Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 comparison: Tech’in to the max

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 comparison: Tech'in to the max
Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 comparison: Tech'in to the max

The Hyundai Ioniq 5 has been one of the standout EVs of recent years, so much so that we crowned it our 2024 Car of the Year. Back then, besides being one of the most impressive electric cars on sale, it was also among the most affordable in its segment. And when compared with rivals like the BYD Sealion 7 and BMW iX1, the Ioniq 5 came out on top thanks to its comfort, practicality and value.

Fast forward to 2026, and the landscape has changed. Hyundai has updated the Ioniq 5, and the biggest talking point is its larger 84kWh battery. But in the process, this value-focused EV has become one of the most expensive options available.

Tesla, meanwhile, has dropped prices. The Model Y now starts at just under Rs 51 lakh, undercutting the Ioniq 5 and transforming itself from one of the pricier alternatives into the more affordable option. With the pricing hierarchy flipped, this comparison has become more interesting than ever.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Exterior design

 

The Tesla Model Y is the larger vehicle overall, although the Hyundai counters with a longer wheelbase. Neither car follows a traditional SUV or sedan template, with muscular proportions and aggressive styling, but the Ioniq 5 stands out with its retro-futuristic design language, blending hatchback and crossover cues into a shape that is both distinctive and characterful. That said, its styling will continue to divide opinion.

The Tesla, by comparison, plays it a little safer. It too wears a crossover body style, but with a minimalist design that is unlikely to offend anyone. Frameless windows and a unique tail-lamp treatment with a hidden light bar add some flair to its otherwise fuss-free styling. 

It’s worth noting that Tesla lists ground clearance at 167mm (unladen), while the Ioniq’s figure is specified as laden, coming in at 163mm. In the real world, the Tesla occasionally scrapes over unusually large speed breakers, while the Hyundai clears most of them despite its longer wheelbase.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Interior and features

Takes minimalism to a whole different level, with merely a handful of physical controls. Lack of design elements, vegan materials don’t feel special.

Tesla’s non-motorised flush door handles remain a usability frustration, requiring an awkward push-and-pull action to operate. On the inside, the Model Y’s cabin embraces minimalism to an even greater extent. Even the air vents are hidden. The lack of design elements looks clean, but this and the choice of materials diminish the sense of occasion one expects at this price point.

All functions are relegated to its slick screen.

Taking centre stage, quite literally, is a massive touchscreen. Nearly every function is controlled via the screen, including controls for the frunk, tailgate, glovebox, climate control, seats and steering, and mirror adjustments, among many others. This over-reliance on the touchscreen is daunting at first, but Tesla’s software experience is exceptional. The interface remains the benchmark for responsiveness, fluidity and overall usability.

The steering wheel features multi-function controls that take some time to get accustomed to. The high-beam flasher is integrated into the steering wheel too. Thankfully, the indicators and power-window switches remain physical controls. The lack of buttons might seem futuristic, but it often feels as though technology has taken precedence over usability. There are two charging pads, and below them sits an unusually bulky centre console that robs the cabin of some of its sense of space. Hampering usability further is the exceptionally deep storage area, which requires you to stretch to reach items placed inside.

Albeit a bit low-set, this space feels airy thanks to its low window line.

The front seats look simple and are surprisingly comfortable, with heating and ventilation functions. The rear seat is equally comfortable, although the seating position is somewhat low, resulting in a knees-up posture. What’s nice is that the backrest reclines to a comfortable angle. Rear-seat passengers are also treated to a dedicated touchscreen capable of controlling climate functions, streaming content and even gaming.

Rear screen for controls, games and videos.

One major drawback is that the sunroof still lacks a dedicated sunshade, causing the cabin to heat up considerably under the afternoon sun. The rear windows also miss out on sunshades.

More suited to our conditions, the black interiors are well-finished. It gets full marks as far as storage, ergonomics and usability goes.

The Ioniq 5’s interior takes a more balanced, user-friendly approach. Not only does it get motorised pop-out door handles, but its cabin also combines touch-sensitive controls with physical buttons and knobs, creating an environment that feels intuitive from the moment you step in.

Thankfully, it retains physical controls.

Material quality is impressive, and where the Hyundai truly excels is in comfort and practicality. Storage areas are thoughtfully integrated throughout the cabin, and the sense of space is outstanding, making the Ioniq 5 particularly easy to live with.

