is likely to be launched in India alongside overseas markets in the second half of next year. 

While Norton’s India innings is yet to begin, the company spokesperson says that the Manx R and Atlas launched earlier this year are being delivered to customers across Europe. The naked Manx and road-biased Atlas GT have not yet been formally launched. The company said it now has more than 50 retailers across 10 markets, including the UK, Italy, France, Germany and Spain. Preparations for a United States launch are continuing, subject to the final stages of vehicle certification.

“As Norton continues to build the brand globally, it is important to ensure that Norton’s entry into India is equally meaningful and thoughtfully executed,” the spokesperson said. “The positive response to Norton’s products in Europe gives us confidence, and more on Norton’s India plans will be shared in due course.”

With inputs from Anurag Chaturvedi.

Report Card: Maruti Victoris’ 1-Year Innings

Report Card: Maruti Victoris’ 1-Year Innings
Maruti Victoris one year report card

Maruti Suzuki introduced the Victoris SUV on September 15, 2026, as its second mid-size SUV. With the Victoris, Maruti aimed to capture a larger share of the mid-size SUV segment by retailing it through its widespread Arena dealership network, in contrast to its Nexa-sold stablemate, the Grand Vitara. The Victoris shares its platform and engines with the Grand Vitara but sports a distinct exterior design. Additionally, it introduced features such as an underbody-mounted CNG tank and became the first Maruti model to feature a Level 2 ADAS suite.

  1. Victoris records 1,47,602 units in total sales in its first year.
  2. Prices have increased/decreased for select variants; still range between Rs 10.5 lakh and Rs 19.99 lakh.
  3. No variant rejigs took place in its first year.

Maruti Victoris sales 

In its first year since launch, the Maruti Suzuki Victoris recorded sales of 1,47,602 units, averaging roughly 12,300 units per month. Monthly volumes began at 4,261 units in September 2025 and rose quickly to 13,496 units in October 2025. Following a minor dip to 12,300 units in November 2025, sales dropped by nearly half in December 2025. Peak sales were recorded in January 2026 at 15,240 units, after which the SUV maintained steady monthly volumes ranging between 10,000 and 13,000 units.

Despite launching after the Grand Vitara, the Victoris achieves higher monthly sales figures, largely supported by Maruti Suzuki’s wider Arena dealership network. Notably, the SUV crossed the 1-lakh sales milestone within eight months of launch—outpacing the Grand Vitara to reach this mark. 

Maruti Victoris variant -wise price 

Variant

Price now (Rs lakh)

Price at launch (Rs lakh)

1.5 LXi

10.50

10.50

1.5 LXi CNG

11.55

11.50

1.5 VXi

11.85

11.80

1.5 VXi AT

13.41

13.36

1.5 VXi CNG

12.90

12.80

1.5 VXi strong hybrid eCVT

16.43

16.38

1.5 ZXi  

13.62

13.57

1.5 ZXi AT

15.18

15.13

1.5 ZXi CNG

14.66

14.57

1.5 ZXi strong hybrid eCVT

18.00

17.80

1.5 ZXi(O)  

13.69

14.08

1.5 ZXi(O) AT 

15.25

15.64

1.5 ZXi(O) strong hybrid

18.43

18.39

1.5 ZXi+  

15.39

15.24

1.5 ZXi+ AT

17.34

17.19

1.5 ZXi+ AT AWD

18.69

18.64

1.5 ZXi+ strong hybrid eCVT

19.52

19.47

1.5 ZXi+(O) 

15.48

15.82

1.5 ZXi+(O)  AT

17.43

17.77

1.5 ZXi+(O) AT AWD

19.27

19.22

1.5 ZXi+(O) strong hybrid eCVT

19.99

19.99

The Victoris is priced between Rs 10.50 lakh and Rs 19.99 lakh, and is offered in several variants. Depending on the variant, prices have increased by up to Rs 20,000 because of hikes by the carmaker due to a rise in input costs. However, select variants of the Victoris saw a price cut of up to Rs 39,000 in July 2026.

Maruti Victoris milestones

Within its first year in the market, Maruti hasn’t introduced or discontinued any of its variants. Additionally, the SUV has not been subject to any recalls.

Maruti Victoris specifications

The Victoris is offered with petrol, CNG, and strong-hybrid powertrains. The petrol and CNG versions use a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated engine: the former produces 103hp and 139Nm, while the latter outputs 88hp and 122Nm. Petrol variants feature a 5-speed manual or a 6-speed automatic transmission, with the automatic also available in an all-wheel-drive (AWD) configuration. CNG versions come exclusively with a 5-speed manual.

The strong-hybrid variant is powered by a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated Atkinson-cycle petrol engine producing 92hp and 122Nm, paired with an e-CVT. The system incorporates a 0.76 kWh battery and an electric motor generating 80hp and 141Nm, delivering a combined peak power output of 116 hp.

In terms of fuel efficiency, the claimed figures for the petrol manual, petrol automatic, and petrol AWD variants are 21.18kpl, 21.06kpl, and 19.07kpl, respectively. The strong-hybrid model leads with a claimed efficiency of 28.65kpl, while the CNG version delivers 27.02km/kg.

All prices are ex-showroom, India