Slide, recline, boss function and sunshades mean a better rear experience.

The front seats are broader and more comfortable, with extensive adjustment, including an ottoman-style leg support. Both front seats can be set up in a ‘zero-gravity’ position, where your back is reclined and legs lifted on the ottoman, making it very comfy. Plus, you can have the seats cooled or heated too, which adds to the relaxing experience. Rear-seat comfort is equally impressive, thanks to a bench that both slides and reclines. While it doesn’t get a dedicated rear screen like the Tesla, it does offer window sunshades and a 3-pin socket to power larger electronic devices.

Along with a larger boot, the Tesla gets substantial underfloor storage.

The Tesla regains some lost ground when it comes to luggage-carrying capacity. Its front luggage compartment is broader and deeper than the Ioniq’s, and its boot is more spacious too. Additionally, it offers even more storage space beneath the boot floor. The Ioniq 5, on the other hand, not only falls a bit short in outright boot capacity, but also has a relatively higher loading lip, making it slightly more challenging to load heavy luggage.

The Model Y has a deeper and wider front-loading area than the Hyundai.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Powertrain and performance

Hyundai has increased the battery size from 72.6kWh to 84kWh (gross capacity) while continuing to use Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) cell chemistry. This feeds a 229hp/350Nm rear-mounted motor, which is 12hp more than before. However, the larger battery has pushed kerb weight up to 2,165kg, which is 150kg more than the outgoing version.

 

In contrast, the Model Y uses a 64kWh (gross capacity) battery with Lithium Ferrous Phosphate (LFP) cell chemistry, powering a 299hp/420Nm rear-mounted electric motor. While it is significantly more powerful, the Tesla is also 162kg lighter. As a result, its performance feels considerably stronger. It feels quicker off the line, accelerates harder and responds more eagerly to throttle inputs than the Hyundai. 

Tesla keeps things simple with just two drive modes: Standard and Chill, the latter serving as an economy setting. Impressively, Chill mode remains highly usable and, despite being toned down, still accelerates as strongly as the Hyundai in its sportiest setting.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Acceleration test (in seconds)

 

Tesla Model Y

Hyundai Ioniq 5

20kph

1.29

1.31

40kph

2.33

2.66

60kph

3.48

4.05

80kph

4.69

5.71

100kph

6.19

7.97

120kph

8.23

10.83

140kph

10.78

14.63

160kph

14

20.27

To put its performance into perspective, the Model Y accelerates from 0-100kph in just 6.19 seconds in Standard mode and reaches its 203kph top speed in roughly 25 seconds. Even in Chill mode, it completes the 0-100kph run in a respectable 8.25 seconds, just 0.28 seconds slower than the Ioniq 5. More interestingly, the Tesla reaches 160kph in 18.58 seconds, making it 1.6 seconds quicker to the mark.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Regenerative braking distance (80-20kph)

 

Tesla Model Y

Hyundai Ioniq 5

Strongest

116.71m (Standard)

136.45m (i-Pedal)

Weakest

223.55m (Reduced)

391.50m (Level 1)

In the Model Y, regenerative braking has just two modes – Standard and Reduced – and the retardation is seamless, though quite strong when you lift off the accelerator. Notably, Standard mode generates stronger deceleration than the Ioniq 5 in its most aggressive single-pedal setting. And while both cars support true one-pedal driving, the Tesla’s implementation feels more natural and intuitive. The Ioniq, though, with its multiple levels, can be set up to have retardation feel more ICE-like and thus very familiar.

 

Turning our attention to the Hyundai Ioniq 5, it may not dominate traffic-light drag races, but the good news is that power delivery is exceptionally smooth, and the overall driving experience feels highly refined. It offers multiple drive modes that alter part-throttle responses, steering feel and brake-pedal feel, although outright acceleration remains largely unchanged between them.

In general, the Ioniq 5’s cabin feels slightly more hushed than the Model Y’s, with a quieter motor and lower levels of road and tyre noise. Notably, though, the Tesla’s frontal sound insulation is exceptional – from inside the cabin, you would swear its horn is rather meek, but we assure you, that isn’t the case.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Ride and handling 

The Model Y is quicker, but the Ioniq 5 betters it on range and fast-charging speed.

On the move, the Model Y inspires confidence. High-speed stability is excellent, and it changes direction with greater eagerness compared to the Ioniq. The small-diameter steering wheel offers different weight settings, but even its lightest mode feels substantial; it isn’t that light, one-finger-twirl setup and does come across as heavy. Ride comfort also doesn’t feel particularly plush. The suspension is quite firm and thuds noticeably over potholes and broken surfaces, making it less suited to rough Indian roads.

The Ioniq 5 takes a different approach. It feels far more comfortable and user-friendly, thanks to lighter steering and a softer suspension that, despite its 20-inch alloy wheels, absorbs road imperfections with much greater composure than the Tesla. The result is a more relaxed and comfortable driving experience. Sure, it doesn’t feel as sporty while changing direction and can feel a touch floaty at higher speeds, but that is a compromise many buyers will gladly accept for its low-speed pliancy and overall comfort.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Range and efficiency

For our real-world range test, we ran the Hyundai Ioniq 5 in Eco mode and the Model Y in Chill mode, with the former’s regenerative braking set to Level 2 in the city and Level 1 on the highway, and the latter’s set to Standard in the city and Reduced on the highway.

As far as efficiency goes, the Ioniq 5 was more efficient in the city, delivering 6.22km/kWh, while the Model Y managed 5.84km/kWh. On the highway, the Tesla’s superior aerodynamics yielded 6.52km/kWh, whereas the Ioniq 5 managed 5.71km/kWh. However, thanks to Hyundai’s substantially larger battery, its overall average range extrapolates to 501km, comfortably ahead of the Tesla’s 371km.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Real-world range and efficiency 

 

Tesla Model Y

Hyundai Ioniq 5

Claimed range

500km

690km

City range

350km

523km

City efficiency

5.84km/kWh

6.22km/kWh

Highway range

391km

479km

Highway efficiency

6.52km/kWh

5.71km/kWh

Average range

371km

501km

Average efficiency

6.18km/kWh

5.96km/kWh

As for charging performance, we plugged the Model Y into a 250kW Tesla Supercharger, where it achieved peak charging speeds of 183kW. However, the Model Y does not sustain such high speeds for long, and its 60kWh battery is charged from 20-80 percent SoC in 23 minutes. From there, it took an additional 30 minutes to reach a full charge.

The Hyundai Ioniq 5 performs even better. Connected to a 360kW DC fast charger, its 800V electrical architecture enabled it to consistently maintain higher average charging speeds, peaking at 251kW. As a result, its 84kWh battery charged from 20-80 percent SoC in just 16 minutes. Like the Tesla, however, it required an additional 33 minutes to charge from 80 percent to full.

Tesla Model Y vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: Verdict

The Ioniq 5 no longer offers the value it once did. The Model Y, however, does.

The Tesla Model Y makes a compelling case for itself. It is quicker, more technologically advanced and backed by software that remains among the best in the automotive world. Crucially, it is now the more affordable option, making it a very tempting proposition. However, its over-reliance on the touchscreen, heavy steering, a firm low-speed ride and limited range due to the smaller battery count against it.

In comparison, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 remains the more rounded package. Its superior ride comfort, more intuitive cabin, significantly longer real-world range and impressive charging performance give it a clear edge where it matters most. More importantly, it feels better adapted to Indian roads and daily usage, thanks to its lighter steering and more comfortable ride.

At current prices, though, the Hyundai no longer holds the value card, nor does the brand command the same equity or snob value as some similarly priced rivals. But judged purely on its merits, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 continues to be the best all-round EV at this price point and thus gets our vote.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 review: Familiar, but better

Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 review: Familiar, but better
Rider going around a corner on the Royal Enfield Himalayan 440

A lot can change in three years, as it turns out. Back in October 2023 at the Himalayan 450 launch, I would have confidently told you that the older Himalayan’s 411 time was up and that the 450 served as a fitting replacement. Fast forward to 2026 and I will now willingly concede that there is very much a place for the new Himalayan 440 in this market.

What’s new and why is it back?

A tempting price as well as meaningful improvements

Price plays a big role behind this change in reasoning. 3 years ago, the entry level 450 was about Rs 40,000 more than the top 411 – a not insignificant, but justifiable increase . Today that gap has nearly doubled thanks to the agonizingly short-sighted new GST policy that levies a brutal 40 percent tax rate on motorcycles that use engines bigger than 350cc. RE is clearly feeling the heat from the new wave of sub 350cc competition because the reborn 440 is priced super aggressively. In fact, at 2.29 lakh ex-showroom Chennai, it costs exactly the same as the top 411 did in 2023, despite packing significant improvements.  Beyond the price, it’s those very improvements that have convinced me that this bike has earned its return in 2026.

The Himalayan 440 is based on the Scram 440 and it brings in the same improvements we saw there last year. The oil-cooled single has been bumped up to 443cc and RE has also strived towards increasing the refinement. An added 6th gear and as well a lighter clutch lever increase the bike’s appeal on the highway and in the city. Work has also been put into improving braking performance and feel.  

Himalayan 440 Design and Style – 7/10

New colours, but familiar design 

There are three new colour schemes as well, but beyond that, the bike retains its quirky oddball styling, although it does gain a new (average at best) LED headlamp and an updated instrument cluster based on the Scram 440.

Gets an updated instrument cluster based on the Scram 440.

Hopping onto the Himalayan 440 after all these years is like being re-acquainted with an old friend. It more or less looks the same and also feels the same to sit on. The low 800mm seat height in particular is one of the biggest appeals with this bike and it brings back some of the short rider accessibility that was sacrificed by the Himalayan 450.

Himalayan 440 Engine and performance – 8/10

A smooth and characterful engine brimming with torque, but it’s not about speed

The engine retains that same relatively slow thump as its predecessor, but there is certainly an improvement in refinement. You can very much hear and feel the engine through the entire bike, but there are no intrusive vibrations until you build the revs quite high. Unfortunately, the Himalayan no longer has a rev counter so I can’t tell what rpm it starts to feel stressed at, but peak power comes in at just 6250rpm, so the number isn’t that high.

Nevertheless, with this improved vibration control as well as the added 6th gear, a 100kph cruise is now a smooth and stressfree affair. You can stretch that up to about 110kph before the engine’s discomfort starts to become apparent. Top speed is around an indicated 130kph, but this is not the bike’s happy place.

Our performance and efficiency test revealed numbers that you would expect and while this Himalayan is certainly not a fast bike, it’s not slow either. That being said, the 440 is an absolute joy when ridden at a sedate pace. The new-found smoothness, dialed-in throttle connection and oodles of torque make it one of the nicest bikes at this price point to calmly explore the great outdoors. Its 25.4hp power figure is on par with many rivals in the class, but the 34Nm of torque is what makes the difference to the riding experience – as well as the pleasing exhaust sound that occasionally includes loud pops on deceleration. Then again, its 199kg kerb weight is an equally big differentiator to the rest of the segment.

Himalayan 440 comfort, handling and off road – 7/10

Welcoming to short riders and decently capable, but feels its age

The chassis is pretty much unchanged and that means that the Himalayan 440 is very similar to the 411 in terms of dynamics. This is where you become aware that the 440 feels more like a refined version of an old motorcycle, rather than an all new one. It can carry a decent pace on or off road, but it doesn’t appreciate being ridden fast. The main stand starts to scrape at lean on road – or when you land it with some conviction off road – which serves as a reminder to ease off. Keep pushing and you’ll realise that the chassis doesn’t have the same composure as more modern rivals and the suspension certainly doesn’t come anywhere close to the lofty standards set by the 450.

Over normal roads, suspension comfort is good. However, the 440 did not isolate me as well as I’d have liked from the incessantly bumpy concrete surfaces that now sadly snake across large parts of Maharashtra. After an 8-hour ride over mostly concrete roads at highway speeds, I returned home with a slightly sore back. If absolute comfort is a priority, bikes like the Xpulse 210 or Himalayan 450 are where you want to look. As for braking, it is by no means outstanding, but the 440 gets the job done and there is switchable ABS, which is nice.

Himalayan 440 Features and Safety – 7/10

It’s a simple bike but provides most of the essentials

The Himalayan 440 retains its original identity as a rugged, go anywhere, yet simple and basic motorcycle. In terms of features, you get a USB C port, RE’s Tripper navigation display and the aforementioned switchable ABS. Compared with most rivals, it does have fewer frills, but the only real ‘luxury’ that I miss is tubeless tyres. It would be nice to have the option of paying extra for them like you can on the Himalayan 450.

Himalayan 440 Price and verdict – 8/10

Well priced and a unique riding experience

Essentially, this is a back to basics motorcycle and it feels that way in person. If maximum bang for your buck is what you’re after, then the TVS Apache RTX will completely outdo the 440 in nearly all parameters for similar, if not less money. The same goes for speed and aggression – there are better options at this price point. However, if you want a gentle, well-mannered and characterful motorcycle that makes for a convincing travel partner at a reasonable price, then the new 440 definitely packs genuine appeal.

घूमने का बना रहे हैं प्लान? IndiGo घरेलू और इंटरनेशनल फ्लाइट पर दे रहा बड़ा ऑफर, जानें पूरी डिटेल

अगर आप कहीं पर घूमने का प्लान बना रहे हैं तो आपके लिए अच्छी खबर है। इंडिगो ने यात्रियों के लिए ‘ग्रेट कनेक्शन्स सेल’ ऑफर शुरू किया है। इस ऑफर के तहत लोगों को घरेलू (डोमेस्टिक) और अंतरराष्ट्रीय (इंटरनेशनल) रूट्स की कनेक्टिंग फ्लाइट्स की कीमत पर तगड़ा ऑफर मिलने वाला है। वहीं इंडिगो का ये ऑफर कम ही समय के लिए है। आप इस सेल का लाभ 17 सितंबर 2026 तक ही उठा सकते हैं। वहीं ऑफर के तहत 18 सितंबर 2026 से 31 मार्च 2027 तक की यात्रा के लिए टिकट बुक किए जा सकेंगे। आइए जानते हैं इसके बारे में सबकुछ

कितने किराए में होगा सफर

इंडिगो एयरलाइन का ये ऑफर केवल कनेक्टिंग फ्लाइट्स पर ही लागू होगा। इंडिगो की इस सेल में घरेलू कनेक्टिंग फ्लाइट का एक तरफ का किराया 3,999 रुपये और अंतरराष्ट्रीय कनेक्टिंग फ्लाइट का किराया 8,999 रुपये से शुरू होगा। इस ऑफर का फायदा उठाने के लिए यात्रियों को फ्लाइट रवाना होने से कम से कम तीन दिन पहले टिकट बुक करनी होगी। एयरलाइन के मुताबिक, इस सेल का उद्देश्य यात्रियों को कनेक्टिंग और एक से ज्यादा शहरों की यात्रा कम खर्च में करने का मौका देना है।

इन सेवाओं पर भी मिलेगी छुट

इंडिगो की सेल में यात्रियों को कुछ अतिरिक्त सेवाएं भी कम कीमत पर मिलेंगी। इंडिगो स्विच की कीमत 199 रुपये से शुरू होगी, जबकि सीधे इंडिगो से टिकट बुक करने पर 6ई फेयर होल्ड की सुविधा 49 रुपये से मिल सकेगी। वहीं, फास्ट फॉरवर्ड की सुविधा इंडिगो के ट्रैवल पार्टनर्स समेत सभी बुकिंग चैनल पर 299 रुपये से उपलब्ध होगी। कस्टमर टिकट और इन सेवाओं की बुकिंग इंडिगो की वेबसाइट, मोबाइल ऐप, 6ईस्काई, व्हाट्सऐप या चुने हुए ट्रैवल पार्टनर्स के जरिए कर सकते हैं।

इन बातों का रखें ध्यान

ये बात ध्यान देने वाली है कि 3,999 रुपये और 8,999 रुपये का शुरुआती किराया हर फ्लाइट में नहीं मिलेगा। कम किराए वाली सीटें सीमित हैं और टिकट की कीमत यात्रा के रूट, तारीख और सीटों की उपलब्धता के हिसाब से बदल सकती है। इसलिए कम कीमत में टिकट पाने के लिए जल्द बुकिंग करना बेहतर रहेगा। इंडिगो के मुताबिक, एयरलाइन के पास 430 से ज्यादा विमानों का बेड़ा है। कंपनी हर दिन करीब 2,200 उड़ानें संचालित करती है। इन फ्लाइट्स के जरिए देश के 95 से ज्यादा शहरों के साथ-साथ 40 अंतरराष्ट्रीय जगहों को भी जोड़ा जाता है।